Proactive infliximab optimisation using a pharmacokinetic dashboard versus standard of care in patients with Crohn's disease: study protocol for a randomised, controlled, multicentre, open-label study (the OPTIMIZE trial)

Konstantinos Papamichael, Vipul Jairath, Guangyong Zou, Benjamin Cohen, Timothy Ritter, Bruce Sands, Corey Siegel, John Valentine, Michelle Smith, Niels Vande Casteele, Marla Dubinsky, Adam Cheifetz, Konstantinos Papamichael, Vipul Jairath, Guangyong Zou, Benjamin Cohen, Timothy Ritter, Bruce Sands, Corey Siegel, John Valentine, Michelle Smith, Niels Vande Casteele, Marla Dubinsky, Adam Cheifetz

Abstract

Introduction: Preliminary data indicates that proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is associated with better outcomes compared with empiric dose escalation and/or reactive TDM, and that pharmacokinetic (PK) modelling can improve the precision of individual dosing schedules in Crohn's disease (CD). However, there are no data regarding the utility of a proactive TDM combined PK-dashboard starting early during the induction phase, when disease activity and drug clearance are greatest. The aim of this randomised, controlled, multicentre, open-label trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a proactive TDM combined PK dashboard-driven infliximab dosing compared with standard of care (SOC) dosing in patients with moderately to severely active CD.

Methods and analysis: Eligible adolescent and adult (aged ≥16-80 years) patients with moderately to severely active CD will be randomised 1:1 to receive either infliximab monotherapy with proactive TDM using a PK dashboard (iDose, Projections Research) or SOC infliximab therapy, with or without a concomitant immunomodulator (IMM) (thiopurine or methotrexate) at the discretion of the investigator. The primary outcome of the study is the proportion of subjects with sustained corticosteroid-free clinical remission and no need for rescue therapy from week 14 throughout week 52. Rescue therapy is defined as any IFX dose escalation other than what is forecasted by iDose either done empirically or based on reactive TDM; addition of an IMM after week 2; reintroduction of corticosteroids after initial tapering; switch to another biologic or need for CD-related surgery. The secondary outcomes will include both efficacy and safety end points, such as endoscopic and biological remission, durability of response and CD-related surgery and hospitalisation.

Ethics and dissemination: The protocol has been approved by the Institutional Review Board Committee of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (IRB#:2021P000391). Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific meetings.

Trial registration number: NCT04835506.

Keywords: clinical pharmacology; immunology; inflammatory bowel disease.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: ASC: reports consultancy fees from Janssen, AbbVie, Artugen, Procise, Prometheus, Arena, Grifols, Bacainn, Bristol Myers Squibb. VJ has received consulting/advisory board fees from AbbVie, Alimentiv (formerly Robarts Clinical Trials), Arena Pharmaceuticals, Asieris, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Genetech, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Mylan, Pandion, Pendopharm, Pfizer, Reistone Biopharma, Roche, Sandoz, Takeda, Teva, Topivert; speaker’s fees from, AbbVie, Ferring, Galapagos, Janssen Pfizer Shire, Takeda. CS: reports consultancy fees from AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer, Prometheus, Takeda, Trellus Health; speaker's fees for CME activities for AbbVie, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda; grant support from the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation, Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, AbbVie, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda; intellectual property owned by MiTest Health (Software Company) and ColonaryConcepts; equity interest and co-founder of MiTest Health and ColonaryConcepts. KP reports lecture fees from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma and Physicians Education Resource; consultancy fee from Prometheus Laboratories and scientific advisory board fees from ProciseDx and Scipher Medicine Corporation. JFV: reports research support from Roche/Genentech, Takeda, Applied Molecular Transport, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Arena Pharmaceuticals. GZ: reports consulting fees from Alimentiv. BC: reports financial support for advisory boards and consultancy from AbbVie, Celgene-Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Sublimity Therapeutics, Takeda, TARGET RWE; CME Companies: Cornerstones, Vindico; speaker's fees from AbbVie; educational grant from Pfizer. MD: reports consultancy fees from AbbVie, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim International, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cengene, Eli Lilly and Company, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen Global Services, Pfizer, Prometheus Biosciences, Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, UCB SA; research grants from AbbVie, Janssen Global Services, Pfizer, Prometheus Biosciences; ownership interest (stocks) Trellus Health and holds licensing fee with Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA. TR: reports speaker's fees from Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb; data adjudication committee fees from Ferring/Rebiotix; advisory boards fees from AbbVie, Arena, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Coral Genomics (and shareholder), Ferring, Genentech/Roche, Gilead, Gossamer, Intercept, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Prometheus, Sanofi, Takeda. BES: discloses research grants from Takeda, Pfizer, Theravance Biopharma R&D, Janssen; consulting fees from 4D Pharma, Abivax, AbbVie, Alimentiv, Allergan, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Bacainn Therapeutics, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Bristol yers Squibb, Calibr, Capella Bioscience, Celgene, Celltrion Healthcare, ClostraBio, Enthera, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ferring, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, GossamerBio, Immunic, Index Pharmaceuticals, Innovation Pharmaceuticals, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Kaleido, Kallyope, Lilly, MiroBio, Morphic Therapeutic, Oppilan Pharma, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Otsuka, Palatin Technologies, Pfizer, Progenity, Prometheus Biosciences, Prometheus Laboratories, Protagonist Therapeutics, Q32 Bio, Redhill Biopharma, Rheos Medicines, Salix Pharmaceuticals, Seres Therapeutics, Shire, Sienna Biopharmaceuticals, Sun Pharma, Surrozen, Takeda, Target PharmaSolutions, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Thelium, Theravance Biopharma R&D, TLL Pharma, USWM Enterprises, Ventyx Biosciences, Viela Bio, Vivante Health, Vivelix Pharmaceuticals; and stock for Vivante Health and Ventyx Biosciences. NVC: received research grants from R-Biopharm, Takeda and UCB; and personal fees from AcelaBio, Alimentiv, Celltrion, ProciseDX, Prometheus, R-Biopharm, Takeda, UCB, Ventyx and Vividion. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
OPTIMIZE trial study design. CD, Crohn’s disease; CS, corticosteroid; IMM, immunomodulator; IFX, infliximab; MTX, methotrexate; PK, pharmacokinetic; TDM, therapeutic drug monitoring; w, week.

References

    1. Torres J, Mehandru S, Colombel J-F, et al. . Crohn’s disease. The Lancet 2017;389:1741–55. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31711-1
    1. Ng SC, Shi HY, Hamidi N, et al. . Worldwide incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in the 21st century: a systematic review of population-based studies. Lancet 2017;390:2769–78. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32448-0
    1. Papamichael K, Lin S, Moore M, et al. . Infliximab in inflammatory bowel disease. Ther Adv Chronic Dis 2019;10:2040622319838443. 10.1177/2040622319838443
    1. Colombel JF, Sandborn WJ, Reinisch W, et al. . Infliximab, azathioprine, or combination therapy for Crohn's disease. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1383–95. 10.1056/NEJMoa0904492
    1. Khanna R, Bressler B, Levesque BG, et al. . Early combined immunosuppression for the management of Crohn's disease (react): a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015;386:1825–34. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00068-9
    1. Papamichael K, Mantzaris GJ, Peyrin-Biroulet L. A safety assessment of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy for treatment of Crohn's disease. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2016;15:493–501. 10.1517/14740338.2016.1145653
    1. Singh S, Facciorusso A, Dulai PS, et al. . Comparative risk of serious infections with biologic and/or immunosuppressive therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;18:69–81. 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.02.044
    1. Chan W, Chen A, Tiao D, et al. . Medication adherence in inflammatory bowel disease. Intest Res 2017;15:434–45. 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.434
    1. Brady JE, Stott-Miller M, Mu G, et al. . Treatment patterns and sequencing in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Ther 2018;40:1509–21. 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.07.013
    1. Siegel CA, Thompson KD, Walls D, et al. . Perspectives from patients and gastroenterologists on de-escalating therapy for Crohn's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;19:403–5. 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.11.062
    1. Fine S, Papamichael K, Cheifetz AS. Etiology and management of lack or loss of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;15:656–65.
    1. Vermeire S, Dreesen E, Papamichael K, et al. . How, when, and for whom should we perform therapeutic drug monitoring? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;18:1291–9. 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.09.041
    1. Sparrow MP, Papamichael K, Ward MG, et al. . Therapeutic drug monitoring of biologics during induction to prevent primary non-response. J Crohns Colitis 2020;14:542–56. 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz162
    1. Vaughn BP, Martinez-Vazquez M, Patwardhan VR, et al. . Proactive therapeutic concentration monitoring of infliximab may improve outcomes for patients with inflammatory bowel disease: results from a pilot observational study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2014;20:1996–2003. 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000156
    1. Papamichael K, Vajravelu RK, Vaughn BP, et al. . Proactive infliximab monitoring following reactive testing is associated with better clinical outcomes than reactive testing alone in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis 2018;12:804–10. 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy039
    1. Papamichael K, Chachu KA, Vajravelu RK, et al. . Improved long-term outcomes of patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving proactive compared with reactive monitoring of serum concentrations of infliximab. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;15:1580–8. 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.03.031
    1. Vande Casteele N, Ferrante M, Van Assche G, et al. . Trough concentrations of infliximab guide dosing for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 2015;148:1320–9. 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.02.031
    1. Colman RJ, Tsai Y-T, Jackson K, et al. . Achieving target infliximab drug concentrations improves blood and fecal neutrophil biomarkers in Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2021;27:1045–51. 10.1093/ibd/izaa241
    1. Kennedy NA, Heap GA, Green HD, et al. . Predictors of anti-TNF treatment failure in anti-TNF-naive patients with active luminal Crohn's disease: a prospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;4:341–53. 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30012-3
    1. Cheifetz AS, Abreu MT, Afif W, et al. . A comprehensive literature review and expert consensus statement on therapeutic drug monitoring of biologics in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2021;116:2014–25. 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001396
    1. Reinisch W, Colombel J-F, Sandborn WJ, et al. . Factors associated with short- and long-term outcomes of therapy for Crohn's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;13:539–47. 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.09.031
    1. Ungar B, Levy I, Yavne Y, et al. . Optimizing Anti-TNF-α Therapy: Serum Levels of Infliximab and Adalimumab Are Associated With Mucosal Healing in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;14:550–7. 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.10.025
    1. Dreesen E, Baert F, Laharie D, et al. . Monitoring a combination of calprotectin and infliximab identifies patients with mucosal healing of Crohn's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;18:637–46. 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.05.029
    1. Lega S, Phan BL, Rosenthal CJ, et al. . Proactively optimized infliximab monotherapy is as effective as combination therapy in IBD. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2019;25:134–41. 10.1093/ibd/izy203
    1. Drobne D, Kurent T, Golob S, et al. . Optimised infliximab monotherapy is as effective as optimised combination therapy, but is associated with higher drug consumption in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2019;49:880–9. 10.1111/apt.15179
    1. Colombel J-F, Adedokun OJ, Gasink C, et al. . Combination therapy with infliximab and azathioprine improves infliximab pharmacokinetic features and efficacy: a post hoc analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;17:1525–32. 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.09.033
    1. Ungaro RC, Colombel J-F, Dubinsky MC, et al. . Impact of thiopurine exposure on immunogenicity to infliximab is negligible in the setting of elevated infliximab concentrations. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2021:izab232. 10.1093/ibd/izab232
    1. Ordás I, Mould DR, Feagan BG, et al. . Anti-Tnf monoclonal antibodies in inflammatory bowel disease: pharmacokinetics-based dosing paradigms. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2012;91:635–46. 10.1038/clpt.2011.328
    1. Santacana E, Rodríguez-Alonso L, Padullés A, et al. . Predictors of infliximab trough concentrations in inflammatory bowel disease patients using a repeated-measures design. Ther Drug Monit 2020;42:102–10. 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000669
    1. Shannahan SE, Papamichael K, Cheifetz AS. Evidence supporting high-dose use of biologics in clinical practice. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2020;18:408–22. 10.1007/s11938-020-00302-1
    1. Dubinsky MC, Mendiolaza ML, Phan BL, et al. . Dashboard-driven accelerated infliximab induction dosing increases infliximab durability and reduces immunogenicity. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2022:izab285. 10.1093/ibd/izab285
    1. Dubinsky MC, Phan BL, Singh N, et al. . Pharmacokinetic dashboard-recommended dosing is different than standard of care dosing in infliximab-treated pediatric IBD patients. Aaps J 2017;19:215–22. 10.1208/s12248-016-9994-y
    1. Eser A, Primas C, Reinisch S, et al. . Prediction of individual serum infliximab concentrations in inflammatory bowel disease by a Bayesian dashboard system. J Clin Pharmacol 2018;58:790–802. 10.1002/jcph.1069
    1. Strik AS, Löwenberg M, Mould DR, et al. . Efficacy of dashboard driven dosing of infliximab in inflammatory bowel disease patients; a randomized controlled trial. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021;56:145–54. 10.1080/00365521.2020.1856405
    1. Gil Candel M, Gascón Cánovas JJ, Gómez Espín R, et al. . Usefulness of population pharmacokinetics to optimize the dosage regimen of infliximab in inflammatory bowel disease patients. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2020;112:590–7. 10.17235/reed.2020.6857/2020
    1. Bauman LE, Xiong Y, Mizuno T, et al. . Improved population pharmacokinetic model for predicting optimized infliximab exposure in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2020;26:429–39. 10.1093/ibd/izz143
    1. Santacana Juncosa E, Rodríguez-Alonso L, Padullés Zamora A, et al. . Bayes-based dosing of infliximab in inflammatory bowel diseases: short-term efficacy. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2021;87:494–505. 10.1111/bcp.14410
    1. Dave MB, Dherai AJ, Desai DC, et al. . Optimization of infliximab therapy in inflammatory bowel disease using a dashboard approach-an Indian experience. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2021;77:55–62. 10.1007/s00228-020-02975-0
    1. Wang S-L, Ohrmund L, Hauenstein S, et al. . Development and validation of a homogeneous mobility shift assay for the measurement of infliximab and antibodies-to-infliximab levels in patient serum. J Immunol Methods 2012;382:177–88. 10.1016/j.jim.2012.06.002
    1. Bossuyt P, Pouillon L, Claeys S, et al. . Ultra-proactive therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab based on point of care testing in inflammatory bowel disease: results of a pragmatic trial. J Crohns Colitis 2022;16:199–206. 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab127
    1. Papamichael K, Cheifetz AS. Optimizing therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease: a focus on therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2021;17:1423–31. 10.1080/17425255.2021.2027367
    1. Zou G. Confidence interval estimation for treatment effects in cluster randomization trials based on ranks. Stat Med 2021;40:3227–50. 10.1002/sim.8918
    1. Newcombe RG. Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods. Stat Med 1998;17:873–90. 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<873::aid-sim779>;2-i
    1. Zou G. A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol 2004;159:702–6. 10.1093/aje/kwh090
    1. Sazonovs A, Kennedy NA, Moutsianas L, et al. . HLA-DQA1*05 carriage associated with development of anti-drug antibodies to infliximab and adalimumab in patients with Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 2020;158:189–99. 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.041
    1. Winter DA, Joosse ME, de Wildt SN, et al. . Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of infliximab in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and revised dosing considerations. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2020;70:763–76. 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002631
    1. Brandse JF, van den Brink GR, Wildenberg ME, et al. . Loss of infliximab into feces is associated with lack of response to therapy in patients with severe ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 2015;149:350–5. 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.016
    1. Spencer EA, Stachelski J, Dervieux T. Failure to achieve target drug concentrations during induction and not HLA-DQA1*05 carriage is associated with anti-drug antibody formation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 2022;S0016-5085:00017–18.
    1. Yao J, Jiang X, You JHS. A systematic review on cost-effectiveness analyses of therapeutic drug monitoring for patients with inflammatory bowel disease: from immunosuppressive to anti-TNF therapy. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2021;27:275–82. 10.1093/ibd/izaa073

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever