Self-Management in Long-Term Prostate Cancer Survivors: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Ted A Skolarus, Tabitha Metreger, Daniela Wittmann, Soohyun Hwang, Hyungjin Myra Kim, Robert L Grubb 3rd, Jeffrey R Gingrich, Hui Zhu, John D Piette, Sarah T Hawley, Ted A Skolarus, Tabitha Metreger, Daniela Wittmann, Soohyun Hwang, Hyungjin Myra Kim, Robert L Grubb 3rd, Jeffrey R Gingrich, Hui Zhu, John D Piette, Sarah T Hawley

Abstract

Purpose: This randomized clinical trial compared a personally tailored, automated telephone symptom management intervention to improve self-management among long-term survivors of prostate cancer with usual care enhanced with a nontailored newsletter about symptom management. We hypothesized that intervention-group participants would have more confident symptom self-management and reduced symptom burden.

Methods: A total of 556 prostate cancer survivors who, more than 1 year after treatment, were experiencing symptom burden were recruited from April 2015 to February 2017 across four Veterans Affairs sites. Participants were randomly assigned to intervention (n = 278) or usual care (n = 278) groups. We compared differences in the primary (symptom burden according to Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 [EPIC], confidence in self-management) and secondary outcomes between groups using intent-to-treat analyses. We compared domain-specific changes in symptom burden from baseline to 5 and 12 months among the intervention group according to the primary symptom focus area (urinary, bowel, sexual, general) of participants.

Results: Most of the prostate cancer survivors in this study were married (54.3%), were white (69.2%), were retired (62.4%), and underwent radiation therapy (56.7% v 46.2% who underwent surgery), and the mean age was 67 years. There were no baseline differences in urinary, bowel, sexual, or hormonal domain EPIC scores across groups. We observed higher EPIC scores in the intervention arm in all domain areas at 5 months, though differences were not statistically significant. No differences were found in secondary outcomes; however, coping appraisal was higher (2.8 v 2.6; P = .02) in intervention-arm patients at 5 months. In subgroup analyses, intervention participants reported improvement from baseline at 5 and 12 months in their symptom focus area domains.

Conclusion: This intervention was well received among veterans who were long-term survivors of prostate cancer. Although overall outcome differences were not observed across groups, the intervention tailored to symptom area of choice may hold promise to improve associated burden.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01900561.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Study flow. EPIC, Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26.
FIG A1.
FIG A1.
Building Your New Normal, a tailored self-management newsletter.
FIG A1.
FIG A1.
Building Your New Normal, a tailored self-management newsletter.
FIG A1.
FIG A1.
Building Your New Normal, a tailored self-management newsletter.
FIG A1.
FIG A1.
Building Your New Normal, a tailored self-management newsletter.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever