Sacubitril/Valsartan in Advanced Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Rationale and Design of the LIFE Trial

Douglas L Mann, Stephen J Greene, Michael M Givertz, Justin M Vader, Randall C Starling, Andrew P Ambrosy, Palak Shah, Steven E McNulty, Claudius Mahr, Divya Gupta, Margaret M Redfield, Anuradha Lala, Gregory D Lewis, Selma F Mohammed, Nisha A Gilotra, Adam D DeVore, Eiran Z Gorodeski, Patrice Desvigne-Nickens, Adrian F Hernandez, Eugene Braunwald, LIFE Investigators, Douglas L Mann, Stephen J Greene, Michael M Givertz, Justin M Vader, Randall C Starling, Andrew P Ambrosy, Palak Shah, Steven E McNulty, Claudius Mahr, Divya Gupta, Margaret M Redfield, Anuradha Lala, Gregory D Lewis, Selma F Mohammed, Nisha A Gilotra, Adam D DeVore, Eiran Z Gorodeski, Patrice Desvigne-Nickens, Adrian F Hernandez, Eugene Braunwald, LIFE Investigators

Abstract

The PARADIGM-HF (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Neprilysin Inhibitor With Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure) trial reported that sacubitril/valsartan (S/V), an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, significantly reduced mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalization in HF patients with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, fewer than 1% of patients in the PARADIGM-HF study had New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class IV symptoms. Accordingly, data that informed the use of S/V among patients with advanced HF were limited. The LIFE (LCZ696 in Hospitalized Advanced Heart Failure) study was a 24-week prospective, multicenter, double-blinded, double-dummy, active comparator trial that compared the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of S/V with those of valsartan in patients with advanced HFrEF. The trial planned to randomize 400 patients ≥18 years of age with advanced HF, defined as an EF ≤35%, New York Heart Association functional class IV symptoms, elevated natriuretic peptide concentration (B-type natriuretic peptide [BNP] ≥250 pg/ml or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP] ≥800 pg/ml), and ≥1 objective finding of advanced HF. Following a 3- to 7-day open label run-in period with S/V (24 mg/26 mg twice daily), patients were randomized 1:1 to S/V titrated to 97 mg/103 mg twice daily versus 160 mg of V twice daily. The primary endpoint was the proportional change from baseline in the area under the curve for NT-proBNP levels measured through week 24. Secondary and tertiary endpoints included clinical outcomes and safety and tolerability. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, enrollment in the LIFE trial was stopped prematurely to ensure patient safety and data integrity. The primary analysis consists of the first 335 randomized patients whose clinical follow-up examination results were not severely impacted by COVID-19. (Entresto [LCZ696] in Advanced Heart Failure [LIFE STUDY] [HFN-LIFE]; NCT02816736).

Keywords: NYHA functional class IV; heart failure; sacubitril/valsartan; valsartan.

Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract
Central Illustration
Central Illustration
Overview of Study Protocol and Timeline The screening visit (visit 0) and visit 1 may was allowed to be combined at the investigator’s discretion for subjects who were stable and for whom laboratory results were reviewed as long as the investigator ensured the first dose of sacubitril/valsartan was given >36 h after the last dose of ACE inhibitor (if applicable). If visit data were not combined, visit 1 timeline should have taken place within 7 days of the screening visit. BID = twice daily; S/V = sacubitril/valsartan; w = week.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Timeline for LIFE Trial LIFE trial timelines are shown from the date on which the first patient was enrolled and from the first data and safety monitoring board interim analysis. Enrollment in the trial was suspended March 23, 2020, because of the high risk for adverse outcomes related to COVID-19. The plan for data analysis was adjusted to restrict the primary analysis to patients who had their week-12 visit prior to March 1, 2020. The last anticipated 24-week follow-up visit for patients randomized before March 23 was anticipated to be October 24, 2020. COVID-19 = coronavirus-2019; LIFE = LCZ696 in Hospitalized Advanced Heart Failure.

References

    1. Yancy C.W., Jessup M., Bozkurt B., et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:e147–e239.
    1. Yancy C.W., Jessup M., Bozkurt B., et al. 2016 ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update on new pharmacological therapy for heart failure: an update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1476–1488.
    1. Ambardekar A.V., Kittleson M.M., Palardy M., et al. Outcomes with ambulatory advanced heart failure from the Medical Arm of Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (MedaMACS) registry. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019;38:408–417.
    1. Fang J.C., Ewald G.A., Allen L.A., et al. Advanced (stage D) heart failure: a statement from the Heart Failure Society of America Guidelines Committee. J Card Fail. 2015;21:519–534.
    1. McMurray J.J., Packer M., Desai A.S., et al. Dual angiotensin receptor and neprilysin inhibition as an alternative to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in patients with chronic systolic heart failure: rationale for and design of the Prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and morbidity in Heart Failure trial (PARADIGM-HF) Eur J Heart Fail. 2013;15:1062–1073.
    1. McMurray J.J., Packer M., Desai A.S., et al. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:993–1004.
    1. Claggett B., Packer M., McMurray J.J., et al. Estimating the long-term treatment benefits of sacubitril-valsartan. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2289–2290.
    1. Srivastava P.K., Claggett B.L., Solomon S.D., et al. Estimated 5-year number needed to treat to prevent cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization with angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition vs standard therapy for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: an analysis of data from the PARADIGM-HF trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3:1226–1231.
    1. Yancy C.W., Jessup M., Bozkurt B., et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:776–803.
    1. Ponikowski P., Voors A.A., Anker S.D., et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2016;37 2129–200.
    1. Desai A.S., Solomon S., Claggett B., et al. Factors associated with noncompletion during the run-in period before randomization and influence on the estimated benefit of LCZ696 in the PARADIGM-HF trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2016;9 e002735.
    1. McMurray J.J., Packer M., Desai A.S., et al. Baseline characteristics and treatment of patients in prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEI to determine impact on global mortality and morbidity in heart failure trial (PARADIGM-HF) Eur J Heart Fail. 2014;16:817–825.
    1. Velazquez E.J., Morrow D.A., DeVore A.D., et al. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition in acute decompensated heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:539–548.
    1. Pocock S.J., Ariti C.A., Collier T.J., Wang D. The win ratio: a new approach to the analysis of composite endpoints in clinical trials based on clinical priorities. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:176–182.
    1. Solomon S.D., Zile M., Pieske B., et al. The angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a phase 2 double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;380:1387–1395.
    1. Solomon S.D., McMurray J.J.V., Anand I.S., et al. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1609–1620.
    1. Greene S.J., Mentz R.J., Felker G.M. Outpatient worsening heart failure as a target for therapy: a review. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3:252–259.
    1. Greene S.J., Felker G.M., Butler J. Outpatient versus inpatient worsening heart failure: distinguishing biology and risk from location of care. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019;21:121–124.
    1. Group C.T.S. Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure: results of the cooperative north scandanavian enalapril survival study. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:1429–1435.
    1. Packer M., Coats A.J., Fowler M.B., et al. Effect of carvedilol on survival in severe chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1651–1658.
    1. Cohn J.N., Fowler M.B., Bristow M.R., et al. Safety and efficacy of carvedilol in severe heart failure. The U.S. Carvedilol Heart Failure Study Group. J Card Fail. 1997;3:173–179.
    1. Pitt B., Zannad F., Remme W.J., et al. The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study investigators. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:709–717.
    1. Taylor A.L., Ziesche S., Yancy C., et al. Combination of isosorbide dinitrate and hydralazine in blacks with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2049–2057.
    1. Packer M., O'Connor C.M., Ghali J.K., et al. Effect of amlodipine on morbidity and mortality in severe chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1107–1114.
    1. Packer M., Carson P., Elkayam U., et al. Effect of amlodipine on the survival of patients with severe chronic heart failure due to a nonischemic cardiomyopathy: results of the PRAISE-2 study (prospective randomized amlodipine survival evaluation 2) J Am Coll Cardiol HF. 2013;1:308–314.
    1. Armstrong P.W., Pieske B., Anstrom K.J., et al. Vericiguat in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1883–1893.
    1. Packer M., Carver J.R., Rodeheffer R.J., et al. Effect of oral milrinone on mortality in severe chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1468–1475.
    1. Metra M., Eichhorn E., Abraham W.T., et al. Effects of low-dose oral enoximone administration on mortality, morbidity, and exercise capacity in patients with advanced heart failure: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group ESSENTIAL trials. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:3015–3026.
    1. Feldman A.M., Oren R.M., Abraham W.T., et al. Low-dose oral enoximone enhances the ability to wean patients with ultra-advanced heart failure from intravenous inotropic support: results of the oral enoximone in intravenous inotrope-dependent subjects trial. Am Heart J. 2007;154:861–869.
    1. Nieminen M.S., Cleland J.G., Eha J., et al. Oral levosimendan in patients with severe chronic heart failure---the PERSIST study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2008;10:1246–1254.
    1. Packer M., Pitt B., Rouleau J.L., Swedberg K., DeMets D.L., Fisher L. Long-term effects of flosequinan on the morbidity and mortality of patients with severe chronic heart failure: primary results of the PROFILE trial After 24 years. J Am Coll Cardiol HF. 2017;5:399–407.
    1. Hampton J.R., van Veldhuisen D.J., Kleber F.X., et al. Randomised study of effect of ibopamine on survival in patients with advanced severe heart failure. Second Prospective Randomised Study of Ibopamine on Mortality and Efficacy (PRIME II) Investigators [see comments] Lancet. 1997;349:971–977.
    1. Xamoterol in severe heart failure. The xamoterol in Severe Heart Failure Study group. Lancet. 1990;336:1–6.
    1. Massie B., Bourassa M., DiBianco R., et al. Long-term oral administration of amrinone for congestive heart failure: lack of efficacy in a multicenter controlled trial. Circulation. 1985;71:963–971.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera