Appropriate prescribing in nursing homes demonstration project (APDP) study protocol: pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial and mixed methods process evaluation of an Ontario policy-maker initiative to improve appropriate prescribing of antipsychotics

Laura Desveaux, Tara Gomes, Mina Tadrous, Lianne Jeffs, Monica Taljaard, Jess Rogers, Chaim M Bell, Noah M Ivers, Laura Desveaux, Tara Gomes, Mina Tadrous, Lianne Jeffs, Monica Taljaard, Jess Rogers, Chaim M Bell, Noah M Ivers

Abstract

Background: Antipsychotic medications are routinely prescribed in nursing homes to address the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. Unfortunately, inappropriate prescribing of antipsychotic medications is common and associated with increased morbidity, adverse drug events, and hospitalizations. Multifaceted interventions can achieve a 12-20 % reduction in antipsychotic prescribing levels in nursing homes. Effective interventions have featured educational outreach and ongoing performance feedback.

Methods/design: This pragmatic, cluster-randomized control trial and embedded process evaluation seeks to determine the effect of adding academic detailing to audit and feedback on prescribing of antipsychotic medications in nursing homes, compared with audit and feedback alone. Nursing homes within pre-determined regions of Ontario, Canada, are eligible if they express an interest in the intervention. The academic detailing intervention will be delivered by registered health professionals following an intensive training program including relevant clinical issues and techniques to support health professional behavior change. Physicians in both groups will have the opportunity to access confidential reports summarizing their prescribing patterns for antipsychotics in comparison to the local and provincial average. Participating homes will be allocated to one of the two arms of the study (active/full intervention versus standard audit and feedback) in two waves, with a 2:1 allocation ratio. Homes will be randomized after stratifying for geography, baseline antipsychotic prescription rates, and size, to ensure a balance of characteristics. The primary outcome is antipsychotic dispensing in nursing homes, measured 6 months after allocation; secondary outcomes include clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization.

Discussion: Policy-makers and the public have taken note that antipsychotics are used in nursing homes in Ontario far more than other jurisdictions. Academic detailing can be an effective technique to address challenges in appropriate prescribing in nursing homes, but effect sizes vary widely. This opportunistic, policy-driven evaluation, embedded within a government-initiated demonstration project, was designed to ensure policy-makers receive the best evidence possible regarding whether and how to scale up the intervention.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NLM Identifier: NCT02604056 .

Keywords: Academic detailing; Antipsychotic medication; Inappropriate prescribing; Nursing home; Randomized trials.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow of participants

References

    1. Loganathan M, Singh S, Franklin BD, Bottle A, Majeed A. Interventions to optimise prescribing in care homes: systematic review. Age Ageing. 2011;40(2):150–162. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afq161.
    1. Beers MH, Ouslander JG, Fingold SF, et al. Inappropriate medication prescribing in skilled-nursing facilities. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117(8):684–689. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-117-8-684.
    1. Garcia-Gollarte F, Baleriola-Julvez J, Ferrero-Lopez I, Cuenllas-Diaz A, Cruz-Jentoft AJ. An educational intervention on drug use in nursing homes improves health outcomes resource utilization and reduces inappropriate drug prescription. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15(12):885–891. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.04.010.
    1. Rochon PA, Stukel TA, Bronskill SE, et al. Variation in nursing home antipsychotic prescribing rates. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(7):676–683. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.7.676.
    1. Thompson Coon J, Abbott R, Rogers M, et al. Interventions to reduce inappropriate prescribing of antipsychotic medications in people with dementia resident in care homes: a systematic review. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15(10):706–718. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.06.012.
    1. Price D, Hillyer EV, Molen T. Efficacy versus effectiveness trials: informing guidelines for asthma management. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;13(1):50–57. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e32835ad059.
    1. Bruser D, McLean J, Bailey A. Use of antipsychotics soaring at Ontario nursing homes. The Toronto Star. Retrieved from: .
    1. Little MO, Morley A. Reducing polypharmacy: evidence from a simple quality improvement initiative. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14(3):152–156. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.11.007.
    1. Rantz MJ, Popejoy L, Petroski GF, et al. Randomized clinical trial of a quality improvement intervention in nursing homes. Gerontologist. 2001;41(4):525–538. doi: 10.1093/geront/41.4.525.
    1. Lomas J, Brown AD. Research and advice giving: a functional view of evidence-informed policy advice in a Canadian ministry of health. Milbank Q. 2009;87(4):903–926. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00583.x.
    1. National Resource Center for Academic Detailing. 2015; . Accessed September 1, 2015, 2015.
    1. Morris JN, Fries BE, Morris SA. Scaling ADLs within the MDS. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1999;54(11):M546–M553. doi: 10.1093/gerona/54.11.M546.
    1. Fries BE, Simon SE, Morris JN, Flodstrom C, Bookstein FL. Pain in U.S. Nursing homes: validating a pain scale for the minimum data set. Gerontologist. 2001;41(2):173–179. doi: 10.1093/geront/41.2.173.
    1. Burrows AB, Morris JN, Simon SE, Hirdes JP, Phillips C. Development of a minimum data set-based depression rating scale for use in nursing homes. Age Ageing. 2000;29(2):165–172. doi: 10.1093/ageing/29.2.165.
    1. Barnett-Page E, Homas T. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:59. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-59.
    1. Grimshaw JM, Zwarenstein M, Tetroe JM, et al. Looking inside the black box: a theory-based process evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial of printed educational materials (the Ontario printed educational message, OPEM) to improve referral and prescribing practices in primary care in Ontario. Canada Implement Sci. 2007;2:38. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-38.
    1. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.
    1. Huijg JM, Gebhardt WA, Dusseldorp E, et al. Measuring determinants of implementation behavior: psychometric properties of a questionnaire based on the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci. 2014;9:33. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-33.
    1. Presseau J, Johnston M, Francis JJ, et al. Theory-based predictors of multiple clinician behaviors in the management of diabetes. J Behav Med. 2014;37(4):607–620. doi: 10.1007/s10865-013-9513-x.
    1. Davidoff F, Dixon-Woods M, Leviton L, Michie S. Demystifying theory and its use in improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24(3):228–238. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003627.
    1. Portela MC, Pronovost PJ, Woodcock T, Carter P, Dixon-Woods M. How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24(5):325–336. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003620.
    1. Reed JE, McNicholas C, Woodcock T, Issen L, Bell D. Designing quality improvement initiatives: the action effect method, a structured approach to identifying and articulating programme theory. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(12):1040–1048. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003103.
    1. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.
    1. Macfarlane A, O’Reilly-de Brun M. Using a theory-driven conceptual framework in qualitative health research. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(5):607–618. doi: 10.1177/1049732311431898.
    1. Hoddinott SN, Bass MJ. The Dillman total design survey method. Can Fam Physician. 1986;32:2366–2368.
    1. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. 2. London: Sage; 2014.
    1. Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117.
    1. Smith J, Firth J. Qualitative data analysis: the framework approach. Nurse Res. 2011;18(2):52–62. doi: 10.7748/nr2011.01.18.2.52.c8284.
    1. Yin R. Case study research: design and methods. 4. Los Angeles: Sage; 2009.
    1. Kidder L, Judd C. Research methods in social relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston; 1986.
    1. Canadian Institute of Health Information . When a nursing home is home: how do Canadian nursing homes measure up on quality? Ottawa: CIHI; 2013.
    1. Milton JC, Hill-Smith I, Jackson SH. Prescribing for older people. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2008;336(7644):606–609. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39503.424653.80.
    1. Spinewine A, Schmader KE, Barber N, et al. Appropriate prescribing in elderly people: how well can it be measured and optimised? Lancet. 2007;370(9582):173–184. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61091-5.
    1. Smeets CH, Smalbrugge M, Zuidema SU, et al. Factors related to psychotropic drug prescription for neuropsychiatric symptoms in nursing home residents with dementia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15(11):835–840. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.08.016.
    1. Kaufmann CP, Tremp R, Hersberger KE, Lampert ML. Inappropriate prescribing: a systematic overview of published assessment tools. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;70(1):1–11. doi: 10.1007/s00228-013-1575-8.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever