- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT04814836
Laser Etching Effect on Application Mode of Universal Adhesive
Clinical Evaluation of Cervical Composite Restorations Placed Using Universal Adhesive in Different Modes and Different Etching Methods
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
- Procedimento: Total-etch mode with 35% phosphoric acid (K-ETCHANT) (TE-A group)
- Procedimento: Selective-etch mode with 35% phosphoric acid (K-ETCHANT) (SE-A group)
- Procedimento: Total-etch mode with Er, Cr: YSGG laser (Waterlase MD) (TE-L group)
- Procedimento: Selective-etch mode with Er, Cr: YSGG laser (Waterlase MD) (SE-L group).
- Procedimento: Self-etch mode Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (Kuraray, Japan) (SE group)
Descrição detalhada
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Real)
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Locais de estudo
-
-
-
Ankara, Peru, 06100
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Dentistry
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants were 18 years of age or older,
- no possible health problems (such as allergies) related to resin-based restorations,
- good general health,
- having at least five non-carious cervical lesions.
- The depth of the lesions were at least 1 mm, without carious, not previously restored, having teeth with vital, enamel and dentin tissue.
Exclusion Criteria
- Participant had fewer than 20 teeth,
- having poor oral hygiene,
- uncontrolled periodontal disease,
- xerostomia,
- pregnancy or breastfeeding possible health problems (such as allergy) related to resin-based restorations,
- having bleaching treatment or orthodontic treatment.
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Outro: Group I
Total-etch mode with 35% phosphoric acid
|
35% phosphoric acid was applied to enamel and dentin for 10 s, washed and dried for 5 s.
The universal adhesive, Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (CBQ) was applied to enamel and dentin surfaces with a single-use applicator, then gently air-dried for 5 s without waiting, and light-cured for 10 s.
|
|
Outro: Group II
Selective-etch mode with 35% phosphoric acid
|
35% phosphoric acid was used only on enamel for 10 s, then washed and dried for 5 seconds.
Subsequently, the adhesive was applied in a similar manner to the TE-A group.
|
|
Outro: Group III
Total-etch mode with laser (Er,Cr:YSGG)
|
the enamel margin and dentin surfaces of lesions were irradiated with an Er,Cr:YSGG laser (2780 nm, Waterlase MD, BioLase Technology, Inc., San Clemente, CA).
Then the adhesive was applied in a similar manner to the TE-A group.
|
|
Outro: Group IV
Selective-etch mode with laser (Er,Cr:YSGG)
|
The laser system was applied in the same way as described in the TE-L group only on enamel surface.
Subsequently, the adhesive was applied in the same way as described in the TE-A group.
|
|
Outro: Group V
Self-etch mode
|
Universal adhesive system (CBQ) was applied to enamel and dentin surfaces without any previous etching.
Then gently air-dried for 5 s without waiting, and light-cured for 10 s.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Retention,
Prazo: From baseline to 2 year the change of restorations was evaluated
|
The retention criterion determines how long a restorative material functions in the oral environment, it is the most important criterion that shows the success of the material. Alpha: The restoration is present. Charlie: The restoration is absent. |
From baseline to 2 year the change of restorations was evaluated
|
|
Marginal Discoloration
Prazo: From baseline to 2 year the change of restorations was evaluated
|
The marginal discoloration that occur at the edge staining restoration boundaries are generally thought to be due to microleakage. Alpha: No discoloration at margins. Bravo: Shallow discoloration, clinically acceptable. Charlie: Deep discoloration clinically unacceptable. |
From baseline to 2 year the change of restorations was evaluated
|
|
Marginal Adaptation
Prazo: From baseline to 2 year the change of restorations was evaluated
|
Marginal adaptation is achieved by fully ensuring the integrity of the tooth-restoration joint border. Alpha: Restoration is closely adapted to the tooth. Bravo: Visible evidence of a crevice along the margin, dentin not exposed, clinically acceptable. Charlie: Explorer penetrates into crevice, dentin is exposed; clinically unacceptable. |
From baseline to 2 year the change of restorations was evaluated
|
|
Color match
Prazo: From baseline to 2 year the change of restorations was evaluated
|
Color match is the evaluation of the restoration according to the darkening or lightening of the color, taking into account the tooth tissue surrounding restoration. Alpha:Matches tooth. Bravo: Acceptable mismatch. Charlie:Unacceptable mismatch. |
From baseline to 2 year the change of restorations was evaluated
|
|
Post-op Hypersensitivity
Prazo: From baseline to 2 year the change of restorations was evaluated
|
Determination of sensitivity after restorations are placed.
Alpha: Absent.
Charlie: Present; clinically unacceptable.
|
From baseline to 2 year the change of restorations was evaluated
|
|
Secondary Caries
Prazo: From baseline to 2 year the change of restorations was evaluated
|
Secondary caries is the progression of caries in the tooth tissue adjacent to the restorations. Caries formation means restoration failure. Alpha: Absent. Charlie: Present; clinically unacceptable. |
From baseline to 2 year the change of restorations was evaluated
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: A. Ruya Yazici, Hacettepe University Faculty of Dentistry
Publicações e links úteis
Publicações Gerais
- Atalay C, Uslu A, Yazici AR. Does laser etching have an effect on application mode of a universal adhesive?-A microleakage and scanning electron microscopy evaluation. Microsc Res Tech. 2021 Jan;84(1):125-132. doi: 10.1002/jemt.23573. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
- Atalay C, Ozgunaltay G, Yazici AR. Thirty-six-month clinical evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Apr;24(4):1569-1578. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03052-2. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
Links úteis
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
Conclusão Primária (Real)
Conclusão do estudo (Antecipado)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- KA180076
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
produto fabricado e exportado dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .