The impact of SASA!, a community mobilization intervention, on reported HIV-related risk behaviours and relationship dynamics in Kampala, Uganda

Nambusi Kyegombe, Tanya Abramsky, Karen M Devries, Elizabeth Starmann, Lori Michau, Janet Nakuti, Tina Musuya, Lori Heise, Charlotte Watts, Nambusi Kyegombe, Tanya Abramsky, Karen M Devries, Elizabeth Starmann, Lori Michau, Janet Nakuti, Tina Musuya, Lori Heise, Charlotte Watts

Abstract

Introduction: Intimate partner violence (IPV) violates women's human rights, and it is a serious public health concern associated with increased HIV risk. SASA!, a phased community mobilization intervention, engages communities to prevent IPV and promote gender equity. The SASA! study assessed the community-level impact of SASA! on reported HIV-related risk behaviours and relationship dynamics.

Methods: Data were collected as part of a cluster randomized controlled trial conducted between 2007 and 2012 in eight communities in Kampala. An adjusted cluster-level intention to treat analysis, compares secondary outcomes in intervention and control communities at follow-up. The qualitative evaluation explored participants' subjective experience of SASA!. A total of 82 in-depth interviews were audio recorded at follow-up, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: Men in intervention communities were significantly more likely than controls to report a broad range of HIV-protective behaviours, including higher levels of condom use (aRR 2.03, 95% CI 1.22-3.39), HIV testing (aRR 1.50, 95% CI 1.13-2.00) and fewer concurrent partners (aRR 0.60, 95% CI 0.37-0.97). They were also more likely to report increased joint decision-making (aRR 1.92, 95% CI 1.27-2.91), greater male participation in household tasks (aRR 1.48, 95% CI 1.09-2.01), more open communication and greater appreciation of their partner's work inside (aRR 1.31, 95% CI 1.04-1.66) and outside (aRR 1.49, 95% CI 1.08-2.06) the home. For women, all outcomes were in the hypothesized direction, but effect sizes were smaller. Only some achieved statistical significance. Women in intervention communities were significantly more likely to report being able to refuse sex with their partners (aRR 1.16, 95% CI 1.00-1.35), joint decision-making (aRR 1.37, 95% CI 1.06-1.78) and more open communication on a number of indicators. Qualitative interviews suggest that shifts operated through broader improvements in relationships, including increased trust and cooperation, participants' greater awareness of the connections between HIV and IPV and their resultant desire to improve their relationships. Barriers to change include partial uptake of SASA!, partner resistance, fear and entrenched previous beliefs.

Conclusions: SASA! impacted positively on reported HIV-related risk behaviours and relationship dynamics at a community level, especially among men. Social change programmes focusing on IPV and gender equity could play an important role in HIV prevention efforts.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00790959.

Keywords: HIV-related risk behaviours; SASA!; Uganda; community mobilization; intimate partner violence; relationship dynamics.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
SASA!'s intended impact on HIV-related risk behaviours and relationship dynamics.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The four phases of SASA!.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Consort diagram of the SASA! Study.
Figure A1
Figure A1
SASA! part of the fabric of the community.

References

    1. Devries KM, Mak JYT, García-Moreno C, Petzold M, Child JC, Falder G, et al. The global prevalence of intimate partner violence against women. Science. 2013;340(6140):1527–8.
    1. Ellsberg M, Jansen HA, Heise L, Watts CH, Garcia-Moreno C. Intimate partner violence and women's physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence: an observational study. Lancet. 2008;371(9619):1165–72.
    1. Stöckl H, Devries K, Rotstein A, Abrahams N, Campbell J, Watts C, et al. The global prevalence of intimate partner homicide: a systematic review. Lancet. 2013;382(9895):859–65.
    1. Devries KM, Mak JY, Bacchus LJ, Child JC, Falder G, Petzold M, et al. Intimate partner violence and incident depressive symptoms and suicide attempts: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. PLoS Med. 2013;10(5):e1001439.
    1. Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen H, Ellsberg M, Heise L, Watts C. Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence. Lancet. 2006;368:1260–9.
    1. Maman S, Campbell J, Sweat MD, Gielen AC. The intersections of HIV and violence: directions for future research and interventions. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50(4):459–78.
    1. Jewkes RK, Dunkle K, Nduna M, Shai N. Intimate partner violence, relationship power inequity, and incidence of HIV infection in young women in South Africa: a cohort study. Lancet. 2010;376(9734):41–8.
    1. Dunkle KL, Jewkes RK, Nduna M, Levin J, Jama N, Khuzwayo N, et al. Perpetration of partner violence and HIV risk behaviour among young men in the rural Eastern Cape, South Africa. AIDS. 2006;20(16):2107–14.
    1. Kouyoumdjian FG, Calzavara LM, Bondy SJ, O'Campo P, Serwadda D, Nalugoda F, et al. Intimate partner violence is associated with incident HIV infection in women in Uganda. AIDS. 2013;27(8):1331–8. doi: 10.097/QAD.0b013e32835fd851.
    1. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2012. Global report: UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic.
    1. Maman S, Mbwambo J, Hogan N, Kilonzo G, Sweat M. Women's barriers to HIV-1 testing and disclosure: challenges for HIV-1 voluntary counselling and testing. AIDS Care. 2001;13:595–603.
    1. World Health Organization. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006. Addressing violence against women in HIV testing and counselling: a meeting report.
    1. Dunkle KL, Jewkes RK, Brown HC, Gray GE, McIntryre JA, Harlow SD. Gender-based violence, relationship power, and risk of HIV infection in women attending antenatal clinics in South Africa. Lancet. 2004;363(9419):1415–21.
    1. World Health Organization, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. Preventing intimate partner violence against women: taking action and generating evidence.
    1. Heise L. London: STRIVE Research Consortium; 2011. What works to prevent partner violence: an evidence overview.
    1. Pronyk P, Hargreaves J, Kim J, Morison L, Phetla G, Watts C, et al. Effect of a structural intervention for the prevention of intimate-partner violence and HIV in rural South Africa: a cluster randomised trial. Lancet. 2006;368:1973–83.
    1. Jewkes R, Nduna M, Levin J, Jama N, Dunkle K, Puren A, et al. Impact of stepping stones on incidence of HIV and HSV-2 and sexual behaviour in rural South Africa: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2008;337:a506.
    1. Verma R, Pulerwitz J, Mahendra VS, Singh AK, Das SS, Mehra S, et al. Promoting gender equity as a strategy to reduce HIV risk and gender-based violence among young men in India. Washington, DC: Population Council; 2008.
    1. Pronyk P, Kim J, Abramsky T, Phetla G, Hargreaves J, Morison L, et al. A combined microfinance and training intervention can reduce HIV risk behaviour in young female participants. AIDS. 2008;22:1659–65.
    1. Kim J, Watts C, Hargreaves J, Ndhlovu L, Phetla G, Morison L, et al. Understanding the impact of a microfinance-based intervention on women's empowerment and the reduction of intimate partner violence in South Africa. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:1794–802.
    1. Michau L. The SASA! Activist kit for preventing violence against women and HIV. Kampala, Uganda: Raising Voices; 2008.
    1. Abramsky T, Devries KM, Kiss L, Nakuti J, Kyegombe N, Starmann E, et al. Findings from the SASA! Study: a cluster randomised controlled trial to assess the impact of a community mobilisation intervention to prevent violence against women and reduce HIV risk in Kampala, Uganda. BMC Med. 2014;12(1):122.
    1. Abramsky T, Devries K, Kiss L, Francisco L, Nakuti J, Musuya T, et al. A community mobilisation intervention to prevent violence against women and reduce HIV/AIDS risk in Kampala, Uganda (the SASA! Study): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2012;13(1):96.
    1. Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS), Macro International Inc. Calverton, MD: UBOS; 2007. Uganda Demographic and Health Survey 2006.
    1. Uganda Ministry of Health, ICF International. Calverton, MD: MOH; 2012. 2011 Uganda AIDS indicator survey: key findings.
    1. Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen H, Ellsberg M, Heise L, Watts C. WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence against women. Geneva: WHO; 2005.
    1. Stata Corp. 12.0. Houston, TX: Stata Corp; 2012. Intercooled Stata.
    1. QSR International Pty Ltd. 2012. NVivo qualitative data analysis software.
    1. Watts C, Heise L, Ellsberg M, Garcia-Moreno C. In: Putting women's safety first: ethical and safety recommendations for research on domestic violence against women. WHO, editor. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1999.
    1. Kyegombe N, Starmann E, Devries KM, Michau L, Nakuti J, Musuya T, et al. “SASA! is the medicine that treats violence.” Qualitative findings on how a community mobilisation intervention to prevent violence against women created change in Kampala, Uganda. Glob Health Action. 2014;7(8) 25082, .
    1. Dahlberg LL, Krug EG. Violence – a global public health problem. In: Krug EG, Dahlberg LL, Mercy JA, Zwi AB, Lozano R, editors. World report on violence and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. pp. 1–21.
    1. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behaviour change. Am J Health Promot. 1997;12(1):38–48.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever