Virtual Reality and Web-Based Growth Mindset Interventions for Adolescent Depression: Protocol for a Three-Arm Randomized Trial

Jessica Lee Schleider, Michael C Mullarkey, John R Weisz, Jessica Lee Schleider, Michael C Mullarkey, John R Weisz

Abstract

Background: Depression is the leading cause of disability in youth, with a global economic burden of US >$210 billion annually. However, up to 70% of youth with depression do not receive services. Even among those who do access treatment, 30% to 65% fail to respond and many dropout prematurely, demonstrating a need for more potent, accessible interventions. In a previous trial, a single-session Web-based growth mindset (GM) intervention significantly reduced depressive symptoms in high-symptom adolescents; however, this intervention did not benefit adolescents uniformly. For instance, the intervention reduced depression in adolescents who reported post intervention increases in perceived control, but it did not lead to significant depression reductions in adolescents who reported no significant post intervention increases in perceived control.

Objective: The goal of this project is to test the acceptability and efficacy of a novel, single-session, virtual reality (VR) depression intervention-the VR Personality Project-teaching GM, the belief that personal attributes are malleable rather than fixed. The VR Personality Project was designed to systematically target and increase adolescents' perceived control by offering a more immersive, engaging, user-directed intervention experience than the Web-based intervention can provide. By targeting an identified predictor of intervention response, the VR Personality Project may lead to larger reductions in depressive symptoms than existing Web-based mindset interventions.

Methods: Adolescents with elevated depressive symptoms or a recent history of depression (N=159; ages 12 to 16 years) will be randomized to one of 3 intervention conditions: the VR Personality Project; the Web-based GM intervention tested previously; or an active, Web-based control. Adolescents and their parents will report on the adolescents' depression symptoms, perceived control, and related domains of functioning at preintervention, postintervention, and at 3- and 9-month follow-up assessments.

Results: We predict that the VR and Web-based mindset interventions will both lead to larger reductions in adolescent symptoms than the control intervention. Additionally, we predict that the VR-based single session intervention will lead to larger reductions in depression than the online mindset intervention and that these symptom reductions will be mediated by increases in adolescents' perceived control from pre- to postintervention.

Conclusions: The results may suggest an efficient strategy for reducing adolescent depressive symptoms: One that is mechanism-targeted, relatively affordable (less than US $200 for a commercially available VR headset, a fraction of the cost of long-term psychotherapy) and potentially engaging to adolescents experiencing mood-related distress.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT0385881; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03858881 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/78C3roDgA).

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/13368.

Keywords: adolescence; depression; ehealth; mental health; virtual reality.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Jessica Lee Schleider, Michael C Mullarkey, John R Weisz. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 09.07.2019.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screen Capture from VR Personality Project – lesson on neuroplasticity.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Screen Capture from VR Personality Project – a “scientist” describes research suggesting the malleability of personal traits.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Screen Capture from VR Personality Project. 3a: Participants select gender identity. 3b: Peer guides for adolescents who are male-identifying. 3c: Peer guides for adolescents who are female-identifying. Adolescents who select “another identity” or “rather not say” encounter peer guides shown in panel 3b.

References

    1. Hankin BL. Cognitive vulnerability-stress model of depression during adolescence: investigating depressive symptom specificity in a multi-wave prospective study. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2008 Oct;36(7):999–1014. doi: 10.1007/s10802-008-9228-6.
    1. Lu W. Adolescent depression: national trends, risk factors, and healthcare disparities. Am J Health Behav. 2019 Jan 01;43(1):181–194. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.43.1.15.
    1. Cheung AH, Cook S, Kozloff N, Chee JN, Mann RE, Boak A. Substance use and internalizing symptoms among high school students and access to health care services: results from a population-based study. Can J Public Health. 2019 Feb;110(1):85–92. doi: 10.17269/s41997-018-0144-4.
    1. Zuckerbrot RA, Cheung A, Jensen PS, Stein RE, Laraque D, GLAD-PC STEERING GROUP Guidelines for adolescent depression in primary care (GLAD-PC): part I. Practice preparation, identification, assessment, and initial management. Pediatrics. 2018 Dec;141(3) doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-4081.
    1. March JS, Silva S, Petrycki S, Curry J, Wells K, Fairbank J, Burns B, Domino M, McNulty S, Vitiello B, Severe J. The Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS): long-term effectiveness and safety outcomes. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;64(10):1132–43. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.10.1132.
    1. Harpaz-Rotem I, Leslie D, Rosenheck RA. Treatment retention among children entering a new episode of mental health care. Psychiatr Serv. 2004 Sep;55(9):1022–8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.55.9.1022.
    1. Schleider JL, Weisz JR. Little treatments, promising effects? Meta-analysis of single-session interventions for youth psychiatric problems. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;56(2):107–115. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.11.007.
    1. Weisz JR, Kuppens S, Ng MY, Eckshtain D, Ugueto AM, Vaughn-Coaxum R, Jensen-Doss A, Hawley KM, Krumholz Marchette LS, Chu BC, Weersing VR, Fordwood SR. What five decades of research tells us about the effects of youth psychological therapy: a multilevel meta-analysis and implications for science and practice. Am Psychol. 2017;72(2):79–117. doi: 10.1037/a0040360.
    1. Schleider JL, Abel MR, Weisz JR. Implicit theories and youth mental health problems: a random-effects meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Feb;35:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.11.001.
    1. Schleider J, Weisz J. Implicit theories relate to youth psychopathology, but how? A longitudinal test of two predictive models. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2016 Aug;47(4):603–17. doi: 10.1007/s10578-015-0595-2.
    1. Romero C, Master A, Paunesku D, Dweck CS, Gross JJ. Academic and emotional functioning in middle school: the role of implicit theories. Emotion. 2014 Apr;14(2):227–34. doi: 10.1037/a0035490.
    1. Miu A, Yeager D. Preventing symptoms of depression by teaching adolescents that people can change. Clin Psychol Sci. 2014 Sep 15;3(5):726–743. doi: 10.1177/2167702614548317.
    1. Schleider JL, Weisz JR. Reducing risk for anxiety and depression in adolescents: effects of a single-session intervention teaching that personality can change. Behav Res Ther. 2016 Dec;87:170–181. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.09.011.
    1. Schleider J, Weisz J. A single-session growth mindset intervention for adolescent anxiety and depression: 9-month outcomes of a randomized trial. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018 Dec;59(2):160–170. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12811.
    1. Yeager DS, Romero C, Paunesku D, Hulleman CS, Schneider B, Hinojosa C, Lee HY, O'Brien J, Flint K, Roberts A, Trott J, Greene D, Walton GM, Dweck CS. Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: the case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school. J Educ Psychol. 2016 Apr;108(3):374–391. doi: 10.1037/edu0000098.
    1. Schleider J, Abel M, Weisz J. Do immediate gains predict long-term symptom change? Findings from a randomized trial of a single-session intervention for youth anxiety and depression. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2019 Apr 16;:1–14. doi: 10.1007/s10578-019-00889-2. (forthcoming)
    1. Brown JD, Siegel JM. Attributions for negative life events and depression: the role of perceived control. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Feb;54(2):316–22.
    1. Culpin I, Stapinski L, Miles ÖB, Araya R, Joinson C. Exposure to socioeconomic adversity in early life and risk of depression at 18 years: the mediating role of locus of control. J Affect Disord. 2015 Sep 01;183:269–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.05.030.
    1. Rothbaum F, Weisz J, Snyder S. Changing the world and changing the self: a two-process model of perceived control. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1982;42(1):5–37. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.5.
    1. Roussi P, Miller S, Shoda Y. Discriminative facility in the face of threat: relationship to psychological distress. Psychol Health. 2000 Feb;15(1):21–33. doi: 10.1080/08870440008400286.
    1. Weisz JR, Francis SE, Bearman SK. Assessing secondary control and its association with youth depression symptoms. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2010 Oct;38(7):883–93. doi: 10.1007/s10802-010-9440-z.
    1. Freeman D, Reeve S, Robinson A, Ehlers A, Clark D, Spanlang B, Slater M. Virtual reality in the assessment, understanding, and treatment of mental health disorders. Psychol Med. 2017 Oct;47(14):2393–2400. doi: 10.1017/S003329171700040X.
    1. Schwartzman D. McGill. 2017. [2019-05-02]. Virtual Reality Interventions in Mental Health: Synthesizing the Evidence .
    1. Otkhmezuri B, Boffo M, Siriaraya P, Matsangidou M, Wiers RW, Mackintosh B, Ang CS, Salemink E. Believing is seeing: a proof-of-concept semiexperimental study on using mobile virtual reality to boost the effects of interpretation bias modification for anxiety. JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Feb 21;6(2):e11517. doi: 10.2196/11517.
    1. Oing T, Prescott J. Implementations of virtual reality for anxiety-related disorders: systematic review. JMIR Serious Games. 2018 Nov 07;6(4):e10965. doi: 10.2196/10965.
    1. Clus D, Larsen ME, Lemey C, Berrouiguet S. The use of virtual reality in patients with eating disorders: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Dec 27;20(4):e157. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7898.
    1. Garrett B, Taverner T, Gromala D, Tao G, Cordingley E, Sun C. Virtual reality clinical research: promises and challenges. JMIR Serious Games. 2018 Oct 17;6(4):e10839. doi: 10.2196/10839.
    1. Jerdan SW, Grindle M, van Woerden HC, Kamel Boulos MN. Head-mounted virtual reality and mental health: critical review of current research. JMIR Serious Games. 2018 Jul 06;6(3):e14. doi: 10.2196/games.9226.
    1. Rus-Calafell M, Garety P, Sason E, Craig TJ, Valmaggia LR. Virtual reality in the assessment and treatment of psychosis: a systematic review of its utility, acceptability and effectiveness. Psychol Med. 2018 Feb;48(3):362–391. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717001945.
    1. Petersen AC, Crockett L, Richards M, Boxer A. A self-report measure of pubertal status: reliability, validity, and initial norms. J Youth Adolesc. 1988 Apr;17(2):117–33. doi: 10.1007/BF01537962.
    1. Kovacs M. Children's Depression Inventory. 2nd Edition. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems Inc; 2012.
    1. Schleider J, Krause E, Gillham J. Sequential comorbidity of anxiety and depression in youth: present knowledge and future directions. Curr Psychiatry Rev. 2014 Jan 31;10(1):75–87. doi: 10.2174/1573400509666131217010652.
    1. Birmaher B, Khetarpal S, Brent D, Cully M, Balach L, Kaufman J, Neer SM. The Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED): scale construction and psychometric characteristics. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997 Apr;36(4):545–53. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199704000-00018.
    1. Birmaher B, Brent DA, Chiappetta L, Bridge J, Monga S, Baugher M. Psychometric properties of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED): a replication study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1999 Oct;38(10):1230–6. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199910000-00011.
    1. Weisz. Weiss B, Wasserman AA, Rintoul B. Control-related beliefs and depression among clinic-referred children and adolescents. J Abnorm Psychol. 1987 Feb;96(1):58–63.
    1. Yeager DS, Miu AS, Powers J, Dweck CS. Implicit theories of personality and attributions of hostile intent: a meta-analysis, an experiment, and a longitudinal intervention. Child Dev. 2013;84(5):1651–67. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12062.
    1. Russell DW. UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure. J Pers Assess. 1996 Feb;66(1):20–40. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2.
    1. Perczel Forintos D, Rózsa S, Pilling J, Kopp M. Proposal for a short version of the Beck Hopelessness Scale based on a national representative survey in Hungary. Community Ment Health J. 2013 Dec;49(6):822–30. doi: 10.1007/s10597-013-9619-1.
    1. Beck A, Weissman A, Lester D, Trexler L. Hopelessness Scale. PsycTESTS Dataset. 1974
    1. Cheung YB, Law CK, Chan B, Liu KY, Yip PS. Suicidal ideation and suicidal attempts in a population-based study of Chinese people: risk attributable to hopelessness, depression, and social factors. J Affect Disord. 2006 Feb;90(2-3):193–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.11.018.
    1. Derogatis L. BSI 18, Brief Symptom Inventory 18: administration, scoring and procedures manual. Minneapolis, MN: NCS Pearson, Inc; 2001.
    1. Schleider J, Weisz J. Parent expectancies and preferences for mental health treatment: the roles of emotion mind-sets and views of failure. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2018;47(sup1):S480–S496. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2017.1405353.
    1. Mullarkey MC, Marchetti I, Beevers CG. Using network analysis to identify central symptoms of adolescent depression. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2018 Mar 13;:1–13. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2018.1437735.
    1. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):879–91.
    1. Mallinckrodt B, Todd AW, Wei M, Russell D. Advances in testing the statistical significance of mediation effects. J Couns Psychol. 2006;53(3):372–378. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879.
    1. Rosseel Y. lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Soft. 2012;48(2) doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02.
    1. Briggs N. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering. 2007. Estimation of the Standard Error and Confidence Interval of the Indirect Effect in Multiple Mediator Models .

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj