Proactive Infliximab Optimization Using a Pharmacokinetic Dashboard Versus Standard of Care in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The OPTIMIZE Trial

March 4, 2026 updated by: Adam Cheifetz, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
The OPTIMIZE Trial compares whether iDose dashboard-driven infliximab dosing (iDose-driven dosing) is more effective and safer than standard infliximab dosing for inducing and maintaining disease remission in inflammatory bowel disease.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), namely Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are life-long chronic diseases characterized by transmural inflammation of the intestine. CD and UC are global diseases in the 21st century with increasing incidence in newly industrialized countries. One of the most effective therapies to treat patients with moderate to severe disease is the antitumor necrosis factor (TNF) agent infliximab (IFX) either as monotherapy or as a combination therapy with an immunomodulator (IMM), such as azathioprine or methotrexate (MTX).

Although more effective, combination therapy is associated with more serious adverse events, such as serious opportunistic infections and cancers, as well as potential treatment adherence issues. Consequently, many patients and physicians choose to use IFX alone as safety is often prioritized over efficacy. Unfortunately, up to 30% of patients do not respond to induction therapy, and up to 50% of initial responders lose response over time. It is only if patients lose response that physicians check blood IFX concentrations (i.e., reactive therapeutic drug monitoring [TDM]), or empirically increase IFX dose. Reactive TDM helps to explain and better manage these patients with lack or loss of response to IFX. In many cases, the lack or LOR is due to low drug concentrations with or without development of antibodies to IFX (ATI). Unfortunately, reactive TDM or empiric dose escalation is often too late for patients who do not either respond to IFX induction therapy or lose response during maintenance. This reactive approach results in many patients losing IFX as a therapeutic option.

Preliminary data show that proactive IFX optimization to achieve a threshold drug concentration during maintenance therapy (even if the patient is asymptomatic) compared to empiric dose escalation and/or reactive TDM is associated with better long-term outcomes including longer drug persistence, reduced risk of relapse, and fewer hospitalizations and surgeries. IFX dosing by weight only (i.e., mg/kg) may not be adequate for many patients as interindividual variability in drug clearance and other factors affecting IFX concentrations and PK are often not accounted for. Dosing calculators take into account all of these individual factors and improve the precision of dosing towards better personalized medicine. These systems have already been validated, and personalized dosing has shown clinical benefit in patients with IBD.

This is a randomized, controlled, multicenter, open-label study that plans to enroll 196 participants with inflammatory bowel disease. All eligible participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either IFX monotherapy with proactive TDM or SOC IFX therapy, with or without concomitant IMM therapy, and empiric dose optimization or reactive TDM, at the discretion of the investigator.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

124

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • London, Canada
        • London Health Sciences Centre - Children's Hospital
      • Montreal, Canada
        • McGill University Health Centre (MUHC) Montreal General Hospital
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510
        • Yale University School of Medicine
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • University of Miami
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • University of Chicago Medicine
      • Evanston, Illinois, United States, 60208
        • Northwestern University
      • Rockford, Illinois, United States, 61107
        • Rockford GI
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • University of Maryland Medical Center
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Boston Children's Hospital
      • Burlington, Massachusetts, United States, 01805
        • Lahey Hospital and Medical Center
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • University of Minnesota
    • New Hampshire
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03766
        • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Weill Cornell Medical College
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • NYU Langone Health
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28204
        • Atrium Health Center for Digestive Health
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02915
        • LifeSpan Brown University
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Medical University of South Carolina
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 20500
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
        • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84132
        • University of Utah
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
        • Medical College of Wisconsin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Males or nonpregnant, nonlactating females aged 16 to 80 years inclusive.
  2. Diagnosis of IBD prior to screening using standard endoscopic, histologic, or radiologic criteria. Participants with patchy colonic inflammation initially diagnosed as indeterminate colitis would meet inclusion criteria, if the investigator feels that the findings are consistent with CD or UC. Enrollment of participants with UC will be capped at 49% of the planned study population (maximum 61 participants).
  3. Moderately to severely active IBD, defined by a total CDAI score between 220 and 450 points for CD or a partial Mayo Score (PMS) > 4 for UC (including a rectal bleeding subscore [RBS] ≥ 1), and at least 1 of the following:

    1. Elevated CRP (> upper limit of normal)
    2. Elevated FC (> 250 μg/g)
    3. SES-CD > 6 (SES-CD > 3 for isolated ileal disease) for CD only and a Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) ≥ 2 for UC only.
  4. Physician intends to prescribe IFX as part of the usual care of the subject.
  5. No previous use of IFX prior to enrolment in the current study, unless the participant received 1 prior dose of IFX (within 2.5 weeks of enrolment) and met all eligibility criteria at the time of starting IFX and IFX was administered according to the requirements outlined in this protocol
  6. Able to participate fully in all aspects of this clinical trial.
  7. Written informed consent must be obtained and documented.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants with any of the following IBD-related complications:

    1. Abdominal or pelvic abscess, including perianal
    2. Presence of stoma, ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, or ostomy
    3. Isolated perianal disease
    4. Obstructive disease, such as obstructive stricture
    5. Short gut syndrome
    6. Toxic megacolon or any other complications that might require surgery, or any other manifestation that precludes or confounds the assessment of disease activity (CDAI or SES-CD for CD or PMS, PRO2, or MES for UC)
    7. Total colectomy.
  2. History or current diagnosis of ulcerative proctitis (UC extending < 15 cm from the anal verge), acute severe (fulminant) UC, hospitalised IV steroid-refractory UC, indeterminate colitis, microscopic colitis, ischemic colitis, colonic mucosal dysplasia, or untreated bile acid malabsorption.
  3. Current bacterial or parasitic pathogenic enteric infection, according to SOC assessments, including: Clostridioides difficile; tuberculosis; known infection with hepatitis B or C virus; known infection with HIV; sepsis; abscesses. History of the following: opportunistic infection within 6 months prior to screening; any infection requiring antimicrobial therapy within 2 weeks prior to screening; more than 1 episode of herpes zoster or any episode of disseminated zoster; any other infection requiring hospitalization or intravenous antimicrobial therapy within 4 weeks prior to screening.
  4. Has any malignancy or lymphoproliferative disorder other than nonmelanoma cutaneous malignancies or cervical carcinoma in situ that has been treated with no evidence of recurrence within the last 5 years.
  5. Known primary or secondary immunodeficiency.
  6. PNR to adalimumab, defined as no objective evidence of clinical benefit after 14 weeks of therapy.
  7. Subjects with failure to a prior biologic, defined as PNR or SLR, will be excluded when a maximum of 40% of the planned enrollment (approximately 78 subjects) have failure to prior biologic exposure.
  8. Concomitant use of oral corticosteroid therapy exceeding prednisone 40 mg/day, budesonide 9 mg/day, or equivalent, unless a tapering schedule is initiated with a plan to be off CS by Week 14
  9. Presence of any medical condition or use of any medication that is a contraindication for IFX use, as outlined on the product label.
  10. A concurrent clinically significant, serious, unstable, or uncontrolled underlying cardiovascular, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, GI, genitourinary, hematological, coagulation, immunological, endocrine/metabolic, or other medical disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, might confound the study results, pose additional risk to the subject, or interfere with the subject's ability to participate fully in the study.
  11. Pregnant or lactating women, to be excluded based on the physician's usual practice for determining pregnancy or lactation status.
  12. Known intolerance or hypersensitivity to IFX or other murine proteins.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: proactive infliximab optimization
proactive infliximab optimization using a pharmacokinetic dashboard
infliximab
Experimental: standard of care infliximab dosing
infliximab

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
clinical remission
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Proportion of subjects with sustained corticosteroid-free (no CS use from Week 14 through 52) clinical remission (CD: CDAI <150 at Weeks 14, 26, 52; UC: PRO2 ≤ 1 with an RBS = 0) and no disease worsening
52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
biological remission
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Proportion of subjects with sustained biological remission (hs-CRP <10 mg/L)
52 weeks
hs-CRP normalization
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Proportion of subjects with normalization of hs-CRP (decrease from ≥ 10 at baseline to < 10 mg/L)
52 weeks
hs-CRP change from baseline
Time Frame: week 14, week 26, and week 52
Hs-CRP change from baseline
week 14, week 26, and week 52
fecal calprotectin
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Proportion of subjects with normalization of fecal calprotectin (decrease from >250 µg/g at baseline to ≤ 250 µg/g)
52 weeks
fecal calprotectin change
Time Frame: 52 weeks
fecal calprotectin change from baseline
52 weeks
clinical remission
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Proportion of subjects in CS-free clinical remission (CD: CDAI < 150; UC: PRO2 ≤ 1 with an RBS = 0) and no use of CS within previous 6 months)
52 weeks
deep remission
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Proportion of subjects in deep remission (CD: CDAI < 150 and SES-CD ≤ 4, with no individual subscore > 1; UC: PRO2 ≤ 1 with an RBS = 0 and MES ≤ 1)
52 weeks
composite biological and endoscopic remission
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Proportion of subjects with a composite biological (hs-CRP < 10 mg/L) and endoscopic remission (CD: SES-CD ≤ 4; UC: MES ≤ 1)
52 weeks
sustained CS-free clinical remission
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Proportion of subjects with sustained CS-free clinical remission (CD: CDAI < 150; UC: PRO2 ≤ 1 with an RBS = 0) and no CS use or need for rescue therapy from Week 14 through Week 52)
52 weeks
primary non-responders
Time Frame: 14 weeks
Proportion of subjects who are primary nonresponders (≤ 70-point decrease in CDAI score or lack of a ≥ 1-point and 30% reduction from baseline in PRO2 and a ≥ 1-point reduction in RBS or an absolute RBS ≤ 1 for UC and at least one of: hs-CRP ≥10 mg/L, FC > 250 μg/g, or SES-CD > 4 or MES > 1 for UC, or disease worsening prior to Week 14)
14 weeks
endoscopic remission
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Proportion of subjects with endoscopic remission (SES-CD ≤ 4, with no individual subscore > 1 for CD or MES ≤ 1 for UC)
52 weeks
endoscopic response
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Proportion of subjects with an endoscopic response (CD: ≥ 50% decrease from baseline SES-CD score; UC: ≥ 1-point decrease in MES)
52 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified participant data and trial-level data will be available on reasonable request. This data will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and statistical analysis plan and execution of a data sharing agreement

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After completion and publication of primary study.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

This data will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and statistical analysis plan and execution of a data sharing agreement

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Clinical Trials on Infliximab

Subscribe