Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib in Chinese Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Zhan-Guo Li, Yi Liu, Hu-Ji Xu, Zhi-Wei Chen, Chun-De Bao, Jie-Ruo Gu, Dong-Bao Zhao, Yuan An, Lie-Ju Hwang, Lisy Wang, Joel Kremer, Qi-Zhe Wu, Zhan-Guo Li, Yi Liu, Hu-Ji Xu, Zhi-Wei Chen, Chun-De Bao, Jie-Ruo Gu, Dong-Bao Zhao, Yuan An, Lie-Ju Hwang, Lisy Wang, Joel Kremer, Qi-Zhe Wu

Abstract

Background: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study assessed the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in Chinese patients with RA enrolled in Phase 3 and long-term extension (LTE) studies.

Methods: ORAL Sync was a 1-year, randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 trial. Patients received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID) or placebo advanced to tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID at 3 or 6 months. All patients remained on ≥1 background conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. ORAL Sequel is an open-label LTE study (data-cut: March 2015; data collection and analyses were ongoing, and study database was not locked at the time of analysis; study was closed in 2017). Efficacy outcomes: American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 response rates and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-4 [ESR]). Patient- and physician-reported outcomes: Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Patient and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis, and pain (visual analog scale). Safety was assessed throughout.

Results: ORAL Sync included 218 patients; 192 were subsequently enrolled into ORAL Sequel. In ORAL Sync, more patients achieved ACR20 (tofacitinib 5 mg BID, 67.4%; 10 mg BID, 70.6%; placebo, 34.1%) and DAS28-4 (ESR) <2.6 (tofacitinib 5 mg BID, 7.1%; 10 mg BID, 13.1%; placebo, 2.3%) with tofacitinib versus placebo at Month 6. Mean changes from baseline in HAQ-DI were greater with tofacitinib versus placebo at Month 6. In ORAL Sequel, efficacy was consistent to Month 48. Incidence rates for adverse events of special interest in tofacitinib-treated patients were similar to the global population.

Conclusions: Tofacitinib significantly reduced signs/symptoms and improved physical function and quality of life in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severely active RA up to Month 48. The safety profile was consistent with the global population.

Clinical trial identifier: NCT00856544 and NCT00413699.

Keywords: Clinical Efficacy; Patient-Reported Outcomes; Rheumatoid Arthritis; Safety; Tofacitinib.

Conflict of interest statement

An Y, Bao CD, Chen ZW, Gu JR, Li ZG, Liu Y, Xu HJ, and Zhao DB have nothing to disclose. Kremer J has served as a consultant for, and has received research support from, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Genentech, Pfizer Inc, and UCB; he has also received payment for lectures, including service on speakers’ bureaus, from AbbVie. Hwang LJ was an employee and shareholder of Pfizer Inc at the time of analysis. Wang L and Wu QZ are employees and shareholders of Pfizer Inc.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ACR20/50 response rates in Chinese patients through: (a) Month 12 in ORAL Sync by treatment sequence (FAS, NRINAP); and (b) Month 48 in ORAL Sequel (OC). ACR: American College of Rheumatology; BID: Twice daily; FAS: Full analysis set; NRINAP: Nonresponder imputation, no advancement penalty; OC: Observed cases; SE: Standard error.
Figure 2
Figure 2
LS mean change from baseline in DAS28-4 (ESR) through: (a) Month 6 in ORAL Sync (FAS, longitudinal model); (b) Month 12 in ORAL Sync by treatment sequence (FAS, longitudinal model); and (c) Month 48 in ORAL Sequel (FAS, no imputation). *P < 0.05; †P < 0.001; ‡P < 0.0001. BID: Twice daily; DAS28-4 (ESR): Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using erythrocyte sedimentation rate; FAS: Full analysis set; LS: Least squares; SE: Standard error.
Figure 3
Figure 3
LS mean change from baseline in HAQ-DI through: (a) Month 6 in ORAL Sync (FAS, longitudinal model); and (b) Month 48 in ORAL Sequel (FAS, no imputation). *P < 0.05; †P < 0.001; horizontal dashed line represents MCID, 0.22. BID: Twice daily; FAS: Full analysis set; HAQ-DI: Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index; LS: Least squares; MCID: Minimal clinically important difference; SE: Standard error.

References

    1. Strand V, Khanna D. The impact of rheumatoid arthritis and treatment on patients’ lives. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2010;28:S32–40.
    1. Wang G, Mu R, Xu H. Management of rheumatoid arthritis in People's Republic of China – Focus on tocilizumab and patient considerations. Int J Gen Med. 2015;8:187–94. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S81633.
    1. Li Z, Yang Y. Rheumatology in China: Challenges and development. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012;51:1733–4. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes166.
    1. Zhang X, Mu R, Wang X, Xu C, Duan T, An Y, et al. The impact of rheumatoid arthritis on work capacity in Chinese patients: A cross-sectional study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2015;54:1478–87. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev014.
    1. Xu C, Wang X, Mu R, Yang L, Zhang Y, Han S, et al. Societal costs of rheumatoid arthritis in China: A hospital-based cross-sectional study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2014;66:523–31. doi: 10.1002/acr.22160.
    1. Langley PC, Mu R, Wu M, Dong P, Tang B. The impact of rheumatoid arthritis on the burden of disease in urban China. J Med Econ. 2011;14:709–19. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.611201.
    1. Wang GY, Zhang SL, Wang XR, Feng M, Li C, An Y, et al. Remission of rheumatoid arthritis and potential determinants: A national multi-center cross-sectional survey. Clin Rheumatol. 2015;34:221–30. doi: 10.1007/s10067-014-2828-3.
    1. Lau CS, Chia F, Harrison A, Hsieh TY, Jain R, Jung SM, et al. APLAR rheumatoid arthritis treatment recommendations. Int J Rheum Dis. 2015;18:685–713. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12754.
    1. Singh JA, Saag KG, Bridges SL, Jr, Akl EA, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC. 2015 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68:1–26. doi: 10.1002/art.39480.
    1. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Bijlsma JW, Breedveld FC, Boumpas D, Burmester G, et al. Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: Recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:631–7. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.123919.
    1. Li ZG. A new look at rheumatology in China – Opportunities and challenges. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015;11:313–7. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.218.
    1. Smolen JS, Landewé R, Breedveld FC, Buch M, Burmester G, Dougados M, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2013 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:492–509. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204573.
    1. Li R, Liu X, Ye H, Yao HH, Guo JL, Li GT, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in early rheumatoid arthritis: A multicenter, prospective study. Clin Rheumatol. 2016;35:303–8. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3180-6.
    1. Curtis JR, Singh JA. Use of biologics in rheumatoid arthritis: Current and emerging paradigms of care. Clin Ther. 2011;33:679–707. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.05.044.
    1. Augustovski F, Beratarrechea A, Irazola V, Rubinstein F, Tesolin P, Gonzalez J, et al. Patient preferences for biologic agents in rheumatoid arthritis: A discrete-choice experiment. Value Health. 2013;16:385–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.11.007.
    1. Fleischmann R, Cutolo M, Genovese MC, Lee EB, Kanik KS, Sadis S, et al. Phase IIb dose-ranging study of the oral JAK inhibitor tofacitinib (CP-690,550) or adalimumab monotherapy versus placebo in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:617–29. doi: 10.1002/art.33383.
    1. Kremer JM, Bloom BJ, Breedveld FC, Coombs JH, Fletcher MP, Gruben D, et al. The safety and efficacy of a JAK inhibitor in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: Results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIa trial of three dosage levels of CP-690,550 versus placebo. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:1895–905. doi: 10.1002/art.24567.
    1. Kremer JM, Cohen S, Wilkinson BE, Connell CA, French JL, Gomez-Reino J, et al. A phase IIb dose-ranging study of the oral JAK inhibitor tofacitinib (CP-690,550) versus placebo in combination with background methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate alone. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:970–81. doi: 10.1002/art.33419.
    1. Tanaka Y, Suzuki M, Nakamura H, Toyoizumi S, Zwillich SH Tofacitinib Study Investigators. Phase II study of tofacitinib (CP-690,550) combined with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63:1150–8. doi: 10.1002/acr.20494.
    1. Tanaka Y, Takeuchi T, Yamanaka H, Nakamura H, Toyoizumi S, Zwillich S, et al. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib as monotherapy in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: A 12-week, randomized, phase 2 study. Mod Rheumatol. 2015;25:514–21. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2014.995875.
    1. Burmester GR, Blanco R, Charles-Schoeman C, Wollenhaupt J, Zerbini C, Benda B, et al. Tofacitinib (CP-690,550) in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: A randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013;381:451–60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61424-X.
    1. Fleischmann R, Kremer J, Cush J, Schulze-Koops H, Connell CA, Bradley JD, et al. Placebo-controlled trial of tofacitinib monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:495–507. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109071.
    1. Kremer J, Li ZG, Hall S, Fleischmann R, Genovese M, Martin-Mola E, et al. Tofacitinib in combination with nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159:253–61. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-4-201308200-00006.
    1. Lee EB, Fleischmann R, Hall S, Wilkinson B, Bradley JD, Gruben D, et al. Tofacitinib versus methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2377–86. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310476.
    1. van der Heijde D, Tanaka Y, Fleischmann R, Keystone E, Kremer J, Zerbini C, et al. Tofacitinib (CP-690,550) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving methotrexate: Twelve-month data from a twenty-four-month phase III randomized radiographic study. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:559–70. doi: 10.1002/art.37816.
    1. van Vollenhoven RF, Fleischmann R, Cohen S, Lee EB, García Meijide JA, Wagner S, et al. Tofacitinib or adalimumab versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:508–19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112072.
    1. Fleischmann R, Mysler E, Hall S, Kivitz AJ, Moots RJ, Luo Z, et al. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib with methotrexate, and adalimumab with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (ORAL strategy): A phase 3b/4, double-blind, head-to-head, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;390:457–68. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31618-5.
    1. Wollenhaupt J, Silverfield J, Lee EB, Curtis JR, Wood SP, Soma K, et al. Safety and efficacy of tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in open-label, longterm extension studies. J Rheumatol. 2014;41:837–52. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130683.
    1. Yamanaka H, Tanaka Y, Takeuchi T, Sugiyama N, Yuasa H, Toyoizumi S, et al. Tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, as monotherapy or with background methotrexate, in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: An open-label, long-term extension study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016;18:34. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-0932-2.
    1. Wollenhaupt J, Silverfield J, Lee EB, Terry K, Kwok K, Strengholt S, et al. Tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: safety and efficacy in open-label, long-term extension studies over 9 years. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69(suppl 10):683–4.
    1. Li Z, An Y, Su H, Li X, Xu J, Zheng Y, et al. Tofacitinib with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in Chinese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Patient-reported outcomes from a phase 3 randomized controlled trial. Int J Rheum Dis. 2018;21:402–14. doi: 10.1111/1756-185x.13244.
    1. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, et al. The American rheumatism association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1988;31:315–24. doi: 10.1002/art.1780310302.
    1. Strand V, Burmester GR, Zerbini CA, Mebus CA, Zwillich SH, Gruben D, et al. Tofacitinib with methotrexate in third-line treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: Patient-reported outcomes from a phase III trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015;67:475–83. doi: 10.1002/acr.22453.
    1. Strand V, Kremer J, Wallenstein G, Kanik KS, Connell C, Gruben D, et al. Effects of tofacitinib monotherapy on patient-reported outcomes in a randomized phase 3 study of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate responses to DMARDs. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17:307. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0825-9.
    1. Strand V, van Vollenhoven RF, Lee EB, Fleischmann R, Zwillich SH, Gruben D, et al. Tofacitinib or adalimumab versus placebo: Patient-reported outcomes from a phase 3 study of active rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2016;55:1031–41. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev442.
    1. Pfizer Inc. Tofacitinib Citrate Tablets Labeling Document. China: Pfizer Inc; 2017.
    1. Carmona L, Hernández-García C, Vadillo C, Pato E, Balsa A, González-Alvaro I, et al. Increased risk of tuberculosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2003;30:1436–9.
    1. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2015. [Last accessed on 2016 Oct 19]. Available from:

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera