Validation of the Revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire (OBVQ-R) Among Adolescents in Chile

Jorge Gaete, Daniela Valenzuela, María Inés Godoy, Cristian A Rojas-Barahona, Christina Salmivalli, Ricardo Araya, Jorge Gaete, Daniela Valenzuela, María Inés Godoy, Cristian A Rojas-Barahona, Christina Salmivalli, Ricardo Araya

Abstract

Bullying is a phenomenon that affects children and adolescents worldwide, and it has major consequences for all participants involved in these situations. In Chile, researchers have validated several instruments used to investigate aggression between peers and school violence, but there is a lack of validation of instruments to investigate bullying. The purpose of this study was to provide evidence of the validity and reliability of the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire-Revised version (OBVQ-R) in the Chilean context. The participants were 2,775 students from schools of low, medium, and high socioeconomic status. OBVQ-R is a self-report questionnaire with 42 items, which has been used in different countries, and has adequate psychometric properties to assess the prevalence of victimization and aggression and various forms of bullying worldwide. Results confirmed the two-factor structure of the OBVQ-R (victimization and perpetration subscales) and good reliability (ω = 0.81 and ω = 0.75, respectively). These dimensions seem to be correlated. Comparison between OBVQ-R with the School Violence between Peers Questionnaire and the Internet Experiences Questionnaire showed some degree of agreement. The Item Response Theory analysis showed that the item about verbal bullying, in both subscales, had the lowest-severity parameters, meaning that these forms of bullying were the most prevalent. The higher-severity parameter in the victimization scale was the cyberbullying item, and the sexual bullying item showed higher severity in the perpetration subscale. The differential item functioning analysis by gender showed a trend in which boys responded with lower-severity parameters than girls. In the victimization scale, the exception was the item about spreading rumors, and in the perpetration subscale, it was the item about racial bullying. We have provided evidence of the validation of OBVQ-R among school-age children and adolescents in Chile. This study is part of a trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02898324.

Keywords: Chile; OBVQ-R; adolescents; bullying; children; questionnaire; reliability; validity.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2021 Gaete, Valenzuela, Godoy, Rojas-Barahona, Salmivalli and Araya.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Confirmatory factor analysis of the victimization subscale.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Confirmatory factor analysis of the prepetration subscale.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Confirmatory factor analysis of the model with two factors correlated for victimization and perpetration subscales.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Confirmatory factor analysis of the model with two factors uncorrelated for victimization and perpetration subscales.

References

    1. Baker F. B. (2001). The Basics of Item Response Theory 2nd Edn. College Park, MD: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation. Available online at:
    1. Bevans K. B., Bradshaw C. P., Waasdorp T. E. (2013). Gender bias in the measurement of peer victimization: an application of item response theory. Aggress. Behav. 39 370–380. 10.1002/ab.21486
    1. Bollen K. A. (1990). Overall fit in covariance structure models: two types of sample size effects. Psychol. Bull. 107 256–259. 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.256
    1. Bollen K. A., Long J. S. (1993). Testing Structural Equation Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
    1. Breivik K., Olweus D. (2015). An item response theory analysis of the Olweus Bullying scale. Aggress. Behav. 41 1–13. 10.1002/ab.21571
    1. Brener N. D., Billy J. O., Grady W. R. (2003). Assessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health-risk behavior among adolescents: evidence from the scientific literature. J. Adolesc. Health 33 436–457.
    1. Brittingham A., Tourangeau R., Kay W. (1998). Reports of smoking in a national survey: data from screening and detailed interviews, and from self- and interviewer-administered questions. Ann. Epidemiol. 8 393–401.
    1. Brown C. F., Demaray M. K., Secord S. M. (2014). Cyber victimization in middle school and relations to social emotional outcomes. Comp. Hum. Behav. 35 12–21. 10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.014
    1. Browne M. W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 37 62–83. 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1984.tb00789.x
    1. Cao Q., Xu X., Xiang H., Yang Y., Peng P., Xu S. (2020). Bullying victimization and suicidal ideation among Chinese left-behind children: mediating effect of loneliness and moderating effect of gender. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 111:104848. 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104848
    1. Chalmers R. P. (2012). mirt: a multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment. J. Stat. Softw. 48:29. 10.18637/jss.v048.i06
    1. Chiodo D., Wolfe D. A., Crooks C., Hughes R., Jaffe P. (2009). Impact of sexual harassment victimization by peers on subsequent adolescent victimization and adjustment: a longitudinal study. J. Adolesc. Health 45 246–252. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.01.006
    1. Crothers L. M., Levinson E. M. (2004). Assessment of bullying: a review of methods and instruments. J. Counsel. Dev. 82 496–503. 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2004.tb00338.x
    1. Cunradi C. B., Caetano R., Schafer J. (2002). Socioeconomic predictors of intimate partner violence among white, black, and hispanic couples in the United States. J. Fam. Viol. 17 377–389. 10.1023/A:1020374617328
    1. Evans C. B. R., Fraser M. W., Cotter K. L. (2014). The effectiveness of school-based bullying prevention programs: a systematic review. Aggres. Viol. Behav. 19 532–544. 10.1016/j.avb.2014.07.004
    1. Flora D. B., Curran P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychol. Methods 9 466–491. 10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466
    1. Fornell C., Larcker D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Market. Res. 18 39–50. 10.2307/3151312
    1. Fredrick S. S., Demaray M. K. (2018). Peer victimization and suicidal ideation: the role of gender and depression in a school-based sample. J. Schl. Psychol. 67 1–15. 10.1016/j.jsp.2018.02.001
    1. Gaete J., Tornero B., Valenzuela D., Rojas-Barahona C. A., Salmivalli C., Valenzuela E., et al. (2017). Substance use among adolescents involved in bullying: a cross-sectional multilevel study. Front. Psychol. 8:1056. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01056
    1. Galobardes B., Shaw M., Lawlor D. A., Lynch J. W., Davey Smith G. (2006a). Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). J. Epidemiol. Commun. Health 60 7–12. 10.1136/jech.2004.023531
    1. Galobardes B., Shaw M., Lawlor D. A., Lynch J. W., Davey Smith G. (2006b). Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 2). J. Epidemiol. Commun. Health 60 95–101. 10.1136/jech.2004.028092
    1. Gonçalves F. G., Heldt E., Peixoto B. N., Rodrigues G. A., Filipetto M., Guimarães L. S. P. (2016). Construct validity and reliability of Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire – Brazilian version. Psicol. Reflexão Crít. 29:27. 10.1186/s41155-016-0019-7
    1. Green J. G., Felix E. D., Sharkey J. D., Furlong M. J., Kras J. E. (2013). Identifying bully victims: definitional versus behavioral approaches. Psychol. Assess. 25 651–657. 10.1037/a0031248
    1. Haynie D. L., Nansel T., Eitel P., Crump A. D., Saylor K., Yu K., et al. (2001). Bullies, victims, and bully/victims::distinct groups of at-risk youth. J. Early Adoles. 21 29–49. 10.1177/0272431601021001002
    1. Heerde J. A., Hemphill S. A. (2019). Are bullying perpetration and victimization associated with adolescent deliberate self-harm? A meta-analysis. Arch. Suicide Res. 23 353–381. 10.1080/13811118.2018.1472690
    1. Hu L. T., Bentler P. M. (1995). “Evaluating model fit,” in Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, ed. Hoyle R. H. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; ), 76–99.
    1. Hu L. T., Bentler P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscipl. J. 6 1–55. 10.1080/10705519909540118
    1. Jadambaa A., Thomas H. J., Scott J. G., Graves N., Brain D., Pacella R. (2019). Prevalence of traditional bullying and cyberbullying among children and adolescents in Australia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 53 878–888. 10.1177/0004867419846393
    1. John A., Glendenning A. C., Marchant A., Montgomery P., Stewart A., Wood S., et al. (2018). Self-Harm, suicidal behaviours, and cyberbullying in children and young people: systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 20:e129. 10.2196/jmir.9044
    1. Jöreskog K. G., Sörbom D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
    1. Kowalski R. M., Limber S. P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. J. Adoles. Health 41(Suppl. 6), S22–S30. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.017
    1. Kyriakides L., Kaloyirou C., Lindsay G. (2006). An analysis of the revised olweus bully/victim questionnaire using the rasch measurement model. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 76(Pt 4) 781–801. 10.1348/000709905x53499
    1. Landis J. R., Koch G. G. (1977). An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 33 363–374. 10.2307/2529786
    1. Lecannelier F., Varela J., Astudillo J., Rodríguez J., Orellana P. (2010). “Adaptación y validación del instrumento “internet experiences questionnaire” a escolares que cursan 7’ año básico a 4’ medio, de la ciudad de Santiago de Chile, en el año 2008. En: Paz Ciudadana Ed,” Paper presented at the Sexto Congreso Nacional de Investigación Sobre Violencia y Delincuencia, Santiago.
    1. Lecannelier F., Varela J., Rodríguez J., Hoffmann M., Flores F., Ascanio L. (2011). Validación del Cuestionario de Maltrato entre Iguales por Abuso de Poder (MIAP) para escolares. Rev. Méd. Chile 139 474–479.
    1. Malta D. C., Silva M. A. I., Mello F. C. M. D., Monteiro R. A., Sardinha L. M. V., Crespo C., et al. (2010). Bullying nas escolas brasileiras: resultados da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde do Escolar (PeNSE), 2009. Ciência Saúde Coletiva 15 3065–3076.
    1. McDonald R. P. (2013). Test Theory: A Unified Treatment. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis.
    1. McDougall P., Vaillancourt T. (2015). Long-term adult outcomes of peer victimization in childhood and adolescence: pathways to adjustment and maladjustment. Am. Psychol. 70 300–310. 10.1037/a0039174
    1. McMaster L. E., Connolly J., Pepler D., Craig W. M. (2002). Peer to peer sexual harassment in early adolescence: a developmental perspective. Dev. Psychopathol. 14 91–105. 10.1017/s0954579402001050
    1. Menesini E., Salmivalli C. (2017). Bullying in schools: the state of knowledge and effective interventions. Psychol. Health Med. 22(Suppl. 1), 240–253. 10.1080/13548506.2017.1279740
    1. Modecki K. L., Minchin J., Harbaugh A. G., Guerra N. G., Runions K. C. (2014). Bullying prevalence across contexts: a meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. J. Adolesc. Health 55 602–611. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.06.007
    1. Muthén B. (1984). A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika 49 115–132. 10.1007/BF02294210
    1. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Preventing Bullying Through Science, Policy, and Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 10.17226/23482.
    1. Nelson H. J., Burns S. K., Kendall G. E., Schonert-Reichl K. A. (2018). The factors that influence and protect against power imbalance in covert bullying among preadolescent children at school: a thematic analysis. J. Schl. Nurs. 34 281–291. 10.1177/1059840517748417
    1. OECD (2015). In It Together: Why Less Inequality Benefits All. Paris: OECD.
    1. Olweus D. (1978). Aggression in the Schools: Bullies and Whipping Boys. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
    1. Peng Z., Klomek A. B., Li L., Su X., Sillanmäki L., Chudal R., et al. (2019). Associations between Chinese adolescents subjected to traditional and cyber bullying and suicidal ideation, self-harm and suicide attempts. BMC Psychiatry 19:324. 10.1186/s12888-019-2319-9
    1. Pokorski T. L., Chen W. W., Bertholf R. L. (1994). Use of urine cotinine to validate smoking self-reports in U.S. Navy recruits. Addict. Behav. 19 451–454.
    1. Polanin J. R., Espelage D. L., Pigott T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of school-based bullying prevention programs’ effects on bystander intervention behavior. Schl. Psychol. Rev. 41 47–65. 10.1080/02796015.2012.12087375
    1. Raskauskas J., Stoltz A. D. (2007). Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Dev. Psychol. 43 564–575. 10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.564
    1. Reise S. P., Ainsworth A. T., Haviland M. G. (2005). Item response theory: fundamentals, applications, and promise in psychological research. Curr. Direct. Psychol. Sci. 14 95–101. 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00342.x
    1. Resett S. (2011). Aplicación del cuestionario de agresores/víctimas de Olweus a una muestra de adolescentes argentinos. Revista de Psicología de la Universidad Católica Argentina 13 27–44.
    1. Resett S. (2016). Una caracterización del acoso escolar en la adolescencia: quiénes, cómo y dónde se agrede. Perspect. Psicol. 13 11–20.
    1. Resett S., Costa D., Murata C., Falcone N. (2015). Equivalencia factorial del Cuestionario de Agresores/Victimas de Olweus según género. Interdisciplinaria 32 169–181.
    1. Rey L., Quintana-Orts C., Mérida-López S., Extremera N. (2019). Being bullied at school: gratitude as potential protective factor for suicide risk in adolescents. Front. Psychol. 10:662. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00662
    1. Rivers I. (2011). Morbidity among bystanders of bullying behavior at school: concepts, concerns, and clinical/research issues. Int. J. Adolesc. Med. Health 24 11–16. 10.1515/ijamh.2012.003
    1. Ronan G. F., Dreer L., Maurelli K., Ronan D., Gerhart J. (2013). Practitioner’s Guide to Empirically Supported Measures of Anger, Aggression, and Violence. Berlin: Springer International Publishing.
    1. Rosseel Y. (2012). lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J. Stat. Softw. 48:36. 10.18637/jss.v048.i02
    1. Salmivalli C., Peets K. (2018). “Bullies, victims, bully-victim relationships in middle childhood and adolescence,” in Handbook of Peer Interactions, Relationships, and Groups, eds Bukowski W. M., Laursen B., Rubin K. H. (New York, NY: Guilford Press; ).
    1. Samejima F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika 34 1–97. 10.1007/BF03372160
    1. Schumacker R. E., Lomax R. G. (2012). A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd Edn. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis.
    1. Shute R., Owens L., Slee P. (2008). Everyday victimization of adolescent girls by boys: sexual harassment, bullying or aggression? Sex Roles 58 477–489. 10.1007/s11199-007-9363-5
    1. Skapinakis P., Bellos S., Gkatsa T., Magklara K., Lewis G., Araya R., et al. (2011). The association between bullying and early stages of suicidal ideation in late adolescents in Greece. BMC Psychiatry 11:22. 10.1186/1471-244X-11-22
    1. Smith P. K., Kwak K., Toda Y. (2016). School Bullying in Different Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    1. Smith P. K., López-Castro L., Robinson S., Görzig A. (2019). Consistency of gender differences in bullying in cross-cultural surveys. Aggres. Viol. Behav. 45 33–40. 10.1016/j.avb.2018.04.006
    1. Solberg M. E., Olweus D. (2003). Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Aggres. Behav. 29 239–268. 10.1002/ab.10047
    1. Straus M. A., Stewart J. H. (1999). Corporal punishment by american parents: national data on prevalence, chronicity, severity, and duration, in relation to child and family characteristics. Clin. Child Fam. Psychol. Rev. 2 55–70. 10.1023/A:1021891529770
    1. Tippett N., Wolke D. (2014). Socioeconomic status and bullying: a meta-analysis. Am. J. Publ. Health 104 e48–e59. 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301960
    1. Vessey J., Strout T. D., DiFazio R. L., Walker A. (2014). Measuring the youth bullying experience: a systematic review of the psychometric properties of available instruments. J. Schl. Health 84 819–843. 10.1111/josh.12210
    1. Wang J., Iannotti R. J., Nansel T. R. (2009). School bullying among adolescents in the United States: physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. J. Adolesc. Health 45 368–375. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.03.021
    1. Zequinão M. A., Medeiros P. D., Pereira B., Cardoso F. L. (2016). Association between spectator and other roles in school bullying. J. Hum. Growth Dev. 26 352–359.
    1. Zych I., Ortega-Ruiz R., Del Rey R. (2015). Systematic review of theoretical studies on bullying and cyberbullying: facts, knowledge, prevention, and intervention. Aggres. Viol. Behav. 23 1–21. 10.1016/j.avb.2015.10.001

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera