The effect of gender medicine education in GP training: a prospective cohort study

Patrick Dielissen, Petra Verdonk, Magreet Wieringa-de Waard, Ben Bottema, Toine Lagro-Janssen, Patrick Dielissen, Petra Verdonk, Magreet Wieringa-de Waard, Ben Bottema, Toine Lagro-Janssen

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the change in general practitioner (GP) trainees' gender awareness following a modular gender medicine programme or a mainstream gender medicine programme. In 2007, a prospective study was conducted in three cohorts of in total 207 GP trainees who entered GP training in the Netherlands. The outcome measure was the Nijmegen Gender Awareness in Medicine Scale and a 16-item gender knowledge questionnaire. Two gender medicine teaching methods were compared: a modular approach (n = 75) versus a mainstream approach (n = 72). Both strategies were compared with a control cohort (n = 60). Statistical analysis included analysis of variance and t-tests. The overall response rates for the modular, mainstream and control cohort were 78, 72 and 82 %, respectively. There was a significant difference in change in gender knowledge scores between the modular cohort compared with the mainstream and control cohort (p = 0.049). There were no statistical differences between the cohorts on gender sensitivity and gender role ideology. At entry and end, female GP trainees demonstrated significantly higher gender awareness than male GP trainees. A modular teaching method is not a more favourable educational method to teach gender medicine in GP training. Female GP trainees are more gender aware, but male GP trainees are not unaware of gender-related issues.

References

    1. Lagro-Janssen T, Lo Fo Wong S, van den Muijsenbergh M. The importance of gender in health problems. Eur J Gen Pract. 2008;14(Suppl 1):33–37. doi: 10.1080/13814780802436127.
    1. Dielissen PW, Bottema BJ, Verdonk P, Lagro-Janssen TL. Incorporating and evaluating an integrated gender-specific medicine curriculum: a survey study in Dutch GP Training. BMC Med Educ. 2009;9:58. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-9-58.
    1. Hamberg K. Gender bias in medicine. Womens Health (Lond Engl) 2008;4:237–243. doi: 10.2217/17455057.4.3.237.
    1. Makoul G. Essential elements of communication in medical encounters: the Kalamazoo consensus statement. Acad Med. 2001;76:390–393. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200104000-00021.
    1. Von Fragstein M, Silverman J, Cushing A, Quilligan S, Salisbury H, Wiskin C. UK consensus statement on the content of communication curricula in undergraduate medical education. Med Educ. 2008;42:1100–1107. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03137.x.
    1. Des Rosiers P, Charney DA, Russell RC, du Fort GG, Boothroyd LJ. Teaching on gender-related issues: a survey of psychiatry faculty and residents. Med Educ. 1998;32:522–526. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1998.00257.x.
    1. Kuzma MA, Rutenberg CL, Gracely E, Nieman LZ. The effect of incorporating women’s health into a PBL curriculum on students’ tendencies to identify learning issues in an ambulatory care setting. Acad Med. 1997;72:913–915. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199710000-00017.
    1. Robertson PA, Brown JS, Flanagan TA, et al. The women’s health curriculum by a problem-based learning method for medical students at the University of California, San Francisco. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176:1368–1373. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70360-0.
    1. Spencer AL, McNeil M. Interdisciplinary curriculum to train internal medicine and obstetrics-gynecology residents in ambulatory women’s health: adapting problem-based learning to residency education. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2009;18:1369–1375. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.1253.
    1. Zebrack JR, Mitchell JL, Davids SL, Simpson DE. Web-based curriculum. A practical and effective strategy for teaching women’s health. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:68–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40062.x.
    1. Conway T, Hu TC, Mason E, Mueller C. Are primary care residents adequately prepared to care for women of reproductive age? Fam Plann Perspect. 1995;27:66–70. doi: 10.2307/2135907.
    1. Hohener HC, Spielvogel AM. Teaching women’s issues in psychiatric residency: residents’ attitudes. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 1995;50:14–16.
    1. Wayne DB, DaRosa DA. Evaluating and enhancing a women’s health curriculum in an internal medicine residency program. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:754–759. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30017.x.
    1. Broderick GA, Abdolrasulnia M. Men’s sexual health: evaluating the effectiveness of print- and PDA-based CME. J Sex Med. 2009;6:2417–2424. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01270.x.
    1. Celik HH, Klinge II, Weijden TT, Widdershoven GG, Lagro-Janssen TA. Gender sensitivity among general practitioners: results of a training programme. BMC Med Educ. 2008;8:36. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-8-36.
    1. Dielissen PW, Verdonk P, Bottema BJ, Lagro-Janssen AL. Evaluating the teaching of gender-specific medicine in postgraduate training for general practitioners. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15:1226–1229. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01183.x.
    1. Pursley HG, Kwolek DS, Griffith CH, Wilson JF. Women’s health issues and residents’ knowledge. J Ky Med Assoc. 2002;100:238–244.
    1. Spencer AL, Bost JE, McNeil M. Do women’s health internal medicine residency tracks make a difference? J Womens Health. 2007;16:1219–1223. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2006.0274.
    1. Guarin-Nieto E, Krugman SD. Gender disparity in women’s health training at a family medicine residency program. Fam Med. 2010;42:100–104.
    1. Conigliaro RL, Hess R, McNeil M. An innovative program to provide adequate women’s health education to residents with VA-based ambulatory care experiences. Teach Learn Med. 2007;19:148–153. doi: 10.1080/10401330701332896.
    1. Orsetti KE, Frohna JG, Gruppen LD, Del VJ. Impact of a Veterans affairs continuity clinic on resident competencies in women’s health. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:419–422. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20733.x.
    1. Boonyasai RT, Windish DM, Chakraborti C, Feldman LS, Rubin HR, Bass EB. Effectiveness of teaching quality improvement to clinicians: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007;298:1023–1037. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.9.1023.
    1. Satterlee WG, Eggers RG, Grimes DA. Effective medical education: insights from the Cochrane library. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2008;63:329–333. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e31816ff661.
    1. Boonyasai RT, Windish DM, Chakraborti C, Feldman LS, Rubin HR, Bass EB. Effectiveness of teaching quality improvement to clinicians: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007;298:1023–1037. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.9.1023.
    1. Branch WT, Jr, Paranjape A. Feedback and reflection: teaching methods for clinical settings. Acad Med. 2002;77:1185–1188. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200212000-00005.
    1. Mann K, Gordon J, Macleod A. Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009;14:595–621.
    1. Steinert Y, Cruess S, Cruess R, Snell L. Faculty development for teaching and evaluating professionalism: from programme design to curriculum change. Med Educ. 2005;39:127–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02069.x.
    1. Van den Einden LCG, te Kolste MGJ, Lagro-Janssen ALM, Dukel L. ‘I’ll just do this one’ The role of physician in the refusal of medical students in gynaecological examinations. Acad Med. 2014;89:77–83
    1. Witte FM, Stratton TD, Nora LM. Stories from the field: students’ descriptions of gender discrimination and sexual harassment during medical school. Acad Med. 2006;81:648–654. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000232421.04170.d2.
    1. Verdonk P, Benschop YWM, de Haes JCJM, Lagro-Janssen ALM. Medical students’ gender awareness, construction of the Nijmegen Gender Awareness in Medicine Scale (N-GAMS) Sex Roles. 2008;58:222–234. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9326-x.
    1. Andersson J, Verdonk P, Johansson EE, Lagro-Janssen T, Hamberg K. Comparing gender awareness in Dutch and Swedish first-year medical students-results from a questionnaire. BMC Med Educ. 2012;12:3. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-3.
    1. Carifio J, Perla RJ. Ten common misunderstandings, misconceptions, persistent myths and urban legends about Likert scales and Likert response formats and their antidotes. J Soc Sci. 2007;3:106–116.
    1. Banks AD. Women and heart disease: missed opportunities. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2008;53:430–439. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2008.04.008.
    1. Blauwet LA, Redberg RF. The role of sex-specific results reporting in cardiovascular disease. Cardiol Rev. 2007;15:275–278. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0b013e318158b45b.
    1. Lempp H, Seale C. The hidden curriculum in undergraduate medical education: qualitative study of medical students’ perceptions of teaching. BMJ. 2004;329:770–773. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7469.770.
    1. Phillips CB. Student portfolios and the hidden curriculum on gender: mapping exclusion. Med Educ. 2009;43:847–853. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03403.x.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera