Variability in Golimumab Exposure: A 'Real-Life' Observational Study in Active Ulcerative Colitis

Iris Detrez, Erwin Dreesen, Thomas Van Stappen, Annick de Vries, Els Brouwers, Gert Van Assche, Séverine Vermeire, Marc Ferrante, Ann Gils, Iris Detrez, Erwin Dreesen, Thomas Van Stappen, Annick de Vries, Els Brouwers, Gert Van Assche, Séverine Vermeire, Marc Ferrante, Ann Gils

Abstract

Background and aims: Golimumab has been approved recently to treat refractory moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis [UC]. To date it is not clear why a considerable fraction of patients do not respond, or lose initial response, to golimumab therapy. Our aim was to investigate whether a low golimumab serum concentration and/or a positive anti-golimumab antibody status reduces the efficacy of this drug in patients with UC.

Methods: Serum samples of 21 patients with moderate-to-severe UC were collected during the first 14 weeks of golimumab therapy. For measurement of golimumab serum concentrations, both a tumour necrosis factor [TNF]-coated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA] and a sandwich-type ELISA were developed. Anti-golimumab antibodies were measured using a bridging ELISA and a newly-developed drug-tolerant immunoassay. Clinical response and mucosal healing were assessed 14 weeks after start of treatment.

Results: Out of 21 patients, 10 [48%] reached partial clinical response at Week 14. Median [interquartile range] serum golimumab concentration was significantly higher in partial clinical responders than in non-responders: 10.0 [7.8-10.5] µg/ml versus 7.4 [4.8-8.3] µg/ml at Week 2 [p = 0.035] and 5.1 [4.0-7.9] µg/ml versus 2.1 [1.8-4.2] µg/ml at week 6 [p = 0.037]. Four out of 21 UC patients developed anti-golimumab antibodies, detectable only using a drug-tolerant immunoassay, and three had a partial clinical response at that time. Clinical non-responders had a significantly more severe colitis, indicated by a higher endoscopic Mayo score at baseline compared with partial clinical responders [p = 0.048].

Conclusion: Adequate exposure to golimumab drives clinical response. A worse disease at baseline influences clinical response rate negatively.

Keywords: Therapeutic drug monitoring; golimumab; ulcerative colitis.

Copyright © 2016 European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Drug exposure as defined by area under the curve (AUC [Weeks 0–6]) of golimumab for partial clinical responders [solid black line] and non-responders [dashed black line].
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Detection of anti-golimumab antibody in the presence of various concentrations of golimumab using the drug-tolerant immunoassay. Determination of 500ng/ml MA-GOM159B8, spiked with golimumab concentrations between 0 and 10 µg/ml [molar excess up to 20-fold].
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
The course of golimumab concentrations [solid line, left y-axis] and anti-golimumab antibody concentrations as measured using drug-tolerant immunoassay [dashed line, right y-axis] in four individual patients. The dotted line represents the cut-off [25ng/ml MA-GOM159B8 equivalents] of the drug-tolerant immunoassay. [A] Non-responder. [B, C, and D] Partial clinical responders.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj