Sarilumab and adalimumab differential effects on bone remodelling and cardiovascular risk biomarkers, and predictions of treatment outcomes

Cem Gabay, Gerd R Burmester, Vibeke Strand, Jérôme Msihid, Moshe Zilberstein, Toshio Kimura, Hubert van Hoogstraten, Susan H Boklage, Jonathan Sadeh, Neil M H Graham, Anita Boyapati, Cem Gabay, Gerd R Burmester, Vibeke Strand, Jérôme Msihid, Moshe Zilberstein, Toshio Kimura, Hubert van Hoogstraten, Susan H Boklage, Jonathan Sadeh, Neil M H Graham, Anita Boyapati

Abstract

Background: Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a pleiotropic cytokine that plays a key role in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Sarilumab is a human monoclonal antibody that binds membrane-bound and soluble IL-6 receptor-α to inhibit IL-6 signalling. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of sarilumab and adalimumab (a tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitor) monotherapy on levels of circulating biomarkers associated with the acute-phase response, bone remodelling, atherothrombosis, anaemia of chronic disease and markers purported to reflect synovial lymphoid and myeloid cell infiltrates, as well as the potential of these biomarkers to differentially predict clinical and patient-reported outcomes with sarilumab vs. adalimumab.

Methods: In this post hoc analysis, serum samples were analysed at baseline and prespecified post-treatment timepoints up to week 24 in adults with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis intolerant of or inadequate responders to methotrexate from the MONARCH trial (NCT02332590).

Results: Greater reductions in C-reactive protein (CRP; - 94.0% vs. -24.0%), serum amyloid A (SAA; - 83.2% vs. -17.4%), total receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL; - 18.3% vs. 10.5%) and lipoprotein (a) (- 41.0% vs. -2.8%) were observed at week 24 with sarilumab vs. adalimumab, respectively (adjusted p < 0.0001). Greater increases in procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) were observed with sarilumab vs. adalimumab at week 24 (22.8% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.027). Patients with high baseline SAA, CRP and matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) were more likely to achieve clinical efficacy, including American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria and Disease Activity Score (28 joints)-CRP < 3.2, and report improvements in patient-reported outcomes, including Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index and pain visual analogue scale, with sarilumab than adalimumab.

Conclusion: Sarilumab was associated with greater positive effects on bone remodelling and decreases in biomarkers of the acute-phase response, synovial inflammation and cardiovascular risk vs. adalimumab. High baseline concentrations of SAA, CRP and MMP-3 are predictive of clinical and patient-reported outcome responses to sarilumab treatment and prospective validation is warranted to confirm these results.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02332590. Registered on 5 January 2015.

Keywords: Acute-phase response; Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; Biomarkers; Bone remodelling; Cardiovascular risk; Rheumatoid arthritis; Sarilumab; Synovial inflammation.

Conflict of interest statement

CG received research grants from AB2 Bio, Pfizer and Roche and consulting fees or other remuneration from AB2 Bio, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi and UCB. GRB has received research grants from AbbVie, Pfizer, UCB and Roche and consulting fees or other remuneration from AbbVie, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Sanofi, Roche and UCB. VS received consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, CORRONA, Crescendo, Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Sandoz, Sanofi and UCB. JM is an employee of Sanofi and may hold stock and/or stock options in the company. MZ and HvH are employees of Sanofi Genzyme and may hold stock and/or stock options in the company. JS is a former employee of Sanofi Genzyme and may hold stock and/or stock options in the company and is currently employed by Bristol Myers Squibb. TK, SHB, NMHG and AB are employees of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and may hold stock and/or stock options in the company.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Correlations between baseline biomarkers. CRP, C-reactive protein; CXCL13, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 13; Lp(a), lipoprotein (a); MMP-3, matrix metalloproteinase-3; OPG, osteoprotegerin; P1NP, procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide; RANKL, receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand; SAA, serum amyloid A; sICAM-1, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1; TIBC, total iron-binding capacity
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Median percentage changes from baseline in biomarkers through week 24. Median percentage changes from baseline in biomarkers of a, b the acute-phase response (CRP and SAA), cf bone remodelling (P1NP, OC, total RANKL and OPG), g synovial inflammation (MMP-3) and h atherothrombosis (Lp [a]). *Adjusted p < 0.05; **adjusted p < 0.01 vs. adalimumab; ***adjusted p < 0.0001 vs. adalimumab (Benjamini–Hochberg procedure). CRP, C-reactive protein; Lp(a), lipoprotein (a); MMP-3, matrix metalloproteinase-3; OC, osteocalcin; OPG, osteoprotegerin; P1NP, procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide; Q, quartile; q2w, every 2 weeks; RANKL, receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand; SAA, serum amyloid A
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Proportions of patients whose biomarker values returned to normal reference ranges at week 24. Proportions of patients with biomarker serum concentrations exceeding the reference range at baseline that normalized to within reference range at week 24. ***Nominal p < 0.0001 vs. adalimumab (X2 test). CRP, C-reactive protein; Lp(a), lipoprotein (a); OC, osteocalcin; OPG, osteoprotegerin; P1NP, procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide; q2w, every 2 weeks; RANKL, receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand; SAA, serum amyloid A
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Odds ratios for achieving efficacy endpoints at week 24 by baseline biomarker tertile. Odds ratios (sarilumab vs. adalimumab) for achieving ACR20, ACR50 and DAS28-CRP

Fig. 5

Changes from baseline in PROs…

Fig. 5

Changes from baseline in PROs at week 24 by baseline biomarker tertile. LS…

Fig. 5
Changes from baseline in PROs at week 24 by baseline biomarker tertile. LS mean differences in changes from baseline between sarilumab and adalimumab at week 24 by baseline biomarker tertile in a HAQ-DI and b pain VAS. *Nominal biomarker-by-treatment interaction vs. low tertile. Low, medium and high subgroups are based on biomarker tertile values in overall treatment groups (see Table S3 for tertile ranges). CI, confidence interval; CXCL13, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 13; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index; LS, least squares; MMP-3, matrix metalloproteinase-3; NS, not significant at 5%; P1NP, procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide; SAA, serum amyloid A; VAS, visual analogue scale
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Changes from baseline in PROs at week 24 by baseline biomarker tertile. LS mean differences in changes from baseline between sarilumab and adalimumab at week 24 by baseline biomarker tertile in a HAQ-DI and b pain VAS. *Nominal biomarker-by-treatment interaction vs. low tertile. Low, medium and high subgroups are based on biomarker tertile values in overall treatment groups (see Table S3 for tertile ranges). CI, confidence interval; CXCL13, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 13; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index; LS, least squares; MMP-3, matrix metalloproteinase-3; NS, not significant at 5%; P1NP, procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide; SAA, serum amyloid A; VAS, visual analogue scale

References

    1. Karmakar S, Kay J, Gravallese EM. Bone damage in rheumatoid arthritis: mechanistic insights and approaches to prevention. Rheum Dis Clin N Am. 2010;36:385–404. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2010.03.003.
    1. McInnes IB, Schett G. Cytokines in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:429–442. doi: 10.1038/nri2094.
    1. Schett G, Gravallese E. Bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis: mechanisms, diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012;8:656–664. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2012.153.
    1. Choy E. Understanding the dynamics: pathways involved in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012;51(Suppl 5):v3–11. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes113.
    1. Smolen JS, Aletaha D. The assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2010;28:S18–S27.
    1. Schett G. Physiological effects of modulating the interleukin-6 axis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2018;57:ii43–ii50. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex513.
    1. Calabrese LH, Rose-John S. IL-6 biology: implications for clinical targeting in rheumatic disease. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2014;10:720–727. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.127.
    1. Hunter CA, Jones SA. IL-6 as a keystone cytokine in health and disease. Nat Immunol. 2015;16:448–457. doi: 10.1038/ni.3153.
    1. Choy EHS, Calabrese LH. Neuroendocrine and neurophysiological effects of interleukin 6 in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2018;57:1885–1895. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex391.
    1. Solomon DH, Goodson NJ, Katz JN, Weinblatt ME, Avorn J, Setoguchi S, et al. Patterns of cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:1608–1612. doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.050377.
    1. Choy E, Ganeshalingam K, Semb AG, Szekanecz Z, Nurmohamed M. Cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis: recent advances in the understanding of the pivotal role of inflammation, risk predictors and the impact of treatment. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2014;53:2143–2154. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu224.
    1. Gabay C, McInnes IB, Kavanaugh A, Tuckwell K, Klearman M, Pulley J, et al. Comparison of lipid and lipid-associated cardiovascular risk marker changes after treatment with tocilizumab or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75:1806–1812. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207872.
    1. Genovese MC, Fleischmann R, Kivitz AJ, Rell-Bakalarska M, Martincova R, Fiore S, et al. Sarilumab plus methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate: results of a phase III study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67:1424–37.
    1. Fleischmann R, van Adelsberg J, Lin Y, Castelar-Pinheiro GD, Brzezicki J, Hrycaj P, et al. Sarilumab and nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response or intolerance to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69:277–290. doi: 10.1002/art.39944.
    1. Burmester GR, Lin Y, Patel R, van Adelsberg J, Mangan EK, Graham NM, et al. Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MONARCH): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group phase III trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:840–847. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210310.
    1. AbbVie Inc. US prescribing information: HUMIRA (adalimumab) injection, solution for subcutaneous use. . Accessed 17 July 2019.
    1. Strand V, Gossec L, Proudfoot CWJ, Chen CI, Reaney M, Guillonneau S, et al. Patient-reported outcomes from a randomized phase III trial of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2018;20:129. doi: 10.1186/s13075-018-1614-z.
    1. Gabay C, Msihid J, Zilberstein M, Paccard C, Lin Y, Graham NMH, et al. Identification of sarilumab pharmacodynamic and predictive markers in patients with inadequate response to TNF inhibition: a biomarker substudy of the phase 3 TARGET study. RMD Open. 2018;4:e000607. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000607.
    1. Boyapati A, Msihid J, Fiore S, van Adelsberg J, Graham NM, Hamilton JD. Sarilumab plus methotrexate suppresses circulating biomarkers of bone resorption and synovial damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate: a biomarker study of MOBILITY. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016;18:225. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-1132-9.
    1. Burmester GR, Hagino O, Dong Q, Stanislav M, Gomez-Centeno A, Selmi C, et al. Unique changes in hemoglobin with sarilumab versus adalimumab are independent of better disease control in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl. 10):Abstract 1528.
    1. Terpos E, Fragiadaki K, Konsta M, Bratengeier C, Papatheodorou A, Sfikakis PP. Early effects of IL-6 receptor inhibition on bone homeostasis: a pilot study in women with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011;29:921–925.
    1. Fassio A, Adami G, Gatti D, Orsolini G, Giollo A, Idolazzi L, et al. Inhibition of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis results in acute changes of bone modulators. Int Immunopharmacol. 2019;67:487–489. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2018.12.050.
    1. Song S-NJ, Iwahashi M, Tomosugi N, Uno K, Yamana J, Yamana S, et al. Comparative evaluation of the effects of treatment with tocilizumab and TNF-α inhibitors on serum hepcidin, anemia response and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013;15:R141-R.
    1. Gavrilă BI, Ciofu C, Stoica V. Biomarkers in rheumatoid arthritis, what is new? J Med Life. 2016;9:144–148.
    1. Sechidis K, Papangelou K, Metcalfe PD, Svensson D, Weatherall J, Brown G. Distinguishing prognostic and predictive biomarkers: an information theoretic approach. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:3365–3376. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty357.
    1. Kringelbach TM, Glintborg B, Hogdall EV, Johansen JS, Hetland ML. Identification of new biomarkers to promote personalised treatment of patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease: protocol for an open cohort study. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e019325.
    1. Dennis G, Jr, Holweg CT, Kummerfeld SK, Choy DF, Setiadi AF, Hackney JA, et al. Synovial phenotypes in rheumatoid arthritis correlate with response to biologic therapeutics. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014;16:R90. doi: 10.1186/ar4555.
    1. Curtis JR, Wright GC, Strand V, Davis CS, Hitraya E, Sasso EH. Reanalysis of the multi-biomarker disease activity score for assessing disease activity in the abatacept versus adalimumab comparison in biologic-naive rheumatoid arthritis subjects with background methotrexate study: comment on the article by Fleischmann et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69:863–865. doi: 10.1002/art.39981.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj