CEA, CA19-9, circulating DNA and circulating tumour cell kinetics in patients treated for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
David Sefrioui, Ludivine Beaussire, André Gillibert, France Blanchard, Emmanuel Toure, Céline Bazille, Anne Perdrix, Frédéric Ziegler, Alice Gangloff, Mélanie Hassine, Caroline Elie, Anne-Laure Bignon, Aurélie Parzy, Philippe Gomez, Caroline Thill, Florian Clatot, Jean-Christophe Sabourin, Thierry Frebourg, Jacques Benichou, Karine Bouhier-Leporrier, Marie-Pierre Gallais, Nasrin Sarafan-Vasseur, Pierre Michel, Frédéric Di Fiore, David Sefrioui, Ludivine Beaussire, André Gillibert, France Blanchard, Emmanuel Toure, Céline Bazille, Anne Perdrix, Frédéric Ziegler, Alice Gangloff, Mélanie Hassine, Caroline Elie, Anne-Laure Bignon, Aurélie Parzy, Philippe Gomez, Caroline Thill, Florian Clatot, Jean-Christophe Sabourin, Thierry Frebourg, Jacques Benichou, Karine Bouhier-Leporrier, Marie-Pierre Gallais, Nasrin Sarafan-Vasseur, Pierre Michel, Frédéric Di Fiore
Abstract
Background: We previously reported that CEA kinetics are a marker of progressive disease (PD) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This study was specifically designed to confirm CEA kinetics for predicting PD and to evaluate CA19-9, cell-free DNA (cfDNA), circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) and circulating tumour cell (CTC) kinetics.
Methods: Patients starting a chemotherapy (CT) with pre-treatment CEA > 5 ng/mL and/or CA19.9 > 30 UI/mL were prospectively included. Samples were collected from baseline to cycle 4 for CEA and CA19-9 and at baseline and the sixth week for other markers. CEA kinetics were calculated from the first to the third or fourth CT cycle.
Results: A total of 192 mCRC patients were included. CEA kinetics based on the previously identified >0.05 threshold was significantly associated with PD (p < 0.0001). By dichotomising by the median value, cfDNA, ctDNA and CA19-9 were associated with PD, PFS and OS in multivariate analysis. A circulating scoring system (CSS) combining CEA kinetics and baseline CA19-9 and cfDNA values classified patients based on high (n = 58) and low risk (n = 113) of PD and was independently associated with PD (ORa = 4.6, p < 0.0001), PFS (HRa = 2.07, p < 0.0001) and OS (HRa = 2.55, p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: CEA kinetics alone or combined with baseline CA19-9 and cfDNA are clinically relevant for predicting outcomes in mCRC.
Trial registration number: NCT01212510.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Figures
Source: PubMed