Ixazomib as Postinduction Maintenance for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Not Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: The Phase III TOURMALINE-MM4 Trial

Meletios A Dimopoulos, Ivan Špička, Hang Quach, Albert Oriol, Roman Hájek, Mamta Garg, Meral Beksac, Sara Bringhen, Eirini Katodritou, Wee-Joo Chng, Xavier Leleu, Shinsuke Iida, María-Victoria Mateos, Gareth Morgan, Alexander Vorog, Richard Labotka, Bingxia Wang, Antonio Palumbo, Sagar Lonial, TOURMALINE-MM4 study group, Meletios A Dimopoulos, Ivan Špička, Hang Quach, Albert Oriol, Roman Hájek, Mamta Garg, Meral Beksac, Sara Bringhen, Eirini Katodritou, Wee-Joo Chng, Xavier Leleu, Shinsuke Iida, María-Victoria Mateos, Gareth Morgan, Alexander Vorog, Richard Labotka, Bingxia Wang, Antonio Palumbo, Sagar Lonial, TOURMALINE-MM4 study group

Abstract

Purpose: Maintenance therapy prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) not undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) but has generally been limited to immunomodulatory agents. Other options that complement the induction regimen with favorable toxicity are needed.

Patients and methods: The phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled TOURMALINE-MM4 study randomly assigned (3:2) patients with NDMM not undergoing ASCT who achieved better than or equal to partial response after 6-12 months of standard induction therapy to receive the oral proteasome inhibitor (PI) ixazomib or placebo on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles as maintenance for 24 months. The primary endpoint was PFS since time of randomization.

Results: Patients were randomly assigned to receive ixazomib (n = 425) or placebo (n = 281). TOURMALINE-MM4 met its primary endpoint with a 34.1% reduction in risk of progression or death with ixazomib versus placebo (median PFS since randomization, 17.4 v 9.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.659; 95% CI, 0.542 to 0.801; P < .001; median follow-up, 21.1 months). Ixazomib significantly benefitted patients who achieved complete or very good partial response postinduction (median PFS, 25.6 v 12.9 months; HR, 0.586; P < .001). With ixazomib versus placebo, 36.6% versus 23.2% of patients had grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); 12.9% versus 8.0% discontinued treatment because of TEAEs. Common any-grade TEAEs included nausea (26.8% v 8.0%), vomiting (24.2% v 4.3%), and diarrhea (23.2% v 12.3%). There was no increase in new primary malignancies (5.2% v 6.2%); rates of on-study deaths were 2.6% versus 2.2%.

Conclusion: Ixazomib maintenance prolongs PFS with no unexpected toxicity in patients with NDMM not undergoing ASCT. To our knowledge, this is the first PI demonstrated in a randomized clinical trial to have single-agent efficacy for maintenance and is the first oral PI option in this patient population.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02312258.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
CONSORT diagram.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Kaplan-Meier analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) by independent review (A) in the intention-to-treat population and (B) by prespecified patient subgroups. Stratified log-rank tests and Cox models were used for interarm comparisons. Some subgroup data are not shown because of small patient numbers. (*) Data per stratification variables. (†) Data per individual patient-level clinical data after medical review. (‡) High-risk cytogenetic abnormalities were del(17p), t(4;14), and t(14;16). See the Data Supplement for additional details. (¶) Expanded high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities comprised the high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities plus amplification of 1q21. See the Data Supplement for additional details. CR, complete response; HR, hazard ratio; IMiD, immunomodulatory drug; ISS, International Staging System; PI, proteasome inhibitor; PR, partial response; VGPR, very good partial response.

References

    1. Palumbo A Gay F Cavallo F, et al. : Continuous therapy versus fixed duration of therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 33:3459-3466, 2015
    1. Ludwig H, Zojer N: Fixed duration vs continuous therapy in multiple myeloma. Hematology (Am Soc Hematol Educ Program) 2017:212-222, 2017
    1. Gay F Jackson G Rosiñol L, et al. : Maintenance treatment and survival in patients with myeloma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol 4:1389-1397, 2018
    1. Yong K Delforge M Driessen C, et al. : Multiple myeloma: Patient outcomes in real-world practice. Br J Haematol 175:252-264, 2016
    1. Terpos E, Suzan F, Goldschmidt H: Going the distance: Are we losing patients along the multiple myeloma treatment pathway? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 126:19-23, 2018
    1. Chng WJ, Beksac M, Hajek R, et al: Addressing unmet medical needs in maintenance treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Hemasphere 2:1001, 2018 (abstr S1)
    1. Kumar SK Callander NS Hillengass J, et al. : NCCN guidelines insights: Multiple myeloma, Version 1.2020. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 17:1154-1165, 2019
    1. Mateos MV Cavo M Blade J, et al. : Overall survival with daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (ALCYONE): A randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 395:132-141, 2020
    1. Durie BGM Hoering A Abidi MH, et al. : Bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma without intent for immediate autologous stem-cell transplant (SWOG S0777): A randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 389:519-527, 2017
    1. Jackson GH Davies FE Pawlyn C, et al. : Lenalidomide maintenance versus observation for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (Myeloma XI): A multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 20:57-73, 2019
    1. McCarthy PL Holstein SA Petrucci MT, et al. : Lenalidomide maintenance after autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: A meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 35:3279-3289, 2017
    1. Palumbo A Hajek R Delforge M, et al. : Continuous lenalidomide treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 366:1759-1769, 2012
    1. Pulte ED Dmytrijuk A Nie L, et al. : FDA approval summary: Lenalidomide as maintenance therapy after autologous stem cell transplant in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Oncologist 23:734-739, 2018
    1. Benboubker L Dimopoulos MA Dispenzieri A, et al. : Lenalidomide and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma. N Engl J Med 371:906-917, 2014
    1. Facon T Dimopoulos MA Dispenzieri A, et al. : Final analysis of survival outcomes in the phase 3 FIRST trial of up-front treatment for multiple myeloma. Blood 131:301-310, 2018
    1. Facon T Kumar S Plesner T, et al. : Daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone for untreated myeloma. N Engl J Med 380:2104-2115, 2019
    1. Richardson PG San Miguel JF Moreau P, et al. : Interpreting clinical trial data in multiple myeloma: Translating findings to the real-world setting. Blood Cancer J 8:109, 2018
    1. Goldschmidt H Ashcroft J Szabo Z, et al. : Navigating the treatment landscape in multiple myeloma: Which combinations to use and when? Ann Hematol 98:1-18, 2019
    1. Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Highlights of prescribing information. .
    1. Dimopoulos MA Gay F Schjesvold F, et al. : Oral ixazomib maintenance following autologous stem cell transplantation (TOURMALINE-MM3): A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 393:253-264, 2019
    1. Schjesvold F, Goldschmidt H, Maisnar V, et al: Quality of life is maintained with ixazomib maintenance in post-transplant newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: The TOURMALINE-MM3 trial. Eur J Haematol 104:443-458, 2019.
    1. Rajkumar SV Dimopoulos MA Palumbo A, et al. : International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol 15:e538-e548, 2014
    1. Rajkumar SV Harousseau JL Durie B, et al. : Consensus recommendations for the uniform reporting of clinical trials: Report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 1. Blood 117:4691-4695, 2011
    1. O’Brien PC, Fleming TR: A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics 35:549-556, 1979
    1. Kumar H, Fojo T, Mailankody S: An appraisal of clinically meaningful outcomes guidelines for oncology clinical trials. JAMA Oncol 2:1238-1240, 2016
    1. Sonneveld P Avet-Loiseau H Lonial S, et al. : Treatment of multiple myeloma with high-risk cytogenetics: A consensus of the International Myeloma Working Group. Blood 127:2955-2962, 2016
    1. Hari P Lin HM Zhu Y, et al. : Healthcare resource utilization with ixazomib or placebo plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 TOURMALINE-MM1 study in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. J Med Econ 21:793-798, 2018
    1. Leleu X Masszi T Bahlis NJ, et al. : Patient-reported health-related quality of life from the phase III TOURMALINE-MM1 study of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone versus placebo-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Am J Hematol 93:985-993, 2018
    1. Palumbo A Cavallo F Gay F, et al. : Autologous transplantation and maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 371:895-905, 2014
    1. Mateos MV Oriol A Martínez-López J, et al. : GEM2005 trial update comparing VMP/VTP as induction in elderly multiple myeloma patients: Do we still need alkylators? Blood 124:1887-1893, 2014
    1. Palumbo A Bringhen S Rossi D, et al. : Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide followed by maintenance with bortezomib-thalidomide compared with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 28:5101-5109, 2010
    1. Niesvizky R Flinn IW Rifkin R, et al. : Community-based phase IIIB trial of three UPFRONT bortezomib-based myeloma regimens. J Clin Oncol 33:3921-3929, 2015
    1. Bringhen S, D’Agostino M, Paris L, et al: Lenalidomide-based induction and maintenance in elderly newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: Updated results of the EMN01 randomized trial. Haematologica 105:1937-1947, 2020.
    1. Larocca A Salvini M Gaidano G, et al. : Sparing steroids in elderly intermediate-fit newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with a dose/schedule-adjusted Rd-R vs. continuous Rd: Results of RV-MM-PI-0752 phase III randomized study. HemaSphere 3:244-245, 2019
    1. Dimopoulos MA Laubach JP Echeveste Gutierrez MA, et al. : Ixazomib maintenance therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: An integrated analysis of four phase I/II studies. Eur J Haematol 102:494-503, 2019
    1. Facon T Venner CP Bahlis NJ, et al. : Ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) vs. placebo-Rd for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients not eligible for autologous stem cell transplant: The double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 TOURMALINE-MM2 Trial. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 20(Suppl.1):S307-S308, 2020
    1. Sonneveld P Schmidt-Wolf IG van der Holt B, et al. : Bortezomib induction and maintenance treatment in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: Results of the randomized phase III HOVON-65/ GMMG-HD4 trial. J Clin Oncol 30:2946-2955, 2012

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera