Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Phase III BRIGHTE Trial of the HIV-1 Attachment Inhibitor Prodrug Fostemsavir in Heavily Treatment-Experienced Individuals

Sarah-Jane Anderson, Miranda Murray, David Cella, Robert Grossberg, Debbie Hagins, William Towner, Marcia Wang, Andrew Clark, Amy Pierce, Cyril Llamoso, Peter Ackerman, Max Lataillade, Sarah-Jane Anderson, Miranda Murray, David Cella, Robert Grossberg, Debbie Hagins, William Towner, Marcia Wang, Andrew Clark, Amy Pierce, Cyril Llamoso, Peter Ackerman, Max Lataillade

Abstract

Introduction: Heavily treatment-experienced (HTE) people living with HIV-1 (PLWH) have limited viable antiretroviral regimens available because of multidrug resistance and safety concerns. The first-in-class HIV-1 attachment inhibitor fostemsavir demonstrated efficacy and safety in HTE participants in the ongoing phase III BRIGHTE trial.

Objectives: We describe patient-reported outcomes (PROs) through week 48.

Methods: Eligible participants for whom their current regimen was failing were assigned to the randomized cohort (RC; one to two fully active agents remaining) or the nonrandomized cohort (NRC; no fully active agents remaining). PRO assessments included the EQ-5D-3L, EQ-VAS, and Functional Assessment of HIV Infection (FAHI) instruments.

Results: Both cohorts achieved increases in EQ-5D-3L US- and UK-referenced utility score from baseline at week 24. Mean visual analog scale (VAS) scores in the RC and NRC increased from baseline by 8.7 (95% CI 6.2-11.2) and 5.6 points (95% CI 1.5-9.7) at week 24 and increased from baseline by 9.8 (95% CI 7.0-12.6) and 4.9 points (95% CI 0.6-9.2) at week 48, respectively. Mean increases in FAHI total score from baseline to weeks 24 and 48 in the RC were 6.9 (95% CI 4.2-9.7) and 5.8 (95% CI 2.7-9.0), respectively, whereas mean increases in physical and emotional well-being subscale scores were 2.7 (95% CI 1.9-3.6) and 2.4 (95% CI 1.3-3.4) and 3.2 (95% CI 2.2-4.2) and 2.6 (95% CI 1.6-3.7), respectively, with little to no change in other subscales.

Conclusions: Improvements in major domains of the EQ-VAS and FAHI through week 48, combined with efficacy and safety results, support the use of fostemsavir for HTE PLWH.

Trial registration number and date: NCT02362503; February 13, 2015.

Conflict of interest statement

S-JA and MW are employees of and own stock in GlaxoSmithKline. MM was an employee of ViiV Healthcare when the work was conducted, is now with Health Analytics and Outcomes, London, UK, and owns/owned stock in GlaxoSmithKline. DC is president of FACIT.org, which licenses FAHI, and has been a consultant to ViiV Healthcare. RG has received research support from ViiV Healthcare, Amgen, and Gilead Sciences; consulting fees from Thera Technologies as member of an advisory board; and speaker fees from ViiV Healthcare. DH has received speaker fees and consulting fees from ViiV Healthcare as a member of an advisory board. WT is an employee of Southern California Permanente Medical Group and has received institutional grants from ViiV Healthcare, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Dynavax, and Merck. AC, AP, CL, PA, and ML are employees of ViiV Healthcare and own stock in GlaxoSmithKline.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
BRIGHTE study disposition at week 24 and week 48

References

    1. Palella FJ Jr, Delaney KM, Moorman AC, et al, and the HIV Outpatient Study Investigators. Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(13):853–60.
    1. Brown J, Chien C, Timmins P, et al. Compartmental absorption modeling and site of absorption studies to determine feasibility of an extended-release formulation of an HIV-1 attachment inhibitor phosphate ester prodrug. J Pharm Sci. 2013;102(6):1742–1751. doi: 10.1002/jps.23476.
    1. Langley DR, Kimura SR, Sivaprakasam P, et al. Homology models of the HIV-1 attachment inhibitor BMS-626529 bound to gp120 suggest a unique mechanism of action. Proteins. 2015;83(2):331–350. doi: 10.1002/prot.24726.
    1. Ray N, Hwang C, Healy MD, et al. Prediction of virological response and assessment of resistance emergence to the HIV-1 attachment inhibitor BMS-626529 during 8-day monotherapy with its prodrug BMS-663068. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;64(1):7–15. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31829726f3.
    1. Nowicka-Sans B, Gong Y-F, McAuliffe B, et al. In vitro antiviral characteristics of HIV-1 attachment inhibitor BMS-626529, the active component of the prodrug BMS-663068. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(7):3498–3507. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00426-12.
    1. Li Z, Zhou N, Sun Y, et al. Activity of the HIV-1 attachment inhibitor BMS-626529, the active component of the prodrug BMS-663068, against CD4-independent viruses and HIV-1 envelopes resistant to other entry inhibitors. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57(9):4172–4180. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00513-13.
    1. Rukobia [prescribing information]. Research Triangle Park, NC: ViiV Healthcare; 2020.
    1. Kozal M, Aberg J, Pialoux G, et al. Fostemsavir in adults with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(13):1232–1243. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1902493.
    1. Powers JH, III, Howard K, Saretsky T, et al. Patient-reported outcome assessments as endpoints in studies in infectious diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(suppl 2):S52–S56. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw317.
    1. Viala-Danten M, Dubois D, Gilet H, Martin S, Peeters K, Cella D. Psychometric evaluation of the functional assessment of HIV Infection (FAHI) questionnaire and its usefulness in clinical trials. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(8):1215–1227. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9674-9.
    1. Nachega JB, Marconi VC, van Zyl GU, et al. HIV treatment adherence, drug resistance, virologic failure: evolving concepts. Infect Disord Drug Targets. 2011;11(2):167–174. doi: 10.2174/187152611795589663.
    1. Struble K, Murray J, Cheng B, Gegeny T, Miller V, Gulick R. Antiretroviral therapies for treatment-experienced patients: current status and research challenges. AIDS. 2005;19(8):747–756. doi: 10.1097/.
    1. Campsmith ML, Nakashima AK, Davidson AJ. Self-reported health-related quality of life in persons with HIV infection: results from a multi-site interview project. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:12. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-12.
    1. Bucciardini R, Pugliese K, Weimer L, et al. Relationship between health-related quality of life measures and high HIV viral load in HIV-infected triple-class-experienced patients. HIV Clin Trials. 2014;15(4):176–183. doi: 10.1310/hct1504-176.
    1. Cella D, Gilet H, Viala-Danten M, Peeters K, Dubois D, Martin S. Effects of etravirine versus placebo on health-related quality of life in treatment-experienced HIV patients as measured by the functional assessment of human immunodeficiency virus infection (FAHI) questionnaire in the DUET trials. HIV Clin Trials. 2010;11(1):18–27. doi: 10.1310/hct1101-18.
    1. Cella DF, McCain NL, Peterman AH, Mo F, Wolen D. Development and validation of the Functional Assessment of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection (FAHI) quality of life instrument. Qual Life Res. 1996;5(4):450–463. doi: 10.1007/BF00449920.
    1. Boyd MA, Hill AM. Clinical management of treatment-experienced, HIV/AIDS patients in the combination antiretroviral therapy era. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(suppl 1):17–34. doi: 10.2165/11587420-000000000-00000.
    1. Burgoyne RW, Tan DHS. Prolongation and quality of life for HIV-infected adults treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART): a balancing act. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;61(3):469–473. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkm499.
    1. Walsh JC, Mandalia S, Gazzard BG. Responses to a 1 month self-report on adherence to antiretroviral therapy are consistent with electronic data and virological treatment outcome. AIDS. 2002;16(2):269–277. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200201250-00017.
    1. EuroQol. EQ-5D-3L user guide. EuroQol Research Foundation. 2015. . Accessed 15 Apr 2019.
    1. Miners A, Phillips A, Kreif N, et al. Health-related quality-of-life of people with HIV in the era of combination antiretroviral treatment: a cross-sectional comparison with the general population. Lancet HIV. 2014;1(1):e32–e40. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(14)70018-9.
    1. Byrne S, Petry NM. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection (FAHI) in patients with drug and alcohol use disorders. AIDS Care. 2013;25(1):118–125. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2012.687811.
    1. Janssen MF, Pickard AS, Golicki D, et al. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(7):1717–1727. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0322-4.
    1. Nan L, Johnson JA, Shaw JW, Coons SJ. A comparison of EQ-5D index scores derived from the US and UK population-based scoring functions. Med Decis Making. 2007;27(3):321–326. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07300603.
    1. Clotet B, Bellos N, Molina J-M, et al. Efficacy and safety of darunavir-ritonavir at week 48 in treatment-experienced patients with HIV-1 infection in POWER 1 and 2: a pooled subgroup analysis of data from two randomised trials. Lancet. 2007;369(9568):1169–1178. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60497-8.
    1. Dubois D, Smets E, Vangeneugden T, et al. Improved quality of life in treatment-experienced HIV patients treated with TMC114/r vs control protease inhibitors: results of POWER 1 and 2 functional assessment of HIV infection (FAHI). Poster presented at: 16th International AIDS Conference; August 13–18, 2006; Toronto, Canada.
    1. Madruga JV, Cahn P, Grinsztejn B, et al. Efficacy and safety of TMC125 (etravirine) in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients in DUET-1: 24-week results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;370(9581):29–38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61047-2.
    1. Lazzarin A, Campbell T, Clotet B, et al. Efficacy and safety of TMC125 (etravirine) in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients in DUET-2: 24-week results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;370(9581):39–48. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61048-4.
    1. Gakhar H, Kamali A, Holodniy M. Health-related quality of life assessment after antiretroviral therapy: a review of the literature. Drugs. 2013;73(7):651–672. doi: 10.1007/s40265-013-0040-4.
    1. Wyrwich KW, Bullinger M, Aaronson N, Hays RD, Patrick DL, Symonds T. Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(2):285–295. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-0705-2.
    1. Briongos Figuero LS, Bachiller Luque P, Palacios Martín T, González Sagrado M, Eiros Bouza JM. Assessment of factors influencing health-related quality of life in HIV-infected patients. HIV Med. 2011;12(1):22–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2010.00844.x.
    1. Anis AH, Nosyk B, Sun H, et al. Quality of life of patients with advanced HIV/AIDS: measuring the impact of both AIDS-defining events and non-AIDS serious adverse events. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;51(5):631–639. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181a4f00d.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera