Intestinal cell damage and systemic immune activation in individuals reporting sensitivity to wheat in the absence of coeliac disease

Melanie Uhde, Mary Ajamian, Giacomo Caio, Roberto De Giorgio, Alyssa Indart, Peter H Green, Elizabeth C Verna, Umberto Volta, Armin Alaedini, Melanie Uhde, Mary Ajamian, Giacomo Caio, Roberto De Giorgio, Alyssa Indart, Peter H Green, Elizabeth C Verna, Umberto Volta, Armin Alaedini

Abstract

Objective: Wheat gluten and related proteins can trigger an autoimmune enteropathy, known as coeliac disease, in people with genetic susceptibility. However, some individuals experience a range of symptoms in response to wheat ingestion, without the characteristic serological or histological evidence of coeliac disease. The aetiology and mechanism of these symptoms are unknown, and no biomarkers have been identified. We aimed to determine if sensitivity to wheat in the absence of coeliac disease is associated with systemic immune activation that may be linked to an enteropathy.

Design: Study participants included individuals who reported symptoms in response to wheat intake and in whom coeliac disease and wheat allergy were ruled out, patients with coeliac disease and healthy controls. Sera were analysed for markers of intestinal cell damage and systemic immune response to microbial components.

Results: Individuals with wheat sensitivity had significantly increased serum levels of soluble CD14 and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein, as well as antibody reactivity to bacterial LPS and flagellin. Circulating levels of fatty acid-binding protein 2 (FABP2), a marker of intestinal epithelial cell damage, were significantly elevated in the affected individuals and correlated with the immune responses to microbial products. There was a significant change towards normalisation of the levels of FABP2 and immune activation markers in a subgroup of individuals with wheat sensitivity who observed a diet excluding wheat and related cereals.

Conclusions: These findings reveal a state of systemic immune activation in conjunction with a compromised intestinal epithelium affecting a subset of individuals who experience sensitivity to wheat in the absence of coeliac disease.

Keywords: CELIAC DISEASE; GUT INFLAMMATION; INTESTINAL BARRIER FUNCTION; INTESTINAL EPITHELIUM.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Markers of coeliac disease and immune reactivity to wheat gluten. Serum levels of (A) IgA antibody to transglutaminase 2 (TG2), (B) IgG antibody to deamidated gliadin, (C) IgA antibody to deamidated gliadin, (D) IgG antibody to native gliadin, (E) IgA antibody to native gliadin and (F) IgM antibody to native gliadin in cohorts of healthy controls, patients with coeliac disease and individuals identified as having non-coeliac wheat sensitivity (NCWS). Horizontal red lines indicate the median for each cohort.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Markers of systemic immune response to microbial components. Serum levels of (A) lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP), (B) soluble CD14 (sCD14), (C) endotoxin-core antibodies (EndoCAb) IgG, (D) EndoCAb IgM, (E) IgG antibody to flagellin and (F) IgM antibody to flagellin in cohorts of healthy controls, patients with coeliac disease and individuals with non-coeliac wheat sensitivity (NCWS). Horizontal red lines indicate the median for each cohort.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Intestinal epithelial cell damage and correlation with systemic immune activation. (A) Serum levels of fatty acid-binding protein 2 (FABP2) in cohorts of healthy controls, patients with coeliac disease and individuals identified as having non-coeliac wheat sensitivity (NCWS). (B and C) Correlation of serum levels of FABP2 with lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) (B) and soluble CD14 (sCD14) (C) in individuals with NCWS. Horizontal red lines indicate the median for each cohort.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Principal component analysis (PCA) score plot for the complete dataset of serological markers (anti-transglutaminase 2 (anti-TG2) IgA; anti-deamidated gliadin IgG and IgA; anti-gliadin IgG, IgA and IgM; lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP); soluble CD14 (sCD14); endotoxin-core antibodies (EndoCAb) IgG, IgA and IgM; anti-flagellin IgG, IgA and IgM; and fatty acid-binding protein 2 (FABP2)) measured in healthy controls, patients with coeliac disease and individuals with non-coeliac wheat sensitivity (NCWS). Subjects are plotted in two dimensions using the first and second principal components (PC1 and PC2).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Symptoms and anti-gliadin antibody reactivity in response to the restrictive diet. (A and B) Composite scores for intestinal symptoms (bloating, abdominal pain, diarrhoea, epigastric pain and nausea) and extraintestinal symptoms (fatigue, headache, anxiety, memory and/or cognitive disturbances, and numbness in arms and/or legs) before and after 6 months of a diet free of wheat, rye and barley in a cohort of 20 patients with non-coeliac wheat sensitivity (NCWS). (C–E) Levels of IgG, IgA and IgM antibody to gliadin proteins before and 6 months after starting the diet in the NCWS cohort. Each individual is represented by a dot and the two points corresponding to the same individual are connected by a line. Each box indicates the 25th–75th percentiles of distribution, with the horizontal line inside the box representing the median.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Markers of intestinal epithelial cell damage and systemic immune activation in response to the restrictive diet. (A–F) Levels of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP), soluble CD14 (sCD14), endotoxin-core antibodies (EndoCAb) IgM, anti-flagellin IgG, anti-flagellin IgM and fatty acid-binding protein 2 (FABP2) before and after 6 months of a diet free of wheat, rye and barley in the cohort of 20 patients with non-coeliac wheat sensitivity (NCWS). Each individual is represented by a dot and the two points corresponding to the same individual are connected by a line. Each box indicates the 25th–75th percentiles of distribution, with the horizontal line inside the box representing the median.

References

    1. Guandalini S, Assiri A. Celiac disease: a review. JAMA Pediatr 2014;168:272–8. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.3858
    1. Louka AS, Sollid LM. HLA in coeliac disease: unravelling the complex genetics of a complex disorder. Tissue Antigens 2003;61:105–17. 10.1034/j.1399-0039.2003.00017.x
    1. Sollid LM, Jabri B. Celiac disease and transglutaminase 2: a model for posttranslational modification of antigens and HLA association in the pathogenesis of autoimmune disorders. Curr Opin Immunol 2011;23:732–8. 10.1016/j.coi.2011.08.006
    1. Rostom A, Murray JA, Kagnoff MF. American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute Technical Review on the Diagnosis and Management of Celiac Disease. Gastroenterology 2006;131:1981–2002. 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.10.004
    1. Carroccio A, Mansueto P, Iacono G, et al. . Non-celiac wheat sensitivity diagnosed by double-blind placebo-controlled challenge: exploring a new clinical entity. Am J Gastroenterol 2012;107:1898–906. 10.1038/ajg.2012.236
    1. Volta U, Bardella MT, Calabrò A, et al. . An Italian prospective multicenter survey on patients suspected of having non-celiac gluten sensitivity. BMC Med 2014;12:85 10.1186/1741-7015-12-85
    1. Biesiekierski JR, Newnham ED, Irving PM, et al. . Gluten causes gastrointestinal symptoms in subjects without celiac disease: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2011;106:508–14. 10.1038/ajg.2010.487
    1. Peters SL, Biesiekierski JR, Yelland GW, et al. . Randomised clinical trial: gluten may cause depression in subjects with non-coeliac gluten sensitivity—an exploratory clinical study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2014;39:1104–12. 10.1111/apt.12730
    1. Ludvigsson JF, Leffler DA, Bai JC, et al. . The Oslo definitions for coeliac disease and related terms. Gut 2013;62:43–52. 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301346
    1. Fasano A, Sapone A, Zevallos V, et al. . Nonceliac gluten sensitivity. Gastroenterology 2015;148:1195–204. 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.12.049
    1. Green PH, Lebwohl B, Greywoode R. Celiac disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2015;135:1099–106. 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.01.044
    1. Di Sabatino A, Volta U, Salvatore C, et al. . Small amounts of gluten in subjects with suspected nonceliac gluten sensitivity: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;13:1604–12. 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.01.029
    1. Junker Y, Zeissig S, Kim SJ, et al. . Wheat amylase trypsin inhibitors drive intestinal inflammation via activation of toll-like receptor 4. J Exp Med 2012;209:2395–408. 10.1084/jem.20102660
    1. Biesiekierski JR, Peters SL, Newnham ED, et al. . No effects of gluten in patients with self-reported non-celiac gluten sensitivity after dietary reduction of fermentable, poorly absorbed, short-chain carbohydrates. Gastroenterology 2013;145:320–8. 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.04.051
    1. Volta U, Tovoli F, Cicola R, et al. . Serological tests in gluten sensitivity (nonceliac gluten intolerance). J Clin Gastroenterol 2012;46:680–5. 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182372541
    1. Sapone A, Lammers KM, Casolaro V, et al. . Divergence of gut permeability and mucosal immune gene expression in two gluten-associated conditions: celiac disease and gluten sensitivity. BMC Med 2011;9:23 10.1186/1741-7015-9-23
    1. Brottveit M, Beitnes AC, Tollefsen S, et al. . Mucosal cytokine response after short-term gluten challenge in celiac disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Am J Gastroenterol 2013;108:842–50. 10.1038/ajg.2013.91
    1. Estes JD, Harris LD, Klatt NR, et al. . Damaged intestinal epithelial integrity linked to microbial translocation in pathogenic simian immunodeficiency virus infections. PLoS Pathog 2010;6:e1001052 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001052
    1. Brenchley JM, Douek DC. Microbial translocation across the GI tract. Annu Rev Immunol 2012;30:149–73. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-075001
    1. Catassi C, Elli L, Bonaz B, et al. . Diagnosis of non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS): the Salerno experts’ criteria. Nutrients 2015;7:4966–77. 10.3390/nu7064966
    1. Caio G, Volta U, Tovoli F, et al. . Effect of gluten free diet on immune response to gliadin in patients with non-celiac gluten sensitivity. BMC Gastroenterol 2014;14:26 10.1186/1471-230X-14-26
    1. Volta U, Caio G, De Giorgio R, et al. . Non-celiac gluten sensitivity: a work-in-progress entity in the spectrum of wheat-related disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2015;29:477–91. 10.1016/j.bpg.2015.04.006
    1. Rubio-Tapia A, Hill ID, Kelly CP, et al. . ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2013;108:656–76. 10.1038/ajg.2013.79
    1. Moeller S, Canetta PA, Taylor AK, et al. . Lack of serologic evidence to link IgA nephropathy with celiac disease or immune reactivity to gluten. PLoS ONE 2014;9:e94677 10.1371/journal.pone.0094677
    1. Lau NM, Green PH, Taylor AK, et al. . Markers of celiac disease and gluten sensitivity in children with autism. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e66155 10.1371/journal.pone.0066155
    1. Huebener S, Tanaka CK, Uhde M, et al. . Specific nongluten proteins of wheat are novel target antigens in celiac disease humoral response. J Proteome Res 2015;14:503–11. 10.1021/pr500809b
    1. Miller SI, Ernst RK, Bader MW. LPS, TLR4 and infectious disease diversity. Nat Rev Microbiol 2005;3:36–46. 10.1038/nrmicro1068
    1. Barclay GR. Endogenous endotoxin-core antibody (EndoCAb) as a marker of endotoxin exposure and a prognostic indicator: a review. Prog Clin Biol Res 1995;392:263–72.
    1. Akira S, Takeda K. Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat Rev Immunol 2004;4:499–511. 10.1038/nri1391
    1. Chen Z, Jalabi W, Shpargel KB, et al. . Lipopolysaccharide-induced microglial activation and neuroprotection against experimental brain injury is independent of hematogenous TLR4. J Neurosci 2012;32:11706–15. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0730-12.2012
    1. Sandler NG, Douek DC. Microbial translocation in HIV infection: causes, consequences and treatment opportunities. Nat Rev Microbiol 2012;10:655–66. 10.1038/nrmicro2848
    1. Pelsers MM, Hermens WT, Glatz JF. Fatty acid-binding proteins as plasma markers of tissue injury. Clin Chim Acta 2005;352:15–35. 10.1016/j.cccn.2004.09.001
    1. Pelsers MM, Namiot Z, Kisielewski W, et al. . Intestinal-type and liver-type fatty acid-binding protein in the intestine. Tissue distribution and clinical utility. Clin Biochem 2003;36:529–35.
    1. Sandler NG, Koh C, Roque A, et al. . Host response to translocated microbial products predicts outcomes of patients with HBV or HCV infection. Gastroenterology 2011;141:1220–30. 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.06.063
    1. Sacchettini JC, Hauft SM, Van Camp SL, et al. . Developmental and structural studies of an intracellular lipid binding protein expressed in the ileal epithelium. J Biol Chem 1990;265:19199–207.
    1. Adriaanse MP, Tack GJ, Passos VL, et al. . Serum I-FABP as marker for enterocyte damage in coeliac disease and its relation to villous atrophy and circulating autoantibodies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013;37:482–90. 10.1111/apt.12194
    1. Hunt PW, Sinclair E, Rodriguez B, et al. . Gut epithelial barrier dysfunction and innate immune activation predict mortality in treated HIV infection. J Infect Dis 2014;210:1228–38. 10.1093/infdis/jiu238
    1. Shahbazkhani B, Sadeghi A, Malekzadeh R, et al. . Non-celiac gluten sensitivity has narrowed the spectrum of irritable bowel syndrome: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Nutrients 2015;7:4542–54. 10.3390/nu7064542
    1. Derikx JP, Vreugdenhil AC, Van den Neucker AM, et al. . A pilot study on the noninvasive evaluation of intestinal damage in celiac disease using I-FABP and L-FABP. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009;43:727–33. 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31819194b0
    1. Cossart P, Sansonetti PJ. Bacterial invasion: the paradigms of enteroinvasive pathogens. Science 2004;304:242–8. 10.1126/science.1090124
    1. Kiesslich R, Goetz M, Angus EM, et al. . Identification of epithelial gaps in human small and large intestine by confocal endomicroscopy. Gastroenterology 2007;133:1769–78. 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.09.011
    1. Lanzavecchia A, Bernasconi N, Traggiai E, et al. . Understanding and making use of human memory B cells. Immunol Rev 2006;211:303–9. 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2006.00403.x
    1. Capolunghi F, Rosado MM, Sinibaldi M, et al. . Why do we need IgM memory B cells? Immunol Lett 2013;152:114–20. 10.1016/j.imlet.2013.04.007
    1. Bailey M, Haverson K, Miller B, et al. . Effects of infection with transmissible gastroenteritis virus on concomitant immune responses to dietary and injected antigens. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2004;11:337–43.
    1. Ehrenstein MR, Notley CA. The importance of natural IgM: scavenger, protector and regulator. Nat Rev Immunol 2010;10:778–86. 10.1038/nri2849
    1. Katz KD, Rashtak S, Lahr BD, et al. . Screening for celiac disease in a North American population: sequential serology and gastrointestinal symptoms. Am J Gastroenterol 2011;106:1333–9. 10.1038/ajg.2011.21
    1. Leffler DA, Dennis M, Hyett B, et al. . Etiologies and predictors of diagnosis in nonresponsive celiac disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;5:445–50. 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.12.006

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera