Can trained nurses exclude acute otitis media with tympanometry or acoustic reflectometry in symptomatic children?

Miia K Laine, Paula A Tähtinen, Olli Ruuskanen, Eliisa Löyttyniemi, Aino Ruohola, Miia K Laine, Paula A Tähtinen, Olli Ruuskanen, Eliisa Löyttyniemi, Aino Ruohola

Abstract

Objective: Since acute otitis media (AOM) is the most prevalent bacterial infection in young children, the reliable exclusion of AOM by nurses might save physicians' time for other duties. The study aim was to determine whether nurses without otoscopic experience can reliably use tympanometry or spectral gradient acoustic reflectometry (SG-AR) to exclude AOM.

Design: Three nurses were trained, who performed examinations with tympanometry and SG-AR. Pneumatic otoscopy by the study physician served as the diagnostic standard.

Setting: Study clinic at primary health care level.

Patients: 281 children 6-35 months of age.

Main outcome measures: Predictive values (with 95% confidence interval) for tympanometry and SG-AR, and the clinical usefulness, i.e. the proportion of visits where nurses obtained the exclusive test result from both ears of the child.

Results: At 459 visits, the negative predictive value of type A and C1 tympanograms (tympanometric peak pressure >-200 daPa) was 94% (91-97%). Based on type A and C1 tympanograms, the nurse could exclude AOM at 94/459 (20%) of visits. The negative predictive value of SG-AR level 1 result (>95°) was 94% (89-97%). Based on the SG-AR level 1 result, the nurse could exclude AOM at 36/459 (8%) of visits.

Conclusion: Type A and C1 tympanograms and SG-AR level 1 results obtained by nurses are reliable test results in excluding AOM. However, the clinical usefulness of these test results is limited by their rarity. Type A and C1 tympanograms were obtained by nurses from both ears of the child only at one-fifth of the symptomatic visits. Key Points Acute otitis media (AOM) is the most prevalent bacterial infection in young children. Nurses' role in excluding AOM is unknown. Type A and C1 tympanograms (tympanometric peak pressure >-200 daPa) obtained by nurses are reliable test results in excluding AOM. With type A and C1 tympanograms, nurses could exclude AOM only at one-fifth of the symptomatic visits. The clinical usefulness of the exclusion of AOM performed by nurses seems to be limited.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00299455.

Keywords: Acute otitis media; Finland; children; exclusion; general practice; spectral gradient acoustic reflectometry; tympanometry.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow chart of the included children, visits, and tympanometric and spectral gradient acoustic reflectometry (SG-AR) examinations.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Exclusion of acute otitis media (AOM) based on tympanometry performed by the nurses at symptomatic visits (n = 459). Type A and C1 tympanograms from both ears of the child were regarded as the exclusive test result for AOM. Notes: aClassification of tympanograms. Type A (tympanometric peak pressure greater than –100 daPa); type C1 (the pressure between –100 and –199 daPa); type C2 (pressure –200 daPa or less); type Cs (width >300 daPa or static acoustic admittance <0.2 mmho); and type B (flat).

References

    1. Vergison A, Dagan R, Arguedas A, Bonhoeffer J, Cohen R, Dhooge I, Hoberman A, Liese J, Marchisio P, Palmu AA, Ray GT, Sanders EA, Simões EA, Uhari M, van Eldere J, Pelton SI. Otitis media and its consequences: Beyond the earache. Lancet Infect Dis 2010;10:195203.
    1. Saxen U, Jaatinen PT, Kivela SL.. How does a shortage of physicians impact on the job satisfaction of health centre staff? Scand J Prim Health Care 2008;26:248–50.
    1. Lieberthal AS, Carroll AE, Chonmaitree T, Ganiats TG, Hoberman A, Jackson MA, Joffe MD, Miller DT, Rosenfeld RM, Sevilla XD, Schwartz RH, Thomas PA, Tunkel DE. The diagnosis and management of acute otitis media. Pediatrics 2013;131:e96499.
    1. Jerger J. Clinical experience with impedance audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol 1970;92:311–24.
    1. Teele DW, Teele J.. Detection of middle ear effusion by acoustic reflectometry. J Pediatr 1984;104:832–8.
    1. Kimball S. Acoustic reflectometry: Spectral gradient analysis for improved detection of middle ear effusion in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998;17:552–5; discussion 580.
    1. Smith CG, Paradise JL, Sabo DL, Rockette HE, Kurs-Lasky M, Bernard BS, Colborn DK. Tympanometric findings and the probability of middle-ear effusion in 3686 infants and young children. Pediatrics 2006;118:113.
    1. Chianese J, Hoberman A, Paradise JL, Colborn DK, Kearney D, Rockette HE, Kurs-Lasky M. Spectral gradient acoustic reflectometry compared with tympanometry in diagnosing middle ear effusion in children aged 6 to 24 months. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161:8848.
    1. Laine MK, Tähtinen PA, Helenius KK, Luoto R, Ruohola A.. Acoustic reflectometry in discrimination of otoscopic diagnoses in young ambulatory children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2012;31:1007–11.
    1. Helenius KK, Laine MK, Tähtinen PA, Lahti E, Ruohola A.. Tympanometry in discrimination of otoscopic diagnoses in young ambulatory children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2012;31:1003–6.
    1. Palmu A, Puhakka H, Rahko T, Takala AK.. Diagnostic value of tympanometry in infants in clinical practice. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1999;49:207–13.
    1. Lous J, Ryborg CT, Damsgaard JJ, Munck AP.. Tympanometry in general practice: Use, problems and solutions. Fam Pract 2012;29:726–32.
    1. Lous J. Use of tympanometry in general practice in Denmark. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2014;78:124–7.
    1. Laine MK, Tähtinen PA, Ruuskanen O, Löyttyniemi E, Ruohola A.. Can nurses exclude middle-ear effusion without otoscopy in young asymptomatic children in primary care? Scand J Prim Health Care 2015;33:115–20.
    1. Teppo H, Revonta M, Linden H, Palmu A.. Detection of middle-ear fluid in children with spectral gradient acoustic reflectometry: A screening tool for nurses? Scand J Prim Health Care 2006;24:88–92.
    1. Blomgren K, Haapkyla J, Pitkaranta A.. Tympanometry by nurses: Can allocation of tasks be optimised? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2007;71:7–10.
    1. Puhakka T, Pulkkinen J, Silvennoinen H, Heikkinen T.. Comparison of spectral gradient acoustic reflectometry and tympanometry for detection of middle ear effusion in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2014;33:e183–6.
    1. Tähtinen PA, Laine MK, Huovinen P, Jalava J, Ruuskanen O, Ruohola A.. A placebo-controlled trial of antimicrobial treatment for acute otitis media. N Engl J Med 2011;364:116–26.
    1. Fiellau-Nikolajsen M, Lous J.. Prospective tympanometry in 3-year-old children. A study of the spontaneous course of tympanometry types in a nonselected population. Arch Otolaryngol 1979;105:461–6.
    1. Koivunen P, Alho OP, Uhari M, Niemela M, Luotonen J.. Minitympanometry in detecting middle ear fluid. J Pediatr 1997;131:419–22.
    1. Patricoski C, Ferguson S.. Which tympanometer is optimal for an outpatient primary care setting? J Fam Pract 2006;55:946–52.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera