New elements for informed decision making: a qualitative study of older adults' views
Erika Leemann Price, Sylvia Bereknyei, Alma Kuby, Wendy Levinson, Clarence Henry Braddock 3rd, Erika Leemann Price, Sylvia Bereknyei, Alma Kuby, Wendy Levinson, Clarence Henry Braddock 3rd
Abstract
Objective: To explore older adults' views of existing informed decision making (IDM) elements and investigate the need for additional elements.
Methods: We recruited persons 65 and older to participate in six focus groups. Participants completed questionnaires about IDM preferences, and discussed videotapes of idealized patient-physician interactions in light of seven IDM elements: (1) discussion of the patient's role in decision making; (2) discussion of the clinical issue; (3) discussion of alternatives; (4) discussion of benefits/risks; (5) discussion of uncertainties; (6) assessment of patient understanding; and (7) exploration of patient preference. We used a modified grounded theory approach to assess agreement with existing IDM elements and identify new elements.
Results: In questionnaires, 97-100% of 59 participants rated each IDM element as "somewhat" or "very" important. Qualitative analysis supported existing elements and suggested two more: opportunity for input from trusted others, and discussion of decisions' impacts on patients' daily lives. Elements overlapped with global communication themes.
Conclusion: Focus groups affirmed existing IDM elements and suggested two more with particular relevance for older patients.
Practice implications: Incorporation of additional IDM elements into clinical practice can enhance informed participation of older adults in decision making.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source: PubMed