Intravenous or enteral loop diuretics for preterm infants with (or developing) chronic lung disease

Audra Stewart, Luc P Brion, Audra Stewart, Luc P Brion

Abstract

Background: Lung disease in preterm infants is often complicated with lung edema.

Objectives: To assess the risks and benefits of administration of a diuretic acting on the loop of Henle (loop diuretic) in preterm infants with or developing chronic lung disease (CLD).

Search strategy: Standard search method of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group was used. Initial search included the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2003), EMBASE (1974 to 1998). In addition, several abstract books of national and international American and European Societies were hand searched. The MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central searches were updated in March 2007 and December 2010. The EMBASE search was completed in April 2007 and December 2010. Additional searches in CINAHL, clinicaltrials.gov and controlled-trials.com was completed in December 2010.

Selection criteria: Trials in which preterm infants with or developing chronic lung disease and at least five days of age were all randomly allocated to receive a loop diuretic either enterally or intravenously were included in this analysis.

Data collection and analysis: The standard method for the Cochrane Collaboration described in the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook were used. Two investigators extracted, assessed and coded separately all data for each study. Parallel and cross-over trials were combined and, whenever possible, transformed baseline and final outcome data measured on a continuous scale into change scores using Follmann's formula.

Main results: The only loop diuretic used in the six studies that met the selection criteria was furosemide. Most studies focused on pathophysiological parameters and did not assess effects on important clinical outcomes defined in this review, or the potential complications of diuretic therapy. In preterm infants < 3 weeks of age developing CLD, furosemide administration has either inconsistent effects or no detectable effect. In infants > 3 weeks of age with CLD, a single intravenous dose of 1 mg/kg of furosemide improves lung compliance and airway resistance for one hour. Chronic administration of furosemide improves both oxygenation and lung compliance.

Authors' conclusions: In view of the lack of data from randomized trials concerning effects on important clinical outcomes, routine or sustained use of systemic loop diuretics in infants with (or developing) CLD cannot be recommended based on current evidence. Randomized trials are needed to assess the effects of furosemide administration on survival, duration of ventilatory support and oxygen administration, length of hospital stay, potential complications and long-term outcome.

Conflict of interest statement

None

Figures

1.1. Analysis
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 1 Change in alveolar‐arterial pO2 gradient (mm Hg) 2 hours after last dose, PNA

1.2. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral…

1.2. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 2 Change in percent…

1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 2 Change in percent inspiratory oxygen after 1 wk, non‐intubated patients.

1.3. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral…

1.3. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 3 Change in percent…

1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 3 Change in percent inspiratory oxygen, all patients.

1.4. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral…

1.4. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 4 Failure to extubate…

1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 4 Failure to extubate after 1 week.

1.5. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral…

1.5. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 5 Failure to wean…

1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 5 Failure to wean ventilatory settings or to extubate within 1 wk.

1.6. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral…

1.6. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 6 Ventilator peak pressure…

1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 6 Ventilator peak pressure (cm H2O) after 1 week.

1.7. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral…

1.7. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 7 Ventilator frequency after…

1.7. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 7 Ventilator frequency after 1 week.

1.8. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral…

1.8. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 8 Change in compliance…

1.8. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 8 Change in compliance (ml/cm H2O/kg), non‐intubated patients.

1.9. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral…

1.9. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 9 Change in compliance…

1.9. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 9 Change in compliance (ml/cm H2O/kg), all patients.

1.10. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral…

1.10. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 10 Change in resistance…

1.10. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 10 Change in resistance (cm/L/sec), non‐intubated patients.

1.11. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral…

1.11. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 11 Change in resistance…

1.11. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 11 Change in resistance (cm/L/sec), all patients.

1.12. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral…

1.12. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 12 Change in alveolar…

1.12. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 12 Change in alveolar ventilation (ml/kg/min), endotracheal tube not a criterion.

1.13. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral…

1.13. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 13 Change in minute…

1.13. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 13 Change in minute ventilation (ml/kg/min), endotracheal tube not a criterion.

1.14. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral…

1.14. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 14 Change in tidal…

1.14. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 14 Change in tidal volume (ml/kg), endotracheal tube not a criterion.

1.15. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral…

1.15. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 15 Failure to improve…

1.15. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 15 Failure to improve chest radiogram.

1.16. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral…

1.16. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 16 Severe hypochloremia.

1.16. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 16 Severe hypochloremia.

1.17. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral…

1.17. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 17 Average weight gain…

1.17. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 17 Average weight gain (g/day) in 1 wk.

1.18. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral…

1.18. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 18 Calciuria (mg/dl) after…

1.18. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 18 Calciuria (mg/dl) after 1 wk.

1.19. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral…

1.19. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 19 Calcium:creatinine ratio (mg/mg)…

1.19. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 19 Calcium:creatinine ratio (mg/mg) after 1 wk.

1.20. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral…

1.20. Analysis

Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 20 Hearing loss.

1.20. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 20 Hearing loss.

2.1. Analysis

Comparison 2 Furosemide infusion vs…

2.1. Analysis

Comparison 2 Furosemide infusion vs furosemide by intravenous bolus, Outcome 1 Change in…

2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2 Furosemide infusion vs furosemide by intravenous bolus, Outcome 1 Change in % inspiratory O2.
All figures (21)
1.2. Analysis
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 2 Change in percent inspiratory oxygen after 1 wk, non‐intubated patients.
1.3. Analysis
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 3 Change in percent inspiratory oxygen, all patients.
1.4. Analysis
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 4 Failure to extubate after 1 week.
1.5. Analysis
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 5 Failure to wean ventilatory settings or to extubate within 1 wk.
1.6. Analysis
1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 6 Ventilator peak pressure (cm H2O) after 1 week.
1.7. Analysis
1.7. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 7 Ventilator frequency after 1 week.
1.8. Analysis
1.8. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 8 Change in compliance (ml/cm H2O/kg), non‐intubated patients.
1.9. Analysis
1.9. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 9 Change in compliance (ml/cm H2O/kg), all patients.
1.10. Analysis
1.10. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 10 Change in resistance (cm/L/sec), non‐intubated patients.
1.11. Analysis
1.11. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 11 Change in resistance (cm/L/sec), all patients.
1.12. Analysis
1.12. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 12 Change in alveolar ventilation (ml/kg/min), endotracheal tube not a criterion.
1.13. Analysis
1.13. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 13 Change in minute ventilation (ml/kg/min), endotracheal tube not a criterion.
1.14. Analysis
1.14. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 14 Change in tidal volume (ml/kg), endotracheal tube not a criterion.
1.15. Analysis
1.15. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 15 Failure to improve chest radiogram.
1.16. Analysis
1.16. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 16 Severe hypochloremia.
1.17. Analysis
1.17. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 17 Average weight gain (g/day) in 1 wk.
1.18. Analysis
1.18. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 18 Calciuria (mg/dl) after 1 wk.
1.19. Analysis
1.19. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 19 Calcium:creatinine ratio (mg/mg) after 1 wk.
1.20. Analysis
1.20. Analysis
Comparison 1 Intravenous or oral furosemide vs control, Outcome 20 Hearing loss.
2.1. Analysis
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2 Furosemide infusion vs furosemide by intravenous bolus, Outcome 1 Change in % inspiratory O2.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera