Lilly Insulin Glargine Versus Lantus® in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: India and East Asia Subpopulation Analyses of the ELEMENT 5 Study

Viswanathan Mohan, Kyu Jeung Ahn, Young Min Cho, Rakesh Kumar Sahay, Chien-Ning Huang, Sanjay Kalra, Manoj Chadha, Indranil Bhattacharya, So Yeon Kim, Erik Spaepen, Viswanathan Mohan, Kyu Jeung Ahn, Young Min Cho, Rakesh Kumar Sahay, Chien-Ning Huang, Sanjay Kalra, Manoj Chadha, Indranil Bhattacharya, So Yeon Kim, Erik Spaepen

Abstract

Background and objectives: Lilly insulin glargine (LY IGlar; Basaglar®) and the reference insulin glargine product (IGlar; Lantus®) are basal insulin glargine analogs with identical amino acid sequence and similar pharmacological profiles. ELEMENT 5, a Phase 3, prospective, randomized, multinational, two-arm, active-controlled, open-label, parallel-design study in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients (N = 493) showed similar efficacy and safety profiles with LY IGlar and IGlar. This study reports results from India (N = 100) and East Asia (N = 134) subpopulations.

Methods: Patients from India and East Asia (Korea and Taiwan) with T2DM who were insulin naïve (glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 7.0% and ≤ 11.0%) or on basal insulin (HbA1c ≤ 11.0%) were randomized to receive LY IGlar or IGlar along with oral antihyperglycemic medications (OAMs) for 24 weeks. Patients were instructed to self-titrate from the starting dose by 1 unit/day until fasting blood glucose (FBG) ≤ 5.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) was achieved. The key outcome was HbA1c change from baseline to Week 24.

Results: Within-group least-squares mean (LSM) decrease (baseline to Week 24) in HbA1c was similar between treatments. The upper limit of confidence interval (CI) for treatment difference was below the defined 0.4% noninferiority margin in India (LY IGlar: - 0.83%; IGlar: - 0.62%; difference [95% CI] - 0.21 [- 0.70, 0.28]) and East Asia (LY IGlar: - 1.28%; IGlar: - 1.26%; difference [95% CI] - 0.02 [- 0.34, 0.30]) subpopulations. Results of other efficacy and safety endpoints at Week 24 were similar between treatments in both subpopulations. LSM self-monitored FBG levels were similar between treatments at all visits in both subpopulations except at Week 24 in the India subpopulation (LY IGlar: 5.65 [0.10] mmol/L or 101.8 [1.86] mg/dL; IGlar: 5.18 [0.10] mmol/L or 93.3 [1.75] mg/dL; p = 0.002).

Conclusion: Efficacy and safety profiles of LY IGlar and IGlar, in combination with OAMs, were similar in India and East Asia subpopulations. This was consistent with the ELEMENT 5 total population.

Clinical trial registration: NCT02302716.

Conflict of interest statement

Viswanathan Mohan and Manoj Chadha have received speaker fees from Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi. Young Min Cho has received research support or consultant fees from Astrazeneca, Sanofi, LG chemicals, and Hanmi. Sanjay Kalra has received speaker fees from Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi. Rakesh Kumar Sahay has received speaker fees from Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk, and USV India. Indranil Bhattacharya, So Yeon Kim, and Erik Spaepen are employees of Eli Lilly and Company. Chien-Ning Huang, and Kyu Jeung Ahn do not have any conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
HbA1c levels over 24 weeks. a India subpopulation; b East Asia subpopulation; c ELEMENT 5 total population. Values presented are LSM (standard error). Analyses are based on mixed-model repeated-measures. Data points are slightly offset along the x axis to avoid overlapping error bars. HbA1c glycated hemoglobin, IGlar insulin glargine (Lantus), LSM least-square mean, LY IGlar Lilly insulin glargine. p > 0.05 for all comparisons between LY IGlar and IGlar in all three populations. p values were < 0.001 for all within-treatment comparisons in all three populations
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Self-monitored fasting blood glucose levels over 24 weeks. a India subpopulation; b East Asia subpopulation; c ELEMENT 5 total population. Values presented are LSM (standard error). Analyses are based on mixed-model repeated-measures. Data points are slightly offset along the x axis to avoid overlapping error bars. FBG fasting blood glucose, IGlar insulin glargine (Lantus), LSM least-squares mean, LY IGlar Lilly insulin glargine. p > 0.05 for all comparisons between LY IGlar and IGlar in all three populations except FBG for ELEMENT 5 total population (p = 0.007) and India (p = 0.002) at Week 24
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Incidence of hypoglycemia. a Total hypoglycemia; b Nocturnal hypoglycemia. Data presented are percentage of patients experiencing hypoglycemia measured for the overall 24-week treatment period. IGlar insulin glargine (Lantus), LY IGlar Lilly insulin glargine. p > 0.05 for all comparisons between LY IGlar and IGlar in all three populations
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Antibody binding levels over 24 weeks. a India subpopulation; b East Asia subpopulation; c ELEMENT 5 total population. Values are presented as median (25th, 75th percentiles). p values for treatment comparisons are derived from the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Data points are slightly offset along the x axis to avoid overlapping error bars. IGlar insulin glargine (Lantus), LY IGlar Lilly insulin glargine. p > 0.05 for all comparisons between LY IGlar and IGlar in all three populations

References

    1. IDF Diabetes Atlas Eighth edition. 2017. Available from: . Accessed July 2018.
    1. Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, et al. Medical management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(1):193–203. doi: 10.2337/dc08-9025.
    1. Davies Melanie J., D’Alessio David A., Fradkin Judith, Kernan Walter N., Mathieu Chantal, Mingrone Geltrude, Rossing Peter, Tsapas Apostolos, Wexler Deborah J., Buse John B. Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) Diabetes Care. 2018;41(12):2669–2701. doi: 10.2337/dci18-0033.
    1. Owens DR. Insulin preparations with prolonged effect. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011;13(Suppl 1):S5–S14. doi: 10.1089/dia.2011.0068.
    1. Hilgenfeld R, Seipke G, Berchtold H, Owens DR. The evolution of insulin glargine and its continuing contribution to diabetes care. Drugs. 2014;74(8):911–927. doi: 10.1007/s40265-014-0226-4.
    1. Heinemann L, Linkeschova R, Rave K, Hompesch B, Sedlak M, Heise T. Time-action profile of the long-acting insulin analog insulin glargine (HOE901) in comparison with those of NPH insulin and placebo. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(5):644–649. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.5.644.
    1. Riddle M. C., Rosenstock J., Gerich J. The Treat-to-Target Trial: Randomized addition of glargine or human NPH insulin to oral therapy of type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(11):3080–3086. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.11.3080.
    1. Lepore M, Pampanelli S, Fanelli C, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of subcutaneous injection of long-acting human insulin analog glargine, NPH insulin, and ultralente human insulin and continuous subcutaneous infusion of insulin lispro. Diabetes. 2000;49(12):2142–2148. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.49.12.2142.
    1. Davies M, Dahl D, Heise T, Kiljanski J, Mathieu C. Introduction of biosimilar insulins in Europe. Diabet Med. 2017;34(10):1340–1353. doi: 10.1111/dme.13400.
    1. Tieu C, Lucas EJ, DePaola M, Rosman L, Alexander GC. Efficacy and safety of biosimilar insulins compared to their reference products: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2018;13(4):e0195012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195012.
    1. Ilag LL, Costigan TM, Deeg MA, et al. Clinical outcomes of patients with diabetes who exhibit upper-quartile insulin antibody responses after treatment with LY2963016 or Lantus® Insulin Glargine. Diabetes Ther. 2017;8(3):545–554. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0253-8.
    1. A study of LY2963016 compared to LANTUS® in adult participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (ELEMENT 5). . Accessed Jan 2019.
    1. Pollom RK, Ilag LL, Lacaya LB, Morwick TM, Ortiz Carrasquillo R. Lilly insulin glargine versus Lantus® in insulin-naive and insulin-treated adults with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled trial (ELEMENT 5) Diabetes Ther. 2019;10(1):189–203. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0549-3.
    1. Rhee EJ. Diabetes in Asians. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2015;30(3):263–269. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2015.30.3.263.
    1. Unnikrishnan R, Anjana RM, Mohan V. Diabetes mellitus and its complications in India. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016;12(6):357–370. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2016.53.
    1. Tsai ST, Pathan F, Ji L, et al. First insulinization with basal insulin in patients with Type 2 diabetes in a real-world setting in Asia. J Diabetes. 2011;3(3):208–216. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-0407.2011.00137.x.
    1. Mohan V, Shah SN, Joshi SR, et al. Current status of management, control, complications and psychosocial aspects of patients with diabetes in India: results from the DiabCare India 2011 Study. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2014;18(3):370–378. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.131191.
    1. Hu FB. Globalization of diabetes: the role of diet, lifestyle, and genes. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(6):1249–1257. doi: 10.2337/dc11-0442.
    1. Anderson RT, Skovlund SE, Marrero D, et al. Development and validation of the insulin treatment satisfaction questionnaire. Clin Ther. 2004;26(4):565–578. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(04)90059-8.
    1. Nishiyama H, Shingaki T, Suzuki Y, Ilag LL. Similar intrapatient blood glucose variability with LY2963016 and Lantus® Insulin Glargine in patients with type 1 (T1D) or type 2 diabetes, including a Japanese T1D subpopulation. Diabetes Ther. 2018;9(4):1469–1476. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0450-0.
    1. Chan WB, Chen JF, Goh SY, et al. Challenges and unmet needs in basal insulin therapy: lessons from the Asian experience. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2017;10:521–532. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S143046.
    1. Chan JCN, Bunnag P, Chan SP, et al. Glycaemic responses in Asian and non-Asian people with type 2 diabetes initiating insulin glargine 100 units/mL: a patient-level pooled analysis of 16 randomised controlled trials. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;135:199–205. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.11.025.
    1. Ji L, Min KW, Oliveira J, Lew T, Duan R. Comparison of efficacy and safety of two starting insulin regimens in non-Asian, Asian Indian, and East Asian patients with type 2 diabetes: a post hoc analysis of the PARADIGM study. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2016;9:243–249. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S104752.
    1. Brath H, Paldanius PM, Bader G, Kolaczynski WM, Nilsson PM. Differences in glycemic control across world regions: a post-hoc analysis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on dual antidiabetes drug therapy. Nutr Diabetes. 2016;6(7):e217. doi: 10.1038/nutd.2016.25.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera