Early immune anergy towards recall antigens and mitogens in patients at onset of septic shock

M Feuerecker, L Sudhoff, B Crucian, J-I Pagel, C Sams, C Strewe, A Guo, G Schelling, J Briegel, I Kaufmann, A Choukèr, M Feuerecker, L Sudhoff, B Crucian, J-I Pagel, C Sams, C Strewe, A Guo, G Schelling, J Briegel, I Kaufmann, A Choukèr

Abstract

The pathology of sepsis is typically characterized by an infection and excessive initial inflammation including a cytokine storm, followed by a state of immune suppression or paralysis. This classical view of a two peak kinetic immune response is currently controversially discussed. This study was a sub-study of the randomized clinical Trial SISPCT registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00832039, Registration date: 29/01/2009). Blood samples from 76 patients with severe sepsis and septic shock were incubated for 48 h at 37 °C in vitro with bacterial or fungal recall-antigens or specific mitogen antigens within 24 hours of sepsis onset. Recall-antigen stimulation led to a severe dampening of normal cytokine release. This immunologic anergy was similarly observed after mitogen stimulation. Moreover, patients under hydrocortisone therapy or with lowered arterial oxygen tension had further reductions in cytokine levels upon B- and T-cell mitogen stimulation. This investigation reveals an early onset of immunoparalysis during sepsis. This immune incompetence in mounting an adequate response to further infections includes previously sensitized pathogens, as seen with recall-antigens. Also, the immune-suppressive role of hydrocortisone and low PaO2 is highlighted. Aside from early broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy, our findings reinforce the need for maximal immunological support and protection against further infections at the onset of sepsis.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patients versus control group in unstimulated assay and after stimulation with recall antigens. SS: severe sepsis/septic shock patients, Basal: unstimulated test assay, Bacteria: bacterial antigen mixture, Fungi: fungal antigen mixture. Blood samples were taken subsequently to study enrolment (SS) or at a time of subjective physical well-being (control group), respectively. In boxplots, boxes show the median and interquartile range (IQR), whiskers represent the 10th and 90th percentile. Statistically significant differences (Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test) are indicated as follows: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. y-axis: logarithmic scale.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patients versus control group after stimulation with PWM, PMA, CD3/28 and LPS. PWM: Pokeweed mitogen, LPS: Lipopolysaccharide, PMA-I: Phorbol myristate acetate and Ionomycin, CD3/28: Cluster of Differentiation 3/28, SS: severe sepsis/septic shock patients. Blood samples were taken subsequently to study enrolment (SS) or at a time of subjective physical well-being (control group), respectively. In boxplots, boxes show the median and interquartile range (IQR), whiskers represent the 10th and 90th percentile. Statistically significant differences (Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test) are indicated as follows: *p 

Figure 3

Relationship between disease severity and…

Figure 3

Relationship between disease severity and TNF-α release in Bacteria and PWM assay. TNF-α…

Figure 3
Relationship between disease severity and TNF-α release in Bacteria and PWM assay. TNF-α release from whole blood was correlated with quartile groups for disease severity as measured by SAPS II (A,C) and APACHE II (B,D) disease severity classification systems. Panels A and B show hereby stimulations with bacterial antigen mixtures, Panels C and D with Pokeweed mitogen assay. Statistically significant differences (One-way ANOVA on RANKS followed by Dunn’s test) are indicated *p < 0.05.

Figure 4

Relationship between hydrocortisone administration and…

Figure 4

Relationship between hydrocortisone administration and cytokine release. Patients were allocated to two groups…

Figure 4
Relationship between hydrocortisone administration and cytokine release. Patients were allocated to two groups (Hydrocortisone (HC) or no HC) for comparison of stimulated cytokine release. (A) TNF-α in supernatants of whole blood stimulated with PWM. (B) IL-1β in supernatants of LPS stimulated whole blood. Statistically significant differences (Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test) are indicated as follows: **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Figure 5

Relationship between PaO 2 and…

Figure 5

Relationship between PaO 2 and cytokine release. Patients were allocated to groups regarding…

Figure 5
Relationship between PaO2 and cytokine release. Patients were allocated to groups regarding their arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) for comparison of stimulated cytokine release: hypoxemia (PaO2 < 80 mmHg) and normoxemia (PaO280–100mmHg). (A) TNF-α measured after stimulation with PWM. (B) IL-1β measured after stimulation with LPS. Statistically significant differences (Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test) are indicated *p < 0.05.

Figure 6

ROC curves for the endpoint‘‘RRT…

Figure 6

ROC curves for the endpoint‘‘RRT during ICU stay” ROC-curves for ( A )…

Figure 6
ROC curves for the endpoint‘‘RRT during ICU stay” ROC-curves for (A) whole blood response, (B) established parameters used in sepsis and (C) different combinations of markers referring to (A and B) regarding the endpoint “initiation of RRT during ICU stay”: ROC: Receiver operating characteristic curve, all markers combined: combination of PWM stimulated TNF-α release, LPS stimulated IL-1β release, SAPS II, APACHE II and serum IL-6.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relationship between disease severity and TNF-α release in Bacteria and PWM assay. TNF-α release from whole blood was correlated with quartile groups for disease severity as measured by SAPS II (A,C) and APACHE II (B,D) disease severity classification systems. Panels A and B show hereby stimulations with bacterial antigen mixtures, Panels C and D with Pokeweed mitogen assay. Statistically significant differences (One-way ANOVA on RANKS followed by Dunn’s test) are indicated *p < 0.05.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Relationship between hydrocortisone administration and cytokine release. Patients were allocated to two groups (Hydrocortisone (HC) or no HC) for comparison of stimulated cytokine release. (A) TNF-α in supernatants of whole blood stimulated with PWM. (B) IL-1β in supernatants of LPS stimulated whole blood. Statistically significant differences (Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test) are indicated as follows: **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Relationship between PaO2 and cytokine release. Patients were allocated to groups regarding their arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) for comparison of stimulated cytokine release: hypoxemia (PaO2 < 80 mmHg) and normoxemia (PaO280–100mmHg). (A) TNF-α measured after stimulation with PWM. (B) IL-1β measured after stimulation with LPS. Statistically significant differences (Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test) are indicated *p < 0.05.
Figure 6
Figure 6
ROC curves for the endpoint‘‘RRT during ICU stay” ROC-curves for (A) whole blood response, (B) established parameters used in sepsis and (C) different combinations of markers referring to (A and B) regarding the endpoint “initiation of RRT during ICU stay”: ROC: Receiver operating characteristic curve, all markers combined: combination of PWM stimulated TNF-α release, LPS stimulated IL-1β release, SAPS II, APACHE II and serum IL-6.

References

    1. Martin GS. Sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock: changes in incidence, pathogens and outcomes. Expert Rev. Anti. Infect. Ther. 2012;10:701–706. doi: 10.1586/eri.12.50.
    1. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003;348:1546–1554. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022139.
    1. Hotchkiss RS, Karl IE. The pathophysiology and treatment of sepsis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003;348:138–150. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra021333.
    1. Angus DC, et al. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit. Care Med. 2001;29:1303–1310. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00002.
    1. Rittirsch D, Flierl MA, Ward PA. Harmful molecular mechanisms in sepsis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2008;8:776–787. doi: 10.1038/nri2402.
    1. Wiersinga WJ. Current insights in sepsis: from pathogenesis to new treatment targets. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care. 2011;17:480–486. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32834a4aeb.
    1. Ertel W, et al. Inhibition of the defense system stimulating interleukin-12 interferon-gamma pathway during critical Illness. Blood. 1997;89:1612–1620.
    1. Hotchkiss RS, et al. Apoptotic cell death in patients with sepsis, shock, and multiple organ dysfunction. Crit. Care Med. 1999;27:1230–1251. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199907000-00002.
    1. Osuchowski MF, Craciun F, Weixelbaumer KM, Duffy ER, Remick DG. Sepsis chronically in MARS: systemic cytokine responses are always mixed regardless of the outcome, magnitude, or phase of sepsis. J. Immunol. 2012;189:4648–4656. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201806.
    1. Huttunen R, Aittoniemi J. New concepts in the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of bacteremia and sepsis. J. Infect. 2011;63:407–419. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2011.08.004.
    1. Bloos F, et al. Effect of Sodium Selenite Administration and Procalcitonin-Guided Therapy on Mortality in Patients With Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern. Med. 2016;176:1266–1276. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2514.
    1. Reinhart, K. et al. Prevention, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up care of sepsis: 1st revision of S-2k guidelines of the German Sepsis Society (Deutsche Sepsis-Gesellschaft e.V. (DSG)) and the German Interdisciplinary Association of Intensive Care andEmergency Medicine (Deutsche Interdisziplinare Vereinigung fur Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin (DIVI)). Ger. Med. Sci.: GMS e-journal 8, Doc14, 10.3205/000103 (2010).
    1. Jacob, S. & Cory, F. In Common Surgical Diseases (eds J. A. Myers, K. W. Millikan, & T. J. Saclarides) Ch. 97, 391–394 (Springer New York, 2008).
    1. respiratoryupdate. Levels of Hypoxemia, (2015).
    1. Feuerecker M, et al. A corticoid-sensitive cytokine release assay for monitoring stress-mediated immune modulation. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2013;172:290–299. doi: 10.1111/cei.12049.
    1. Leentjens J, Kox M, van der Hoeven JG, Netea MG, Pickkers P. Immunotherapy for the adjunctive treatment of sepsis: from immunosuppression to immunostimulation. Time for a paradigm change? Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2013;187:1287–1293. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201301-0036CP.
    1. Tamayo E, et al. Pro- and anti-inflammatory responses are regulated simultaneously from the first moments of septic shock. Eur. Cytokine Netw. 2011;22:82–87.
    1. Novotny AR, et al. Mixed antagonist response and sepsis severity-dependent dysbalance of pro- and anti-inflammatory responses at the onset of postoperative sepsis. Immunobiology. 2012;217:616–621. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2011.10.019.
    1. Remick DG, Newcomb DE, Bolgos GL, Call DR. Comparison of the mortality and inflammatory response of two models of sepsis: lipopolysaccharide vs. cecal ligation and puncture. Shock. 2000;13:110–116. doi: 10.1097/00024382-200013020-00004.
    1. Frazier, W. J. & Hall, M. W. Immunoparalysis and adverse outcomes from critical illness. Pediatr. Clin. North Am. 55, 647–668, xi, 10.1016/j.pcl.2008.02.009 (2008).
    1. Zhang Q, et al. Circulating mitochondrial DAMPs cause inflammatory responses to injury. Nature. 2010;464:104–107. doi: 10.1038/nature08780.
    1. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA. 1993;270:2957–2963. doi: 10.1001/jama.1993.03510240069035.
    1. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit. Care Med. 1985;13:818–829. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198510000-00009.
    1. Haziot A, Tsuberi BZ, Goyert SM. Neutrophil CD14: biochemical properties and role in the secretion of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in response to lipopolysaccharide. J. Immunol. 1993;150:5556–5565.
    1. McGettrick AF, et al. Trif-related adapter molecule is phosphorylated by PKC{epsilon} during Toll-like receptor 4 signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:9196–9201. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600462103.
    1. Dellinger RP, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:580–637. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af.
    1. Chouker A, et al. Critical role of hypoxia and A2A adenosine receptors in liver tissue-protecting physiological anti-inflammatory pathway. Mol. Med. 2008;14:116–123. doi: 10.2119/2007-00075.Chouker.
    1. Kaufmann I, et al. Effects of adenosine on functions of polymorphonuclear leukocytes from patients with septic shock. Shock. 2007;27:25–31. doi: 10.1097/01.shk.0000238066.00074.90.
    1. Thiel, M. et al. Oxygenation inhibits the physiological tissue-protecting mechanism and thereby exacerbates acute inflammatory lung injury. PLoS Biol. 3, e174, 04-PLBI-RA-0506R3, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030174 (2005).
    1. Eltzschig HK, Carmeliet P. Hypoxia and inflammation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011;364:656–665. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0910283.
    1. Nowak M, et al. The A2aR adenosine receptor controls cytokine production in iNKT cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2010;40:682–687. doi: 10.1002/eji.200939897.
    1. Linden, J. Adenosine in tissue protection and tissue regeneration. Mol. Pharmacol. 67, 1385–1387, 105.011783/10.1124/mol.105.011783 (2005).
    1. Oppert M, et al. Acute renal failure in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock–a significant independent risk factor for mortality: results from the German Prevalence Study. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2008;23:904–909. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm610.
    1. Anderberg SB, Luther T, Frithiof R. Physiological aspects of Toll-like receptor 4 activation in sepsis-induced acute kidney injury. Acta physiol. 2017;219:573–588. doi: 10.1111/apha.12798.
    1. Liu, V. X. et al. The Timing of Early Antibiotics and Hospital Mortality in Sepsis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., 10.1164/rccm.201609-1848OC (2017).
    1. Hotchkiss RS, Coopersmith CM, McDunn JE, Ferguson TA. The sepsis seesaw: tilting toward immunosuppression. Nat.med. 2009;15:496–497. doi: 10.1038/nm0509-496.
    1. Opal SM. New perspectives on immunomodulatory therapy for bacteraemia and sepsis. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2010;36(Suppl 2):S70–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.11.008.
    1. Huang GK, Stewardson AJ, Grayson ML. Back to basics: hand hygiene and isolation. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2014;27:379–389. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000080.
    1. Bone RC, et al. A controlled clinical trial of high-dose methylprednisolone in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N. Engl. J. Med. 1987;317:653–658. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198709103171101.
    1. Annane D, et al. Corticosteroids in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock in adults: a systematic review. JAMA Intern. Med. 2009;301:2362–2375.
    1. Annane, D. et al. Corticosteroids for treating sepsis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., CD002243, 10.1002/14651858.CD002243.pub3 (2015).
    1. Heming N, Lamothe L, Ambrosi X, Annane D. Emerging drugs for the treatment of sepsis. Expert Opin. Emerg. Drugs. 2016;21:27–37. doi: 10.1517/14728214.2016.1132700.
    1. Mathias B, Szpila BE, Moore FA, Efron PA, Moldawer LL. A Review of GM-CSF Therapy in Sepsis. Medicine. 2015;94:e2044. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002044.
    1. Mansur A, et al. Chronic kidney disease is associated with a higher 90-day mortality than other chronic medical conditions in patients with sepsis. Sci. rep. 2015;5:10539. doi: 10.1038/srep10539.
    1. Kelly E, et al. Comparison of arterial and venous blood biomarker levels in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. F1000Res. 2013;2:114.
    1. Fernandez-Serrano S, et al. Molecular inflammatory responses measured in blood of patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2003;10:813–820.
    1. Shah B, et al. Comparison of platelet activity measurements by use of arterial and venous blood sampling. Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis: JTH. 2013;11:1922–1924.
    1. Sepsis, K. .
    1. Suzuki N, Sakane T. Mechanism of T cell-derived helper factor production upon stimulation with pokeweed mitogen in humans. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 1988;71:343–349.
    1. Waldmann TA, Broder S. Polyclonal B-cell activators in the study of the regulation of immunoglobulin synthesis in the human system. Adv. Immunol. 1982;32:1–63. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2776(08)60720-8.
    1. Iliodromitis EK, et al. The PKC activator PMA preconditions rabbit heart in the presence of adenosine receptor blockade: is 5′-nucleotidase important? J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 1998;30:2201–2211. doi: 10.1006/jmcc.1998.0780.
    1. Nishihira J, O’Flaherty JT. Phorbol myristate acetate receptors in human polymorphonuclear neutrophils. J. Immunol. 1985;135:3439–3447.
    1. Masilamani M, Kassahn D, Mikkat S, Glocker MO, Illges H. B cell activation leads to shedding of complement receptor type II (CR2/CD21) Eur. J. Immunol. 2003;33:2391–2397. doi: 10.1002/eji.200323843.
    1. Touraine JL, et al. Phorbol myristate acetate: a mitogen selective for a T-lymphocyte subpopulation. J. Exp. Med. 1977;145:460–465. doi: 10.1084/jem.145.2.460.
    1. Trickett A, Kwan YL. T cell stimulation and expansion using anti-CD3/CD28 beads. J. Immunol. Methods. 2003;275:251–255. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1759(03)00010-3.
    1. Poltorak A, et al. Defective LPS signaling in C3H/HeJ and C57BL/10ScCr mice: mutations in Tlr4 gene. Science. 1998;282:2085–2088. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5396.2085.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj