Follow-up of patients with R/R FLT3-mutation-positive AML treated with gilteritinib in the phase 3 ADMIRAL trial

Alexander E Perl, Richard A Larson, Nikolai A Podoltsev, Stephen Strickland, Eunice S Wang, Ehab Atallah, Gary J Schiller, Giovanni Martinelli, Andreas Neubauer, Jorge Sierra, Pau Montesinos, Christian Récher, Sung-Soo Yoon, Naoko Hosono, Masahiro Onozawa, Shigeru Chiba, Hee-Je Kim, Nahla Hasabou, Qiaoyang Lu, Ramon Tiu, Mark J Levis, Alexander E Perl, Richard A Larson, Nikolai A Podoltsev, Stephen Strickland, Eunice S Wang, Ehab Atallah, Gary J Schiller, Giovanni Martinelli, Andreas Neubauer, Jorge Sierra, Pau Montesinos, Christian Récher, Sung-Soo Yoon, Naoko Hosono, Masahiro Onozawa, Shigeru Chiba, Hee-Je Kim, Nahla Hasabou, Qiaoyang Lu, Ramon Tiu, Mark J Levis

Abstract

The phase 3 ADMIRAL (NCT02421939; Study ID: 2215-CL-0301) trial showed superior overall survival in patients with relapsed/refractory FLT3-mutation-positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML) randomized 2:1 to receive the oral FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 inhibitor gilteritinib vs those randomized to receive salvage chemotherapy (SC). Here we provide a follow-up of the ADMIRAL trial 2 years after the primary analysis to clarify the long-term treatment effects and safety of gilteritinib in these patients with AML. At the time of this analysis, the median survival follow-up was 37.1 months, with deaths in 203 of 247 and 97 of 124 patients in the gilteritinib and SC arms, respectively; 16 gilteritinib-treated patients remained on treatment. The median overall survival for the gilteritinib and SC arms was 9.3 and 5.6 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.665; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.518, 0.853; two-sided P = .0013); 2-year estimated survival rates were 20.6% (95% CI, 15.8, 26.0) and 14.2% (95% CI, 8.3, 21.6). The gilteritinib-arm 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse after composite complete remission was 75.7%, with few relapses occurring after 18 months. Overall, 49 of 247 patients in the gilteritinib arm and 14 of 124 patients in the SC arm were alive for ≥2 years. Twenty-six gilteritinib-treated patients remained alive for ≥2 years without relapse; 18 of these patients underwent transplantation (hematopoietic stem cell transplantation [HSCT]) and 16 restarted gilteritinib as post-HSCT maintenance therapy. The most common adverse events of interest during years 1 and 2 of gilteritinib therapy were increased liver transaminase levels; adverse event incidence decreased in year 2. Thus, continued and post-HSCT gilteritinib maintenance treatment sustained remission with a stable safety profile. These findings confirm that prolonged gilteritinib therapy is safe and is associated with superior survival vs SC. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02421939.

© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology.

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patient disposition. (A) Disposition according to treatment received. (B) Disposition according to transplantation status: patients remaining alive for ≥2 years without relapse in the gilteritinib arm. (C) Disposition by preselected chemotherapy: patients remaining alive for ≥2 years without relapse in the gilteritinib arm. Due to limited follow-up of patients in the SC arm, data related to posttransplant relapse and survival were not available. ITT, intention-to-treat.
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patient disposition. (A) Disposition according to treatment received. (B) Disposition according to transplantation status: patients remaining alive for ≥2 years without relapse in the gilteritinib arm. (C) Disposition by preselected chemotherapy: patients remaining alive for ≥2 years without relapse in the gilteritinib arm. Due to limited follow-up of patients in the SC arm, data related to posttransplant relapse and survival were not available. ITT, intention-to-treat.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
OS in patients with R/R FLT3+ AML (intention-to-treat population).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Cumulative incidence of relapse in patients with R/R FLT3+ AML in the gilteritinib arm. (A) Cumulative incidence of relapse after CR. (B) Cumulative incidence of relapse after CRc.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
AEs of interest during and after the first year of gilteritinib therapy in patients with R/R FLT3+ AML.

References

    1. Perl AE, Martinelli G, Cortes JE, et al. . Gilteritinib or chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory FLT3-mutated AML. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(18):1728-1740.
    1. Cortes JE, Khaled S, Martinelli G, et al. . Quizartinib versus salvage chemotherapy in relapsed or refractory FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukaemia (QuANTUM-R): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(7):984-997.
    1. DiNardo CD, Stein EM, de Botton S, et al. . Durable remissions with ivosidenib in IDH1-mutated relapsed or refractory AML. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(25):2386-2398.
    1. Stone RM, Mandrekar SJ, Sanford BL, et al. . Midostaurin plus chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia with a FLT3 mutation. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(5):454-464.
    1. Stein EM, DiNardo CD, Pollyea DA, et al. . Enasidenib in mutant IDH2 relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2017;130(6):722-731.
    1. Burchert A, Bug G, Fritz LV, et al. . Sorafenib maintenance after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia with FLT3-internal tandem duplication mutation (SORMAIN). J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(26):2993-3002.
    1. Xuan L, Wang Y, Huang F, et al. . Sorafenib maintenance in patients with FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukaemia undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: an open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(9):1201-1212.
    1. Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Kopecky KJ, et al. ; International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia . Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for diagnosis, standardization of response criteria, treatment outcomes, and reporting standards for therapeutic trials in acute myeloid leukemia [published correction appears in J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(3):576]. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(24):4642-4649.
    1. Murphy KM, Levis M, Hafez MJ, et al. . Detection of FLT3 internal tandem duplication and D835 mutations by a multiplex polymerase chain reaction and capillary electrophoresis assay. J Mol Diagn. 2003;5(2):96-102.
    1. Ganguly S, Cortes JE, Krämer A, et al. . Clinical outcomes in patients with FLT3-ITD-mutated relapsed/refractory acute myelogenous leukemia undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after quizartinib or salvage chemotherapy in the QuANTUM-R trial. Transplant Cell Ther. 2021;27(2):153-162.
    1. Sandmaier BM, Khaled S, Oran B, Gammon G, Trone D, Frankfurt O. Results of a phase 1 study of quizartinib as maintenance therapy in subjects with acute myeloid leukemia in remission following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Am J Hematol. 2018;93(2): 222-231.
    1. Brunner AM, Li S, Fathi AT, et al. . Haematopoietic cell transplantation with and without sorafenib maintenance for patients with FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukaemia in first complete remission. Br J Haematol. 2016;175(3):496-504.
    1. Tschan-Plessl A, Halter JP, Heim D, Medinger M, Passweg JR, Gerull S. Synergistic effect of sorafenib and cGvHD in patients with high-risk FLT3-ITD+AML allows long-term disease control after allogeneic transplantation. Ann Hematol. 2015;94(11):1899-1905.
    1. Altman JK, Perl AE, Hill JE, Rosales M, Bahceci E, Levis MJ. The impact of FLT3 mutation clearance and treatment response after gilteritinib therapy on overall survival in patients with FLT3 mutation-positive relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Med. 2021;10(3):797-805.
    1. Perl AE, Altman JK, Cortes J, et al. . Selective inhibition of FLT3 by gilteritinib in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia: a multicentre, first-in-human, open-label, phase 1-2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(8):1061-1075.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever