Development of measures for assessing mistreatment of women during facility-based childbirth based on labour observations

Blair O Berger, Donna M Strobino, Hedieh Mehrtash, Meghan A Bohren, Kwame Adu-Bonsaffoh, Hannah H Leslie, Theresa Azonima Irinyenikan, Thae Maung Maung, Mamadou Dioulde Balde, Özge Tunçalp, Blair O Berger, Donna M Strobino, Hedieh Mehrtash, Meghan A Bohren, Kwame Adu-Bonsaffoh, Hannah H Leslie, Theresa Azonima Irinyenikan, Thae Maung Maung, Mamadou Dioulde Balde, Özge Tunçalp

Abstract

Introduction: Mistreatment of women during childbirth is increasingly recognised as a significant issue globally. Research and programmatic efforts targeting this phenomenon have been limited by a lack of validated measurement tools. This study aimed to develop a set of concise, valid and reliable multidimensional measures for mistreatment using labour observations applicable across multiple settings.

Methods: Data from continuous labour observations of 1974 women in Nigeria (n=407), Ghana (n=912) and Guinea (n=655) were used from the cross-sectional WHO's multicountry study 'How women are treated during facility-based childbirth' (2016-2018). Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to develop a scale measuring interpersonal abuse. Two indexes were developed through a modified Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development approach for generating composite indexes. Measures were evaluated for performance, validity and internal reliability.

Results: Three mistreatment measures were developed: a 7-item Interpersonal Abuse Scale, a 3-item Exams & Procedures Index and a 12-item Unsupportive Birth Environment Index. Factor analysis results showed a consistent unidimensional factor structure for the Interpersonal Abuse Scale in all three countries based on factor loadings and interitem correlations, indicating good structural construct validity. The scale had a reliability coefficient of 0.71 in Nigeria and approached 0.60 in Ghana and Guinea. Low correlations (Spearman correlation range: -0.06-0.19; p≥0.05) between mistreatment measures supported our decision to develop three separate measures. Predictive criterion validation yielded mixed results across countries. Both items within measures and measure scores were internally consistent across countries; each item co-occurred with other items in a measure, and scores consistently distinguished between 'high' and 'low' mistreatment levels.

Conclusion: The set of concise, comprehensive multidimensional measures of mistreatment can be used in future research and quality improvement initiatives targeting mistreatment to quantify burden, identify risk factors and determine its impact on health and well-being outcomes. Further validation and reliability testing of the measures in other contexts is needed.

Keywords: cross-sectional survey; maternal health; obstetrics; public health.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. Bohren MA, Hunter EC, Munthe-Kaas HM, et al. . Facilitators and barriers to facility-based delivery in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Reprod Health 2014;11:71. 10.1186/1742-4755-11-71
    1. Miller S, Abalos E, Chamillard M, et al. . Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. Lancet 2016;388:2176–92. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31472-6
    1. Gabrysch S, Campbell OMR. Still too far to walk: literature review of the determinants of delivery service use. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2009;9:34. 10.1186/1471-2393-9-34
    1. Souza JP, Gülmezoglu AM, Vogel J, et al. . Moving beyond essential interventions for reduction of maternal mortality (the who multicountry survey on maternal and newborn health): a cross-sectional study. Lancet 2013;381:1747–55. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60686-8
    1. Hulton L, Matthews Z, Martin-Hilber A, et al. . Using evidence to drive action: a "revolution in accountability" to implement quality care for better maternal and newborn health in Africa. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2014;127:96–101. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.07.002
    1. Ӧ T, Were W, MacLennan C. Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns—the who vision. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics & gynaecology 2015;122:1045–9.
    1. Brizuela V, Leslie HH, Sharma J, et al. . Measuring quality of care for all women and newborns: how do we know if we are doing it right? A review of facility assessment tools. Lancet Glob Health 2019;7:e624–32. 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30033-6
    1. Kruk ME, Gage AD, Arsenault C, et al. . High-Quality health systems in the sustainable development goals era: time for a revolution. Lancet Glob Health 2018;6:e1196–252. 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30386-3
    1. Larson E, Sharma J, Bohren MA. When the patient is the expert: measuring patient experience and satisfaction with care. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2019: 1–13.
    1. Bohren MA, Mehrtash H, Fawole B, et al. . How women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries: a cross-sectional study with labour observations and community-based surveys. Lancet 2019;394:1750–63. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31992-0
    1. Abuya T, Warren CE, Miller N, et al. . Exploring the prevalence of disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Kenya. PLoS One 2015;10:e0123606. 10.1371/journal.pone.0123606
    1. Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, et al. . The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: a mixed-methods systematic review. PLoS Med 2015;12:e1001847. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847
    1. Rominski SD, Lori J, Nakua E, et al. . When the baby remains there for a long time, it is going to die so you have to hit her small for the baby to come out": justification of disrespectful and abusive care during childbirth among midwifery students in Ghana. Health Policy Plan 2017;32:215–24. 10.1093/heapol/czw114
    1. Bowser D, Hill K. Exploring evidence for disrespect and abuse in facility-based childbirth. Boston: USAID-TRAction Project, Harvard School of Public Health, 2010.
    1. Sethi R, Gupta S, Oseni L, et al. . The prevalence of disrespect and abuse during facility-based maternity care in Malawi: evidence from direct observations of labor and delivery. Reprod Health 2017;14:111. 10.1186/s12978-017-0370-x
    1. Sando D, Ratcliffe H, McDonald K, et al. . The prevalence of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth in urban Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016;16:236. 10.1186/s12884-016-1019-4
    1. Raj A, Dey A, Boyce S, et al. . Associations between mistreatment by a provider during childbirth and maternal health complications in Uttar Pradesh, India. Matern Child Health J 2017;21:1821–33. 10.1007/s10995-017-2298-8
    1. Okafor II, Ugwu EO, Obi SN. Disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth in a low-income country. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015;128:110–3. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.08.015
    1. Kujawski S, Mbaruku G, Freedman LP, et al. . Association between Disrespect and abuse during childbirth and women's confidence in health facilities in Tanzania. Matern Child Health J 2015;19:2243–50. 10.1007/s10995-015-1743-9
    1. Sheferaw ED, Bazant E, Gibson H, et al. . Respectful maternity care in Ethiopian public health facilities. Reprod Health 2017;14:60. 10.1186/s12978-017-0323-4
    1. Abuya T, Sripad P, Ritter J, et al. . Measuring mistreatment of women throughout the birthing process: implications for quality of care assessments. Reprod Health Matters 2018;26:48–61. 10.1080/09688080.2018.1502018
    1. Afulani PA, Phillips B, Aborigo RA, et al. . Person-Centred maternity care in low-income and middle-income countries: analysis of data from Kenya, Ghana, and India. Lancet Glob Health 2019;7:e96–109. 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30403-0
    1. Bishanga DR, Massenga J, Mwanamsangu AH, et al. . Women's experience of Facility-Based childbirth care and receipt of an early postnatal check for herself and her newborn in northwestern Tanzania. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16. 10.3390/ijerph16030481. [Epub ahead of print: 07 Feb 2019].
    1. Tekle Bobo F, Kebebe Kasaye H, Etana B, et al. . Disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Western Ethiopia: should women continue to tolerate? PLoS One 2019;14:e0217126. 10.1371/journal.pone.0217126
    1. Ijadunola MY, Olotu EA, Oyedun OO, et al. . Lifting the veil on disrespect and abuse in facility-based child birth care: findings from South West Nigeria. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019;19:39. 10.1186/s12884-019-2188-8
    1. Vedam S, Stoll K, McRae DN, et al. . Patient-led decision making: measuring autonomy and respect in Canadian maternity care. Patient Educ Couns 2019;102:586–94. 10.1016/j.pec.2018.10.023
    1. Morton CH, Henley MM, Seacrist M, et al. . Bearing witness: United States and Canadian maternity support workers' observations of disrespectful care in childbirth. Birth 2018;45:263–74. 10.1111/birt.12373
    1. Sando D, Abuya T, Asefa A, et al. . Methods used in prevalence studies of disrespect and abuse during facility based childbirth: lessons learned. Reprod Health 2017;14:127. 10.1186/s12978-017-0389-z
    1. Sharma G, Penn-Kekana L, Halder K, et al. . An investigation into mistreatment of women during labour and childbirth in maternity care facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India: a mixed methods study. Reprod Health 2019;16:7. 10.1186/s12978-019-0668-y
    1. Warren C, Njuki R, Abuya T, et al. . Study protocol for promoting respectful maternity care initiative to assess, measure and design interventions to reduce disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Kenya. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013;13:21. 10.1186/1471-2393-13-21
    1. Abuya T, Ndwiga C, Ritter J, et al. . The effect of a multi-component intervention on disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Kenya. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015;15:224. 10.1186/s12884-015-0645-6
    1. Kruk ME, Kujawski S, Mbaruku G. Disrespectful and abusive treatment during facility delivery in Tanzania: a facility and community survey. Health Policy Plan 2014:czu079. 10.1093/heapol/czu079
    1. Rosen HE, Lynam PF, Carr C, et al. . Direct observation of respectful maternity care in five countries: a cross-sectional study of health facilities in East and southern Africa. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015;15:306. 10.1186/s12884-015-0728-4
    1. Sando D, Kendall T, Lyatuu G, et al. . Disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Tanzania: are women living with HIV more vulnerable? J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2014;67 Suppl 4:S228. 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000378
    1. Sheferaw ED, Mengesha TZ, Wase SB. Development of a tool to measure women's perception of respectful maternity care in public health facilities. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016;16:67. 10.1186/s12884-016-0848-5
    1. Ansara DL, Hindin MJ. Exploring gender differences in the patterns of intimate partner violence in Canada: a latent class approach. J Epidemiol Community Health 2010;64:849–54. 10.1136/jech.2009.095208
    1. Straus MA. Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: the conflict tactics (CT) scales. J Marriage Fam 1979;41:75–88. 10.2307/351733
    1. Straus MA, Hamby SL, Boney-McCoy S. The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2) development and preliminary psychometric data. J Fam Issues 1996;17:283–316.
    1. Hindin MJ. Understanding women's attitudes towards wife beating in Zimbabwe. Bull World Health Organ 2003;81:501–8.
    1. Ellsberg M, Heise L, World Health Organization . Researching violence against women: a practical guide for researchers and activists, 2005.
    1. Afulani PA, Diamond-Smith N, Golub G, et al. . Development of a tool to measure person-centered maternity care in developing settings: validation in a rural and urban Kenyan population. Reprod Health 2017;14:118. 10.1186/s12978-017-0381-7
    1. Afulani PA, Diamond-Smith N, Phillips B, et al. . Validation of the person-centered maternity care scale in India. Reprod Health 2018;15:147. 10.1186/s12978-018-0591-7
    1. Afulani PA, Feeser K, Sudhinaraset M, et al. . Toward the development of a short multi-country person-centered maternity care scale. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2019;146:80–7. 10.1002/ijgo.12827
    1. Dey A, Shakya HB, Chandurkar D, et al. . Discordance in self-report and observation data on mistreatment of women by providers during childbirth in Uttar Pradesh, India. Reprod Health 2017;14:149. 10.1186/s12978-017-0409-z
    1. Diamond-Smith N, Treleaven E, Murthy N, et al. . Women's empowerment and experiences of mistreatment during childbirth in facilities in Lucknow, India: results from a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017;17:335. 10.1186/s12884-017-1501-7
    1. Blanc AK, Warren C, McCarthy KJ, et al. . Assessing the validity of indicators of the quality of maternal and newborn health care in Kenya. J Glob Health 2016;6:010405. 10.7189/jogh.06.010405
    1. Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Fawole B, et al. . Methodological development of tools to measure how women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries: labor observation and community survey. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018;18:132. 10.1186/s12874-018-0603-x
    1. Vogel JP, Bohren MA, Tunçalp Özge, et al. . How women are treated during facility-based childbirth: development and validation of measurement tools in four countries - phase 1 formative research study protocol. Reprod Health 2015;12:60. 10.1186/s12978-015-0047-2
    1. Maya ET, Adu-Bonsaffoh K, Dako-Gyeke P, et al. . Women's perspectives of mistreatment during childbirth at health facilities in Ghana: findings from a qualitative study. Reprod Health Matters 2018;26:70–87. 10.1080/09688080.2018.1502020
    1. Balde MD, Bangoura A, Diallo BA, Sall O, et al. . A qualitative study of women's and health providers' attitudes and acceptability of mistreatment during childbirth in health facilities in guinea. Reprod Health 2017;14:4. 10.1186/s12978-016-0262-5
    1. Balde MD, Diallo BA, Bangoura A, et al. . Perceptions and experiences of the mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities in guinea: a qualitative study with women and service providers. Reprod Health 2017;14:3. 10.1186/s12978-016-0266-1
    1. Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Tunçalp Özge, et al. . Mistreatment of women during childbirth in Abuja, Nigeria: a qualitative study on perceptions and experiences of women and healthcare providers. Reprod Health 2017;14:9. 10.1186/s12978-016-0265-2
    1. Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Tunçalp Özge, et al. . "By slapping their laps, the patient will know that you truly care for her": A qualitative study on social norms and acceptability of the mistreatment of women during childbirth in Abuja, Nigeria. SSM Popul Health 2016;2:640–55. 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.07.003
    1. Maung TM, Show KL, Mon NO, et al. . A qualitative study on acceptability of the mistreatment of women during childbirth in Myanmar. Reprod Health 2020;17:56. 10.1186/s12978-020-0907-2
    1. StataCorp LP . Stata/MP 13.0. College Station, tx, 2013.
    1. Bollen K, Lennox R. Conventional wisdom on measurement: a structural equation perspective. Psychol Bull 1991;110:305–14. 10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.305
    1. Streiner DL. Being inconsistent about consistency: when coefficient alpha does and doesn't matter. J Pers Assess 2003;80:217–22. 10.1207/S15327752JPA8003_01
    1. DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. Sage Publications, 2016.
    1. Netemeyer RG, Bearden WO, Sharma S. Scaling procedures: issues and applications. Sage Publications, 2003.
    1. Clark LA, Watson D. Constructing validity: basic issues in objective scale development. Psychol Assess 1995;7:309–19. 10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309
    1. Mokkink LB, Prinsen C, Patrick DL. COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). User manual 2018;78:1.
    1. Prinsen CAC, Vohra S, Rose MR, et al. . How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a "Core Outcome Set" - a practical guideline. Trials 2016;17:449. 10.1186/s13063-016-1555-2
    1. OECD . Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. OECD publishing, 2008.
    1. Dettrick Z, Gouda HN, Hodge A, et al. . Measuring quality of maternal and newborn care in developing countries using demographic and health surveys. PLoS One 2016;11:e0157110. 10.1371/journal.pone.0157110
    1. Tripathi V, Stanton C, Strobino D, et al. . Development and validation of an index to measure the quality of Facility-Based labor and delivery care processes in sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS One 2015;10:e0129491. 10.1371/journal.pone.0129491
    1. Wilhelm D, Lohmann J, De Allegri M, et al. . Quality of maternal obstetric and neonatal care in low-income countries: development of a composite index. BMC Med Res Methodol 2019;19:154. 10.1186/s12874-019-0790-0
    1. Pirkle CM, Dumont A, Traore M, et al. . Validity and reliability of criterion based clinical audit to assess obstetrical quality of care in West Africa. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2012;12:118. 10.1186/1471-2393-12-118
    1. Jennings L, Na M, Cherewick M, et al. . Women's empowerment and male involvement in antenatal care: analyses of demographic and health surveys (DHS) in selected African countries. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014;14:297. 10.1186/1471-2393-14-297
    1. Coltman T, Devinney TM, Midgley DF, et al. . Formative versus reflective measurement models: two applications of formative measurement. J Bus Res 2008;61:1250–62. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.013
    1. Bollen KA, Davis WR. Causal indicator models: identification, estimation, and testing. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 2009;16:498–522. 10.1080/10705510903008253
    1. Strobino DM, Baruffi G. Evaluation of a measure of neonatal morbidity. Med Care 1984;22:818–26. 10.1097/00005650-198409000-00006
    1. Sen G, Reddy B, Iyer A. Beyond measurement: the drivers of disrespect and abuse in obstetric care. Reprod Health Matters 2018;26:6–18. 10.1080/09688080.2018.1508173
    1. Moyer CA, Rominski S, Nakua EK, et al. . Exposure to disrespectful patient care during training: data from midwifery students at 15 midwifery schools in Ghana. Midwifery 2016;41:39–44. 10.1016/j.midw.2016.07.009
    1. Jewkes R, Abrahams N, Mvo Z. Why do nurses abuse patients? reflections from South African obstetric services. Soc Sci Med 1998;47:1781–95. 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00240-8
    1. Kruger Lou‐Marié, Schoombee C. The other side of caring: abuse in a South African maternity ward. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2010;28:84–101. 10.1080/02646830903294979
    1. Smith PH, Earp JA, DeVellis R. Measuring battering: development of the Women’s Experience with Battering (WEB) Scale. Women’s Health 1995;1:273–88.
    1. Baba K, Takauma F, Tada K, et al. . Factor structure of the conflict tactics scale 1. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery 2017;5:239–47.
    1. Kalokhe AS, Stephenson R, Kelley ME, et al. . The development and validation of the Indian family violence and control scale. PLoS One 2016;11:e0148120. 10.1371/journal.pone.0148120
    1. Marshall LL. Development of the severity of violence against women scales. J Fam Violence 1992;7:103–21. 10.1007/BF00978700
    1. de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Bouter LM. Current challenges in clinimetrics. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56:1137–41. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.08.012
    1. Burrowes S, Holcombe SJ, Jara D, et al. . Midwives' and patients' perspectives on disrespect and abuse during labor and delivery care in Ethiopia: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017;17:263. 10.1186/s12884-017-1442-1
    1. Warren N, Beebe M, Chase RP, et al. . Nègènègèn: sweet talk, disrespect, and abuse among rural auxiliary midwives in Mali. Midwifery 2015;31:1073–80. 10.1016/j.midw.2015.07.007
    1. World Health Organization . Who recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. World Health Organization, 2018.
    1. Maung TM, Mon NO, Mehrtash H, et al. . Women's experiences of mistreatment during childbirth and their satisfaction with care: findings from a multicountry community-based study in four countries. BMJ Glob Health 2021;5:e003688. 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003688
    1. Bohren MA, Berger BO, Munthe-Kaas H, et al. . Perceptions and experiences of labour companionship: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;3:CD012449. 10.1002/14651858.CD012449.pub2
    1. Afulani PA, Sayi TS, Montagu D. Predictors of person-centered maternity care: the role of socioeconomic status, empowerment, and facility type. BMC Health Serv Res 2018;18:360. 10.1186/s12913-018-3183-x
    1. Asefa A, Bekele D. Status of respectful and non-abusive care during facility-based childbirth in a hospital and health centers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Reprod Health 2015;12:33. 10.1186/s12978-015-0024-9
    1. Jewkes R, Penn-Kekana L. Mistreatment of women in childbirth: time for action on this important dimension of violence against women. PLoS Med 2015;12:e1001849. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001849
    1. Leslie HH, Sharma J, Mehrtash H. Women’s report of mistreatment during facility-based childbirth: validity and reliability of community survey measures. BMJ Global Health 2021;5:e004822. 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004822
    1. Afulani PA, Buback L, McNally B, et al. . A rapid review of available evidence to inform indicators for routine monitoring and evaluation of Respectful maternity care. Glob Health Sci Pract 2020;8:125–35. 10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00323
    1. Adeniran A, Likaka A, Knutsson A, et al. . Leadership, action, learning and accountability to deliver quality care for women, newborns and children. Bull World Health Organ 2018;96:222–4. 10.2471/BLT.17.197939
    1. World Health Organization . Quality, equity, dignity: the network to improve quality of care for maternal, newborn and child health: strategic objectives, 2018.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera