PrEP acceptability and initiation among women engaged in sex work in Uganda: Implications for HIV prevention

Susan S Witte, Prema Filippone, Fred M Ssewamala, Proscovia Nabunya, Ozge Sensoy Bahar, Larissa Jennings Mayo-Wilson, Flavia Namuwonge, Christopher Damulira, Yesim Tozan, Joshua Kiyingi, Josephine Nabayinda, Abel Mwebembezi, Joseph Kagaayi, Mary McKay, Susan S Witte, Prema Filippone, Fred M Ssewamala, Proscovia Nabunya, Ozge Sensoy Bahar, Larissa Jennings Mayo-Wilson, Flavia Namuwonge, Christopher Damulira, Yesim Tozan, Joshua Kiyingi, Josephine Nabayinda, Abel Mwebembezi, Joseph Kagaayi, Mary McKay

Abstract

Background: Women engaged in sex work (WESW) are disproportionately affected by HIV. In Uganda, HIV prevalence among WESW is estimated at 37%, accounting for 18% of all new infections in the country. WESW experience poverty, gender-based violence, and other issues that reduce their power and limit their ability to negotiate condom use. Female-controlled strategies, including pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), may afford women more transmission protection, but barriers to access and use persist. This cross-sectional study examined baseline PrEP acceptability and initiation among WESW recently enrolled in a randomized clinical trial in Uganda to test the impact of a combination HIV risk reduction and economic empowerment intervention on sexual risk outcomes (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03583541).

Methods: A total of 542 WESW from 19 high HIV-prevalent geographical areas were enrolled in the Kyaterekera study between June 2019 and March 2020. Women were eligible for the study if they: (1) were age 18 or over; (2) reported engagement in transactional sex (a sex act in exchange for pay) in the past 30 days; and (3) reported engagement in one or more episodes of unprotected sex in the past 30 days. Women completed a baseline assessment, were tested for HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) at enrollment, and were connected with antiretroviral therapy (ART), STI treatment, or PrEP, based on need and interest. Descriptive statistics examined baseline data on PrEP acceptability and initiation. Independent variables (i.e. years in sex work, recent sexual coercion, perceived HIV and sex work stigmas, harmful alcohol use, barriers to medical care, and social support) were derived from the empirical literature and women's self-report. Bivariate analysis was performed to test associations between main effects of these variables. Using binomial logistic regression, predictive models were evaluated for two distinct outcomes-PrEP acceptability and PrEP initiation/uptake.

Findings: At baseline, 59% of women (n = 322) tested HIV negative. Among WESW testing negative, 11% (n = 36) were already PrEP enrolled. Most women reported willingness to use PrEP (n = 317; 91%). Slightly over half of WESW not already on PrEP agreed to initiate PrEP (n = 158; 55%). Logistic regression models demonstrate that acceptability of or willingness to use PrEP was significantly associated with fewer years engaged in sex work (AOR= ·18, 95% CI 0·05-·66, p<·01) and greater perceived social support from family (AOR= 1·39, 95% CI 1·03 -1.88, p<·05). PrEP initiation was negatively associated with greater perceived social support from friends (AOR=·81, 95% CI ·68-0·97, p<·05) and positively associated with higher perceived stigma due to sex work among family members (AOR=2·20, 95% CI 1·15-4·22, p<·05).

Interpretation: Despite endorsing PrEP use, many WESW remain reluctant to use it. This gap in prevention practice highlights the heart of a failing PrEP prevention cascade. Findings point to the important role family and friend support may play in destigmatizing sex work and PrEP use for women. Social and structural-level efforts are needed to improve educational messaging and to integrate positive messaging into health promotion campaigns for women and their families, while also working toward decriminalizing sex work.

Funding: This paper was made possible with funding from United States National Institute of Mental Health (Grant number: R01MH116768).

Keywords: FSW; PrEP; Pre-exposure prophylaxis; Sex work; Stigma.

Conflict of interest statement

We declare no competing interests.

© 2022 The Author(s).

References

    1. UNAIDS. Sex Workers Often not Accessing HIV Prevention Services [Internet]. UNAIDS 2019 [cited 2021 Jun 17]. Available from:
    1. Uganda AIDS Commission . Uganda AIDS Commission; 2020. HIV Fact Sheet 2020. [Internet][cited 2021 Jul 26]Available from.
    1. Ratmann O., Kagaayi J., Hall M., et al. Quantifying HIV transmission flow between high-prevalence hotspots and surrounding communities: a population-based study in Rakai, Uganda. Lancet HIV. 2020;7(3):e173–e183.
    1. Bekker L.G., Johnson L., Cowan F., et al. Combination HIV prevention for female sex workers: what is the evidence? Lancet. 2015;385(9962):72–87.
    1. Wanyenze R.K., Musinguzi G., Kiguli J., et al. “When they know that you are a sex worker, you will be the last person to be treated”: perceptions and experiences of female sex workers in accessing HIV services in Uganda. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2017 [Internet]May 5 [cited 2021 Jun 17];17. Available from.
    1. World Health Organization. Consolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, diagnosis, treatment and care for key populations. World Health Organization; 2016.
    1. Pillay D., Stankevitz K., Lanham M., et al. Factors influencing uptake, continuation, and discontinuation of oral PrEP among clients at sex worker and MSM facilities in South Africa. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(4)
    1. Muwonge T.R., Nsubuga R., Brown C., et al. Knowledge and barriers of PrEP delivery among diverse groups of potential PrEP users in Central Uganda. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(10)
    1. Pretorius C., Schnure M., Dent J., et al. Modelling impact and cost-effectiveness of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis in 13 low-resource countries. J Int AIDS Soc. 2020;23(2) [Internet]Feb 28 [cited 2021 Jun 17]Available from.
    1. Glick J.L., Russo R., Jivapong B., et al. The PrEP care continuum among cisgender women who sell sex and/or use drugs globally: a systematic review. AIDS Behav. 2020;24(5):1312–1333.
    1. Restar A.J., Tocco J.U., Mantell J.E., et al. Perspectives on HIV Pre- and post-exposure prophylaxes (PrEP and PEP) among female and male sex workers in Mombasa, Kenya: implications for Integrating biomedical prevention into sexual health services. AIDS Educ Prev Off Publ Int Soc AIDS Educ. 2017;29(2):141–153.
    1. Eakle R., Gomez G.B., Naicker N., et al. HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis and early antiretroviral treatment among female sex workers in South Africa: results from a prospective observational demonstration project. PLoS Med. 2017 Nov;14(11)
    1. Sarr M., Gueye D., Mboup A., et al. Uptake, retention, and outcomes in a demonstration project of pre-exposure prophylaxis among female sex workers in public health centers in Senegal. Int J STD AIDS. 2020;31(11):1063–1072.
    1. Busza J., Phillips A.N., Mushati P., et al. Understanding early uptake of PrEP by female sex workers in Zimbabwe. AIDS Care. 2021;33(6):729–735.
    1. Bazzi A.R., Yotebieng K., Otticha S., et al. PrEP and the syndemic of substance use, violence, and HIV among female and male sex workers: a qualitative study in Kisumu, Kenya. J Int AIDS Soc. 2019;22(4) [Internet]Apr 15 [cited 2021 Jun 17]. Available from.
    1. Fearon E., Phillips A., Mtetwa S., et al. How can programs better support female sex workers to avoid HIV infection in Zimbabwe? A prevention cascade analysis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019;81(1):24–35.
    1. Cowan F.M., Delany-Moretlwe S. Promise and pitfalls of pre-exposure prophylaxis for female sex workers. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2016;11(1):27–34.
    1. Shannon K., Crago A.L., Baral S.D., et al. The global response and unmet actions for HIV and sex workers. Lancet. 2018;392(10148):698–710.
    1. Lyons C.E., Schwartz S.R., Murray S.M., et al. The role of sex work laws and stigmas in increasing HIV risks among sex workers. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):773.
    1. Bershteyn A., Sharma M., Akullian A.N., et al. Impact along the HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis “cascade of prevention” in western Kenya: a mathematical modelling study. J Int AIDS Soc. 2020;23(Suppl 3) [Internet] Jun 30 [cited 2021 Jun 17]. Available from.
    1. Ssewamala F.M., Sensoy Bahar O., Tozan Y., et al. A combination intervention addressing sexual risk-taking behaviors among vulnerable women in Uganda: study protocol for a cluster randomized clinical trial. BMC Womens Health. 2019;19 [Internet] Aug 17 [cited 2021 Feb 14]. Available from.
    1. Witte S.S., Aira T., Tsai L.C., et al. Efficacy of a savings-led microfinance intervention to reduce sexual risk for HIV among women engaged in sex work: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(3):e95–102.
    1. Nabunya P., Kiyingi J., Witte S.S., et al. Working with economically vulnerable women engaged in sex work: collaborating with community stakeholders in southern Uganda. Glob Public Health. 2021;0(0):1–17.
    1. Ye L., Wei S., Zou Y., et al. HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis interest among female sex workers in Guangxi, China. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e86200.
    1. Straus M.A., Hamby S.L., Boney-McCoy S., Sugarman D.B. The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2): development and preliminary psychometric data. J Fam Issues. 1996;17(3):283–316.
    1. Liu S.H., Srikrishnan A.K., Zelaya C.E., Solomon S., Celentano D.D., Sherman S.G. Measuring perceived stigma in female sex workers in Chennai, India. AIDS Care. 2011;23(5):619–627.
    1. Genberg B.L., Kawichai S., Chingono A., Sendah M., Chariyalertsak S., Konda K.A., et al. Assessing HIV/AIDS stigma and discrimination in developing countries. AIDS Behav. 2008;12(5):772–780.
    1. Babor T.F., Higgins-Biddle J.C., Saunders J.B., Monteiro M.G. World Health Organization; 2001. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Guidelines for Use in Primary Care; p. 41. [Internet]Available from.
    1. Kalichman S.C., Catz S., Ramachandran B. Barriers to HIV/AIDS treatment and treatment adherence among African-American adults with disadvantaged education. J Natl Med Assoc. 1999;91(8):439–446.
    1. Zimet G.D., Dahlem N.W., Zimet S.G., Farley G.K. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Personal Assess. 1988;52(1):30–41.
    1. Shushtari Z.J., Hosseini S.A., Sajjadi H., Salimi Y., Latkin C., Snijders T.A.B. Social network and HIV risk behaviors in female sex workers: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1020. Aug 16.
    1. Krovi S.A., Johnson L.M., Luecke E., Achilles S.L., van der Straten A. Advances in long-acting injectables, implants, and vaginal rings for contraception and HIV prevention. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;176
    1. UNAIDS . UNAIDS; 2020. The State of HIV Prevention in Uganda. Available from.
    1. Benoit C., Unsworth R., Healey P., Smith M., Jansson M. Centering sex workers’ voices in law and social policy. Sex Res Soc Policy. 2021 doi: 10.1007/s13178-021-00576-9. [Internet] Apr 24 [cited 2021 Jun 17]
    1. Kerrigan D., Kennedy C.E., Morgan-Thomas R., et al. A community empowerment approach to the HIV response among sex workers: effectiveness, challenges, and considerations for implementation and scale-up. Lancet. 2015;385(9963):172–185. Lond Engl.

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться