International variation in hip replacement rates

H Merx, K Dreinhöfer, P Schräder, T Stürmer, W Puhl, K-P Günther, H Brenner, H Merx, K Dreinhöfer, P Schräder, T Stürmer, W Puhl, K-P Günther, H Brenner

Abstract

Objectives: To summarise epidemiological data on the frequency of hip replacements in the countries of the developed world, especially in countries of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), and to investigate whether missing consensus criteria for the indication for total hip replacement (THR) result in different replacement rates.

Methods: Country-specific hip replacement rates were collected using the available literature, different data sources of national authorities, and estimates of leading hip replacement manufacturers.

Results: According to administrative and literature data sources the reported crude primary THR rate varied between 50 and 130 procedures/100000 inhabitants in OECD countries in the 1990s. The crude overall hip implantation rate, summarising THR, partial hip replacement, and hip revision procedures, was reported to range from 60 to 200 procedures/100000 inhabitants in the late 1990s. Moreover, large national differences were seen in the relationship between total and partial hip replacement procedures.

Conclusion: The reported differences in hip replacement rates in OECD countries are substantial. They may be due to various causes, including different coding systems, country-specific differences in the healthcare system, in total expenditure on health per capita, in the population age structure, and in different indication criteria for THR.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Hip implantation rate per 100 000 inhabitants and total expenditure on health per capita (1998).

References

    1. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1998 Apr;27(4):274-82
    1. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1997 Nov;11(4):817-34
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Aug;(353):166-74
    1. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1998 Jun 20;142(25):1434-8
    1. Arthritis Care Res. 1998 Oct;11(5):315-25
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 1999 Apr;58(4):201-7
    1. Acta Orthop Scand. 1999 Jun;70(3):229-33
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 1999 Sep;58(9):569-72
    1. Med J Aust. 1999 Sep 6;171(5):229-30
    1. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1999;58(3):139-47
    1. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000 Apr;71(2):111-21
    1. J Rheumatol. 2000 Jul;27(7):1745-52
    1. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2001 Feb;9(2):137-46
    1. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1991;241:27-30
    1. Am J Public Health. 1991 Nov;81(11):1435-41
    1. BMJ. 1991 Dec 7;303(6815):1431-5
    1. Acta Orthop Scand. 1992 Oct;63(5):536-8
    1. Mayo Clin Proc. 1993 Jan;68(1):11-8
    1. Acta Orthop Scand. 1993 Jun;64(3):245-51
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 1995 Feb;54(2):107-10
    1. J Rheumatol. 1995 Feb;22(2):204-6
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Oct;38(10):1351-62
    1. JAMA. 1996 Mar 20;275(11):858-65
    1. Can J Surg. 1996 Oct;39(5):361-7
    1. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1996 Aug;26(1):483-91
    1. BMJ. 1996 Nov 30;313(7069):1370
    1. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1997 May-Jun;135(3):184-92
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 Nov;(344):44-60
    1. Med Health R I. 1998 May;81(5):162-4

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj