Optimizing Veteran-Centered Prostate Cancer Survivorship Care

This study will provide much needed information about how to optimize the quality of care and quality of life of Veterans who are survivors of prostate cancer.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Prostate Cancer
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Interactive Voice Response Symptom Management; Behavioral: Tailored Newsletters

Detailed Description

Although there are nearly 150,000 prostate cancer survivors in the VA, there has been little research to understand and improve survivorship care for this large population of Veterans. A substantial proportion of prostate cancer survivors in the general population have significant side effects from treatment (surgery or radiation therapy) that often persist for years, including incontinence, erectile dysfunction, and metabolic syndrome, all of which can contribute to decreased quality of life. The investigators' pilot data suggests that VA prostate cancer survivors experience similar or worse symptom burden to that of the general population of survivors. To address the need to improve patient-centered survivorship care management for Veterans with prostate cancer, the investigators propose a 4 year study with two aims: 1) to conduct a randomized controlled trial to compare a personally tailored automated telephone symptom management intervention for improving symptoms and symptom self-management to usual care. The investigators expect that those in the intervention group will have more confidence in symptom self-management and better symptom self-management and prostate cancer quality of life following the intervention, and that these outcomes will translate to more efficient use of services for these Veterans, and 2) to compare utilization of services among those in the intervention group to those in the control group.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 556
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Michigan
    • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48105
      • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
  • Missouri
    • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63106
      • St. Louis VA Medical Center John Cochran Division, St. Louis, MO
  • Ohio
    • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
      • Louis Stokes VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
  • Pennsylvania
    • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15240
      • VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive Division, Pittsburgh, PA

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 40 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Veteran patient at one of the four study sites (Ann Arbor VA, Cleveland VA, Pittsburgh VA, St. Louis VA)
• History of treatment for prostate cancer treated by surgery, radiation or androgen deprivation therapy between 1-10 years prior to identification

Exclusion Criteria:

• No phone number on file
• Not able to converse on the telephone in English
• Treated for metastatic disease or non-prostate cancer
• Dementia or other significant mental impairment

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: IVR Intervention; The intervention will consist of two components, both with content design based on established theories for self-management support: 1) automated telephone monitoring of PC survivor symptoms and goals for symptom reduction, based on a patient empowerment approach, and 2) personally tailored newsletters that incorporate elements of CBT to improve survivors' identification with the material, confidence/self-efficacy in symptom management, and to reduce common cognitive distortions related to successful implementation of behavior change. Intervention-group participants will receive four automated assessment and self-management support calls over a 3-month period (at baseline, 1-month, 2-month, 3-months). Information collected during automated phone assessments will be used to construct tailored newsletters, which will be sent following each automated call.	Behavioral: Interactive Voice Response Symptom Management; The Interactive Voice Response (IVR) system will provide automated telephone monitoring of PC survivor symptoms and goals for symptom reduction, based on a patient empowerment approach.; Behavioral: Tailored Newsletters; Personally tailored newsletters will incorporate elements of CBT to improve survivors' identification with the material, confidence/self-efficacy in symptom management, and to reduce common cognitive distortions related to successful implementation of behavior change. Information collected during automated phone assessments will be used to construct tailored newsletters, which will be sent following each automated call.
No Intervention: Enhanced Usual Care; Because of the strong evidence documenting symptom burden in PC survivors, the investigators believe that providing control subjects with some information about symptom self-management is warranted. The investigators further believe, based on the investigators' prior experience conducting RCTs, that offering some type of educational material for Veterans randomized to the control arm will increase their willingness to enroll in the study (as opposed to a pure usual care arm where they would not receive any such materials). Therefore, survivors randomized to the control condition will receive written material at the time of enrollment designed to educate them about PC symptoms and symptom management. Material will be approximately six pages in length, also written at or below an 8th grade reading level, and will include a summary of common symptoms experienced by prostate cancer survivors.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - Urinary Health, Irritative	The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.	Baseline
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - Urinary Health, Obstructive	The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.	Baseline
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - Bowel Health	The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.	Baseline
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - Sexual Health	The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.	Baseline
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - General Health	The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.	Baseline
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - EPIC-26 Mean	The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores. The EPIC-26 mean is the average of the five EPIC subscales.	Baseline
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - Urinary Health, Irritative	The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.	5 Months
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - Urinary Health, Obstructive	The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.	5 Months
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - Bowel Health	The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.	5 Months
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - Sexual Health	The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.	5 Months
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - General Health	The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.	5 Months
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - Urinary Health, Irritative	The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.	12 Months
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - Urinary Health, Obstructive	The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.	12 Months
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - Bowel Health	The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.	12 Months
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - Sexual Health	The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.	12 Months
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - General Health	The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.	12 Months
Confidence in Symptom Self-Management	Confidence in symptom self-management was measured using a 5-item scale developed from our pilot work. Scores range from 5 to 15 with higher scores indicating higher level of confidence.	5 months
Confidence in Symptom Self-Management	Confidence in symptom self-management was measured using a 5-item scale developed from our pilot work. Scores range from 5 to 15 with higher scores indicating higher level of confidence.	12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Cancer Control	We assessed perceived cancer control and outlook using five items from a validated measure developed to examine the psychosocial impact of prostate cancer. This measure, the Measuring Patients' Perceptions of the Outcomes of Treatment for Early PC instrument by Clark et al., includes three domains related to confidence that one's cancer is under control, worries about recurrence, and appraisals of one's coping with PC. Cancer control was assessed during the five- and 12-month follow-ups using two cancer control items from the instrument. Scores range from 2 to 10 and higher scores indicate higher confidence that cancer is under control.	5 months
Cancer Control	We assessed perceived cancer control and outlook using five items from a validated measure developed to examine the psychosocial impact of prostate cancer. This measure, the Measuring Patients' Perceptions of the Outcomes of Treatment for Early PC instrument by Clark et al., includes three domains related to confidence that one's cancer is under control, worries about recurrence, and appraisals of one's coping with PC. Cancer control was assessed during the five- and 12-month follow-ups using two cancer control items from the instrument. Scores range from 2 to 10 and higher scores indicate higher confidence that cancer is under control.	12 months
Cancer Outlook	We assessed perceived cancer control and outlook using five items from a validated measure developed to examine the psychosocial impact of prostate cancer. This measure, the Measuring Patients' Perceptions of the Outcomes of Treatment for Early PC instrument by Clark et al., includes three domains related to confidence that one's cancer is under control, worries about recurrence, and appraisals of one's coping with PC. Cancer outlook was assessed during the five- and 12-month follow-ups using three cancer outlook items from the instrument. Scores range from 3 to 15 and higher scores indicate more positive cancer outlook.	5 months
Cancer Outlook	We assessed perceived cancer control and outlook using five items from a validated measure developed to examine the psychosocial impact of prostate cancer. This measure, the Measuring Patients' Perceptions of the Outcomes of Treatment for Early PC instrument by Clark et al., includes three domains related to confidence that one's cancer is under control, worries about recurrence, and appraisals of one's coping with PC. Cancer outlook was assessed during the five- and 12-month follow-ups using three cancer outlook items from the instrument. Scores range from 3 to 15 and higher scores indicate more positive cancer outlook.	12 months
Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI) - 5-item Short Form	Self-efficacy in patient-physician interactions was assessed at 5 and 12 months using a five-item short form version of the Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI). The PEPPI was developed to measure older patients' self-efficacy in obtaining medical information and attention to their medical concerns from physicians. Scores range from 0-25 with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy.	5 months
Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI) - 5-item Short Form	Self-efficacy in patient-physician interactions was assessed at 5 and 12 months using a five-item short form version of the Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI). The PEPPI was developed to measure older patients' self-efficacy in obtaining medical information and attention to their medical concerns from physicians. Scores range from 0-25 with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy.	12 months
Brief Cope - 6 Items	We assessed participants' coping during the five- and 12-month follow-up assessments using six items from the 28-item Brief Cope instrument. This instrument measures emotion-focused, problem-focused, and dysfunctional coping and has been used in cancer survivors. Scores range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating better coping skills.	5 months
Brief Cope - 6 Items	We assessed participants' coping during the five- and 12-month follow-up assessments using six items from the 28-item Brief Cope instrument. This instrument measures emotion-focused, problem-focused, and dysfunctional coping and has been used in cancer survivors. Scores range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating better coping skills.	12 months
Veteran Quality of Life Scale (VR-12) - Physical Health, 2 Items	We assessed subjective physical health using 2 items from the VR-12 (SF-12 for veterans), an established measure of overall QOL that includes perceptions of one's health that may be impacted by prostate cancer. The scores range from 1- 3 and higher scores correspond to better health.	12 months
Veteran Quality of Life Scale (VR-12) - Emotional Health, 3 Items	We assessed subjective emotional health using 3 items from the VR-12 (SF-12 for veterans), an established measure of overall QOL that includes perceptions of one's health that may be impacted by prostate cancer. The scores range from 1- 6 and higher scores correspond to better health.	12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: VA Office of Research and Development
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Sarah T Hawley, PhD MPH BA, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Telem DA, Dimick J, Skolarus TA. Dissecting Surgeon Behavior: Leveraging the Theoretical Domains Framework to Facilitate Evidence-based Surgical Practice. Ann Surg. 2018 Mar;267(3):432-434. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002506. No abstract available.
• Skolarus TA, Wittmann D, Hawley ST. Enhancing prostate cancer survivorship care through self-management. Urol Oncol. 2017 Sep;35(9):564-568. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
• Skolarus TA, Metreger T, Hwang S, Kim HM, Grubb RL 3rd, Gingrich JR, Hawley ST. Optimizing veteran-centered prostate cancer survivorship care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Apr 18;18(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1925-4.
• Skolarus TA, Metreger T, Wittmann D, Hwang S, Kim HM, Grubb RL 3rd, Gingrich JR, Zhu H, Piette JD, Hawley ST. Self-Management in Long-Term Prostate Cancer Survivors: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 20;37(15):1326-1335. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01770. Epub 2019 Mar 29.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): April 17, 2015
• Primary Completion (Actual): February 7, 2018
• Study Completion (Actual): February 7, 2018

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: July 2, 2013
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 15, 2013
• First Posted (Estimate): July 16, 2013

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): May 7, 2019
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 25, 2019
• Last Verified: April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: prostate cancer; telemedicine; intervention; survivorship
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Neoplasms; Urogenital Neoplasms; Neoplasms by Site; Genital Neoplasms, Male; Prostatic Diseases; Prostatic Neoplasms
• Other Study ID Numbers: IIR 12-116

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: No