Diagnostic value of history and physical examination in patients suspected of lumbosacral nerve root compression

P C A J Vroomen, M C T F M de Krom, J T Wilmink, A D M Kester, J A Knottnerus, P C A J Vroomen, M C T F M de Krom, J T Wilmink, A D M Kester, J A Knottnerus

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate patient characteristics, symptoms, and examination findings in the clinical diagnosis of lumbosacral nerve root compression causing sciatica.

Methods: The study involved 274 patients with pain radiating into the leg. All had a standardised clinical assessment and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The associations between patient characteristics, clinical findings, and lumbosacral nerve root compression on MR imaging were analysed.

Results: Nerve root compression was associated with three patient characteristics, three symptoms, and four physical examination findings (paresis, absence of tendon reflexes, a positive straight leg raising test, and increased finger-floor distance). Multivariate analysis, analysing the independent diagnostic value of the tests, showed that nerve root compression was predicted by two patient characteristics, four symptoms, and two signs (increased finger-floor distance and paresis). The straight leg raise test was not predictive. The area under the curve of the receiver-operating characteristic was 0.80 for the history items. It increased to 0.83 when the physical examination items were added.

Conclusions: Various clinical findings were found to be associated with nerve root compression on MR imaging. While this set of findings agrees well with those commonly used in daily practice, the tests tended to have lower sensitivity and specificity than previously reported. Stepwise multivariate analysis showed that most of the diagnostic information revealed by physical examination findings had already been revealed by the history items.

References

    1. Neuroradiology. 1996 Oct;38(7):654-7
    1. N Engl J Med. 1994 Jul 14;331(2):69-73
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Dec 15;21(24 Suppl):1S
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Dec 15;21(24 Suppl):10S-18S
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Dec 15;21(24 Suppl):19S-38S
    1. N Engl J Med. 1999 Feb 11;340(6):418-23
    1. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1961;49:1-135
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Feb 1;20(3):318-27
    1. J Neurol. 1999 Oct;246(10):899-906
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Jan;25(1):91-6; discussion 97
    1. J Neurosurg. 1968 Mar;28(3):204-6
    1. N Engl J Med. 1978 Oct 26;299(17):926-30
    1. Semin Nucl Med. 1978 Oct;8(4):283-98
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983 Mar;8(2):131-40
    1. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1984;73(1-2):67-76
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1985 May;121(5):744-53
    1. Med Decis Making. 1987 Jul-Sep;7(3):139-48
    1. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988 Feb;51(2):169-73
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988 Nov;70(5):717-22
    1. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging. 1989;29(3):307-35
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989 Dec;14(12):1362-7
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Mar;72(3):403-8
    1. Presse Med. 1991 Feb 23;20(7):299-302
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1992 Jul 15;117(2):135-40
    1. Radiology. 1992 Oct;185(1):135-41
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Oct;45(10):1143-54
    1. Med Decis Making. 1992 Oct-Dec;12(4):250-8
    1. J Gen Intern Med. 1993 Sep;8(9):487-96
    1. J Spinal Disord. 1993 Aug;6(4):289-95
    1. Neurology. 1994 Apr;44(4):594-600
    1. N Engl J Med. 1994 Jul 14;331(2):115-6

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera