Long-term safety and tolerability of eptinezumab in patients with chronic migraine: a 2-year, open-label, phase 3 trial

David Kudrow, Roger K Cady, Brent Allan, Susan M Pederson, Joe Hirman, Lahar R Mehta, Barbara A Schaeffler, David Kudrow, Roger K Cady, Brent Allan, Susan M Pederson, Joe Hirman, Lahar R Mehta, Barbara A Schaeffler

Abstract

Background: Eptinezumab, an anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody recently approved in the United States for preventive treatment of migraine in adults, was found to be well tolerated in double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in patients with episodic and chronic migraine. The objective of the PREVAIL study was to evaluate the long-term safety, immunogenicity, and impact on patient-reported outcomes of repeat doses of eptinezumab in patients with chronic migraine.

Methods: PREVAIL was an open-label, phase 3 trial comprising a 48-week treatment phase followed by a second 48-week treatment phase. Adults with chronic migraine received eptinezumab 300 mg by 30-min intravenous administration every 12 weeks for up to 8 doses. Patients were followed for 20 weeks after the final infusion (end-of-study visit at week 104).

Results: Overall, 128 adults (mean age, 41.5 years) with chronic migraine were included. During the 2 years, the most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events were nasopharyngitis (14.1%), upper respiratory tract infection (7.8%), sinusitis (7.8%), influenza (6.3%), bronchitis (5.5%), and migraine (5.5%). The rate of study-drug discontinuation due to adverse events was 6.3%, which included 3 patients with infusion-related hypersensitivity. The incidence of anti-eptinezumab antibodies peaked at week 24 and declined despite continued dosing, to nondetectable levels at week 104. Improvements in patient-reported outcomes were observed at first assessment (week 4) and generally sustained through week 104.

Conclusion: In adults with chronic migraine, eptinezumab 300 mg demonstrated a favorable safety profile, limited long-term immunogenicity, early and sustained reductions in migraine-related burden, and improvements in health-related quality of life over 2 years.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02985398 ).

Keywords: Chronic migraine; Effectiveness; Eptinezumab; Immunogenicity; Safety.

Conflict of interest statement

● D. Kudrow: Advisory board and/or speaker: Amgen, Biohaven, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck Seattle BioPharmaceuticals, Novartis, Promius Pharma; Research support: Allergan, Amgen, Biohaven, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Lundbeck Seattle BioPharmaceuticals, Novartis, Roche Pharma, Teva, UCB, ViroMed; Speaker’s Bureau: Amgen/Novartis, Eli Lilly.

● R. Cady, S. Pederson, L. Mehta: Full-time employee: Lundbeck Seattle BioPharmaceuticals.

● B. Allan: Full-time employee at the time of study: Alder Biopharmaceuticals (CKA Lundbeck Seattle Biopharmaceuticals).

● J. Hirman: Contracted service provider of biostatistical resources: Lundbeck Seattle BioPharmaceuticals.

● B. Schaeffler: Full-time employee at the time of the study and during manuscript development: Lundbeck Seattle BioPharmaceuticals.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient disposition
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Migraine Disability Assessment total score, by visit: (a) mean changes from baseline and (b) level of disability. Mean Migraine Disability Assessment total score at baseline: 56.8. The level of disability in daily functioning was graded using the Migraine Disability Assessment total score: 0–5 days, grade I (little or no disability); 6–10 days, grade II (mild disability); 11–20 days, grade III (moderate disability); 21+ days, grade IV (severe disability) [15]
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Patient-identified most bothersome symptom: change from baseline at weeks 4 and 48. *Worse includes minimally worse, much worse, and very much worse. Not collected beyond week 48
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Patient Global Impression of Change: percentage of patients “much improved” or “very much improved” at each assessment
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Headache Impact Test: mean total score at each assessment. Baseline: n = 128; mean = 65.2

References

    1. GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390:1211–1259. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32154-2.
    1. GBD 2016 Neurology Collaborators Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:459–480. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30499-x.
    1. Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M, Freitag F, Reed ML, Stewart WF. Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology. 2007;68(5):343–349. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000252808.97649.21.
    1. Blumenfeld AM, Bloudek LM, Becker WJ, Buse DC, Varon SF, Maglinte GA, et al. Patterns of use and reasons for discontinuation of prophylactic medications for episodic migraine and chronic migraine: results from the second international burden of migraine study (IBMS-II) Headache. 2013;53(4):644–655. doi: 10.1111/head.12055.
    1. Hepp Z, Dodick DW, Varon SF, Chia J, Matthew N, Gillard P, et al. Persistence and switching patterns of oral migraine prophylactic medications among patients with chronic migraine: a retrospective claims analysis. Cephalalgia. 2017;37(5):470–485. doi: 10.1177/0333102416678382.
    1. Ford JH, Jackson J, Milligan G, Cotton S, Ahl J, Aurora SK. A real-world analysis of migraine: a cross-sectional study of disease burden and treatment patterns. Headache. 2017;57(10):1532–1544. doi: 10.1111/head.13202.
    1. Garcia-Martinez LF, Raport CJ, Ojala EW, Dutzar B, Anderson K, Stewart E, et al. Pharmacologic characterization of ALD403, a potent neutralizing humanized monoclonal antibody against the calcitonin gene-related peptide. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2020;374(1):93–103. doi: 10.1124/jpet.119.264671.
    1. Dodick DW. A phase-by-phase review of migraine pathophysiology. Headache. 2018;58(Suppl 1):4–16. doi: 10.1111/head.13300.
    1. Edvinsson L, Haanes KA, Warfvinge K, Krause DN. CGRP as the target of new migraine therapies — successful translation from bench to clinic. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14(6):338–350. doi: 10.1038/s41582-018-0003-1.
    1. Pellesi L, Guerzoni S, Pini LA. Spotlight on anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine: the clinical evidence to date. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2017;6(6):534–547. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.345.
    1. Ashina M, Saper J, Cady R, Schaeffler B, Biondi DM, Hirman J, et al. Eptinezumab in episodic migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (PROMISE-1) Cephalalgia. 2020;40(3):241–254. doi: 10.1177/0333102420905132.
    1. Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ, Smith J, Schaeffler BA, Biondi DM, Hirman J, et al. Efficacy and safety of eptinezumab in patients with chronic migraine. PROMISE-2. Neurology. 2020;94:e1365–e1e77. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009169.
    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version) Cephalalgia. 2013;33:629–808. doi: 10.1177/0333102413485658.
    1. Posner K, Brent D, Lucas C, Gould M, Stanley B, Brown G, et al. Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). Columbia University. 2009.
    1. Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Dowson AJ, Sawyer J. Development and testing of the migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire to assess headache-related disability. Neurology. 2001;56(6 Suppl 1):S20–S28. doi: 10.1212/WNL.56.suppl_1.S20.
    1. Guy W, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, National Institute of Mental Health, Psychopharmacology Research Branch, Division of Extramural Research Programs . ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. 1976.
    1. Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, Bjorner JB, Ware JE, Jr, Garber WH, Batenhorst A, et al. A six-item short-form survey for measuring headache impact: the HIT-6. Qual Life Res. 2003;12(8):963–974. doi: 10.1023/A:1026119331193.
    1. Yang M, Rendas-Baum R, Varon SF, Kosinski M. Validation of the headache impact test (HIT-6) across episodic and chronic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2011;31(3):357–367. doi: 10.1177/0333102410379890.
    1. American Headache Society The American Headache Society position statement on integrating new migraine treatments into clinical practice. Headache. 2019;59:1–18. doi: 10.1111/head.13456.
    1. Houts CR, Wirth RJ, McGinley JS, Cady R, Lipton RB. Determining thresholds for meaningful change for the headache impact test (HIT-6) total and item-specific scores in chronic migraine. Headache. 2020;60(9):2003–2013. doi: 10.1111/head.13946.
    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018;38:1–211. doi: 10.1177/0333102417738202.
    1. Sampson HA, Munoz-Furlong A, Campbell RL, Adkinson NF, Jr, Bock SA, Branum A, et al. Second symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis: summary report--second National Institute of allergy and infectious disease/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network symposium. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;117(2):391–397. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.12.1303.
    1. Dodick DW, Goadsby PJ, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Olesen J, Ashina M, et al. Safety and efficacy of ALD403, an antibody to calcitonin gene-related peptide, for the prevention of frequent episodic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, exploratory phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(11):1100–1107. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70209-1.
    1. Dodick DW. CGRP ligand and receptor monoclonal antibodies for migraine prevention: evidence review and clinical implications. Cephalalgia. 2019;39(3):445–458. doi: 10.1177/0333102418821662.
    1. Stokes M, Becker WJ, Lipton RB, Sullivan SD, Wilcox TK, Wells L, et al. Cost of health care among patients with chronic and episodic migraine in Canada and the USA: results from the international burden of migraine study (IBMS) Headache. 2011;51(7):1058–1077. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2011.01945.x.
    1. Adams AM, Serrano D, Buse DC, Reed ML, Marske V, Fanning KM, et al. The impact of chronic migraine: the chronic migraine epidemiology and outcomes (CaMEO) study methods and baseline results. Cephalalgia. 2015;35(7):563–578. doi: 10.1177/0333102414552532.
    1. GBD 2016 Headache Collaborators Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17:954–976. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30322-3.
    1. Vo P, Paris N, Bilitou A, Valena T, Fang J, Naujoks C, et al. Burden of migraine in Europe using self-reported digital diary data from the migraine buddy(c) application. Neurol Ther. 2018;7(2):321–332. doi: 10.1007/s40120-018-0113-0.
    1. Hepp Z, Bloudek LM, Varon SF. Systematic review of migraine prophylaxis adherence and persistence. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014;20:22–33. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.1.22.
    1. Tassorelli C, Diener HC, Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Ashina M, et al. Guidelines of the international headache society for controlled trials of preventive treatment of chronic migraine in adults. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(5):815–832. doi: 10.1177/0333102418758283.
    1. Detke HC, Goadsby PJ, Wang S, Friedman DI, Selzler KJ, Aurora SK. Galcanezumab in chronic migraine: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN study. Neurology. 2018;91(24):e2211–e2e21. doi: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000006640.
    1. Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Bigal ME, Yeung PP, Goadsby PJ, Blankenbiller T, et al. Fremanezumab for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(22):2113–2122. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709038.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera