Clinical Trial of TCM Collaborative Care Model in Axial Spondyloarthritis (AcuSpA)

April 18, 2024 updated by: Singapore General Hospital

A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of a Novel TCM Physician-involved Collaborative Care Model in the Management of Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis in Singapore (AcuSpA)

A pragmatic, prospective, randomized controlled trial will be conducted in patients with axial spondyloarthritis who are NSAID inadequate responders. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either receive standard rheumatological care or a Traditional Chinese Medicine physician involved collaborative model of care (i.e. NSAIDs with acupuncture). Primary end-point was spinal pain score at week 6 with secondary end-points being evaluated week 24. Through this study, we hope to assess a novel model of care in AxSpA and be used as a reference to improve the management of other chronic diseases in Singapore.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The objective of this study is to determine the clinical effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of a new model of care in the management of Spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) using a pragmatic trial approach. In this study, we define TCM physician involved collaborative model of care (TCMCMC) as TCM physician delivered acupuncture as well as TCM physician's history taking, physical examination, non-pharmacological advice and communications with rheumatologists in addition to the usual rheumatological care. The TCMCMC involves TCM physicians diagnosing patients based on TCM clinical syndromes and prescribing standardised acupuncture treatment. The patient population will still receive their standard of care (drug therapy and physiotherapy) as background therapy. The proposed study will not be investigating any therapeutic or medicinal products (drugs).

Our primary hypothesis is that novel TCMCMC in patients with AxSpA will result in better pain control as compared the usual rheumatological care. Secondary hypothesis is that TCMCMC will have greater improvements in other clinical, quality of life, and economic outcomes as compared with those under the usual rheumatological care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 169608
        • Recruiting
        • Singapore General Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Lay Lian Tan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 21 years of age or older
  • Have AxSpA, diagnosed according to the 2009 Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria
  • Have active disease based on Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score ≥4 on a 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and spinal pain score ≥4 on a 11-point NRS
  • Has failed 2 sequential NSAIDs (including COX-2 inhibitor) at maximal tolerated doses for ≥ 4 weeks
  • No biologic therapy (i.e tumour necrosis factor blocker or anti-interleukin 17) within the past three months
  • Patient who is on current treatment with concomitant methotrexate (MTX) or sulfasalazine (SSZ) at study entry must be on the drug for ≥12 weeks and at stable dose for ≥4 weeks prior to randomisation. Patients who are on non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) other than methotrexate or sulfasalazine must discontinue the DMARD 4 weeks prior to randomisation, except for leflunomide, which has to be discontinued for 8 weeks prior to randomization unless a cholestyramine washout has been performed. Patients taking systemic corticosteroids have to be on stable dose of ≤ 10mg/day prednisolone or equivalent for at least two weeks before randomisation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • On anti-platelet agents (i.e. aspirin, clopidogrel, dipyridamole, etc) and anti-coagulants (i.e. warfarin, enoxaparin, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, etc)
  • Have bleeding disorders
  • Have blood-borne communicable diseases (e.g. hepatitis B, hepatitis C, human immunodeficiency virus, etc).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Collaborative care with TCM physicians
TCM physician involved collaborative care model (TCMCMC): The intervention arm will involve the TCM physician in the management of patients with AxSpA in addition to the usual rheumatological care.

TCM physician delivered acupuncture as well as history taking, physical examination, non-pharmacological advice and communications with rheumatologists.

Acupuncture procedures: After eliciting the deqi sensation, the needles will be left in place for 30 minutes. The acupuncture treatment will be done 2-3 times a week, with 5 sessions constituting a treatment course. There will be a break of 1 week in between each acupuncture course. Patients in the intervention arm will undergo 2 treatment courses (or 10 sessions) in total.

No Intervention: Usual care only
The attending rheumatologist will prescribe a variety of treatment inclusive of medications such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and physiotherapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean difference in spinal pain score
Time Frame: Week 6
Mean difference in spinal pain score between intervention and control groups from baseline to week 6 of treatment
Week 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean difference in spinal pain score
Time Frame: Week 12, week 24
Mean difference in spinal pain score between intervention and control groups from baseline to week 12 and week 24 of treatment.
Week 12, week 24
Mean difference in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6, week 12, week 24
Mean difference in BASDAI score between intervention and control groups from baseline to week 6, week 12 and week 24 of treatment.
Baseline, week 6, week 12, week 24
Mean difference in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6, week 12, week 24
Mean difference in BASFI score between intervention and control groups from baseline to week 6, week 12 and week 24 of treatment.
Baseline, week 6, week 12, week 24
Mean difference in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global score (BAS-G)
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6, week 12, week 24
Mean difference in BAS-G score between intervention and control groups from baseline to week 6, week 12 and week 24 of treatment.
Baseline, week 6, week 12, week 24
Mean difference in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6, week 12, week 24
Mean difference in HAQ score between intervention and control groups from baseline to week 6, week 12 and week 24 of treatment.
Baseline, week 6, week 12, week 24
Mean difference in 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6, week 12, week 24
Mean difference in SF-36 score between intervention and control groups from baseline to week 6, week 12 and week 24 of treatment.
Baseline, week 6, week 12, week 24
Mean difference in Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL)
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6, week 12, week 24
Mean difference in AsQoL score between intervention and control groups from baseline to week 6, week 12 and week 24 of treatment.
Baseline, week 6, week 12, week 24
Mean difference in rheumatologist's consultation fees
Time Frame: Week 6, week 12, week 24
Mean difference in rheumatologist's consultation fees between intervention and control groups at week 6, week 12 and week 24 of treatment.
Week 6, week 12, week 24
Mean difference in costs of laboratory procedures
Time Frame: Week 6, week 12, week 24
Mean difference in costs of laboratory procedures between intervention and control groups at week 6, week 12 and week 24 of treatment.
Week 6, week 12, week 24
Mean difference in number of inpatient days
Time Frame: Week 6, week 12, week 24
Mean difference in number of inpatient days between intervention and control groups at week 6, week 12 and week 24 of treatment.
Week 6, week 12, week 24

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean difference in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
Time Frame: Week 52
Mean difference in BASDAI score between intervention and control groups from baseline to week 52 of treatment will serve as exploratory outcome.
Week 52
Mean difference in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)
Time Frame: Week 52
Mean difference in BASFI score between intervention and control groups from baseline to week 52 of treatment will serve as exploratory outcome.
Week 52
Mean difference in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global score (BAS-G)
Time Frame: Week 52
Mean difference in BAS-G score between intervention and control groups from baseline to week 52 of treatment will serve as exploratory outcome.
Week 52
Mean difference in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)
Time Frame: Week 52
Mean difference in HAQ score between intervention and control groups from baseline to week 52 of treatment will serve as exploratory outcome.
Week 52
Mean difference in 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: Week 52
Mean difference in SF-36 score between intervention and control groups from baseline to week 52 of treatment will serve as exploratory outcome.
Week 52
Mean difference in Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL)
Time Frame: Week 52
Mean difference in ASQoL score between intervention and control groups from baseline to week 52 of treatment will serve as exploratory outcome.
Week 52
Mean difference in Rheumatologist's consultation fees
Time Frame: Week 52
Mean difference in rheumatologist's consultation fees scores between intervention and control groups at week 52 of treatment will serve as exploratory outcome.
Week 52
Mean difference in costs of laboratory procedures
Time Frame: Week 52
Mean difference in costs of laboratory procedures between intervention and control groups at week 52 of treatment will serve as exploratory outcome.
Week 52
Mean difference in number of inpatient days
Time Frame: Week 52
Mean difference in number of inpatient days between intervention and control groups at week 52 of treatment will serve as exploratory outcome.
Week 52
Mean difference in spinal pain score
Time Frame: Week 52
Mean difference in spinal pain score between intervention and control groups at week 52 of treatment will serve as exploratory outcome.
Week 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 5, 2018

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Axial Spondyloarthritis

Clinical Trials on TCM physician involved collaborative care model (TCMCMC)

3
Subscribe