Clinical and radiographic evaluation of triple antibiotic paste pulp therapy compared to Vitapex pulpectomy in non-vital primary molars

Ohoud T Sijini, Heba J Sabbagh, Khlood K Baghlaf, Amina M Bagher, Azzah A El-Housseiny, Najlaa M Alamoudi, Sara M Bagher, Ohoud T Sijini, Heba J Sabbagh, Khlood K Baghlaf, Amina M Bagher, Azzah A El-Housseiny, Najlaa M Alamoudi, Sara M Bagher

Abstract

Objectives: This study compared and evaluated the clinical and radiographic efficacy of non-instrumentation triple antibiotic paste pulp therapy and Vitapex pulpectomy in non-vital primary molars.

Material and methods: Healthy, 5-9 years old children with at least one non-vital primary molar were included in the study. Molars were divided into two groups based on the subject's cooperation level. In the first group, molars received triple antibiotic paste, and a second group received Vitapex pulpectomy followed by a stainless-steel crown. Triple antibiotic paste was freshly prepared and proportioned in equal parts by volume (metronidazole, minocycline, and ciprofloxacin = 1:1:1) before the scheduled treatment. A clinical and radiographic examination was performed by two trained and calibrated pediatric dentists at the pre-operative baseline and the 6- and 12-month follow-up visits.

Results: A total of 28 molars received triple antibiotic paste pulp therapy and 20 received Vitapex pulpectomy. At the 6-month follow-up, the success rate among the molars in the triple antibiotic paste group was clinically (92.85%) and radiographically (85.71%) higher compared to the Vitapex group (91.67%, 62.50% respectively) with p = 0.89 and 0.55 respectively. At the 12-month follow-up, the molars in the triple antibiotic paste group showed lower clinical (95.45%) but higher radiographic success rate (72.73%) compared to the Vitapex group (100% and 62.50%) with (p = 0.85 and 0.47) respectively. None of the differences were statistically significant.

Conclusions: Both triple antibiotic paste and Vitapex can be clinically and radiographically effective in treating non-vital primary molars.

Keywords: deciduous teeth; endodontic treatment; primary molars and pulpectomy..

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

© 2021 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Tooth treated with TAP pulp therapy showing the procedure of treatment; (a) tooth after access opening and coronal pulp amputation, (b) lesion sterilization and application of freshly mixed TAP and (c) glass ionomer restoration applied and covered with stainless steel crown
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Study flow chart
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Successful TAP pulp therapy in a lower second molar with deep carious lesion and bifunctional radiolucency. (a) Pre‐operative baseline radiograph. (b) Six‐months follow‐up radiograph showing reduction in the size of the bifurcation radiolucency. (c) Twelve‐months follow‐up showing complete healing of the radiographic radiolucency
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Successful Vitapex pulpectomy treatment in a lower second molar with deep carious lesion. (a) Pre‐operative baseline radiograph. (b) Six‐months follow‐up radiograph showing reduction in the size of the bifurcation radiolucency. (c) Twelve‐months follow‐up

References

    1. Ahmed, H. (2013). Anatomical challenges, electronic working length determination and current developments in root canal preparation of primary molar teeth. International Endodontic Journal, 46(11), 1011–1022.
    1. Ahmed, H. M. A. (2014). Pulpectomy procedures in primary molar teeth. European Journal of General Dentistry, 3(1), 3.
    1. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry . (2017). Prescribing dental radiographs for infants, children, adolescents, and individuals with special health care needs. Pediatric Dentistry, 39(6), 205–207.
    1. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Clinical Affairs Committee–Developing Dentition Subcommittee; American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Council on Clinical Affairs . (2005). Guideline on management of the developing dentition and occlusion in pediatric dentistry. Pediatric Dentistry, 27(7 Suppl), 143.
    1. Asl Aminabadi, N. , Satrab, S. , Najafpour, E. , Samiei, M. , Jamali, Z. , & Shirazi, S. (2016). A randomized trial of direct pulp capping in primary molars using MTA compared to 3Mixtatin: A novel pulp capping biomaterial. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 26(4), 281–290. 10.1111/ipd.12196
    1. Camp, J. H. (1994). Pediatric endodontic treatment. In Pathways of the pulp (6th ed., pp. 633–671). Mosby.
    1. Chen, X. , Liu, X. , & Zhong, J. (2017). Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpectomy in primary teeth: A 18‐months clinical randomized controlled trial. Head & Face Medicine, 13(1), 12. 10.1186/s13005-017-0145-1
    1. Dean, J. A. (2015). McDonald and Avery's dentistry for the child and adolescent‐E‐book. Elsevier Health Sciences.
    1. Divya, S. , & Retnakumari, N. (2014). Lesion sterilisation and tissue repair in primary teeth with periapical pathosis–A case series. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences, 13, 7–11.
    1. Doneria, D. , Thakur, S. , Singhal, P. , & Chauhan, D. (2017). Comparative evaluation of clinical and radiological success of zinc oxide‐ozonated oil, modified 3mix‐mp antibiotic paste, and vitapex as treatment options in primary molars requiring pulpectomy: An in vivo study. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, 35(4), 346–352. 10.4103/jisppd.Jisppd_359_16
    1. Hoshino, E. , Ando, N. , Sato, M. , & Kota, K. (1992). Bacterial invasion of non‐exposed dental pulp. International Endodontic Journal, 25(1), 2–5.
    1. Jaya, A. R. , Praveen, P. , Anantharaj, A. , Venkataraghavan, K. , & Rani, P. S. (2012). In vivo evaluation of lesion sterilization and tissue repair in primary teeth pulp therapy using two antibiotic drug combinations. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 37(2), 189–191. 10.17796/jcpd.37.2.e5131jp6m1w33v66
    1. Kayalvizhi, G. , Subramaniyan, B. , & Suganya, G. (2013). Topical application of antibiotics in primary teeth: An overview. Journal of Dentistry for Children, 80(2), 71–79.
    1. Kubota, K. , Golden, B. , & Penugonda, B. (1992). Root canal filling materials for primary teeth: A review of the literature. ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children, 59(3), 225–227.
    1. Mendoza‐Mendoza, A. , Caleza‐Jiménez, C. , Solano‐Mendoza, B. , & Iglesias‐Linares, A. (2017). Are there any differences between first and second primary molar pulpectomy prognoses? A retrospective clinical study. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 18(1), 41–44.
    1. Moskovitz, M. , Sammara, E. , & Holan, G. (2005). Success rate of root canal treatment in primary molars. Journal of Dentistry, 33(1), 41–47.
    1. Nadin, G. , Goel, B. R. , Yeung, A. , & Glenny, A. M. (2003). Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1(1), Cd003220
    1. Najjar, R. S. , Alamoudi, N. M. , El‐Housseiny, A. A. , Al Tuwirqi, A. A. , & Sabbagh, H. J. (2019). A comparison of calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste and zinc oxide eugenol as root filling materials for pulpectomy in primary teeth: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research, 5(3), 294–310.
    1. Nakornchai, S. , Banditsing, P. , & Visetratana, N. (2010). Clinical evaluation of 3Mix and Vitapex as treatment options for pulpally involved primary molars. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 20(3), 214–221. 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2010.01044.x
    1. Nanda, R. , Koul, M. , Srivastava, S. , Upadhyay, V. , & Dwivedi, R. (2014). Clinical evaluation of 3 Mix and Other Mix in non‐instrumental endodontic treatment of necrosed primary teeth. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research, 4(2), 114–119.
    1. Nurko, C. , Ranly, D. , Garcia‐Godoy, F. , & Lakshmyya, K. (2000). Resorption of a calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste (Vitapex) in root canal therapy for primary teeth: A case report. Pediatric Dentistry, 22(6), 517–520.
    1. Ozalp, N. , Saroglu, I. , & Sonmez, H. (2005). Evaluation of various root canal filling materials in primary molar pulpectomies: An in vivo study. American Journal of Dentistry, 18(6), 347–350.
    1. Pinky, C. , Shashibhushan, K. K. , & Subbareddy, V. V. (2011). Endodontic treatment of necrosed primary teeth using two different combinations of antibacterial drugs: An in vivo study. Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, 29(2), 121–127. 10.4103/0970-4388.84684
    1. Prabhakar, A. R. , Sridevi, E. , Raju, O. S. , & Satish, V. (2008). Endodontic treatment of primary teeth using combination of antibacterial drugs: An in vivo study. Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, 26(Suppl 1), S5–S10.
    1. Pramila, R. , Muthu, M. , Deepa, G. , Farzan, J. , & Rodrigues, S. (2016). Pulpectomies in primary mandibular molars: A comparison of outcomes using three root filling materials. International Endodontic Journal, 49(5), 413–421. 10.1111/iej.12478
    1. Raslan, N. , Mansour, O. , & Assfoura, L. (2017). Evaluation of antibiotic mix in Non‐instrumentation Endodontic Treatment of necrotic primary molars. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 18(4), 285–290. 10.23804/ejpd.2017.18.04.04
    1. Reddy, G. A. , Sridevi, E. , Sankar, A. S. , Pranitha, K. , Gowd, M. P. , & Vinay, C. (2017). Endodontic treatment of chronically infected primary teeth using triple antibiotic paste: An in vivo study. Journal of Conservative Dentistry, 20(6), 405.
    1. Stigers, J. I. (2016). Nonpharmacologic Management of Children's Behaviors. In Dean J. A., Avery D. R., & McDonald R. E. (Eds.), McDonald And Avery's Dentistry For The Child And Adolescent (10eds, pp. 286–302). China: Elsevier.
    1. Takushige, T. , Cruz, E. , Asgor Moral, A. , & Hoshino, E. (2004). Endodontic treatment of primary teeth using a combination of antibacterial drugs. International Endodontic Journal, 37(2), 132–138.
    1. Trairatvorakul, C. , & Chunlasikaiwan, S. (2008). Success of pulpectomy with zinc oxide‐eugenol vs calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste in primary molars: A clinical study. Pediatric Dentistry, 30(4), 303–308.
    1. Vijayaraghavan, R. , Mathian, V. M. , Sundaram, A. M. , Karunakaran, R. , & Vinodh, S. (2012). Triple antibiotic paste in root canal therapy. Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences, 4(Suppl 2), S230.
    1. Zacharczuk, G. A. , Toscano, M. A. , Lopez, G. E. , & Ortolani, A. M. (2019). Evaluation of 3Mix‐MP and pulpectomies in non‐vital primary molars. Acta Odontológica Latinoamericana, 32(1), 22–28.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera