Role of cortical N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in auditory sensory memory and mismatch negativity generation: implications for schizophrenia

D C Javitt, M Steinschneider, C E Schroeder, J C Arezzo, D C Javitt, M Steinschneider, C E Schroeder, J C Arezzo

Abstract

Working memory refers to the ability of the brain to store and manipulate information over brief time periods, ranging from seconds to minutes. As opposed to long-term memory, which is critically dependent upon hippocampal processing, critical substrates for working memory are distributed in a modality-specific fashion throughout cortex. N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors play a crucial role in the initiation of long-term memory. Neurochemical mechanisms underlying the transient memory storage required for working memory, however, remain obscure. Auditory sensory memory, which refers to the ability of the brain to retain transient representations of the physical features (e.g., pitch) of simple auditory stimuli for periods of up to approximately 30 sec, represents one of the simplest components of the brain working memory system. Functioning of the auditory sensory memory system is indexed by the generation of a well-defined event-related potential, termed mismatch negativity (MMN). MMN can thus be used as an objective index of auditory sensory memory functioning and a probe for investigating underlying neurochemical mechanisms. Monkeys generate cortical activity in response to deviant stimuli that closely resembles human MMN. This study uses a combination of intracortical recording and pharmacological micromanipulations in awake monkeys to demonstrate that both competitive and noncompetitive NMDA antagonists block the generation of MMN without affecting prior obligatory activity in primary auditory cortex. These findings suggest that, on a neurophysiological level, MMN represents selective current flow through open, unblocked NMDA channels. Furthermore, they suggest a crucial role of cortical NMDA receptors in the assessment of stimulus familiarity/unfamiliarity, which is a key process underlying working memory performance.

References

    1. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992 Jul;83(1):87-90
    1. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992 Mar-Apr;84(2):196-200
    1. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1993;16:207-22
    1. J Neurosci. 1993 Apr;13(4):1460-78
    1. J Neurosci. 1993 Apr;13(4):1479-97
    1. Biol Psychiatry. 1993 Apr 1;33(7):513-9
    1. Science. 1993 Jun 25;260(5116):1955-8
    1. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 Jul;19(4):909-21
    1. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1993;29(2):229-33
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 26;91(9):4009-13
    1. Am J Psychiatry. 1994 Aug;151(8):1234-6
    1. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994 Nov;91(5):353-62
    1. Am J Psychiatry. 1995 Feb;152(2):213-9
    1. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1994 Fall;6(4):348-57
    1. Neuron. 1995 Mar;14(3):477-85
    1. Brain Res. 1994 Dec 26;667(2):192-200
    1. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995 Jul;52(7):550-8
    1. Nature. 1995 Aug 17;376(6541):572-5
    1. Am J Psychiatry. 1995 Oct;152(10):1517-9
    1. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1980 Dec;13(6):887-94
    1. Neurosci Lett. 1984 Sep 7;50(1-3):127-32
    1. J Neurosci. 1987 Jan;7(1):279-90
    1. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1987 Feb;26(2):401-5
    1. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1987 Jun;66(6):571-8
    1. J Comp Neurol. 1987 Jul 8;261(2):209-20
    1. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1988;11:137-56
    1. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1988;11:61-80
    1. Psychol Bull. 1988 Sep;104(2):163-91
    1. J Neurophysiol. 1989 Feb;61(2):331-49
    1. Brain Res. 1990 May 7;515(1-2):326-30
    1. Am J Psychiatry. 1991 Oct;148(10):1301-8
    1. Biol Psychiatry. 1991 Nov 15;30(10):1059-62
    1. Science. 1992 Oct 9;258(5080):245-6

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera