The SASA! Study: An Evaluation of a Community Intervention to Address Gender-based Violence and Reduce HIV/AIDS Risk in Uganda (SASA!)

February 21, 2012 updated by: Charlotte Watts, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

The SASA! Study: a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of a Community Mobilisation Intervention to Prevention Violence Against Women and Reduce HIV/AIDS Risk in Kampala, Uganda

The SASA! Study is a cluster randomized trial of a community mobilization intervention for the prevention of HIV and gender based violence. The study is being conducted in Kampala, Uganda.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background : Physical and sexual violence against women is widespread in Uganda, and is increasingly recognized as a major global social, public health and human rights problem. Epidemiological evidence demonstrates that violence may also be intimately tied in with HIV risk, with violence being both a risk factor for and a consequence of HIV infection.Behaviours that often form the cornerstone of HIV prevention messages such as refusal of sex, inquiring about other partners, or suggesting condom use, have all been identified as triggers of intimate partner violence (IPV) in various settings.

There is now growing interest in integrated HIV/violence prevention strategies to tackle the underlying notions of masculinity that condone both male infidelity and male control over women. Promising research from South Africa and Brazil suggests that interventions which explicitly aim to challenge gender inequalities (either through economic empowerment of women or discussion with men and women about gender inequalities, norms and their implications), may influence levels of violence and HIV risk behaviours. However, such interventions remain few in number, as do scientifically rigorous evaluations of them.

Intervention Design :

SASA! uses a community mobilization approach to address gender inequity and try to change attitudes and behaviours that support both HIV risk behaviours and the perpetration of violence against women.

SASA! supports communities through a four-phase process of social change (based on a social-level adaptation of the Stages of Change Theory):

  1. Start to think about violence against women and HIV/AIDS as interconnected issues and the need to personally address these issues
  2. Awareness raising about how communities accept men's use of power over women, fueling violence against women and HIV/AIDS
  3. Support women and men directly affected by/involved in these issues to change
  4. Action to prevent violence against women and HIV/AIDS

The intervention team engages with four major groups of actors: community volunteers selected from the general public; community leaders (e.g. religious, cultural and local council leaders); resource persons (health care providers, police, etc); and institutional leaders. The community volunteers are key agents to raise awareness about power imbalances between men and women, discuss the impacts of HIV and violence against women, discuss the benefits of non-violence and gender equity, and most importantly to mobilize others in the community to take action thereby promoting sustainable change.

Study design:

The SASA! Study randomized four pairs of communities that were matched on population density and stability/transience. The intervention communities received the SASA! intervention from early 2008. Comparison communities will receive the intervention approximately three years later.

A cross-sectional survey will be conducted among community members prior to the implementation of SASA! in their communities. Another cross-sectional survey was initially planned for three years post-implementation, but later delayed to four years post-implementation due to political disturbances that caused interruptions to programme activity. The primary outcomes are: past year experience of physical IPV (among partnered women); past year experience of sexual IPV (among partnered women); acceptability of violence against women; acceptability of a woman refusing sex; community response to women experiencing violence (among women reporting past year physical and/or sexual IPV); and past year concurrent sexual partners (among partnered men). Data analysis will be appropriate to the cluster-randomized study design. The target sample size per arm at each round of data collection is 800.

Complementary qualitative and quantitative data will also be collected (from community volunteers and resource people as well as from community members) to document processes of change and potential pathways of impact.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

800

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kampala, Uganda
        • Recruiting
        • Raising Voices
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lori Michau, MA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 49 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Lived in the community for at least one year
  • Aged 18-49 years
  • Satisfy gender requirement for sampling sub-cluster

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: SASA!

A community mobilization approach to try to change community and individual attitudes and behaviours that support both the perpetration of violence against women and HIV risk behaviours

The intervention team engages with four major groups of actors: community volunteers selected from the general public; community leaders (e.g. religious, cultural and local council leaders); resource persons (health care providers, police, etc); and institutional leaders. The community volunteers are a key component of the intensive intervention.

ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Control

Control communities will receive the full SASA! intervention after completion of the SASA! Study.

For the duration of the study, they will receive a less intensive intervention comprising the Division-level elements of SASA! (involving community leaders, resource persons and institutional leaders) without the community volunteers.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Past year experience of physical violence by an intimate partner (among women partnered in past year)
Time Frame: 4 years after intervention implementation
4 years after intervention implementation
Past year experience of sexual violence by an intimate partner (among women partnered in the past year)
Time Frame: 4 years after intervention implementation
4 years after intervention implementation
Acceptability of violence against women
Time Frame: 4 years after intervention implementation
4 years after intervention implementation
Acceptability of a woman refusing sex
Time Frame: 4 years after intervention implementation
4 years after intervention implementation
Community response to women experiencing physical and/or sexual IPV in past year (among women reporting physical/sexual IPV in past year)
Time Frame: 4 years after intervention implementation
4 years after intervention implementation
Past year concurrent sexual partner (among men partnered in past year)
Time Frame: 4 years after intervention implementation
4 years after intervention implementation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Charlotte Watts, PhD, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2007

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

May 1, 2012

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

May 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2008

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 14, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 22, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2012

Last Verified

February 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV

Clinical Trials on SASA!

Subscribe