The first-in-human phase I study of a brain-penetrant mutant IDH1 inhibitor DS-1001 in patients with recurrent or progressive IDH1-mutant gliomas

Atsushi Natsume, Yoshiki Arakawa, Yoshitaka Narita, Kazuhiko Sugiyama, Nobuhiro Hata, Yoshihiro Muragaki, Naoki Shinojima, Toshihiro Kumabe, Ryuta Saito, Kazuya Motomura, Yohei Mineharu, Yasuji Miyakita, Fumiyuki Yamasaki, Yuko Matsushita, Koichi Ichimura, Kazumi Ito, Masaya Tachibana, Yasuyuki Kakurai, Naoko Okamoto, Takashi Asahi, Soichiro Nishijima, Tomoyuki Yamaguchi, Hiroshi Tsubouchi, Hideo Nakamura, Ryo Nishikawa, Atsushi Natsume, Yoshiki Arakawa, Yoshitaka Narita, Kazuhiko Sugiyama, Nobuhiro Hata, Yoshihiro Muragaki, Naoki Shinojima, Toshihiro Kumabe, Ryuta Saito, Kazuya Motomura, Yohei Mineharu, Yasuji Miyakita, Fumiyuki Yamasaki, Yuko Matsushita, Koichi Ichimura, Kazumi Ito, Masaya Tachibana, Yasuyuki Kakurai, Naoko Okamoto, Takashi Asahi, Soichiro Nishijima, Tomoyuki Yamaguchi, Hiroshi Tsubouchi, Hideo Nakamura, Ryo Nishikawa

Abstract

Background: Approximately 70% of lower-grade gliomas harbor isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations, resulting in the accumulation of oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2-HG); this leads to epigenetic dysregulation, oncogenesis, and subsequent clonal expansion. DS-1001 is an oral brain-penetrant mutant IDH1 selective inhibitor. This first-in-human study investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of DS-1001.

Methods: This was a multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation, phase I study of DS-1001 for recurrent/progressive IDH1-mutant (R132) glioma (N = 47) (NCT03030066). DS-1001 was administered orally at 125-1400 mg twice daily. Dose-escalation used a modified continual reassessment method.

Results: The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Eight patients were continuing treatment at the data cutoff. Most adverse events (AEs) were grade 1-2. Twenty patients (42.6%) experienced at least 1 grade 3 AE. No grade 4 or 5 AEs or serious drug-related AEs were reported. Common AEs (>20%) were skin hyperpigmentation, diarrhea, pruritus, alopecia, arthralgia, nausea, headache, rash, and dry skin. The objective response rates were 17.1% for enhancing tumors and 33.3% for non-enhancing tumors. Median progression-free survival was 10.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.1 to 17.7 months) and not reached (95% CI, 24.1 to not reached) for the enhancing and non-enhancing glioma cohorts, respectively. Seven on-treatment brain tumor samples showed a significantly lower amount of D-2-HG compared with pre-study archived samples.

Conclusions: DS-1001 was well tolerated with a favorable brain distribution. Recurrent/progressive IDH1-mutant glioma patients responded to treatment. A study of DS-1001 in patients with chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-naïve IDH1-mutated WHO grade 2 glioma is ongoing (NCT04458272).

Keywords: D-2-HG; DS-1001; IDH1-mutant gliomas; brain; lower-grade glioma; penetrant selective IDH1 inhibitor.

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Efficacy of DS-1001: waterfall plot of best percentage change in target tumor size in patients with (A) enhancing tumors and (B) non-enhancing tumors, and swimmer plots of the duration of response in patients with (C) enhancing and (D) non-enhancing tumors. Patients with enhancing tumors are shown in (A) and non-enhancing tumors in (B). In 2 patients, change in tumor size could not be assessed because they had no target lesion or observed tumor hemorrhage, and thus these patients were excluded from this analysis. Two patients (denoted by *1-2) showed a change over 100%. Patients with enhancing tumors are shown in (C) and non-enhancing tumors in (D). Bar colors represent glioma type (astrocytoma or oligodendroglioma) and bar symbols represent the type of response. Arrows at the end of the bars indicate patients who remained on DS-1001. The length of the bars represents the duration of therapy. In general, long response duration was observed in those who responded to treatment regardless of whether a patient had enhancing or non-enhancing tumors. Abbreviations: CR, complete response; MR, minor response; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparison of D-2-HG levels in archived tumor samples vs on-treatment tumor tissues according to DS-1001 dose. Circles represent individual patients, and lines represent the median average D-2-HG concentration at each DS-1001 dose or in archived samples. Tumor D-2-HG concentration at 4 DS-1001 dose levels (125-700 mg bid) is lower than archived samples. Abbreviations: bid, twice daily; D-2-HG, D-2-hydroxyglutarate.

References

    1. Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Fulop J, et al. . CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2008-2012. Neuro Oncol. 2015;17(Supple 4):iv1–iv62.
    1. Suzuki H, Aoki K, Chiba K, et al. . Mutational landscape and clonal architecture in grade II and III gliomas. Nat Genet. 2015;47(5):458–468.
    1. Grill J, Couanet D, Cappelli C, et al. . Radiation-induced cerebral vasculopathy in children with neurofibromatosis and optic pathway glioma. Ann Neurol. 1999;45(3):393–396.
    1. Brat DJ, Verhaak RG, Aldape KD, et al. . Comprehensive, integrative genomic analysis of diffuse lower-grade gliomas. N Engl J Med. 2015;3728(26):2481–2498.
    1. Hartmann C, Meyer J, Balss J, et al. . Type and frequency of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are related to astrocytic and oligodendroglial differentiation and age: a study of 1,010 diffuse gliomas. Acta Neuropathol. 2009;118(4):469–474.
    1. Ohgaki H, Kleihues P. Genetic profile of astrocytic and oligodendroglial gliomas. Brain Tumor Pathol. 2011;28(3):177–183.
    1. Yan H, Parsons DW, Jin G, et al. . IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(8):765–773.
    1. Arita H, Yamasaki K, Matsushita Y, et al. . A combination of TERT promoter mutation and MGMT methylation status predicts clinically relevant subgroups of newly diagnosed glioblastomas. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2016;4(1):79.
    1. Cairns RA, Mak TW. Oncogenic isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations: mechanisms, models, and clinical opportunities. Cancer Discov. 2013;3(7):730–741.
    1. Chowdhury R, Yeoh KK, Tian YM, et al. . The oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate inhibits histone lysine demethylases. EMBO Rep. 2011;12(5):463–469.
    1. Figueroa ME, Abdel-Wahab O, Lu C, et al. . Leukemic IDH1 and IDH2 mutations result in a hypermethylation phenotype, disrupt TET2 function, and impair hematopoietic differentiation. Cancer Cell. 2010;18(6):553–567.
    1. Lu C, Ward PS, Kapoor GS, et al. . IDH mutation impairs histone demethylation and results in a block to cell differentiation. Nature. 2012;483(7390):474–478.
    1. Sasaki M, Knobbe CB, Itsumi M, et al. . D-2-hydroxyglutarate produced by mutant IDH1 perturbs collagen maturation and basement membrane function. Genes Dev. 2012;26(18):2038–2049.
    1. Koivunen P, Lee S, Duncan CG, et al. . Transformation by the (R)-enantiomer of 2-hydroxyglutarate linked to EGLN activation. Nature. 2012;483(7390):484–488.
    1. Dang L, White DW, Gross S, et al. . Cancer-associated IDH1 mutations produce 2-hydroxyglutarate. Nature. 2010;465(7300):966.
    1. Noushmehr H, Weisenberger DJ, Diefes K, et al. . Identification of a CpG island methylator phenotype that defines a distinct subgroup of glioma. Cancer Cell. 2010;17(5):510–522.
    1. Greenberger BA, Pulsifer MB, Ebb DH, et al. . Clinical outcomes and late endocrine, neurocognitive, and visual profiles of proton radiation for pediatric low-grade gliomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;89(5):1060–1068.
    1. Perkins SM, Fei W, Mitra N, et al. . Late causes of death in children treated for CNS malignancies. J Neurooncol. 2013;115(1):79–85.
    1. Ris MD, Beebe DW, Armstrong FD, et al. . Cognitive and adaptive outcome in extracerebellar low-grade brain tumors in children: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(29):4765–4770.
    1. Tacke U, Karger D, Spreer J, et al. . Incidence of vasculopathy in children with hypothalamic/chiasmatic gliomas treated with brachytherapy. Childs Nerv Syst. 2011;27(6):961–966.
    1. Bandopadhayay P, Bergthold G, London WB, et al. . Long-term outcome of 4,040 children diagnosed with pediatric low-grade gliomas: an analysis of the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014;61(7):1173–1179.
    1. Machida Y, Nakagawa M, Matsunaga H, et al. . A potent blood-brain barrier-permeable mutant IDH1 inhibitor suppresses the growth of glioblastoma with IDH1 mutation in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft model. Mol Cancer Ther. 2020;19(2):375–383.
    1. Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, et al. . Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(11):1963–1972.
    1. van den Bent MJ, Wefel JS, Schiff D, et al. . Response assessment in neuro-oncology (a report of the RANO group): assessment of outcome in trials of diffuse low-grade gliomas. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(6):583–593.
    1. Neuenschwander B, Branson M, Gsponer T. Critical aspects of the Bayesian approach to phase I cancer trials. Stat Med. 2008;27(13):2420–2439.
    1. Babb J, Rogatko A, Zacks S. Cancer phase I clinical trials: efficient dose escalation with overdose control. Stat Med. 1998;17(10):1103–1120.
    1. Chukwueke UN, Wen PY. Use of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria in clinical trials and clinical practice. CNS Oncol. 2019;8(1):CNS28.
    1. Struys EA, Jansen EE, Verhoeven NM, et al. . Measurement of urinary d- and l-2-hydroxyglutarate enantiomers by stable-isotope-dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry after derivatization with diacetyl-l-tartaric anhydride. Clin Chem. 2004;50(8):1391–1395.
    1. Arita H, Narita Y, Fukushima S, et al. . Upregulating mutations in the TERT promoter commonly occur in adult malignant gliomas and are strongly associated with total 1p19q loss. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;126(2):267–276.
    1. Dang L, Su SM. Isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation and (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate: from basic discovery to therapeutics development. Annu Rev Biochem. 2017;86:305–331.
    1. Boddu P, Borthakur G. Therapeutic targeting of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant AML. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2017;26(5):525–530.
    1. Mellinghoff IK, Ellingson BM, Touat M, et al. . Ivosidenib in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1-mutated advanced glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(29):3398–3406.
    1. Tap WD, Villalobos VM, Cote GM, et al. . Phase I study of the mutant IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib: safety and clinical activity in patients with advanced chondrosarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(15):1693–1701.
    1. Konteatis Z, Artin E, Nicolay B, et al. . Vorasidenib (AG-881): a first-in-class, brain-penetrant dual inhibitor of mutant IDH1 and 2 for treatment of glioma. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2020;11(2):101–107.
    1. Mellinghoff IK, Penas-Prado M, Peters KB, et al. . Vorasidenib, a dual inhibitor of mutant IDH1/2, in recurrent or progressive glioma; results of a first-in-human phase I trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(16):4491–4499.
    1. Caravella JA, Lin J, Diebold RB, et al. . Structure-based design and identification of FT-2102 (Olutasidenib), a potent mutant-selective IDH1 inhibitor. J Med Chem. 2020;63(4):1612–1623.
    1. Pusch S, Krausert S, Fischer V, et al. . Pan-mutant IDH1 inhibitor BAY 1436032 for effective treatment of IDH1 mutant astrocytoma in vivo. Acta Neuropathol. 2017;133(4):629–644.
    1. Mellinghoff I, Penas-Prado M, Peters K, et al. . ACTR-31. Phase 1 study of AG-881, an inhibitor of mutant IDH1 and IDH2: results from the recurrent/progressive glioma population (Abstract). Neuro Oncol. 2018;20(Suppl_6):vi18.
    1. De la Fuente MI, Colman H, Rosenthal M, et al. . ACTR-52. Phase 1 study of FT-2102, an inhibitor of mutant IDH1, in patients with relapsed/refractory IDH1 mutant gliomas: preliminary safety and clinical activity (E-talk). Paper presented at: 24th Annual Scientific Meeting and Education Day of the Society for Neuro-Oncology; November 20–24; 2019; Phoenix, AZ, USA.
    1. Intlekofer AM, Shih AH, Wang B, et al. . Acquired resistance to IDH inhibition through trans or cis dimer-interface mutations. Nature. 2018;559(7712):125–129.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera