Fysiologiska mekanismer för terapeutiska ridingreppseffekter i en psykiatrisk population av ASD-ungdomar
24 juli 2026 uppdaterad av: University of Colorado, Denver
Fysiologiska verkningsmekanismer relaterade till omedelbara och långvariga terapeutiska ridingreppseffekter i en psykiatrisk population av ungdomar med autismspektrumstörning
Denna randomiserade kontrollstudie (RCT) syftar till att bedöma mekanismerna bakom Terapeutisk Ridning (THR) tidigare observerade signifikanta positiva effekter på ASD-ungdomar, särskilt de med samtidigt förekommande psykiatriska störningar, och att förfina information om hållbarhet, dos och subpopulation effekterna av interventionen.
Studieöversikt
Status
Avslutad
Betingelser
Intervention / Behandling
Detaljerad beskrivning
Denna randomiserade kontrollstudie (RCT) kommer att testa hypotesen att fysiologiska svarsmönster för spottisol, kardiovaskulär och elektrodermal aktivitet står för våra tidigare observerade signifikanta resultat (d.v.s. minskad irritabilitet och hyperaktivitet och förbättrad social och kommunikation) och ytterligare resultat ( känsloreglering vårdgivares livskvalitet och krisanvändning av mentalvård), hos ungdomar 6-16 år.
med ASD och samtidigt förekommande psykiatriska diagnoser randomiserade till en 10-veckors manuell THR-intervention jämfört med en kontroll utan häst Barn Activity (BA) (Mål 1).
Vi kommer att utvärdera hållbarheten av mål 1-resultat i THR-gruppen jämfört med BA-kontrollgruppen sex månader efter interventionsperioden (Mål 2).
Slutligen kommer vi att utforska dos- och subpopulationseffekter av THR- och BA-interventioner genom att jämföra effektstorleksskillnader i THR- och BA-grupper med (a) en 10-veckors väntelista kontrollgrupp; (b) En hybridinterventionsgrupp (fem veckor BA följt av fem veckors THR). och (c) ett delprov av THR-studiepopulationen som randomiserats efter psykiatrisk sjukhusvistelse (Mål 3).
Studietyp
Interventionell
Inskrivning (Faktisk)
236
Fas
- Inte tillämpbar
Kontakter och platser
Det här avsnittet innehåller kontaktuppgifter för dem som genomför studien och information om var denna studie genomförs.
Studieorter
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, Förenta staterna, 80218
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
-
-
Maine
-
Portland, Maine, Förenta staterna, 04102
- Maine Health
-
-
Deltagandekriterier
Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.
Urvalskriterier
Åldrar som är berättigade till studier
6 år till 17 år (Barn)
Tar emot friska volontärer
Ja
Beskrivning
Inklusionskriterier:
- dokumenterad ASD-diagnos och en samtidigt förekommande psykiatrisk störning
- ABC Irritabilitet underskala poäng ≥8
- Leiter-III Nonverbal IQ ≥ 40
- uppfylla Symptom Criterion-poäng (minsta antal symtom som krävs för en DSM-V-diagnos (humör, ångest eller ADHD) på CASI-5)
- uppfylla ASD-gränser på SCQ (≥ 11) och på ADOS-2
- Endast ett barn med ASD per familj för att upprätthålla oberoende observationer
- en konsekvent vårdgivare (d.v.s. förälder eller vårdnadshavare) för att genomföra mätningar av studieresultat
Exklusions kriterier:
- medicinska eller beteendemässiga problem som hindrar deltagande
- statens avdelning
- bedömdes under ridcenterskärmen ha betydande riderfarenhet
- rökning eller regelbunden användning av orala, inhalerade eller topikala steroider på regelbunden basis, faktorer som är kända för att påverka kortisolnivåerna
- Deltagare som väger 200 pund eller mer kommer att uteslutas på grund av ridcentrets säkerhetspolicyer
- Deltagarna kommer inte att tillåtas påbörja baslinjebedömningar förrän det har gått minst sex månader från det att de senast engagerade sig i monterad EAAT, givet pilotbevis för sex månaders upprätthållande av THR-effekter.
Studieplan
Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.
Hur är studien utformad?
Designdetaljer
- Primärt syfte: Behandling
- Tilldelning: Randomiserad
- Interventionsmodell: Parallellt uppdrag
- Maskning: Enda
Vapen och interventioner
Deltagargrupp / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Inget ingripande: Väntelista
De som tilldelats väntelista kommer inte att ha någon hästrelaterad insats under en 10-veckors vänteperiod.
Efter denna vänteperiod och slutförandet av efterbedömningar kommer deltagare i detta tillstånd att börja en hybridgrupp (se Hybridarm)
|
|
|
Experimentell: Terapeutisk ridning
Denna arm är en 10 veckor lång en timmes liten grupp (2-4 deltagare) ledd av en THR-instruktör.
Gruppen kommer att inkludera en 45-minuters monterad aktivitet för att lära sig hästkunskaper som beskrivs i studiens THR-manual, .
Grupptider kommer att vara mellan 13:00-17:00 för att samla in spottkortisol.
Varje vecka kommer deltagarna att följa en konsekvent rutin med att bära både sin elektrodermala aktivitet och pulsmätare, sitta vid ett gruppkonstbord före lektionen, efter detta kommer studiepersonalen att instruera deltagarna att placera den 10 cm långa skumpinnestaven under tungan för en minut medan du tittar på en 1-minuters timer.
Deltagarna tar sedan på sig sina ridhjälmar och går in på ridbanan.
Varje vecka efter avslutad THR-intervention kommer deltagarna igen att sitta med sin grupp vid ett konstbord i 5 minuter följt av ett nytt salivprov.
|
Hästterapi
Andra namn:
|
|
Aktiv komparator: Ladugårdsaktivitet
Denna arm är en 10 veckor lång en timmes liten grupp (2-4 deltagare) som leds av en THR-instruktör och leds av en leverantör av mental hälsa eller arbetsterapi.
Deltagarna kommer att ha en tilldelad volontär och kommer inte ha någon fysisk kontakt med hästar på ridcentret, bara se hästar på avstånd.
Det kommer att finnas en uppstoppad leksakshäst i naturlig storlek för praktisk inlärning relaterat till veckoämnet enligt BA-studiehandboken.
Grupptider kommer att vara mellan 13:00-17:00 för att samla in spottkortisol.
Varje vecka kommer deltagarna att följa en konsekvent rutin med att bära både sin elektrodermala aktivitet och pulsmätare, sitta vid ett gruppkonstbord före lektionen, efter detta kommer studiepersonalen att instruera deltagarna att placera den 10 cm långa skumpinnestaven under tungan för en minut medan du tittar på en 1-minuters timer.
Varje vecka efter avslutad BA-intervention kommer deltagarna återigen att sitta med sin grupp vid ett konstbord i 5 minuter följt av ett nytt salivprov.
|
Horsemanship grupp
Andra namn:
|
|
Experimentell: Hybrid
Deltagare som fyller i väntelistan Arm- och postbedömningar kommer att börja en hybridgrupp mellan 13:00-17:00.
Gruppen består av en 5-veckor 1-timmes BA liten grupp (2-4 deltagare) ledd av en THR-instruktör och leds av en mentalvårdsrådgivare eller OT.
Deltagarna kommer att ha en tilldelad volontär och har ingen fysisk kontakt med hästar på ridcentret, bara se hästar på avstånd.
Det kommer att finnas en uppstoppad häst i naturlig storlek för praktisk inlärning av veckoämnen per BA-studiemanual.
Grupp.
Därefter kommer deltagarna att genomföra 5 veckors terapeutisk ridning i liten grupp (2-4 deltagare) under ledning av en THR-instruktör.
Gruppen kommer att inkludera en 45-minuters uppriden aktivitet för att lära sig hästfärdigheter följt av en 15-minuters omriden hästskötsel- och slagaktivitet enligt THR-manualen.
Deltagarna kommer att ha en tilldelad häst och volontär(er).
|
Mark- och ridaktiviteter
Andra namn:
|
Vad mäter studien?
Primära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community (ABC-C) - Baseline
Tidsram: Baseline
|
The ABC-C is a 58-item caregiver-completed symptom checklist of 5 behavior subscales (i.e.
Irritability, Lethargy, Stereotypy, Hyperactivity, Inappropriate Speech) capturing problem behaviors of children and adults with developmental disabilities in community settings on each subscale.
THIS MEASURE DOES NOT GENERATE A TOTAL SCORE.
Subscale symptom presence and severity scores range from 0 "not a problem" to higher scores indicating more severe problems.
The Irritability subscale scores can range between 0-45; The Lethargy subscale scores can range between 0-48; The Stereotypy subscale scores can range between 0-21; The Hyperactivity subscale scores can range between 0-48; The Inappropriate Speech subscale scores can range between 0-12.
|
Baseline
|
|
Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community (ABC-C) - End of Treatment
Tidsram: End of Treatment
|
The ABC-C is a 58-item caregiver-completed symptom checklist of 5 behavior subscales (i.e.
Irritability, Lethargy, Stereotypy, Hyperactivity, Inappropriate Speech) capturing problem behaviors of children and adults with developmental disabilities in community settings on each subscale.
THIS MEASURE DOES NOT GENERATE A TOTAL SCORE.
Subscale symptom presence and severity scores range from 0 "not a problem" to higher scores indicating more severe problems.
The Irritability subscale scores can range between 0-45; The Lethargy subscale scores can range between 0-48; The Stereotypy subscale scores can range between 0-21; The Hyperactivity subscale scores can range between 0-48; The Inappropriate Speech subscale scores can range between 0-12.
|
End of Treatment
|
|
Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community (ABC-C) - 6 Months Post Treatrment
Tidsram: 6 months post intervention
|
The ABC is a 58-item caregiver-completed symptom checklist of 5 behavior subscales (i.e.
Irritability, Lethargy, Stereotypy, Hyperactivity, Inappropriate Speech) capturing problem behaviors of children and adults with developmental disabilities in community settings on each subscale.
THIS MEASURE DOES NOT GENERATE A TOTAL SCORE.
Subscale symptom presence and severity scores range from 0 "not a problem" to higher scores indicating more severe problems.
The Irritability subscale scores can range between 0-45; The Lethargy subscale scores can range between 0-48; The Stereotypy subscale scores can range between 0-21; The Hyperactivity subscale scores can range between 0-48; The Inappropriate Speech subscale scores can range between 0-12.
|
6 months post intervention
|
|
Social Responsiveness Scale™, Second Edition - End of Treatment
Tidsram: End of Treatment
|
The SOCIAL RESPONSIVENESS SCALE™, Second Edition is a 65-item caregiver-report measure that evaluates social impairments in ASD.
THIS STUDY USED RAW SCORES FOR ANALYSES.
FOR ALL SCALES, HIGHER RAW SCORES INDICATE WORSE OUTCOME.
Combined Social Responsiveness Scale total raw scores RANGE from a MINIMUM score of 0 to a MAXIMUM score of 134.
Social Awareness raw scores RANGE from a MINIMUM score of 0 to a MAXIMUM score of 19.
Social Cognition raw scores RANGE from a MINIMUM score of 0 to a MAXIMUM score of g 28.
Social Communication raw scores range from a MINIMUM score of 0 to a MAXIMUM score of 47. Social Motivation raw scores range from a MINIMUM score of 0 to a MAXIMUM score of 26.
Restricted/Repetitive Behavior raw scores range from a MINIMUM score of 0 to a MAXIMUM score of 28.
|
End of Treatment
|
|
Social Responsiveness Scale™, Second Edition - 6 Months Post Treatment
Tidsram: 6 months post intervention
|
The SOCIAL RESPONSIVENESS SCALE™, Second Edition is a 65-item caregiver-report measure that evaluates social impairments in ASD.
THIS STUDY USED RAW SCORES FOR ANALYSES.
FOR ALL SCALES, HIGHER RAW SCORES INDICATE WORSE OUTCOME.
Combined Social Responsiveness Scale total raw scores RANGE from a MINIMUM score of 0 to a MAXIMUM score of 134.
Social Awareness raw scores RANGE from a MINIMUM score of 0 to a MAXIMUM score of 19.
Social Cognition raw scores RANGE from a MINIMUM score of 0 to a MAXIMUM score of 28.
Social Communication raw scores range from a MINIMUM score of 0 to a MAXIMUM score of 47. Social Motivation raw scores range from a MINIMUM score of 0 to a MAXIMUM score of 26.
Restricted/Repetitive Behavior raw scores range from a MINIMUM score of 0 to a MAXIMUM score of 28.
|
6 months post intervention
|
|
Emotion Dysregulation Inventory (EDI) - Baseline
Tidsram: Baseline
|
The EDI is a 30-item caregiver report form that is comprised of a 24-item EDI Reactivity scale and 6-item Dysphoria scales that are scored separately.
The Reactivity subscale captures intense, rapidly escalating, sustained, and poorly regulated negative emotional reactions.
The Dysphoria scale captures minimal positive affect and motivation along with the presence of nervousness and sadness.
Each scale (Reactivity and Dysphoria) raw scores were converted into t-scores using the Clinical (ASD) sample t-score with a mean= 50 and standard deviation = 10 (citation here).
The theoretical bound of both subscale t-scores is 20-80 and higher scores indicate more symptom severity.
|
Baseline
|
|
Emotion Dysregulation Inventory (EDI) - End of Treatment
Tidsram: End of Treatment
|
The EDI is a 30-item caregiver report form that is comprised of a 24-item EDI Reactivity scale and 6-item Dysphoria scales that are scored separately.
The Reactivity subscale captures intense, rapidly escalating, sustained, and poorly regulated negative emotional reactions.
The Dysphoria scale captures minimal positive affect and motivation along with the presence of nervousness and sadness.
Each scale (Reactivity and Dysphoria) raw scores were converted into t-scores using the Clinical (ASD) sample t-score with a mean= 50 and standard deviation = 10 (citation here).
The theoretical bound of both subscale t-scores is 20-80 and higher scores indicate more symptom severity.
|
End of Treatment
|
|
Emotion Dysregulation Inventory (EDI) - 6 Months Post Treatment
Tidsram: 6 months post intervention
|
The EDI is a 30-item caregiver report form that is comprised of a 24-item EDI Reactivity scale and 6-item Dysphoria scales that are scored separately.
The Reactivity subscale captures intense, rapidly escalating, sustained, and poorly regulated negative emotional reactions.
The Dysphoria scale captures minimal positive affect and motivation along with the presence of nervousness and sadness.
For each scale (Reactivity and Dysphoria), raw scores were converted into t-scores using the Clinical (ASD) sample t-score with a mean= 50 and standard deviation = 10 (citation here).
The theoretical bound of both subscale t-scores is 20-80 and higher scores indicate more symptom severity.
|
6 months post intervention
|
|
Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (SALT) - Baseline
Tidsram: Baseline
|
Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (SALT) provides standardized guidelines to elicit, transcribe, and analyze language samples from individuals, including those with ASD.
The SALT also provides language analysis programs to compute a vocabulary diversity quotient from transcripts entered into the database.
A five-minute expressive language sample was elicited by each participant and recorded by the project's Speech Therapist, blind to participants' randomized group assignment.
Participant's total number of words and total number of different words is dependent on their verbal output during the 5-minute speech sample and use of more words during the language sample is optimal.
|
Baseline
|
|
Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (SALT) - End of Treatment
Tidsram: End of Treatment
|
Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (SALT) provides standardized guidelines to elicit, transcribe, and analyze language samples from individuals, including those with ASD.
The SALT also provides language analysis programs to compute a vocabulary diversity quotient from transcripts entered into the database.
A five-minute expressive language sample was elicited by each participant and recorded by the project's Speech Therapist, blind to participants' randomized group assignment.
Participant's total number of words and total number of different words is dependent on their verbal output during the 5-minute speech sample and use of more words during the language sample is optimal.
|
End of Treatment
|
|
Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (SALT) - 6 Months Post Treatment
Tidsram: 6 months post treatment
|
Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (SALT) provides standardized guidelines to elicit, transcribe, and analyze language samples from individuals, including those with ASD.
The SALT also provides language analysis programs to compute a vocabulary diversity quotient from transcripts entered into the database.
A five-minute expressive language sample was elicited by each participant and recorded by the project's Speech Therapist, blind to participants' randomized group assignment.
Participant's total number of words and total number of different words is dependent on their verbal output during the 5-minute speech sample and use of more words during the language sample is optimal.
|
6 months post treatment
|
|
World Health Organization's Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL-BREF) - Baseline
Tidsram: Baseline
|
The WHOQOL-BREF is a validated self-report instrument consisting of 26 Likert-scale items rated on a five-point scale.
Four primary domain scores of well-being were calculated from 24 items: physical health (7 items), psychological health (6 items), social relationships (3 items), and environment (8 items).
Domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale by dividing the raw domain score by the potential maximum score and multiplying by 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life; these transformed scores are reported here.
Therefore, for each of the scales (i.e., physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment) the minimum score is a value of 0 and the maximum score is a value of 100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
|
Baseline
|
|
World Health Organization's Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL-BREF) - End of Treatment
Tidsram: End of Treatment
|
The WHOQOL-BREF is a validated self-report instrument consisting of 26 Likert-scale items rated on a five-point scale.
Four primary domain scores of well-being were calculated from 24 items: physical health (7 items), psychological health (6 items), social relationships (3 items), and environment (8 items).
Domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale by dividing the raw domain score by the potential maximum score and multiplying by 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life; these transformed scores are reported here.
Therefore, for each of the scales (i.e., physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment) the minimum score is a value of 0 and the maximum score is a value of 100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
|
End of Treatment
|
|
World Health Organization's Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL-BREF) - 6 Months Post Treatment
Tidsram: 6 months post intervention
|
The WHOQOL-BREF is a validated self-report instrument consisting of 26 Likert-scale items rated on a five-point scale.
Four primary domain scores of well-being were calculated from 24 items: physical health (7 items), psychological health (6 items), social relationships (3 items), and environment (8 items).
Domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale by dividing the raw domain score by the potential maximum score and multiplying by 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life; these transformed scores are reported here.Therefore, for each of the scales (i.e., physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment) the minimum score is a value of 0 and the maximum score is a value of 100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
|
6 months post intervention
|
|
Social Responsiveness Scale™, Second Edition - Baseline
Tidsram: Baseline
|
The SOCIAL RESPONSIVENESS SCALE™, Second Edition is a 65-item caregiver-report measure that evaluates social impairments in ASD.
The Social Responsiveness Scale™-Second Edition generates raw scores and t-scores for both the combined total score as well as for each of the 5 subscales (social awareness, social cognition, social communication, social motivation, and restricted/repetitive behaviors).
NOTE: THIS STUDY USED THE RAW SCORES FOR ANALYSES.
The combined Social Responsiveness Scale™-Second Edition total raw scores RANGE from a MINIMUM score of 0 to a MAXIMUM score of 134.
HIGHER SCORES ON THIS SCALE INDICATE WORSE OUTCOMES.
The Social Awareness raw scores RANGE from a MINIMUM score of 0 to a MAXIMUM score of 19.
HIGHER SCORES ON THIS SUBSCALE INDICATE WORSE OUTCOMES.
The Social Cognition raw scores RANGE from a MINIMUM score of 0 to a MAXIMUM score of 28.
HIGHER SCORES ON THIS SUBSCALE.
|
Baseline
|
Andra resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Salivary Cortisol - Baseline Baseline
Tidsram: Baseline sample was taken from each participant's viable cortisol sample from week 1 or if not a viable sample, then from the closest following week (i.e., either week 2 or 3).
|
Each participant donated approximately 0.5-1 mL of saliva at the riding center within 5 minutes before (i.e., "Pre-session") and 20 minutes after (i.e., "Post-Session) each THR or BA group session weeks 1-10.
Salivary cortisol collected pre- and -post intervention activities were analyzed separately.
|
Baseline sample was taken from each participant's viable cortisol sample from week 1 or if not a viable sample, then from the closest following week (i.e., either week 2 or 3).
|
|
Salivary Cortisol - Mid-Point
Tidsram: Mid point sample was taken from each participant's viable cortisol sample from week 5 or if not a viable sample, then from the closest following week (i.e., either week 6 or 7)
|
Each participant donated approximately 0.5-1 mL of saliva at the riding center within 5 minutes before and 20 minutes after each THR or BA group session weeks 1-10.
Salivary cortisol collected pre- and -post intervention activities were analyzed.
|
Mid point sample was taken from each participant's viable cortisol sample from week 5 or if not a viable sample, then from the closest following week (i.e., either week 6 or 7)
|
|
Salivary Cortisol - End of Treatment
Tidsram: Endpoint sample was taken from each participant's viable cortisol sample from week 10 or if not a viable sample, then from the closest preceding week (i.e., either week 9 or 8).
|
Each participant donated approximately 0.5-1 mL of saliva at the riding center within 5 minutes before and 20 minutes after each THR or BA group session weeks 1-10.
Salivary cortisol collected pre- and -post intervention activities were analyzed.
|
Endpoint sample was taken from each participant's viable cortisol sample from week 10 or if not a viable sample, then from the closest preceding week (i.e., either week 9 or 8).
|
|
Heart Rate Variability - Baseline
Tidsram: Baseline ECG was taken from each participant's viable ECG data recording from week 1 or if not viable ECG data, then from the closest following week (i.e., either week 3 or 4).
|
The Shimmer3 cardiac (ECG) monitor was used in this study.
This cardiovascular monitor was specifically developed to record electrocardiographic signals while participants are active or in motion.
The form factor is compact (about 2" by 1"), lightweight (13g), and designed to wear continuously and unobtrusively.
It samples ECG and HRV up to 2,048 Hz, which is sufficient for research.125
It has a built-in accelerometer for quantifying periods of physical activity, necessary to identify signal artifacts in post-processing.
Participants' Shimmer3 ECG assessments were measured continuously during the intervention lesson.
Unit of measure is ms log-10 transformed.
|
Baseline ECG was taken from each participant's viable ECG data recording from week 1 or if not viable ECG data, then from the closest following week (i.e., either week 3 or 4).
|
|
Heart Rate Variability - Mid-point
Tidsram: Mid-point ECG was taken from each participant's viable ECG data recording from week 5 or if not viable ECG data, then from the closest following week (i.e., either week 6 or 7).
|
The Shimmer3 cardiac (ECG) monitor was used in this study.
This cardiovascular monitor was specifically developed to record electrocardiographic signals while participants are active or in motion.
The form factor is compact (about 2" by 1"), lightweight (13g), and designed to wear continuously and unobtrusively.
It samples ECG and HRV up to 2,048 Hz, which is sufficient for research.125
It has a built-in accelerometer for quantifying periods of physical activity, necessary to identify signal artifacts in post-processing.
Participants' Shimmer3 ECG assessments were measured continuously during the intervention lesson.
Unit of measure is ms log-10 transformed.
|
Mid-point ECG was taken from each participant's viable ECG data recording from week 5 or if not viable ECG data, then from the closest following week (i.e., either week 6 or 7).
|
|
Heart Rate Variability - End of Treatment
Tidsram: Endpoint ECG was taken from each participant's at week 10 or if not viable ECG data, then from the closest preceding week (i.e., either week 9 or 8).
|
The Shimmer3 cardiac (ECG) monitor was used in this study.
This cardiovascular monitor was specifically developed to record electrocardiographic signals while participants are active or in motion.
The form factor is compact (about 2" by 1"), lightweight (13g), and designed to wear continuously and unobtrusively.
It samples ECG and HRV up to 2,048 Hz, which is sufficient for research.125
It has a built-in accelerometer for quantifying periods of physical activity, necessary to identify signal artifacts in post-processing.
Participants' Shimmer3 ECG assessments were measured continuously during the intervention lesson.
Unit of measure is ms log-10 transformed.
|
Endpoint ECG was taken from each participant's at week 10 or if not viable ECG data, then from the closest preceding week (i.e., either week 9 or 8).
|
|
Electrodermal Activity -- Baseline
Tidsram: Baseline EDA was taken from each participant's viable EDA data recording from week 1 or if not viable EDA data, then from the closest following week (i.e., either week 3 or 4).
|
The Shimmer3 EDA monitor was used to record EDA from participants' ventral area of the wrist using alternating current imperceptibly applied to the skin through two hypoallergenic, durable, and replaceable Ag electrodes.
As dry non-adhesive electrodes tend to move on the skin surface during physical activity and destroy signal quality, disposable adhesive electrodes with an appropriate salinity (e.g., 0.5%; EL507) were used.
EDA sampling frequency in the Shimmer3 is 4 Hz with a 0.01- 100uS range.
Peripheral skin temperature was recorded by the Shimmer3 EDA monitor at 4 Hz in the -40 to 115-Celsius range using optical infrared thermopile.
The Shimmer3 EDA recorded motion-based activity up to ±8g at 32 Hz using 3-axis accelerometry.
Participants' Shimmer3 EDA assessments were measured during the intervention lesson.
Unit of measure is microsiemens.
|
Baseline EDA was taken from each participant's viable EDA data recording from week 1 or if not viable EDA data, then from the closest following week (i.e., either week 3 or 4).
|
|
Electrodermal Activity - Mid-point
Tidsram: Midpoint EDA was taken from each participant's viable EDA data recording from week 5 or if not viable EDA data, then from the closest following week (i.e., either week 6 or 7).
|
The Shimmer3 EDA monitor was used to record EDA from participants' ventral area of the wrist using alternating current imperceptibly applied to the skin through two hypoallergenic, durable, and replaceable Ag electrodes.
As dry non-adhesive electrodes tend to move on the skin surface during physical activity and destroy signal quality, disposable adhesive electrodes with an appropriate salinity (e.g., 0.5%; EL507) were used.
EDA sampling frequency in the Shimmer3 is 4 Hz with a 0.01- 100uS range.
Peripheral skin temperature was recorded by the Shimmer3 EDA monitor at 4 Hz in the -40 to 115-Celsius range using optical infrared thermopile.
The Shimmer3 EDA recorded motion-based activity up to ±8g at 32 Hz using 3-axis accelerometry.
Participants' Shimmer3 EDA assessments were measured continuously during the intervention lesson.
Unit of measure is microsiemens.
|
Midpoint EDA was taken from each participant's viable EDA data recording from week 5 or if not viable EDA data, then from the closest following week (i.e., either week 6 or 7).
|
|
Electrodermal Activity - End of Treatment
Tidsram: Endpoint EDA was taken from each participant's at week 10 or if not viable EDA data, then from the closest preceding week (i.e., either week 9 or 8).
|
The Shimmer3 EDA monitor was used to record EDA from participants' ventral area of the wrist using alternating current imperceptibly applied to the skin through two hypoallergenic, durable, and replaceable Ag electrodes.
As dry non-adhesive electrodes tend to move on the skin surface during physical activity and destroy signal quality, disposable adhesive electrodes with an appropriate salinity (e.g., 0.5%; EL507) were used.
EDA sampling frequency in the Shimmer3 is 4 Hz with a 0.01- 100uS range.
Peripheral skin temperature was recorded by the Shimmer3 EDA monitor at 4 Hz in the -40 to 115-Celsius range using optical infrared thermopile.
The Shimmer3 EDA recorded motion-based activity up to ±8g at 32 Hz using 3-axis accelerometry.
Participants' Shimmer3 EDA assessments were measured continuously during the intervention lesson.
Unit of measure is microsiemens.
|
Endpoint EDA was taken from each participant's at week 10 or if not viable EDA data, then from the closest preceding week (i.e., either week 9 or 8).
|
Samarbetspartners och utredare
Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.
Sponsor
Samarbetspartners
Utredare
- Huvudutredare: Robin L Gabriels, Psy.D., University of Colorado Anzchutz Medical Campus
Studieavstämningsdatum
Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.
Studera stora datum
Studiestart (Faktisk)
22 december 2020
Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)
22 februari 2025
Avslutad studie (Faktisk)
22 februari 2025
Studieregistreringsdatum
Först inskickad
15 oktober 2020
Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
22 oktober 2020
Första postat (Faktisk)
28 oktober 2020
Uppdateringar av studier
Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)
18 augusti 2026
Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
24 juli 2026
Senast verifierad
1 juli 2026
Mer information
Termer relaterade till denna studie
Nyckelord
Ytterligare relevanta MeSH-villkor
Andra studie-ID-nummer
- 19-1962
- 1R01HD097693-01A1 (U.S.S. NIH-anslag/kontrakt)
Plan för individuella deltagardata (IPD)
Planerar du att dela individuella deltagardata (IPD)?
NEJ
Läkemedels- och apparatinformation, studiedokument
Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad läkemedelsprodukt
Nej
Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad produktprodukt
Nej
Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .