A new surgical technique of uterine auto-transplantation in cynomolgus monkey: preliminary report about two cases

Iori Kisu, Makoto Mihara, Kouji Banno, Hisako Hara, Takumi Yamamoto, Jun Araki, Takuya Iida, Yohei Hayashi, Hisashi Moriguchi, Daisuke Aoki, Iori Kisu, Makoto Mihara, Kouji Banno, Hisako Hara, Takumi Yamamoto, Jun Araki, Takuya Iida, Yohei Hayashi, Hisashi Moriguchi, Daisuke Aoki

Abstract

Objective: Uterine transplantation experiments have been performed in various animal species for future clinical applications of uterine transplantation for permanent uterine factor infertility in humans. The aim of this study was to confirm the feasibility of uterine auto-transplantation in cynomolgus monkeys by developing new surgical techniques.

Methods: Two female cynomolgus monkeys underwent surgery under general anesthesia. The uterus with vascular grafts and the vaginal wall was removed, and back-table preparation was performed using heparinized saline. The uterus with vascular grafts and the vaginal wall was anastomosed with the vaginal stump and blood vessels in the pelvis, respectively. The auto-transplant uterine function was evaluated by confirming engraftment of the uterus by laparotomy, endometrial proliferation by transabdominal ultrasonography and periodical menstruation.

Results: The first animal died due to acute renal failure 2 days after the operation. Second-look laparotomy in the second animal at 40 days after the operation indicated there was no congestion in the uterus, and the uterus showed the typical red color of a normal uterus. Thereafter, endometrial proliferation was observed by transabdominal ultrasonography and periodical menstruation was confirmed, indicating re-established uterine function.

Conclusion: This is the preliminary report of uterine auto-transplantation in cynomolgus monkeys. This study demonstrates the feasibility of uterine auto-transplantation by using new surgical technique in cynomolgus monkeys. Accumulation of basic experimental data in non-human primates is required prior to performing the procedure in humans.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Anatomical characteristics of the inner genital organs of cynomolgus monkey. The uterus, ovaries, fallopian tubes, round ligament, and urinary bladder are shown (a). The anatomical characteristics of the inner genital organs are almost the same as those in humans. The ureter crosses the uterine artery and vein on the dorsal side, as in humans (b)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relationship between the uterus and uterine blood vessels. The main uterine artery branches from the internal iliac artery (IIA) and divides into the ascending and descending branches. The ascending branch feeds the uterine body and joins the ovarian artery. The descending branch extends to the paracolpium. The superficial uterine vein (SUV) is located along the uterine artery (UA). The deep uterine vein (DUV) connects to the external iliac vein (EIV) in the cynomolgus monkey. The ureter is located along the uterine artery on the dorsal side and reaches the urinary bladder
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Uterus excised with the vaginal wall. Uterus was connected only via the bilateral uterine arteries and superficial uterine veins in Case 1 (a). The front side of the uterus excised with the vascular pedicles and the vaginal wall (11 mm anterior and 14 mm posterior) in Case 2 (b). UC uterine cervix
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The uterus before (a) and after (b) perfusion with heparinized saline via the uterine artery on the back-table. Blood components were washed out and the whole uterus became whitish in color
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
A suction tube was inserted via the vagina; the vaginal stump was identified in the abdominal cavity and opened (a). The vaginal wall and stump were sutured using four or five stitches each in the anterior and posterior regions using 4-0 PDS (b)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
The right deep uterine vein (RDUV) was end-to-side anastomosed with the right external iliac vein (REIV) (a). Illustration of uterine auto-transplantation in a cynomolgus monkey (b). SUV superficial uterine vein, UA uterine artery, DUV deep uterine vein, EIAV external iliac artery and vein
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
The uterine color recovered after vascular anastomosis, but uterine congestion was noted in Case 1 (a) in comparison to the uterus in Case 2 (b)
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Second-look laparotomy inspection in Case 2. There was no congestion in the uterus, and it had the characteristic red color of a normal uterus. Ut uterus

References

    1. Campagne DM. Should fertilization treatment start with reducing stress? Hum Reprod. 2006;21:1651–1658. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del078.
    1. Nakashu H, Herdiman J. Surrogacy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;27:246–251. doi: 10.1080/01443610701194788.
    1. Sonoda Y, Abu-Rustum NR, Gemignani ML, et al. A fertility-sparing alternative to radical hysterectomy: how many patients may be eligible? Gynecol Oncol. 2004;95:534–538. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.07.060.
    1. Quinn MA, Benedet JL, Odicino F, et al. Carcinoma of the cervix uteri. FIGO 26th annual report on the results on treatment in gynaecological cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;95:S43–S103. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(06)60030-1.
    1. Creasman WT, Odicino F, Barrett T, et al. Carcinoma of the corpus uteri. FIGO 26th annual report on the results on treatment in gynaecological cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;95:S105–S143. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(06)60031-3.
    1. Marshall LM, Spiegelman D, Barbieri RL, et al. Variation in the incidence of uterine leiomyoma among premenopausal women by age and race. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90:967–973. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00534-6.
    1. Saravelous SH, Cocksedge KA, Li TC. Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with rproductive failure: a critical appraisal. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14:415–429. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmn018.
    1. Bryan AL, Nigro JA, Counseller VS. One hundred cases of congenital absence of the vagina. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1949;88:79–86.
    1. Fageeh W, Raffa H, Jabbad H, et al. Transplantation of the human uterus. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2002;7:245–251. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00597-5.
    1. McKay DB, Josephson MA. Pregnancy in recipients of solid organs-effects on mother and child. N Eng J Med. 2006;354:1281–1293. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra050431.
    1. Devauchelle B, Badet L, Lengele B, et al. First human face allograft: early report. Lancet. 2006;368:203–209. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68935-6.
    1. Silló-Seidl G. The first transplantation of a Fallopian tube of frozen material in woman. Int J Fertil. 1975;20(2):106–108.
    1. Cohen BM. Fallopian tube transplantation and its future. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1980;23(4):1275–1292. doi: 10.1097/00003081-198012000-00033.
    1. Racho El-Akouri R, Kurlberg G, Brännström M. Successful uterine transplantation in the mouse: pregnancy and post-natal development of offspring. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:2018–2023. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg396.
    1. Jiga LP, Lupu CM, Zoica BS, et al. Experimental model of heterotopic uterus transplantation in the laboratory rat. Microsurgery. 2003;23:246–250. doi: 10.1002/micr.10134.
    1. Wranning CA, Akhi SN, Kurlberg G, et al. Uterus transplantation in the rat: model development, surgical learning and morphological evaluation of healing. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87:1239–1247. doi: 10.1080/00016340802484966.
    1. Sieunarine K, Zakaria FBP, Boyle DCM, et al. Possibilities for fertility restoration: a new surgical technique. Int Surg. 2005;90:249–256.
    1. Avison DL, DeFaria W, Tryphonopoulos P, et al. Heterotopic uterus transplantation in a swine model. Transplantation. 2009;88:465–469. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181b07666.
    1. Ramirez ER, Ramirez DK, Pillari VT, et al. Modified uterine transplant procedure in the sheep model. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:311–314. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.01.014.
    1. Enskog A, Johannesson L, Chai DC, et al. Uterus transplantation in the baboon: methodology and long-term function after auto-transplantation. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:1980–1987. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq109.
    1. Milliez J. Uterine transplantation. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2009;106:270. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.03.045.
    1. Del Priore G, Schlatt S, Malanowska-Stega J. Uterus transplant techniques in primates: 10 years’ experience. Exp Clin Transplant. 2008;6(1):87–94.
    1. Nyachieo A, Chai DC, Deprest J, et al. The baboon as a research model for the study of endometrial biology, uterine receptivity and embryo implantation. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2007;64:149–155. doi: 10.1159/000101739.
    1. Koshima I, Yamamoto T, Narushima M, et al. Perforator flaps and supermicrosurgery. Clin Plast Surg. 2010;37(4):683–689. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2010.06.009.
    1. Scott JR, Pitkin RM, Yannone ME. Transplantation of the primate uterus. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1971;133:414–418.
    1. Sieunarine K, Boyle DC, Corless DJ, et al. Pelvic vascular prospects for uterine transplantation. Int Surg. 2006;91:217–222.
    1. Moxey P, Sieunarine K, Cox J, et al. Pulse oximetry and perfusion index measurement to assess uterine perfusion and viability. Int Surg. 2006;91:223–227.
    1. Sieunarine K, Moxey P, Boyle DCM, et al. Selective vessel ligation in the pelvis: an invaluable tool in certain surgical procedures. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005;15:968–973.
    1. Cicinelli E, Einer-Jensen N, Barba B, et al. Blood to the corneal area of the uterus is mainly supplied from the ovarian artery in the follicular phase and from the uterine artery in the luteal phase. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1003–1008. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh171.
    1. Ramirez PT, Schmeler KM, Soliman PT, Frumovitz M. Fertility preservation in patients with early cervical cancer: radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;110:S25–S28. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.03.025.
    1. Summers PM, Shephard AM, Taylo CT, et al. The effects of cryopreservation and transfer on embryonic development in the common marmoset monkey, Callithrix jacchus. J Reprod Fert. 1987;79:241–250. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0790241.
    1. Wranning C, Mölne J, Racho El-Akouri R, et al. Short-term ischaemic storage of human uterine myometrium-basic studies towards uterine transplantation. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:2744–2763. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei125.
    1. Del Priore G, Stega J, Sieunarine K, et al. Human uterus retrieval from a multi-organ donor. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:101–104. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000248535.58004.2f.
    1. Brännström M, Wranning C, Altchek A. Experimental uterus transplantation. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:329–345. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmp049.
    1. Dittrich R, Beckmann MW, Mueller A, Binder H, Hoffmann I, Maltaris T. Uterus cryopreservation: maintenance of uterine contractility by the use of different cryoprotocols. Reprod Domest Anim. 2010;45(1):86–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01258.x.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj