Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) collaborative care for patients with axial spondyloarthritis (AcuSpA): protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial

Yu Heng Kwan, Warren Fong, Xiang Ling Ang, Chuen Seng Tan, Bee Choo Tai, Youyi Huang, Marcel Bilger, Jie Kie Phang, Hui Chin Tan, Jia Ven Lee, Limin Sun, Choy Tip Tan, Bao Qiang Dong, Hwee Ling Koh, Ying Ying Leung, Nai Lee Lui, Siaw Ing Yeo, Swee Cheng Ng, Kok Yong Fong, Julian Thumboo, Truls Østbye, Yu Heng Kwan, Warren Fong, Xiang Ling Ang, Chuen Seng Tan, Bee Choo Tai, Youyi Huang, Marcel Bilger, Jie Kie Phang, Hui Chin Tan, Jia Ven Lee, Limin Sun, Choy Tip Tan, Bao Qiang Dong, Hwee Ling Koh, Ying Ying Leung, Nai Lee Lui, Siaw Ing Yeo, Swee Cheng Ng, Kok Yong Fong, Julian Thumboo, Truls Østbye

Abstract

Background: Axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) is a chronic disease which results in fatigue, pain, and reduced quality of life (QoL). Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), especially acupuncture, has shown promise in managing pain. Although a TCM collaborative model of care (TCMCMC) has been studied in cancer, there are no randomized controlled trials investigating TCM in AxSpA. Therefore, we will conduct a pragmatic trial to determine the clinical effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of TCMCMC for patients with AxSpA. We define TCMCMC as standard TCM history taking and physical examination, acupuncture, and TCM non-pharmacological advice and communications with rheumatologists in addition to usual rheumatologic care. The purpose of this paper is to describe the rationale for and methodology of this trial.

Methods/design: This pragmatic randomized controlled trial will recruit 160 patients who are diagnosed with AxSpA and have inadequate response to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Simple randomization to usual rheumatologic care or the intervention (TCMCMC) with a 1:1 allocation ratio will be used. Ten 30-min acupuncture sessions will be provided to patients assigned to the TCMCMC arm. All participants will continue to receive usual rheumatologic care. The primary endpoint - spinal pain - will be evaluated at week 6. Secondary endpoints include clinical, quality of life, and economic outcome measures. Patients will be followed up for up to 52 weeks, and adverse events will be documented.

Discussion: This trial may provide evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of a TCMCMC for patients with AxSpA.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03420404 . Registered on 14 February 2018.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study has been approved by the SingHealth Centralized Institutional Review Board (Reference number: 2017/2088). Written informed consent is required for participation. Protocol amendments, adverse event reporting and annual review will be overseen by the CIRB.

Consent for publication

Consent to published de-identified information is included in the written informed consent process. However, no data is being published at this time.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
SPIRIT figure for the schedule of enrollment, interventions, and assessments. Abbreviations: ASQoL Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life, BASDAI Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, BASFI Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, BAS-G Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global score, HAQ Health Assessment Questionnaire, QoL quality of life, SF-36 36-item Short Form Health Survey, SPIRIT Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials, TCM traditional Chinese medicine
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Trial work plan. Follow-up will be performed at weeks 6, 12, 24, and 52 after the baseline visit. Pain score at week 6 is the primary outcome measure for this study. Outcome measures at week 52 are exploratory. The remaining outcome measures are the secondary outcomes of the study
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The acupuncture points employed in this study. The main acupuncture points are Jiaji, Shenshu, Yaoyangguan, Mingmen, Huantiao, Ashixue. The patients in the intervention group will be classified into one of the five syndromes based on their clinical presentation and have secondary acupuncture points chosen based on their respective syndromes. There will also be additional acupuncture points for patients with neck pain, thoracic pain, and/or lumbar pain. Patients in both the intervention and control groups will be given usual care consisting of NSAIDs and/or biologics and/or physiotherapy as deemed necessary by the attending rheumatologists. Abbreviations: Acupoints acupuncture points, NSAIDs non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

References

    1. Ramonda R, Marchesoni A, Carletto A, Bianchi G, Cutolo M, Ferraccioli G, Fusaro E, De Vita S, Galeazzi M, Gerli R, et al. Patient-reported impact of spondyloarthritis on work disability and working life: the ATLANTIS survey. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016;18:78. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-0977-2.
    1. Kwan YH, Fong W, How P, Wee H-L, Leung YY, Phang JK, Lui NL, Tan CS, Malhotra R, Østbye T, Thumboo J. The impact of axial spondyloarthritis on quality of life (QoL): a comparison with the impact of moderate to end-stage chronic kidney disease on QoL. Qual Life Res. 2018;27:2321–2327. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1900-x.
    1. Braun J, Kiltz U, Sarholz M, Heldmann F, Regel A, Baraliakos X. Monitoring ankylosing spondylitis: clinically useful markers and prediction of clinical outcomes. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2015;11:935–946. doi: 10.1586/1744666X.2015.1052795.
    1. Asquith M, Rosenbaum JT. The interaction between host genetics and the microbiome in the pathogenesis of spondyloarthropathies. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2016;28:405–412. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000299.
    1. Kiltz U, Baraliakos X, Braun J. Management of axial spondyloarthritis. Internist (Berl) 2016;57:1060–1068. doi: 10.1007/s00108-016-0140-9.
    1. Galloway JB, Mercer LK, Moseley A, Dixon WG, Ustianowski AP, Helbert M, Watson KD, Lunt M, Hyrich KL, Symmons DP. Risk of skin and soft tissue infections (including shingles) in patients exposed to anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:229–234. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-201108.
    1. Ramiro S, Gaujoux-Viala C, Nam JL, Smolen JS, Buch M, Gossec L, van der Heijde D, Winthrop K, Landewé R. Safety of synthetic and biological DMARDs: a systematic literature review informing the 2013 update of the EULAR recommendations for management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:529–535. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204575.
    1. Lim MK, Sadarangani P, Chan HL, Heng JY. Complementary and alternative medicine use in multiracial Singapore. Complement Ther Med. 2005;13:16–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2004.11.002.
    1. Chen F-P, Chen T-J, Kung Y-Y, Chen Y-C, Chou L-F, Chen F-J, Hwang S-J. Use frequency of traditional Chinese medicine in Taiwan. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:26. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-26.
    1. Wong Tze W, Wong Siu L, Stuart PBD. Prevalence and determinants of the use of traditional Chinese medicine in Hong Kong. Asia Pac J Public Health. 1995;8:167–170. doi: 10.1177/101053959500800304.
    1. Meng CF, Wang D, Ngeow J, Lao L, Peterson M, Paget S. Acupuncture for chronic low back pain in older patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003;42:1508–1517. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg405.
    1. Liang FF, Chen WY, Chen B, Xu QG, Zhan HS. Effect of acupuncture therapy on patients with low back pain: a meta-analysis. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2016;29:449–455.
    1. Efthimiou P, Kukar M. Complementary and alternative medicine use in rheumatoid arthritis: proposed mechanism of action and efficacy of commonly used modalities. Rheumatol Int. 2010;30:571–586. doi: 10.1007/s00296-009-1206-y.
    1. Camp A. Medical acupuncture: a western scientific approach. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1998. Acupuncture for rheumatological problems; p. 60.
    1. Bullock ML, Pheley AM, Kiresuk TJ, Lenz SK, Culliton PD. Characteristics and complaints of patients seeking therapy at a hospital-based alternative medicine clinic. J Altern Complement Med. 1997;3:31–37. doi: 10.1089/acm.1997.3.31.
    1. Dale J. Acupuncture practice in the UK. Part 1: report of a survey. Complement Ther Med. 1997;5:215–220. doi: 10.1016/S0965-2299(97)80032-5.
    1. MacPherson H, Sinclair-Lian N, Thomas K. Patients seeking care from acupuncture practitioners in the UK: a national survey. Complement Ther Med. 2006;14:20–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2005.07.006.
    1. Ernst E, Lee MS. Acupuncture for rheumatic conditions: an overview of systematic reviews. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2010;49:1957–1961. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq180.
    1. Phang JK, Kwan YH, Goh H, Tan VIC, Thumboo J, Østbye T, Fong W. Complementary and alternative medicine for rheumatic diseases: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Complement Ther Med. 2018;37:143–157. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2018.03.003.
    1. MacPherson H, Tilbrook H, Bland JM, Bloor K, Brabyn S, Cox H, Kang’ombe AR, Man M-S, Stuardi T, Torgerson D, et al. Acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome: primary care based pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMC Gastroenterol. 2012;12:150. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-150.
    1. Elder WG, Munk N. Using the Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS) model in clinical research: application to refine a practice-based research network (PBRN) study. J Am Board Fam Med. 2014;27:846–854. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.06.140042.
    1. Johnson KE, Neta G, Dember LM, Coronado GD, Suls J, Chambers DA, Rundell S, Smith DH, Liu B, Taplin S, et al. Use of PRECIS ratings in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory. Trials. 2016;17:32. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1158-y.
    1. MacPherson H, Altman DG, Hammerschlag R, Youping L, Taixiang W, White A, Moher D. Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statement. J Evid Based Med. 2010;3:140–155. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-5391.2010.01086.x.
    1. Zwarenstein M, Treweek S, Gagnier JJ, Altman DG, Tunis S, Haynes B, Oxman AD, Moher D. Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ. 2008;337:a2390. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2390.
    1. Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Listing J, Akkoc N, Brandt J, Braun J, Chou CT, Collantes-Estevez E, Dougados M, et al. The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) classification criteria for axial Spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:777–783. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.108233.
    1. Cohen J-D, Cunin P, Farrenq V, Oniankitan O, Carton L, Chevalier X, Claudepierre P. Estimation of the Bath Ankylosing Sspondylitis Disease Activity Index cutoff for perceived symptom relief in patients with spondyloarthropathies. J Rheumatol. 2006;33:79–81.
    1. Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X, Brandt J, Braun J, Burgos-Vargas R, Dougados M, Hermann KG, Landewe R, Maksymowych W, van der Heijde D. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(Suppl 2):ii1–i44. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.104018.
    1. Ferreira-Valente MA, Pais-Ribeiro JL, Jensen MP. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain. 2011;152:2399–2404. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.07.005.
    1. Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, Whitelock H, Gaisford P, Calin A. A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol. 1994;21:2286–2291.
    1. Calin A, Garrett S, Whitelock H, Kennedy LG, O'Hea J, Mallorie P, Jenkinson T. A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. J Rheumatol. 1994;21:2281–2285.
    1. Jones SD, Steiner A, Garrett SL, Calin A. The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Patient Global Score (BAS-G) Rheumatology. 1996;35:66–71. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.1.66.
    1. Bruce B, Fries JF. The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire: a review of its history, issues, progress, and documentation. J Rheumatol. 2003;30:167–178.
    1. Kwan YH, Fong W, Lui NL, Yong ST, Cheung YB, Malhotra R, Thumboo J, Ostbye T. Validity and reliability of the Health Assessment Questionnaire among patients with spondyloarthritis in Singapore. Int J Rheum Dis. 2018;21:699–704. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12989.
    1. Kwan YH, Fong WW, Lui NL, Yong ST, Cheung YB, Malhotra R, Ostbye T, Thumboo J. Validity and reliability of the Short Form 36 Health Surveys (SF-36) among patients with spondyloarthritis in Singapore. Rheumatol Int. 2016;36:1759–1765. doi: 10.1007/s00296-016-3567-3.
    1. Nhan DT, Caplan L. Patient-reported outcomes in axial spondyloarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin N Am. 2016;42:285–299. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2016.01.011.
    1. Leung YY, Lee W, Lui NL, Rouse M, McKenna SP, Thumboo J. Adaptation of Chinese and English versions of the Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) scale for use in Singapore. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18:353. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1715-x.
    1. Quinzanos I, Luong PT, Bobba S, Steuart Richards J, Majithia V, Davis LA, Caplan L. Validation of disease activity and functional status questionnaires in spondyloarthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015;33:146–152.
    1. Bruce B, Fries JF. The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire: dimensions and practical applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:20. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-20.
    1. Hays RD, Morales LS. The RAND-36 measure of health-related quality of life. Ann Med. 2001;33:350–357. doi: 10.3109/07853890109002089.
    1. Zochling J. Measures of symptoms and disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), Ankylosing Sspondylitis Quality of Life Scale (ASQoL), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global Score (BAS-G), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), Dougados Functional Index (DFI), and Health Assessment Questionnaire for the Spondylarthropathies (HAQ-S) Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(Suppl 11):S47–S58. doi: 10.1002/acr.20575.
    1. Zhang J, Shang H, Gao X, Ernst E. Acupuncture-related adverse events: a systematic review of the Chinese literature. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88:915–921c. doi: 10.2471/BLT.10.076737.
    1. Sieper J, van der Heijde D, Dougados M, Mease PJ, Maksymowych WP, Brown MA, Arora V, Pangan AL. Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: results of a randomised placebo-controlled trial (ABILITY-1) Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:815–822. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201766.
    1. Sieper J, Klopsch T, Richter M, Kapelle A, Rudwaleit M, Schwank S, Regourd E, May M. Comparison of two different dosages of celecoxib with diclofenac for the treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis: results of a 12-week randomised, double-blind, controlled study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:323–329. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.075309.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2013.
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:377–381. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.
    1. Luo N, Wang P, Fu AZ, Johnson JA, Coons SJ. Preference-based SF-6D scores derived from the SF-36 and SF-12 have different discriminative power in a population health survey. Med Care. 2012;50:627–632. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31824d7471.
    1. Wee HL, Cheung YB, Fong KY, Luo N, Machin D, Thumboo J. Are English- and Chinese-language versions of the SF-6D equivalent? A comparison from a population-based study. Clin Ther. 2004;26:1137–1148. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(04)90186-5.
    1. Busija L, Pausenberger E, Haines TP, Haymes S, Buchbinder R, Osborne RH. Adult measures of general health and health-related quality of life: Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item (SF-36) and Short Form 12-Item (SF-12) Health Surveys, Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 6D (SF-6D), Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3), Quality of Well-Being Scale (QWB), and Assessment of Quality of Life (AQOL) Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63:S383–S412. doi: 10.1002/acr.20541.
    1. Png K, Kwan YH, Leung YY, Phang JK, Lau JQ, Lim KK, Chew EH, Low LL, Tan CS, Thumboo J, et al. Measurement properties of patient reported outcome measures for spondyloarthritis: a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018;48:274–282. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.02.016.
    1. Godwin M, Ruhland L, Casson I, MacDonald S, Delva D, Birtwhistle R, Lam M, Seguin R. Pragmatic controlled clinical trials in primary care: the struggle between external and internal validity. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-3-28.
    1. Li J, Liu Q, Chen Y, Gao S, Zhang J, Yang Y, Chen W. Treatment patterns, complications, and direct medical costs associated with ankylosing spondylitis in Chinese urban patients: a retrospective claims dataset analysis. J Med Econ. 2017;20:91–97. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2016.1227829.
    1. Kwan YH, Fong W, Tan VIC, Lui NL, Malhotra R, Ostbye T, Thumboo J. A systematic review of quality-of-life domains and items relevant to patients with spondyloarthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017;47:175–182. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.04.002.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever