Women's experiences following severe perineal trauma: a qualitative study

Holly Priddis, Virginia Schmied, Hannah Dahlen, Holly Priddis, Virginia Schmied, Hannah Dahlen

Abstract

Background: Literature reports that the psychological impact for women following severe perineal trauma is extensive and complex, however there is a paucity of research reporting on women's experience and perspective of how they are cared for during this time. The aim of this study was to explore how women experience and make meaning of living with severe perineal trauma.

Methods: A qualitative interpretive approach using a feminist perspective guided data collection and analysis. Data were collected through semi-structured face to face interviews with twelve women in Sydney, Australia, who had experienced severe perineal trauma during vaginal birth. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.

Results: Three main themes were identified: The Abandoned Mother describes how women feel vulnerable, exposed and disempowered throughout the labour and birth, suturing, and postpartum period and how these feelings are a direct result of the actions of their health care providers. The Fractured Fairytale explores the disconnect between the expectations and reality of the birth experience and immediate postpartum period for women, and how this reality impacts upon their ability to mother their newborn child and the sexual relationship they have with their partner. A Completely Different Normal discusses the emotional pathway women travel as they work to rediscover and redefine a new sense of self following severe perineal trauma.

Conclusion: How women are cared for during their labour, birth and postnatal period has a direct impact on how they process, understand and rediscover a new sense of self following severe perineal trauma. Women who experience severe perineal trauma and associated postnatal morbidities undergo a transition as their maternal body boundaries shift, and the trauma to their perineum results in an extended physical opening whereby the internal becomes external, and that creates a continual shift between self and other.

References

    1. Dahlen H, Homer C, Cooke M, Upton A, Nunn R, Brodrick B. Perineal outcomes and maternal comfort related to the application of perineal warm packs in the second stage of labor. A randomized controlled trial. Birth. 2007;34(4):282–290. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00186.x.
    1. Fernando RJ, Sultan AHH, Kettle C, Thakar R, Radley S. Methods of repair for obstetric anal sphincter injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006. Art No: CD002866 DOI: 10.1002/14651858CD002866pub2 2010.
    1. RCOG. Book The Management of Third-and Fourth-Degree Perineal Tears. 29. City: Green-Top Guideline; 2007. The Management of third-and fourth-degree perineal tears: green-top guideline.
    1. Kettle C, Tohill S. Perineal care. Clin Evid. 2008;09:1–17.
    1. Baghestan E, Irgens L, Bordahl P, Rasmussen S. Risk of recurrence and subsequent deliveries after obstetric anal sphincter injuries. BJOG. 2011;119:62–69.
    1. Pauls RN, Silva WA, Rooney CM, Siddighi S, Kleeman SD, Dryfhout V, Karram MM. Sexual function following anal sphincteroplasty for fecal incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(6):618.e1-6.
    1. Bagade P, MacKenzie S. Outcomes from medium term follow-up of patients with third and fourth degree perineal tears. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;30:609–612. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2010.494205.
    1. Rathfisch G, Dikencik BK, Beji NK, Comert N, Tekirdag AI, Kadioglu A. Effects of perineal trauma on postpartum sexual function. J Adv Nurs. 2010;66:2640–2010. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05428.x.
    1. Priddis H, Dahlen H, Schmied V. Women’s experiences following severe perineal trauma: a metaethnographic synthesis. J Adv Nurs. 2012;69(4):748–759.
    1. Kristeva J. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. New York: Columbia University Press; 1982.
    1. Grosz E. Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1994.
    1. Young IM. Pregnant embodiment: subjectivity and alienation. J Med Philo. 1984;9:45–62. doi: 10.1093/jmp/9.1.45.
    1. Lupton D, Schmied V. Splitting bodies/selves: women’s concepts of embodiment at the moment of birth. Sociol Health Illness. 2013;35:828–841. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01532.x.
    1. Neiterman E. Doing pregnancy: pregnant embodiment as a performance. Women’s Stud Int Forum. 2012;35:372–383. doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2012.07.004.
    1. Ackerly B, True J. Doing Feminist Research in Political and Social Science. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2010.
    1. Shapiro M, Setterlund D, Cragg C. Capturing the complexity of women’s experiences: a mixed-method approach to studying incontinence in older women. J Women Social Work. 2003;18:21–33. doi: 10.1177/0886109902239094.
    1. Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: principles in practice. New York: Routledge; 2007.
    1. Clair JM, Wasserman J. Book Qualitative Methods. City: Blackwell Reference Online; 2007. Qualitative methods; p. 8.
    1. Curry LA, Nembhard IM, Bradley EH. Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research. Circulation. 2009;119:1442–1452. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.742775.
    1. Sandelowski M. Telling stories: narrative approaches in qualitative research. Adv Nurs Sci. 1991;8:27–37.
    1. Jackson D, Daly J, Chang E. In: Nursing Research: Methods, Critical Appraisal and Utilisation. 2. Schneider Z, Elliott D, LoBiondo-Wood G, Haber J, editor. Sydney: Mosby; 2003. Approaches in qualitative research; pp. 139–153.
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
    1. Liamputtong P. Qualitative data analysis: conceptual and practical considerations. Health Promot J Austr. 2009;20:133–139.
    1. Polit DF, Hungler BP. Essentials of Nursing Research: Methods, appraisal and utilization. 4. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1997.
    1. Dwyer SC, Buckle JL. The space between: On being an insider-outsider in qualitative research. 2009.
    1. Kanuha VK. “Being” native versus “going native”: conducting social work research as an insider. Soc Work. 2000;45:439–447. doi: 10.1093/sw/45.5.439.
    1. Salmon D. A feminist analysis of women’s experiences of perineal trauma in the immediate post-delivery period. Midwifery. 1999;15:247–256. doi: 10.1054/midw.1999.0182.
    1. Goldberg L. Rethinking the birthing body: Cartesian dualism and perinatal nursing. J Adv Nurs. 2002;37:446–451. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02111.x.
    1. Davis-Floyd RE. The technocratic, humanistic, and holistic paradigms of childbirth. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2001;75:S5–S23.
    1. Leder D. Medicine and paradigms of embodiment. J Med Philo. 1984;9:29–43. doi: 10.1093/jmp/9.1.29.
    1. Merleau-Ponty M. The phenomenology of perception (translated by Colin Smith) London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1962.
    1. Akrich M, Pasveer B. Embodiment and disembodiment in childbirth narratives. Body Soc. 2004;10:63–84. doi: 10.1177/1357034X04042935.
    1. Schmied V. Blurring the boundaries: Breastfeeding as discursive construction and embodied experience. Sydney: University of Technology; 1999.
    1. Boughton M. In: The body in nursing. Lawler J, editor. Melbourne: Churchill Livingstone; 1997. Embodied self, human biology and experience.
    1. Edwards S. The body as object versus the body as subject: the case of disability. Med Health Care Philos. 1998;1:47–56. doi: 10.1023/A:1009985821964.
    1. Cadwallader JR. Stirring up the sediment: the corporealpedagogies of disabilities. Discourse: Stud Cult Polit Educ. 2010;31:513–526. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2010.504366.
    1. McCabe J. In: Abjectly Boundless: Boundaries, Bodies and Health Work. Rudge T, Holmes D, editor. England: Ashgate; 2010. Subjectivity and embodiment: acknowledging abjection in nursing; pp. 213–226.
    1. Braidotti R. In: Writing on the body: Female embodiment and feminist theory. Conboy K, Medina N, Stanbury S, editor. New York: Columbia University Press; 1997. Mothers, Monsters, and Machines.
    1. Peake S, Manderson L, Potts H. “Part and Parcel of Being a Woman”: female urinary incontinence and constructions of control. Med Anthropol Q. 1999;13:267–285. doi: 10.1525/maq.1999.13.3.267.
    1. Danaher G, Schirator T, Webb J. Understanding Foucault. Australia: Allen Unwin; 2000.
    1. Oakley A. Fracture: Adventures of a broken body. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2007.
    1. Draper J. Blurring, moving and broken boundaries: men’s encounters with the pregnant body. Sociol Health Illness. 2003;25:743–767. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-9566.2003.00368.x.
    1. Jordan J. In: Exploring the Dirty Side of Women’s Health. Kirkham M, editor. London: Routledge: ; 2007. Containing the ‘leaky’ body: female urinary incontinence and formal health care; pp. 227–241.
    1. Thomas-MacLean R. In: Abjectly Boundless. Rudge T, Holmes D, editor. Surrey: Ashgate; 2010. Spoiled identities: women’s experiences after mastectomy; pp. 103–116.
    1. Hicks T, Goodall S, Quattrone E, Lydon-Rochelle M. Postpartum sexual functioning and method of delivery: summary of the evidence. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2004;49:430–436. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2004.04.007.
    1. Williams A, Lavender T, Richmond DH, Tincello DG. Women’s experiences after a third degree obstetric anal sphincter tear: a qualitative study. Birth. 2005;32:129–136. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00356.x.
    1. McDonald EA, Brown SJ. Does method of birth make a difference to when women resume sex after childbirth? BJOG. 2013;120:823–830. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12166.
    1. Grabowska C. In: The Social Context of Birth. Squire C, editor. United Kingdom: Radcliffe Publishing; 2009. Unhappiness after childbirth; pp. 236–250.
    1. Hipp LE, Low LK, van Anders SM. Exploring women’s postpartum sexuality: social, psychological, relational, and birth-related contextual factors. J Sexual Med. 2012;9:2330–2341. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02804.x.
    1. Rathfisch G, Dikencik BK, Beji NK, Comert N, Tekirdag AI, Kadioglu A. Effects of perineal trauma on postpartum sexual function. J Adv Nurs. 2012;66:2640–2649.
    1. Boon S. Autobiography by numbers; or, embodying maternal grief. Life Writing. 2012;9:191–202. doi: 10.1080/14484528.2012.667362.
    1. McGrath P, Phillips E, Vaughan G. Speaking out! qualitative insights on the experience of mothers who wanted a vaginal birth after birth by caesarean section. Patient. 2010;3:25–32. doi: 10.2165/11318810-000000000-00000.
    1. Fenwick J, Gamble J, Hauck Y. Believing in birth–choosing VBAC: the childbirth expectations of a self-selected cohort of Australian women. J Clin Nurs. 2007;16:1561–1570. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01747.x.
    1. Elmir R, Schmied V, Wilkes L, Jackson D. Separation, failure and temporary relinquishment: women’s experiences of early mothering in the context of emergency hysterectomy. J Clin Nurs. 2011;21:1119–1127.
    1. Beck CT. Postpartum depression: a meta-synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2002;12:453–472. doi: 10.1177/104973202129120016.
    1. Knudson-Martin C, Silverstein R. Suffering in silence: a qualitative meta-data-analysis of postpartum depression. J Marital Fam Ther. 2009;35:145–158. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00112.x.
    1. Vallido T, Wilkes L, Carter B, Jackson D. Mothering disrupted by illness: a narrative synthesis of qualitative research. J Adv Nurs. 2010;66:1435–1445. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05350.x.
    1. Fenwick S, Holloway I, Alexander J. Achieving normality: the key to status passage to motherhood after a caesarean section. Midwifery. 2009;25:554–563. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2007.10.002.
    1. Rubin R. Attainment of the maternal role: part 1: processes. Nurs Res. 1967;16:237–245.
    1. Thakar R, Sultan AH. In: Perineal and Anal Sphincter Trauma. Sultan AH, Thakar R, Fenner DE, editor. London: Springer; 2007. Postpartum problems and the role of a perineal clinic; pp. 65–79.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera