Impact of guselkumab, an interleukin-23 p19 subunit inhibitor, on enthesitis and dactylitis in patients with moderate to severe psoriatic arthritis: results from a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase II study

Philip J Mease, Dafna D Gladman, Atul Deodhar, Dennis G McGonagle, Peter Nash, Wolf-Henning Boehncke, Alice Gottlieb, Xie L Xu, Stephen Xu, Elizabeth C Hsia, Chetan S Karyekar, Philip S Helliwell, Philip J Mease, Dafna D Gladman, Atul Deodhar, Dennis G McGonagle, Peter Nash, Wolf-Henning Boehncke, Alice Gottlieb, Xie L Xu, Stephen Xu, Elizabeth C Hsia, Chetan S Karyekar, Philip S Helliwell

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of guselkumab on enthesitis and dactylitis in a phase II trial of patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Methods: This was a phase II, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of adults with active PsA (≥3 swollen and ≥3 tender joints and C reactive protein ≥0.3 mg/dL) despite conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and/or oral corticosteroid therapy. Patients were randomised to subcutaneous injections of guselkumab 100 mg or placebo at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks, with placebo crossover to guselkumab at week 24. Dactylitis was scored on a scale of 0-3 on each digit; enthesitis was assessed using the Leeds Enthesitis Index (0-6). Other assessments included American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index responses.

Results: Of 149 randomised patients, 107 patients had enthesitis (mean score=2.7) and 81 patients had dactylitis (mean dactylitis score=5.7) at baseline. Mean improvements in enthesitis and dactylitis at week 24 were greater in the guselkumab group versus placebo and sustained through week 56. Similar results were observed for the proportions of patients with resolution of enthesitis and dactylitis. At week 56, mean improvements in enthesitis and dactylitis among patients who switched from placebo to guselkumab treatment were similar to those in the guselkumab group. In the guselkumab group, ACR20 responders had greater improvements in enthesitis and dactylitis versus non-responders (week 24).

Conclusions: At week 24, the guselkumab group had greater mean improvements in enthesitis and dactylitis and greater proportions of patients with resolution of enthesitis and dactylitis versus placebo. ACR20 response was associated with improvements in enthesitis and dactylitis.

Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02319759.URL: https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT02319759; Registered 18 December 2014.

Keywords: Ankylosing Spondylitis; Anti-TNF; Arthritis; Chemokines; Disease Activity; Lupus Nephritis; Psoriatic Arthritis; Rheumatoid Arthritis; Spondyloarthritis; Systemic Lupus Erythematosus; TNF-alpha; Treatment.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: PJM has received research grants or served as a consultant or speaker for AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen Scientific Affairs, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun and UCB.DDG has received consulting fees and/or grant support from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB.AD reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Janssen, during the conduct of the study; grants and medical writing support from AbbVie and Amgen; grants and personal fees from Eli Lilly; and grants, personal fees and medical writing support from Novartis, Pfizer and UCB.DGM has received research grants from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis and Pfizer and has received honoraria from AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer and UCB.PN has received research funding for clinical trials and honoraria for advice and lectures on behalf of Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, MSD, Pfizer, Sanofi, Roche, Janssen, Gilead, UCB, Novartis, and Lilly.W-HB has received personal fees from Janssen, AbbVie, Almirall, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Leo, Novartis and UCB, and grants from Pfizer.AG has received consulting and/or advisory board fees from AbbVie, Allergan, Avotres Therapeutics, Beiersdorf, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Janssen, Leo, Reddy Labs, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, UCB, Valeant and Xbiotech, and grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Incyte, Janssen, Novartis, UCB and Xbiotech.PSH has received research grants from AbbVie, Janssen and Novartis, and has received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Galapagos, Pfizer, and UCB.XLX, SX and ECH are employees of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, and own stock in Johnson & Johnson, of which Janssen Research & Development, LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary. CSK is an employee of Janssen Global Services, LLC, and owns stock in Johnson & Johnson, of which Janssen Global Services, LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean change from baseline in enthesitis score through week 24 (A) and week 56 (B) and mean change from baseline in dactylitis score through week 24 (C) and week 56 (D). Through week 24, missing data and data for patients who entered early escape were imputed using last observation carried forward (panels A and C); after week 24, no imputation was made for missing data, observed data were used and patients who early escaped or discontinued prior to week 24 were not included in the analysis (panels B and D). GUS, guselkumab; PBO, placebo.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The proportion of patients with resolution of enthesitis through week 24 (A) and week 56 (B) and the proportion of patients with resolution of dactylitis through week 24 (C) and week 56 (D). Through week 24, missing data and data for patients who entered early escape were imputed using last observation carried forward (panels A and C); after week 24, no imputation was made for missing data, observed data were used, and patients who early escaped or discontinued prior to week 24 were not included in the analysis (panels B and D). GUS, guselkumab; PBO, placebo.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean changes from baseline to week 24 in enthesitis score (A) and dactylitis score (B) among ACR20, ACR50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 responders and non-responders in the guselkumab group. ACR 20/50, ≥20%/50% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria; PASI 75/90/100, ≥75%/90%/100% in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score. ACR, American College of Rheumatology; PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index.

References

    1. Ritchlin CT, Colbert RA, Gladman DD. Psoriatic arthritis. N Engl J Med 2017;376:957–70.
    1. Macchioni P, Salvarani C, Possemato N, et al. Ultrasonographic and clinical assessment of peripheral enthesitis in patients with psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, and fibromyalgia syndrome: the ULISSE study. J Rheumatol 2019;46:904–11.
    1. Kaeley GS, Eder L, Aydin SZ, et al. Enthesitis: a hallmark of psoriatic arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2018;48:35–43.
    1. Mease PJ, Karki C, Palmer JB, et al. Clinical characteristics, disease activity, and patient-reported outcomes in psoriatic arthritis patients with dactylitis or enthesitis: results from the Corrona Psoriatic Arthritis/Spondyloarthritis Registry. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017;69:1692–9.
    1. Polachek A, Cook R, Chandran V, et al. The association between sonographic enthesitis and radiographic damage in psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2017;19:189.
    1. Coates LC, Fransen J, Helliwell PS. Defining minimal disease activity in psoriatic arthritis: a proposed objective target for treatment. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:48–53.
    1. Coates LC, Kavanaugh A, Mease PJ, et al. Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis 2015 treatment recommendations for psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2016;68:1060–71.
    1. McGonagle D, Tan AL, Watad A, et al. Pathophysiology, assessment and treatment of psoriatic dactylitis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2019;15:113–22.
    1. Girolomoni G, Strohal R, Puig L, et al. The role of IL-23 and the IL-23/TH 17 immune axis in the pathogenesis and treatment of psoriasis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2017;31:1616–26.
    1. Suzuki E, Mellins ED, Gershwin ME, et al. The IL-23/IL-17 axis in psoriatic arthritis. Autoimmun Rev 2014;13:496–502.
    1. Blauvelt A, Papp KA, Griffiths CEM, et al. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab, an anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, compared with adalimumab for the continuous treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: results from the phase III, double-blinded, placebo- and active comparator-controlled VOYAGE 1 trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017;76:405–17.
    1. Reich K, Armstrong AW, Foley P, et al. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab, an anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, compared with adalimumab for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis with randomized withdrawal and retreatment: results from the phase III, double-blind, placebo- and active comparator-controlled VOYAGE 2 trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017;76:418–31.
    1. Deodhar A, Gottlieb AB, Boehncke WH, et al. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study. Lancet 2018;391:2213–24.
    1. Taylor W, Gladman D, Helliwell P, et al. Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis: development of new criteria from a large international study. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:2665–73.
    1. Fredriksson T, Pettersson U. Severe psoriasis: oral therapy with a new retinoid. Dermatologica 1978;157:238–44.
    1. Antoni CE, Kavanaugh A, Kirkham B, et al. Sustained benefits of infliximab therapy for dermatologic and articular manifestations of psoriatic arthritis: results from the infliximab multinational psoriatic arthritis controlled trial (IMPACT). Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:1227–36.
    1. Healy PJ, Helliwell PS. Measuring clinical enthesitis in psoriatic arthritis: assessment of existing measures and development of an instrument specific to psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:686–91.
    1. Patience A, Helliwell PS, Siddle HJ. Focussing on the foot in psoriatic arthritis: pathology and management options. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2018;14:21–8.
    1. Brockbank JE, Stein M, Schentag CT, et al. Dactylitis in psoriatic arthritis: a marker for disease severity? Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:188–90.
    1. Polachek A, Li S, Chandran V, et al. Clinical enthesitis in a prospective longitudinal psoriatic arthritis cohort: incidence, prevalence, characteristics, and outcome. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017;69:1685–91.
    1. Hyslop E, McInnes IB, Woodburn J, et al. Foot problems in psoriatic arthritis: high burden and low care provision. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:928.
    1. Hojgaard P, Ellegaard K, Nielsen SM, et al. Pain mechanisms and ultrasonic inflammatory activity as prognostic factors in patients with psoriatic arthritis: a prospective cohort study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2019;71:798–810.
    1. Helliwell PS. Assessment of enthesitis in psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol 2019;46:869–70.
    1. Sherlock JP, Joyce-Shaikh B, Turner SP, et al. IL-23 induces spondyloarthropathy by acting on ROR-γt+ CD3+CD4-CD8− entheseal resident T cells. Nat Med 2012;18:1069–76.
    1. Bridgewood C, Watad A, Russell T, et al. Identification of myeloid cells in the human enthesis as the main source of local IL-23 production. Ann Rheum Dis 2019;78:929–33.
    1. Araujo EG, Englbrecht M, Hoepken S, et al. Effects of ustekinumab versus tumor necrosis factor inhibition on enthesitis: results from the enthesial clearance in psoriatic arthritis (ECLIPSA) study. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2019;48:632–7.
    1. Siebert S, Loza MJ, Song Q, et al. Ustekinumab and guselkumab treatment results in differences in serum IL17A, IL17F and CRP levels in psoriatic arthritis patients: a comparison from ustekinumab PH3 and guselkumab PH2 programs. Ann Rheum Dis 2019;78:A293.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj