Efficacy of Tiotropium + Olodaterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease by Initial Disease Severity and Treatment Intensity: A Post Hoc Analysis

Gary T Ferguson, Matjaž Fležar, Stephanie Korn, Lawrence Korducki, Lars Grönke, Roger Abrahams, Roland Buhl, Gary T Ferguson, Matjaž Fležar, Stephanie Korn, Lawrence Korducki, Lars Grönke, Roger Abrahams, Roland Buhl

Abstract

Introduction: The once-daily long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) tiotropium and once-daily long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) olodaterol have been studied as a once-daily fixed-dose combination (FDC) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Two large, 52-week, double-blind, parallel-group studies in patients with moderate-very severe COPD demonstrated that tiotropium + olodaterol significantly improved lung function and symptoms versus the monocomponents. This post hoc analysis determined effects on lung function by prior LAMA or LABA maintenance treatment and initial disease severity.

Methods: 5162 patients were randomized and treated with olodaterol 5 µg, tiotropium 2.5 µg, tiotropium 5 µg, tiotropium + olodaterol 2.5/5 µg, or tiotropium + olodaterol 5/5 µg (all once daily via Respimat(®) inhaler). Primary efficacy (lung-function) end points were forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) area under the curve from 0 to 3 h (AUC0-3) and trough FEV1 responses (i.e., change from baseline). Pooled data are presented for the following subgroups: prior maintenance treatment with LAMA or LABA, Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2 (predicted FEV1 50% to <80%) and 3 (30% to <50%)/4 (<30%), sex, age, and prior use of inhaled corticosteroids.

Results: Tiotropium + olodaterol FDC improved lung function over the monocomponents in patients with GOLD 2 and 3-4 disease, irrespective of prior LAMA or LABA maintenance therapy; most comparisons between FDCs and their respective monocomponents were statistically significant (P < 0.05). FEV1 AUC0-3 and trough FEV1 responses for the individual treatments were generally greater in patients with less severe COPD at baseline.

Conclusions: Tiotropium + olodaterol 5/5 µg significantly improved FEV1 AUC0-3 and trough FEV1 in all GOLD severity groups compared to olodaterol 5 µg and tiotropium 5 µg alone, irrespective of whether patients had received prior LAMA or LABA maintenance treatment. Improvements from baseline in lung function were generally greater in patients with less severe disease.

Funding: Boehringer Ingelheim.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01431274 and NCT01431287.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design (Study 1237.5: NCT01431274; Study 1237.6: NCT01431287). R randomization, FDC fixed-dose combination, QD once daily
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Key inclusion and exclusion criteria. COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, GOLD Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease, FEV1 forced expiratory volume in 1 s
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Adjusted mean FEV1 AUC0–3 responses at 24 weeks; pooled data from TONADO-1 and -2. a Patients without prior LAMA or LABA use; b patients with prior LAMA or LABA use. FEV1 forced expiratory volume in 1 s, AUC03 area under the curve from 0 to 3 h, LAMA long-acting muscarinic antagonist, LABA long-acting β2-agonist, SE standard error, O olodaterol, T tiotropium, GOLD Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Adjusted mean trough FEV1 responses at 24 weeks; pooled data from TONADO-1 and -2. a Patients without prior LAMA or LABA use; b patients with prior LAMA or LABA use. FEV1 forced expiratory volume in 1 s, LAMA long-acting muscarinic antagonist, LABA long-acting β2-agonist, SE standard error, O olodaterol, T tiotropium, GOLD Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Forest plots for FEV1 AUC0–3 responses at 24 weeks. a Tiotropium + olodaterol 5/5 µg versus olodaterol 5 µg; b tiotropium + olodaterol 5/5 µg versus tiotropium 5 µg. FEV1 forced expiratory volume in 1 s, AUC03 area under the curve from 0 to 3 h, ICS inhaled corticosteroid
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Forest plots for trough FEV1 responses at 24 weeks. a Tiotropium + olodaterol 5/5 µg versus olodaterol 5 µg; b tiotropium + olodaterol 5/5 µg versus tiotropium 5 µg. FEV1 forced expiratory volume in 1 s, ICS inhaled corticosteroid

References

    1. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Updated 2015. . Accessed Mar 23, 2015.
    1. Tashkin DP, Celli B, Senn S, et al. A 4-year trial of tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1543–1554. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805800.
    1. Bateman ED, Tashkin D, Siafakas N, et al. A one-year trial of tiotropium Respimat® plus usual therapy in COPD patients. Respir Med. 2010;104:1460–1472. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.06.004.
    1. Cooper CB, Celli BR, Jardim JR, et al. Treadmill endurance during 2-year treatment with tiotropium in patients with COPD: a randomized trial. Chest. 2013;144:490–497. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-2613.
    1. Yohannes AM, Willgoss TG, Vestbo J. Tiotropium for treatment of stable COPD: a meta-analysis of clinically relevant outcomes. Respir Care. 2011;56:477–487. doi: 10.4187/respcare.00852.
    1. Vogelmeier C, Hederer B, Glaab T, et al. Tiotropium versus salmeterol for the prevention of exacerbations of COPD. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1093–1103. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1008378.
    1. Wise RA, Anzueto A, Cotton D, et al. Tiotropium Respimat inhaler and the risk of death in COPD. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1491–1501. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1303342.
    1. Lange P, Aumann J-L, Derom E, et al. The 24-h FEV1 time profile of olodaterol QD delivered via Respimat® in COPD: results from two 6-week studies. Eur Respir J. 2013;42 (Suppl 57):982s, abs 4635.
    1. Feldman G, Bernstein JA, Hamilton A, Nivens C, LaForce C. The 24-hour FEV1 time profile of olodaterol once daily (QD) via Respimat® and formoterol twice daily (BID) via Aerolizer® in patients with COPD: results from two 6-week studies. Chest. 2013;144 (No. 4 Meeting Abstracts), abs 749A.
    1. Ferguson G, Feldman G, Hofbauer P, et al. Lung function efficacy of olodaterol QD delivered via Respimat® in COPD patients: results from two 48-week studies. Eur Respir J. 2013;42 (Suppl 57):5s, abs 187.
    1. Koch A, Pizzichini E, Hamilton A, et al. Lung function efficacy of olodaterol QD delivered via Respimat® vs placebo and formoterol BID in patients with COPD: two 48-week studies. Eur Respir J. 2013;42 (Suppl 57):146s, abs P764.
    1. Koch A, Paggiaro P, Hamilton A, et al. Symptomatic benefit of olodaterol QD delivered via Respimat® vs placebo and formoterol BID in patients with COPD: combined analysis from two 48-week studies. Eur Respir J. 2013;42 (Suppl 57):145s, abs P763.
    1. Maltais F, Kirsten A-M, Hamilton A, De Sousa D, Wang F, Decramer M. Evaluation of the effects of olodaterol on exercise endurance in patients with COPD: results from two 6-week studies. Chest. 2013;144 (No. 4 Meeting Abstracts), abs 748A.
    1. Buhl R, Maltais F, Abrahams R, et al. Tiotropium and olodaterol fixed-dose combination versus mono-components in COPD (GOLD 2–4) Eur Respir J. 2015;45:969–979. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00136014.
    1. Derom E, Westerman J, Groenke L, Hamilton A, Li C, Beeh KM. The 24-hour lung function profile of once-daily tiotropium and olodaterol fixed-dose combination compared with placebo and monotherapies in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189, abs A6727.
    1. Bridevaux P-O, Gerbase MW, Probst-Hensch NM, Schindler C, Gaspoz J-M, Rochat T. Long-term decline in lung function, utilisation of care and quality of life in modified GOLD stage 1 COPD. Thorax. 2008;63:768–774. doi: 10.1136/thx.2007.093724.
    1. Vestbo J, Edwards LD, Scanlon PD, et al. Changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second over time in COPD. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1184–1192. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105482.
    1. Decramer M, Celli B, Kesten S, et al. Effect of tiotropium on outcomes in patients with moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (UPLIFT): a prespecified subgroup analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374:1171–1178. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61298-8.
    1. Maltais F, Dennis N, Chan CK. Rationale for earlier treatment in COPD: a systematic review of published literature in mild-to-moderate COPD. COPD. 2013;10:79–103. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2012.719048.
    1. Welte T, Vogelmeier C, Papi A. COPD: early diagnosis and treatment to slow disease progression. Int J Clin Pract. 2015;69:336–349. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12522.
    1. Dahl R, Jadayel D, Alagappan VKT, Chen H, Banerji D. Efficacy and safety of QVA149 compared to the concurrent administration of its monocomponents indacaterol and glycopyrronium: the BEACON study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2013;8:501–508. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S49615.
    1. Beeh K-M, Korn S, Beier J, et al. Effect of QVA149 on lung volumes and exercise tolerance in COPD patients: the BRIGHT study. Respir Med. 2014;108:584–592. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.01.006.
    1. Mahler DA, D’Urzo A, Bateman ED, et al. Concurrent use of indacaterol plus tiotropium in patients with COPD provides superior bronchodilation compared with tiotropium alone: a randomised, double-blind comparison. Thorax. 2012;67:781–788. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201140.
    1. Tashkin DP, Varghese ST. Combined treatment with formoterol and tiotropium is more efficacious than treatment with tiotropium alone in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, regardless of smoking status, inhaled corticosteroid use, baseline severity, or gender. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2011;24:147–152. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2010.07.003.
    1. Bateman ED, Ferguson GT, Barnes N, et al. Dual bronchodilation with QVA149 versus single bronchodilator therapy: the SHINE study. Eur Respir J. 2013;42:1484–1494. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00200212.
    1. Decramer M, Dahl R, Kornmann O, Korn S, Lawrence D, McBryan D. Effects of long-acting bronchodilators in COPD patients according to COPD severity and ICS use. Respir Med. 2013;107:223–232. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2012.10.022.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera