Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Comparison of The Acute Effects of Different Stretching Methods on Ankle Joint Range In Healty Older Adults

18 de novembro de 2021 atualizado por: Kutay Kaslı, Hacettepe University

Comparison of The Acute Effects of Different Stretching Techniques on Ankle Joint Range of Motion In Healthy Older Adults: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Introduction: To compare the acute effects of different stretching methods on ankle joint range of motion (ROM) in older adults.

Methods: A total of 78 subjects aged 65 years and older were randomly divided into three groups. After the 5-minute walk, the randomly assigned method was applied. Static Stretching Group; static stretching in 3x30sec, PNF Stretching Group; PNF contract-relax in 3x30sec and Roller Massage Group; roller massage in 3x30sec was performed. Immediately after the application, 10 minutes and 20 minutes after application, the range of motion of the ankle joint was measured in the weight-bearing lunge position.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

It is planned to single-blind, randomized controlled study with before-after measurements. Considering the acute effects of stretching exercise for ankle dorsiflexion in older women, the effect size was calculated as 1.02. According to this effect size, it was planned to recruit 26 people to each group with 95% confidence level and 95% power, and 78 people in total would participate in the study. Ethics committee approval of the study was received from Dokuz Eylul University Non-Interventional Research Ethics Committee (with the decision number 2017/17-39 in the meeting dated 22.06.2017). The study was conducted under the Declaration of Helsinki standards. The participants were informed about the study by the physiotherapist and all the participants provided written informed consent to participate in the study. The study included healthy and voluntary older adults aged 65 and over who were able to walk without using an assistive device, independent in their daily life activities, and scored 23 and above according to the mini-mental state test in the study. The exclusion criteria of the study were the presence of a neurological, orthopedic or cardiovascular disease affecting the lower extremity, pain or limitation of movement in the ankle joint, skin diseases, history of falling in the last 1 year, any problem that may prevent lying prone and participation in a regular exercise program. Individuals meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to one of two different groups with the help of the Random Numbers Table. The study was terminated when the target number of participants (n=78) was reached. Static stretching was applied to the first group (n=26), PNF stretching to the second group (n=26), and roller massage to the third group (n=26). Individuals meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to one of two different groups with the help of the Random Numbers Table. The study was terminated when the target number of participants (n=78) was reached. Static stretching was applied to the first group (n=26), PNF stretching to the second group (n=26), and roller massage to the third group (n=26). (Figure 1) After the stretching method to be applied was determined randomly, the participants were asked to walk for 5 minutes in a 50-meter corridor. After warming up with this light-paced walking, applied one of the three methods. Immediately after the application, 10 minutes and 20 minutes after application, the range of motion of the ankle joint was measured in the weight-bearing lunge position.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

78

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

    • Urla
      • İzmir, Urla, Peru
        • Izmir Provincial Health Directorate State Hospital
      • İzmir, Urla, Peru
        • Izmir Provincial Health Directorate Urla State Hospital

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

65 anos e mais velhos (Adulto mais velho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Sim

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy and voluntary older adults aged 65 and over
  • Who were able to walk without using an assistive device,
  • Independent in their daily life activities
  • Who scored 23 and above according to the mini-mental state test.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of a neurological, orthopedic or cardiovascular disease affecting the lower extremity,
  • Pain or limitation of movement in the ankle joint,
  • Skin diseases,
  • History of falling in the last 1 year,
  • Any problem that may prevent lying prone
  • participation in a regular exercise program.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Dobro

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Comparador Ativo: Static Stretching Group
The static stretching method was actively applied while standing.The person was positioned facing the wall, supporting the wall with both hands, with the dominant foot behind. The point where a feeling of tension in the plantar flexor muscles was created and held in this position for 30 seconds. Afterward, a 15-second rest break was given. After completing 3 repetitions (3x30sec) in total, measurements were started.
Static stretching has been the most common stretching method applied to the ankle in healthy older adults, and different protocols have proven to increase ankle range of motion. In this study, the static stretching method was actively applied while standing.
Comparador Ativo: PNF Stretching Method Group
The person was positioned supine, and the ankle joint was dorsiflexed by the physiotherapist to the point where the tension was felt. Then, while the person was trying to push the foot towards the plantarflexion direction for 10 seconds, the movement was prevented by the physiotherapist and isometric contraction was achieved at 20% of the maximum voluntary contraction. After 10 seconds, the person was asked to relax slowly and passive stretching was applied to the plantar flexors for 20 seconds. The contract-relax technique was applied for 30 seconds and completed with 3 repetitions (3x30sec) with 15-second rest intervals.
The contract-relax technique was used in the PNF stretching method.
Comparador Ativo: Myofascial Relaxation Method Group
A comfortable position was achieved by placing a rolled towel on the front of the ankle. The roller was massaged along with the plantar flexors for 30 seconds. The movement of the cylinder from bottom to top and from top to bottom was done for a second. Three repetitions were completed (3x30sec) with a 15-second rest break. For the pressure of the roller to be stable during the application, the numbered pain scale was shown to the participants, and attention was paid to ensure that the perceived severity was 7/10 according to the numbered pain scale. Participants with dry skin in the application area were asked to moisturize with cream beforehand to avoid complications.
A theraband roller massager (Theraband®, The Hygenic Corporation, Akron, OH) was used for the myofascial relaxation method.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Range of motion
Prazo: Baseline
The ankle ROM measurement made in the standing load-bearing position and the measurement made in the weight-bearing position.
Baseline
Range of motion
Prazo: Immediately after application
The ankle ROM measurement made in the standing load-bearing position and the measurement made in the weight-bearing position.
Immediately after application
Range of motion
Prazo: 10 minutes after application
The ankle ROM measurement made in the standing load-bearing position and the measurement made in the weight-bearing position.
10 minutes after application
Range of motion
Prazo: 20 minutes after application
The ankle ROM measurement made in the standing load-bearing position and the measurement made in the weight-bearing position.
20 minutes after application

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Diretor de estudo: Ceren Devrim Şahin, MSc, Dokuz Eylul University
  • Cadeira de estudo: Nursen İlçin, Assoc. prof., Dokuz Eylul University
  • Investigador principal: Kutay Kaşlı, MSc, Çankırı Karatekin University

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

1 de outubro de 2017

Conclusão Primária (Real)

27 de fevereiro de 2018

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

27 de fevereiro de 2018

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

8 de novembro de 2021

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

18 de novembro de 2021

Primeira postagem (Real)

23 de novembro de 2021

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

23 de novembro de 2021

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

18 de novembro de 2021

Última verificação

1 de novembro de 2021

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • 2017/17-39

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

INDECISO

Descrição do plano IPD

It will be shared if it is in line with the objectives of the study.

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

3
Se inscrever