A sex- and gender-based analysis of factors associated with linear growth in infants in Ecuadorian Andes

Emily C Evers, William F Waters, Carlos Andres Gallegos-Riofrío, Chessa K Lutter, Christine P Stewart, Lora L Iannotti, Emily C Evers, William F Waters, Carlos Andres Gallegos-Riofrío, Chessa K Lutter, Christine P Stewart, Lora L Iannotti

Abstract

Although female infants may have an early life biological advantage over males, gendered treatment can alter health outcomes. Ecuador has an unusually high ratio of male to female infant mortality, but gender norms have been reported to favor boys. This analysis of baseline data from the Lulun Project, a randomized controlled trial conducted in rural Andean communities of Ecuador, investigates the roles of sex and gender in undernutrition among infants 6 to 9 months of age. Twenty-four-hour recall frequencies were used to assess dietary intake. Food outcome models were analyzed as prevalence ratios calculated using a binomial distribution with a log link or robust Poisson regression. Linear regression was used to analyze the continuous growth outcome length-for-age z score. Socioeconomic and health history variables were comparable between male and female infants. Boys were more often fed liquids other than breastmilk within their first 3 days of life (17.1% vs. 5.2%, P = 0.026). Compared with girls, boys were less likely to be fed eggs by 33% (95% CI 0.46, 0.96), cheese, yogurt, or other milk products by 40% (95% CI 0.39, 0.92), yellow fruit by 44% (95% CI 0.33, 0.97), water by 37% (95% CI 0.45, 0.88), thin porridge by 29% (95% CI 0.56, 0.92), and tea without milk by 67% (95% CI 0.11, 0.99). Prevalence of boys with an adequate dietary diversity score (≥ 4) was reduced by 27% relative to girls (95% CI 0.54, 0.99). Males fared worse in length-for-age z scores (- 2.16 vs. - 1.56, P = 0.000), weight-for-age z scores (- 0.86 vs. - 0.33, P = 0.002), prevalence of stunting (50.6% vs. 23.4%, P = 0.000), and plasma concentrations of dimethylglycine (1.25 vs. 1.65 µg/mL, P = 0.021). After adjusting for demographic, caregiver perceptions of appetite, and biological factors, length-for-age z score for a male child was 0.62 units lower than for a female (95% CI - 0.98, - 0.26). Male infants were shown to receive lower quality complementary foods and have worse anthropometric measures than female infants.Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02446873. Registered February 28, 2015, https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT02446873 .

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

References

    1. Aibar L, Puertas A, Valverde M, Carrillo MP, Montoya F. Fetal sex and perinatal outcomes. J. Perinat. Med. 2012;40:271–276. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2011-0137.
    1. Di Renzo GC, Rosati A, Sarti RD, Cruciani L, Cutuli AM. Does fetal sex affect pregnancy outcome? Gend. Med. 2007;4:19–30. doi: 10.1016/s1550-8579(07)80004-0.
    1. DiPietro JA, Voegtline KM. The gestational foundation of sex differences in development and vulnerability. Neuroscience. 2017;342:4–20. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.07.068.
    1. Sheiner E, et al. Gender does matter in perinatal medicine. Fetal. Diagn. Ther. 2004;19:366–369. doi: 10.1159/000077967.
    1. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. Sex Differentials in Childhood Mortality. (2011).
    1. Alkema L, Chao F, You D, Pedersen J, Sawyer CC. National, regional, and global sex ratios of infant, child, and under-5 mortality and identification of countries with outlying ratios: a systematic assessment. Lancet Glob. Health. 2014;2:e521–e530. doi: 10.1016/s2214-109x(14)70280-3.
    1. Thurstans S, et al. Boys are more likely to be undernourished than girls: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sex differences in undernutrition. BMJ Glob. Health. 2020;5:1–10. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004030.
    1. Fledderjohann J, et al. Do girls have a nutritional disadvantage compared with boys? Statistical models of breastfeeding and food consumption inequalities among Indian siblings. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e107172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107172.
    1. UN Women. Americas and the Caribbean, Ecuador, (n.d.).
    1. Novotny, R. in Alimentacion, salud y estado nutricional del niño preescolar en la Sierra Ecuatoriana (eds L. McKee & S. Arguello) 271–308 (Editorial Abya-Yala, 1988).
    1. Iannotti LL, et al. Eggs in early complementary feeding and child growth: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2017 doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-3459.
    1. Heidari S, Babor TF, De Castro P, Tort S, Curno M. Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use. Res. Integr. Peer Rev. 2016;1:2. doi: 10.1186/s41073-016-0007-6.
    1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. What a difference sex and gender make: a gender, sex and health research casebook. (Ottowa, Canada, 2012).
    1. Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos (INEC). Censo de Población y Vivienda 2010, (2010).
    1. Gallegos-Riofrío CA, et al. The Lulun Project's social marketing strategy in a trial to introduce eggs during complementary feeding in Ecuador. Matern. Child Nutr. 2018;14 Suppl 3:e12700. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12700.
    1. Arimond M, et al. Simple food group diversity indicators predict micronutrient adequacy of women's diets in 5 diverse, resource-poor settings. J. Nutr. 2010;140:2059s–2069s. doi: 10.3945/jn.110.123414.
    1. Gallegos CA, F. W., Waters W. . Assessment of the food situation of the population of Ecuador [In Spanish]. . (Quito, Ecuador: Secretaria Nacional de Planificacion y Desarrollo (SENPLADES), 2010).
    1. World Health Organization. Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices. (2008).
    1. Iannotti LL, et al. Eggs early in complementary feeding increase choline pathway biomarkers and DHA: a randomized controlled trial in Ecuador. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017;106:1482–1489. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.117.160515.
    1. World Health Organization. Child growth standards, (2017).
    1. Petersen MR, Deddens JA. A comparison of two methods for estimating prevalence ratios. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2008;8:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-9.
    1. Glickman ME, Rao SR, Schultz MR. False discovery rate control is a recommended alternative to Bonferroni-type adjustments in health studies. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2014;67:850–857. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.012.
    1. Campbell, B. C., Lukas, W. D. & Campbell, K. L. in Reproductive Ecology and Human Evolution (ed P. T. Ellison) Ch. 7, 160–164 (Transaction Publishers, 2011).
    1. Urlacher SS, et al. Tradeoffs between immune function and childhood growth among Amazonian forager-horticulturalists. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2018;115:E3914–e3921. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1717522115.
    1. Decaro JA, Decaro E, Worthman CM. Sex differences in child nutritional and immunological status 5–9 years post contact in fringe highland Papua New Guinea. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2010;22:657–666. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.21062.
    1. World Health Organization. Infant and young child feeding, . (2020).
    1. Walker M. Formula supplementation of breastfed infants: helpful or hazardous? ICAN Infant Child Adolescent Nutr. 2015;7:198–207. doi: 10.1177/1941406415591208.
    1. Tumilowicz A, Habicht JP, Pelto G, Pelletier DL. Gender perceptions predict sex differences in growth patterns of indigenous Guatemalan infants and young children. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2015;102:1249–1258. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.100776.
    1. Hoke MK. Economic activity and patterns of infant growth in a high altitude district of Peru. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2017 doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23038.
    1. Ducker GS, Rabinowitz JD. One-carbon metabolism in health and disease. Cell Metab. 2017;25:27–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.08.009.
    1. Martorell R, Zongrone A. Intergenerational influences on child growth and undernutrition. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2012;26(Suppl 1):302–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2012.01298.x.
    1. de Onis M, Branca F. Childhood stunting: a global perspective. Matern. Child Nutr. 2016;12(Suppl 1):12–26. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12231.
    1. Prendergast AJ, Humphrey JH. The stunting syndrome in developing countries. Paediatr. Int. Child Health. 2014;34:250–265. doi: 10.1179/2046905514y.0000000158.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera