Dual-energy CT assessment of rapid monosodium urate depletion and bone erosion remodelling during pegloticase plus methotrexate co-therapy

Nicola Dalbeth, Fabio Becce, John K Botson, Lin Zhao, Ada Kumar, Nicola Dalbeth, Fabio Becce, John K Botson, Lin Zhao, Ada Kumar

Abstract

Objectives: Pegloticase rapidly lowers serum urate in uncontrolled/refractory gout patients, with ≥1 tophus resolution in 70% of pegloticase responders and 28% of non-responders. Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) non-invasively detects MSU deposition, including subclinical deposition, quantifies MSU volumes and depicts bone erosions. This report presents DECT findings in MIRROR open-label trial participants receiving pegloticase+MTX co-therapy.

Methods: Serial DECT scans were obtained during pegloticase (8 mg biweekly infusions)+oral MTX (15 mg/week) co-therapy. Bilateral hand/wrist, elbow, foot/ankle and knee images were analysed with default post-processing settings. MSU volumes were quantified and bone erosions were identified and evaluated for remodelling (decreased size, sclerosis, new bone formation). DECT and physical examination findings were compared.

Results: 2 patients underwent serial DECT. Patient 1 (44-year-old male) completed 52 weeks of pegloticase+MTX co-therapy (26 infusions). Baseline examination detected 4 tophus-affected joints while DECT identified 73 MSU-affected joints (total MSU volume: 128.76 cm3). At end-of-treatment, there were no clinically-affected joints and 4 joints with DECT-detected MSU deposition. MSU volume decreased by 99% and bone erosion remodelling was evident. Patient 2 (51-year-old male) had 10 weeks of therapy (5 infusions), discontinuing because of urate-lowering response loss. Baseline examination detected 7 tophus-affected joints while DECT identified 55 MSU-affected joints (total MSU volume: 59.20 cm3). At end-of-treatment, there were 5 clinically affected joints and 42 joints with DECT-detected MSU deposition. MSU volume decreased by 58% and bone erosion remodelling was evident.

Conclusion: DECT detected subclinical MSU deposition and quantified changes over time. Rapid tophus resolution and bone erosion remodelling occurred during pegloticase+MTX co-therapy.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03635957" title="See in ClinicalTrials.gov">NCT03635957.

Keywords: bone erosion; dual-energy CT; gout; monosodium urate deposition; pegloticase; tophus.

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Serial DECT imaging of the right foot/ankle of Patient 1 (A) and Patient 2 (B) MSU deposition is depicted in green. Patient 2 prematurely discontinued therapy due to loss of urate-lowering effect. Patients 1 and 2 had a total MSU volume reduction of 99% and 58% during therapy, respectively, and first metatarsal head bone erosion (Patient 1) and fifth metatarsal bone erosion (Patient 2) remodelling (decreased erosion size, increased sclerosis or new bone formation) was evident (arrows). Other joints also showed MSU volume reduction and bone erosion remodelling during therapy (C), with MSU reduction/joint averaging 99%±1% and 63%±18% in Patients 1 and 2, respectively. DECT, dual-energy computed tomography; MSU, monosodium urate.

References

    1. Sundy JS, Baraf HS, Yood RA. et al. Efficacy and tolerability of pegloticase for the treatment of chronic gout in patients refractory to conventional treatment: two randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2011;306:711–20.
    1. Mandell BF, Yeo AE, Lipsky PE.. Tophus resolution in patients with chronic refractory gout who have persistent urate-lowering responses to pegloticase. Arthritis Res Ther 2018;20:286.
    1. Richette P, Doherty M, Pascual E. et al. 2018 updated European League Against Rheumatism evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis of gout. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79:31–8.
    1. Choi HK, Al-Arfaj AM, Eftekhari A. et al. Dual energy computed tomography in tophacheous gout. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:1609–12.
    1. Dalbeth N, House ME, Aati O. et al. Urate crystal deposition in asymptomatic hyperuricemia and symptomatic gout: a dual energy CT study. Ann Rheum Dis 2015;74:908–11.
    1. Dalbeth N, Billington K, Doyle A. et al. Effects of allopurinol dose escalation on bone erosion and urate volume in gout: a dual-energy computed tomography imaging study within a randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019;71:1739–46.
    1. Dalbeth N, Aati O, Kalluru R. et al. Relationship between structural joint damage and urate deposition in gout: a plain radiography and dual-energy CT study. Ann Rheum Dis 2015;74:1030–6.
    1. Dalbeth N, Doyle A, Boyer L. et al. Development of a computed tomography method of scoring bone erosion in patients with gout: validation and clinical implications. Rheumatology 2011;50:410–6.
    1. Botson JK, Tesser JRP, Bennett R. et al. Pegloticase in combination with methotrexate in patients with uncontrolled gout: a multicenter, open-label study (MIRROR). J Rheumatol 2021;48:767–74.
    1. Dalbeth N, Doyle AJ, McQueen FM. et al. Exploratory study of radiographic change in patients with tophaceous gout treated with intensive urate-lowering therapy. Arthritis Care Res 2014;66:82–5.
    1. Coupal TM, Mallinson PI, Gershony SL. et al. Getting the most from your dual-energy scanner: recognizing, reducing, and eliminating artifacts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016;206:119–28.
    1. Keenan RT, Baraf HSB, LaMoreaux B.. Use of pre-infusion serum uric acid levels as a biomarker for infusion reaction risk in patients on pegloticase. Rheumatol Ther 2019;6:299–304.
    1. Araujo EG, Bayat S, Petsch C. et al. Tophus resolution with pegloticase: a prospective dual-energy CT study. RMD Open 2015;1:e000075.
    1. Døssing A, Müller, Becce F. et al. Dual-energy computed tomography for detection and characterization of monosodium urate, calcium phyrophosphate, and hyrdoxyapatite: a phantom study on diagnositc performance. Invest Radiol 2021;56:417–24.
    1. Pascart T, Lefebvre A, Ducoulombier V. et al. Drastic monosodium urate crystal dissolution with febuxostat and benzbromarone. Jt Bone Spine 2021;88:105178.
    1. Uhlig T, Eskild T, Karoliussen LF. et al. Two-year reduction of dual-energy CT urate deposition during a treat-to-target strategy in gout in the NOR-Gout longitudinal study. Rheumatology 2022;61(SI):SI81–5.
    1. Dalbeth N, Milligan A, Doyle A. et al. Characterization of new bone formation in gout: a quantitative site-by-site analysis using plain radiography and computed tomography. Arthritis Res Ther 2012;14:R165.
    1. Pecherstorfer C, Simon D, Unbehend S. et al. A detailed analysis of the association between urate deposition and erosions and osteophytes in gout. ACR Open Rheumatol 2020;2:565–72.
    1. Shi D, Chen JY, Wu HX. et al. Relationship between urate within tophus and bone erosion according to the anatomic location of urate deposition in gout: a quantitative analysis using dual-energy CT volume measurements. Medicine 2019;98:e18431.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj