Time to response for clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with tofacitinib, adalimumab, or placebo

Dafna D Gladman, Laura C Coates, Joseph Wu, Lara Fallon, Elizabeth D Bacci, Joseph C Cappelleri, Andrew G Bushmakin, Philip S Helliwell, Dafna D Gladman, Laura C Coates, Joseph Wu, Lara Fallon, Elizabeth D Bacci, Joseph C Cappelleri, Andrew G Bushmakin, Philip S Helliwell

Abstract

Background: This study examined the time to clinically meaningful response in patients with active psoriatic arthritis treated with tofacitinib, adalimumab, or placebo switching to tofacitinib.

Methods: Data were from two phase 3 studies, OPAL Broaden (12 months) and OPAL Beyond (6 months). Patients received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID), adalimumab 40 mg once every 2 weeks (OPAL Broaden only), or placebo switching to tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID at month 3. Baseline to initial response time was according to pre-defined clinically meaningful criteria on Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI; ≥ 0.35-point improvement), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F; ≥ 4-point improvement), Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS; post-baseline score ≤ 3.2 and > 1.6-point improvement from baseline), and minimal disease activity (MDA; meeting at least 5 of 7 criteria) composite.

Results: In OPAL Broaden, median time to initial HAQ-DI score response was 29, 53, and 30 days in patients treated with tofacitinib 5 mg BID, tofacitinib 10 mg BID, or adalimumab, compared with 162 and 112 days in patients treated with placebo switching to tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID at month 3, respectively. Across studies, median time to initial FACIT-F total score response was shorter in patients receiving tofacitinib 5 mg BID (31 days) vs other groups (84-92 days). Median time to initial response was approximately 11 (MDA)/6-9 months (PASDAS) in tofacitinib/adalimumab groups in OPAL Broaden.

Conclusion: This analysis demonstrates tofacitinib's efficacy on most patient-reported and clinical endpoints over time and shows a shorter time to initial, clinically meaningful response in patients receiving tofacitinib vs patients switching from placebo to tofacitinib.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01877668. Registered June 12, 2013. ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01882439. Registered June 18, 2013.

Keywords: Anti-rheumatic agents; Arthritis; Psoriatic.

Conflict of interest statement

DDG has received research grants from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, and UCB, and has been a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, and UCB. LCC has received research grants from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, and UCB, has acted as a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, and UCB, and has received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, and UCB. JW, LF, JCC, and AGB are employees and stockholders of Pfizer Inc. EDB has received consulting fees from Pfizer Inc. PSH has received research grants from AbbVie, Janssen, and Novartis, and has received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Galapagos, Pfizer Inc, and UCB.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Time to initial HAQ-DI score response: a OPAL Broaden, b OPAL Beyond (FAS). Score response defined for HAQ-DI as ≥ 0.35-point improvement from baseline (analyzed for patients with baseline HAQ-DI ≥ 0.35). BID, twice daily; FAS, full analysis set; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index; Q2W, once every 2 weeks; SC, subcutaneous
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Time to initial FACIT-F total score response: a OPAL Broaden, b OPAL Beyond (FAS). Response defined for FACIT-F total score as ≥ 4-point improvement from baseline. BID, twice daily; FACIT-F, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue; FAS, full analysis set; Q2W, once every 2 weeks; SC, subcutaneous
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Time to initial MDA response: a OPAL Broaden, b OPAL Beyond (FAS). Response defined for MDA as meeting ≥ 5 of 7 of the following disease activity outcome criteria: tender joint count ≤ 1; swollen joint count ≤ 1; Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score ≤ 1 or body surface area ≤ 3%; Patient’s Assessment of Arthritis Pain VAS ≤ 15 mm; Patient’s Global Assessment of Arthritis VAS ≤ 20 mm; Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index score ≤ 0.5; or tender entheseal points (using the Leeds Enthesitis Index) ≤ 1 [23]. BID, twice daily; FAS, full analysis set; MDA, minimal disease activity; Q2W, once every 2 weeks; SC, subcutaneous; VAS, visual analog scale
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Time to initial PASDAS response: a OPAL Broaden, b OPAL Beyond (FAS). Response defined for PASDAS as post-baseline score of ≤ 3.2 and > 1.6-point improvement from baseline (analyzed for patients with baseline PASDAS > 3.2). BID, twice daily; FAS, full analysis set; PASDAS, Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score; Q2W, once every 2 weeks; SC, subcutaneous

References

    1. Coates LC, Kavanaugh A, Mease PJ, Soriano ER, Acosta-Felquer ML, Armstrong AW, et al. Group for Research and Assessment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis 2015 treatment recommendations for psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2016;68:1060–1071.
    1. Haroon M, Gallagher P, FitzGerald O. Diagnostic delay of more than 6 months contributes to poor radiographic and functional outcome in psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74:1045–1050. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204858.
    1. Belasco J, Wei N. Psoriatic arthritis: what is happening at the joint? Rheumatol Ther. 2019;6:305–315. doi: 10.1007/s40744-019-0159-1.
    1. Soleymani T, Reddy SM, Cohen JM, Neimann AL. Early recognition and treatment heralds optimal outcomes: the benefits of combined rheumatology-dermatology clinics and integrative care of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis patients. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2017;20:1. doi: 10.1007/s11926-017-0706-0.
    1. Sørensen J, Hetland ML, on behalf of all departments of rheumatology in Denmark Diagnostic delay in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis: results from the Danish nationwide DANBIO registry. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74:e12. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204867.
    1. Gossec L, Baraliakos X, Kerschbaumer A, de Wit M, McInnes I, Dougados M, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79:700–712.
    1. Villani AP, Rouzaud M, Sevrain M, Barnetche T, Paul C, Richard M-A, et al. Prevalence of undiagnosed psoriatic arthritis among psoriasis patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73:242–248. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.05.001.
    1. Coates LC, Moverley AR, McParland L, Brown S, Navarro-Coy N, O’Dwyer JL, et al. Effect of tight control of inflammation in early psoriatic arthritis (TICOPA): a UK multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386:2489–2498. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00347-5.
    1. Dures E, Hewlett S, Lord J, Bowen C, McHugh N. PROMPT study group, et al. important treatment outcomes for patients with psoriatic arthritis: a multisite qualitative study. Patient. 2017;10:455–462. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0221-4.
    1. Garrido-Cumbrera M, Hillmann O, Mahapatra R, Trigos D, Zajc P, Weiss L, et al. Improving the management of psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis: roundtable discussions with healthcare professionals and patients. Rheumatol Ther. 2017;4:219–231. doi: 10.1007/s40744-017-0066-2.
    1. Helliwell P, Coates LC, FitzGerald O, Nash P, Soriano ER, Husni ME, et al. Disease-specific composite measures for psoriatic arthritis are highly responsive to a Janus kinase inhibitor treatment that targets multiple domains of disease. Arthritis Res Ther. 2018;20:242. doi: 10.1186/s13075-018-1739-0.
    1. McGagh D, Coates LC. Assessment of the many faces of PsA: single and composite measures in PsA clinical trials. Rheumatology. 2020;59:i29–i36. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez305.
    1. Mease P, Hall S, FitzGerald O, van der Heijde D, Merola JF, Avila-Zapata F, et al. Tofacitinib or adalimumab versus placebo for psoriatic arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1537–1550. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1615975.
    1. Gladman D, Rigby W, Azevedo VF, Behrens F, Blanco R, Kaszuba A, et al. Tofacitinib for psoriatic arthritis in patients with an inadequate response to TNF inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1525–1536. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1615977.
    1. Nash P, Coates LC, Fleishaker D, Kivitz AJ, Mease PJ, Gladman DD, et al. Safety and efficacy of tofacitinib up to 48 months in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: final analysis of the OPAL balance long-term extension study. Lancet Rheumatol. 2021;3:E270–E283. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00010-2.
    1. Strand V, de Vlam K, Covarrubias-Cobos JA, Mease PJ, Gladman DD, Chen L, et al. Effect of tofacitinib on patient-reported outcomes in patients with active psoriatic arthritis and an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in the phase III, randomised controlled trial: OPAL beyond. RMD Open. 2019;5:e000808. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000808.
    1. Strand V, de Vlam K, Covarrubias-Cobos JA, Mease PJ, Gladman DD, Graham D, et al. Tofacitinib or adalimumab versus placebo: patient-reported outcomes from OPAL broaden—a phase III study of active psoriatic arthritis in patients with an inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. RMD Open. 2019;5:e000806. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000806.
    1. Ogdie A, de Vlam K, McInnes IB, Mease PJ, Baer P, Lukic T, et al. Efficacy of tofacitinib in reducing pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis. RMD Open. 2020;6:e001042. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001042.
    1. Schoels MM, Landesmann U, Alasti F, Baker D, Smolen JS, Aletaha D. Early response to therapy predicts 6-month and 1-year disease activity outcomes in psoriatic arthritis patients. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2018;57:969–976. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key004.
    1. Tofacitinib for treating active psoriatic arthritis after inadequate response to DMARDs. . Accessed 12 Apr 2021
    1. Mease PJ, Woolley JM, Bitman B, Wang BC, Globe DR, Singh A. Minimally important difference of health assessment questionnaire in psoriatic arthritis: relating thresholds of improvement in functional ability to patient-rated importance and satisfaction. J Rheumatol. 2011;38:2461–2465. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.110546.
    1. Reddy S, Bruera E, Pace E, Zhang K, Reyes-Gibby CC. Clinically important improvement in the intensity of fatigue in patients with advanced cancer. J Palliat Med. 2007;10:1068–1075. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2007.0007.
    1. Coates LC, Fransen J, Helliwell PS. Defining minimal disease activity in psoriatic arthritis: a proposed objective target for treatment. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:48–53. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.102053.
    1. Helliwell PS, FitzGerald O, Fransen J. Composite disease activity and responder indices for psoriatic arthritis: a report from the GRAPPA 2013 meeting on development of cutoffs for both disease activity states and response. J Rheumatol. 2014;41:1212–1217. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.140172.
    1. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–481. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452.
    1. Mantel N. Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep. 1966;50:163–170.
    1. van der Heijde D, Deodhar A, Fleischmann R, Mease PJ, Rudwaleit M, Nurminen T, et al. Early disease activity or clinical response as predictors of long-term outcomes with certolizumab pegol in axial spondyloarthritis or psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2017;69:1030–1039. doi: 10.1002/acr.23092.
    1. Coates LC, Orbai AM, Morita A, Benichou O, Kerr L, Adams DH, et al. Achieving minimal disease activity in psoriatic arthritis predicts meaningful improvements in patients' health-related quality of life and productivity. BMC Rheumatol. 2018;2:24. doi: 10.1186/s41927-018-0030-y.
    1. Wervers K, Luime JJ, Tchetverikov I, Gerards AH, Kok MR, Appels CWY, et al. Comparison of disease activity measures in early psoriatic arthritis in usual care. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2019;58:2251–2259. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez215.
    1. Eder L, Chandran V, Schentag CT, Shen H, Cook RJ, Gladman DD. Time and predictors of response to tumour necrosis factor-alpha blockers in psoriatic arthritis: an analysis of a longitudinal observational cohort. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2010;49:1361–1366. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq091.
    1. Mease PJ, Karki C, Liu M, Kavanaugh A, Ritchlin CT, Huynh DH, et al. Baseline patient characteristics associated with response to biologic therapy in patients with psoriatic arthritis enrolled in the Corrona psoriatic arthritis/Spondyloarthritis registry. RMD Open. 2018;4:e000638. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000638.
    1. Behrens F, Koehm M, Schwaneck EC, Schmalzing M, Gnann H, Greger G, et al. Minimal disease activity is a stable measure of therapeutic response in psoriatic arthritis patients receiving treatment with adalimumab. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2018;57:1938–1946. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key203.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj