Immunogenicity of alternative ten-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine schedules in infants in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: results from a single-blind, parallel-group, open-label, randomised, controlled trial

Paul Vincent Licciardi, Beth Temple, Vo Thi Trang Dai, Nguyen Trong Toan, Doan Uyen, Cattram Duong Nguyen, Thanh V Phan, Kathryn Bright, Rachel Ann Marimla, Anne Balloch, Tran Ngoc Huu, Kim Mulholland, Paul Vincent Licciardi, Beth Temple, Vo Thi Trang Dai, Nguyen Trong Toan, Doan Uyen, Cattram Duong Nguyen, Thanh V Phan, Kathryn Bright, Rachel Ann Marimla, Anne Balloch, Tran Ngoc Huu, Kim Mulholland

Abstract

Background: Data are scarce from low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) to support the choice of vaccination schedule for the introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV). We aimed to compare the immunogenicity of four different infant PCV10 schedules in infants in Vietnam.

Methods: In this single-blind, parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled trial, infants aged 2 months were recruited by community health staff in districts 4 and 7 of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Eligible infants had no clinically significant maternal or prenatal history and were born at or after 36 weeks' gestation. Participants were randomly assigned (3:3:5:4:5:4) using block randomisation, stratified by district, to one of six PCV10 or PCV13 vaccination schedules. Here we report results for four groups: group A, who were given PCV10 at ages 2, 3, 4, and 9 months (a 3 + 1 schedule); group B, who were vaccinated at ages 2, 3, and 4 months (3 + 0 schedule); group C, who were vaccinated at ages 2, 4, and 9·5 months (2 + 1 schedule); and group D, who were vaccinated at ages 2 and 6 months (two-dose schedule). Laboratory-based assessors were masked to group allocation. Blood samples were collected at different prespecified timepoints between ages 3-18 months depending on group allocation, within 27-43 days after vaccination, and these were analysed for serotype-specific IgG and opsonophagocytic responses. Participants were followed-up until age 24 months. The primary outcome was the proportion of infants with serotype-specific IgG levels of 0·35 μg/mL or higher at age 5 months, analysed as a non-inferiority comparison (10% margin) of the two-dose and three-dose primary series (group C vs groups A and B combined). We also compared responses 4 weeks after two doses administered at either ages 2 and 4 months (group C) or at ages 2 and 6 months (group D). The primary endpoint was analysed in the per-protocol population. Reactogenicity has been reported previously. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01953510, and is now closed to accrual.

Findings: Between Sept 30, 2013, and Jan 9, 2015, 1201 infants were enrolled and randomly assigned to group A (n=152), group B (n=149), group C (n=250), group D (n=202), or groups E (n=251) and F (n=197). In groups A-D, 388 (52%) of 753 participants were female and 365 (48%) were male. 286 (95%) participants in groups A and B combined (three-dose primary series) and 237 (95%) in group C (two-dose primary series) completed the primary vaccination series and had blood samples taken within the specified time window at age 5 months (per-protocol population). At this timepoint, a two-dose primary series was non-inferior to a three-dose primary series for eight of ten vaccine serotypes; exceptions were 6B (84·6% [95% CI 79·9-88·6] of infants had protective IgG concentrations after three doses [groups A and B combined] vs 76·8% [70·9-82·0] of infants after two doses [group C]; risk difference 7·8% [90% CI 2·1-13·6]) and 23F (90·6% [95% CI 86·6-93·7] vs 77·6% [71·8-82·2]; 12·9% [90% CI 7·7-18·3]). Two doses at ages 2 and 6 months produced higher antibody levels than two doses at ages 2 and 4 months for all serotypes except 5 and 7F.

Interpretation: A two-dose primary vaccination series was non-inferior to a three-dose primary vaccination series while two doses given with a wider interval between doses increased immunogenicity. The use of a two-dose primary vaccination schedule using a wider interval could be considered in LMIC settings to extend protection in the second year of life.

Funding: Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, and The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests.

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial profile Samples collected outside the visit window (27–43 days after vaccination) were included only in the intention-to-treat analyses. Full details of the trial have been described previously. *Half of participants in groups A–D contributed to the opsonophagocytic assay analyses. †Participants allocated to groups A–D from the last 300 recruited provided a blood sample at age 18 months, with the remainder providing a sample at an alternative timepoint, because a maximum of four blood samples was permitted per participant over the course of the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportion of participants with serotype-specific IgG concentrations ≥0·35 μg/mL over time (A) and geometric mean serotype-specific IgG concentrations (B), for all PCV10 serotypes as well as the two cross-reacting serotypes Datapoints are percentage or GMC with error bars showing 95% CIs. Data for the 3+0 schedule was sourced from groups A and B combined (ages 5 months and 9 months) or group B. Data for the 2+1 schedule was sourced from group C and for the two-dose schedule was sourced from group D. The y-axis range is longer for serotypes 14 and 19F because these serotypes were more immunogenic. GMC=geometric mean concentration. PCV10=ten-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportion of participants with serotype-specific IgG concentrations ≥0·35 μg/mL over time (A) and geometric mean serotype-specific IgG concentrations (B), for all PCV10 serotypes as well as the two cross-reacting serotypes Datapoints are percentage or GMC with error bars showing 95% CIs. Data for the 3+0 schedule was sourced from groups A and B combined (ages 5 months and 9 months) or group B. Data for the 2+1 schedule was sourced from group C and for the two-dose schedule was sourced from group D. The y-axis range is longer for serotypes 14 and 19F because these serotypes were more immunogenic. GMC=geometric mean concentration. PCV10=ten-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine.

References

    1. Wahl B, O'Brien KL, Greenbaum A. Burden of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae type b disease in children in the era of conjugate vaccines: global, regional, and national estimates for 2000–15. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6:e744–e757.
    1. Mackenzie GA, Hill PC, Jeffries DJ. Effect of the introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccination on invasive pneumococcal disease in The Gambia: a population-based surveillance study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:703–711.
    1. Cohen C, von Mollendorf C, de Gouveia L. Effectiveness of 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine against invasive pneumococcal disease in HIV-infected and -uninfected children in south africa: a matched case-control study. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:808–818.
    1. O'Grady KF, Carlin JB, Chang AB. Effectiveness of 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine against radiologically diagnosed pneumonia in indigenous infants in Australia. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88:139–146.
    1. Schönberger K, Kirchgässner K, Riedel C, von Kries R. Effectiveness of 2+1 PCV7 vaccination schedules in children under 2 years: a meta-analysis of impact studies. Vaccine. 2013;31:5948–5952.
    1. Shiri T, Datta S, Madan J. Indirect effects of childhood pneumococcal conjugate vaccination on invasive pneumococcal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5:e51–e59.
    1. International Vaccine Access Center; Baltimore, MD: June 2018. VIEW-hub report: global vaccine introduction and implementation.
    1. WHO . World Health Organization; Feb 22, 2019. Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in infants and children under 5 years of age: WHO position paper – February 2019.
    1. Deloria Knoll M, Park DE, Johnson TS. Systematic review of the effect of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine dosing schedules on immunogenicity. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014;33(suppl 2):S119–S129.
    1. Spijkerman J, Veenhoven RH, Wijmenga-Monsuur AJ. Immunogenicity of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine administered according to 4 different primary immunization schedules in infants: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;310:930–937.
    1. Hamaluba M, Kandasamy R, Upreti SR. Comparison of two-dose priming plus 9-month booster with a standard three-dose priming schedule for a ten-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in Nepalese infants: a randomised, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15:405–414.
    1. Madhi SA, Koen A, Jose L. Immunization with 10-valent pneumococcal non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV) according to different schedules in infants in South Africa: a phase III trial. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2017;16:641–656.
    1. Kandasamy R, Gurung M, Thorson S. Comparison of two schedules of two-dose priming with the ten-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in Nepalese children: an open-label, randomised non-inferiority controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19:156–164.
    1. Temple B, Toan NT, Dai VTT. Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of ten-valent versus 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines among infants in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19:497–509.
    1. Temple B, Toan NT, Uyen DY. Evaluation of different infant vaccination schedules incorporating pneumococcal vaccination (The Vietnam Pneumococcal Project): protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2018;8
    1. Licciardi PV, Toh ZQ, Clutterbuck EA. No long-term evidence of hyporesponsiveness after use of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children previously immunized with pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;137:1772–1779.
    1. Balloch A, Roalfe L, Ekstrom N. Interlaboratory comparison of the pneumococcal multiplex opsonophagocytic assays and their level of agreement for determination of antibody function in pediatric sera. mSphere. 2018;3:e00070–e00118.
    1. Vesikari T, Wysocki J, Chevallier B. Immunogenicity of the 10-valent pneumococcal non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV) compared to the licensed 7vCRM vaccine. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28(suppl):S66–S76.
    1. Yeh SH, Gurtman A, Hurley DC. Immunogenicity and safety of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in infants and toddlers. Pediatrics. 2010;126:e493–e505.
    1. Kieninger DM, Kueper K, Steul K. Safety, tolerability, and immunologic noninferiority of a 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine compared to a 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine given with routine pediatric vaccinations in Germany. Vaccine. 2010;28:4192–4203.
    1. Andrews NJ, Waight PA, Burbidge P. Serotype-specific effectiveness and correlates of protection for the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine: a postlicensure indirect cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14:839–846.
    1. Voysey M, Fanshawe TR, Kelly DF. Serotype-specific correlates of protection for pneumococcal carriage: an analysis of immunity in 19 countries. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66:913–920.
    1. Johnson HL, Deloria-Knoll M, Levine OS. Systematic evaluation of serotypes causing invasive pneumococcal disease among children under five: the pneumococcal global serotype project. PLoS Med. 2010;7
    1. Saaka M, Okoko BJ, Kohberger RC. Immunogenicity and serotype-specific efficacy of a 9-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV-9) determined during an efficacy trial in The Gambia. Vaccine. 2008;26:3719–3726.
    1. Klugman KP, Madhi SA, Huebner RE, Kohberger R, Mbelle N, Pierce N. A trial of a 9-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children with and those without HIV infection. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1341–1348.
    1. Klugman KP, Madhi SA, Adegbola RA, Cutts F, Greenwood B, Hausdorff WP. Timing of serotype 1 pneumococcal disease suggests the need for evaluation of a booster dose. Vaccine. 2011;29:3372–3373.
    1. von Mollendorf C, Cohen C, Tempia S. Epidemiology of serotype 1 invasive pneumococcal disease, South Africa, 2003–2013. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:261–270.
    1. Goldblatt D, Southern J, Andrews NJ. Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine 13 delivered as one primary and one booster dose (1 + 1) compared with two primary doses and a booster (2 + 1) in UK infants: a multicentre, parallel group randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18:171–179.
    1. Tsaban G, Ben-Shimol S. Indirect (herd) protection, following pneumococcal conjugated vaccines introduction: a systematic review of the literature. Vaccine. 2017;35:2882–2891.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera