Study design to examine the potential role of assessment reactivity in the Screening, Motivational Assessment, Referral, and Treatment in Emergency Departments (SMART-ED) protocol

Dennis M Donovan, Michael P Bogenschutz, Harold Perl, Alyssa Forcehimes, Bryon Adinoff, Raul Mandler, Neal Oden, Robrina Walker, Dennis M Donovan, Michael P Bogenschutz, Harold Perl, Alyssa Forcehimes, Bryon Adinoff, Raul Mandler, Neal Oden, Robrina Walker

Abstract

Background: Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) approaches to reducing hazardous alcohol and illicit drug use have been assessed in a variety of health care settings, including primary care, trauma centers, and emergency departments. A major methodological concern in these trials, however, is "assessment reactivity," the hypothesized impact of intensive research assessments to reduce alcohol and drug use and thus mask the purported efficacy of the interventions under scrutiny. Thus, it has been recommended that prospective research designs take assessment reactivity into account. The present article describes the design of the National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network protocol, Screening, Motivational Assessment, Referral, and Treatment in Emergency Departments (SMART-ED), which addresses the potential bias of assessment reactivity.

Methods/design: The protocol employs a 3-arm design. Following an initial brief screening, individuals identified as positive cases are consented, asked to provide demographic and locator information, and randomly assigned to one of the three conditions: minimal screening only, screening + assessment, or screening + assessment + brief intervention. In a two-stage process, the randomization procedure first reveals whether or not the participant will be in the minimal-screening-only condition. Participants in the other two groups receive a more extensive baseline assessment before it is revealed whether they have been randomized to also receive a brief intervention. Comparing the screening only and screening + assessment conditions will allow determination of the incremental effect of assessment reactivity.

Discussion: Assessment reactivity is a potential source of bias that may reduce and/or lead to an underestimation of the purported effectiveness of brief interventions. From a methodological perspective, it needs to be accounted for in research designs. The SMART-ED design offers an approach to minimize assessment reactivity as a potential source of bias. Elucidating the role of assessment reactivity may offer insights into the mechanisms underlying SBIRT as well as suggest clinical options incorporating assessment reactivity as a treatment adjunct. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01207791.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prior and more recent emergency-department SBIRT designs.
Figure 2
Figure 2
SMART-ED design overview.

References

    1. US Institute of Medicine. Broadening the Base of Treatment for Alcohol Problems. National Academy Press, Washington, DC; 1990.
    1. Babor TF, McRee BG PAK, Grimaldi PL, Ahmed K, Bray J. Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT): Toward a public health approach to the management of substance abuse. Subst Abuse. 2007;28(3):7–30. doi: 10.1300/J465v28n03_03.
    1. Bernstein J, Bernstein E, Tassiopoulos K, Heeren T, Levenson S, Hingson R. Brief motivational intervention at a clinic visit reduces cocaine and heroin use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005;77(1):49–59. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.07.006.
    1. Babor TF, Kadden RM. Screening and interventions for alcohol and drug problems in medical settings: What works? J Trauma. 2005;59(3 Suppl):S80–S87.
    1. Madras BK, Compton WM, Avula D, Stegbauer T, Stein JB, Clark HW. Screening, brief interventions, referral to treatment (SBIRT) for illicit drug and alcohol use at multiple healthcare sites: comparison at intake and 6 months later. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009;99(1–3):280–295.
    1. Dunn C. Brief motivational interviewing interventions targeting substance abuse in the acute care medical setting. Semi Clin Neuropsychiatr. 2003;8(3):188–196. doi: 10.1016/S1084-3612(03)00025-X.
    1. Miller WM, Rollnick S, editor. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People to Change Addictive Behavior. Guilford Press, New York; 1991.
    1. Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC. Brief Intervention for Hazardous and Harmful Drinking: A Manual for Use in Primary Care. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2001.
    1. Schrimsher GW, Filtz K. Assessment reactivity: Can assessment of alcohol use during research be an active treatment? Alcoholism Treat Q. 2011;29:108–115. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2011.557983.
    1. Kypri K, Langley JD, Saunders JB, Cashell-Smith ML. Assessment may conceal therapeutic benefit: findings from a randomized controlled trial for hazardous drinking. Addiction. 2007;102(1):62–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01632.x.
    1. McCambridge J, Butor-Bhavsar K, Witton J, Elbourne D. Can research assessments themselves cause bias in behaviour change trials? A systematic review of evidence from Solomon 4-group studies. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025223.
    1. McCambridge J, Day M. Randomized controlled trial of the effects of completing the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test questionnaire on self-reported hazardous drinking. Addiction. 2008;103(2):241–248. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02080.x.
    1. McCambridge J, Kypri K. Can simply answering research questions change behaviour? Systematic review and meta analyses of brief alcohol intervention trials. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e23748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023748.
    1. Walters ST, Vader AM, Harris TR, Jouriles EN. Reactivity to alcohol assessment measures: an experimental test. Addiction. 2009;104(8):1305–1310. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02632.x.
    1. Bernstein JA, Bernstein E, Heeren TC. Mechanisms of change in control group drinking in clinical trials of brief alcohol intervention: Implications for bias toward the null. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2010;29(5):498–507. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00174.x.
    1. Clifford PR, Maisto SA. Subject reactivity effects and alcohol treatment outcome research. J Stud Alcohol. 2000;61(6):787–793.
    1. Clifford PR, Maisto SA, Davis CM. Alcohol treatment research assessment exposure subject reactivity effects: part I. Alcohol use and related consequences. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007;68(4):519–528.
    1. Clifford PR, Maisto SA, Franzke LH, Longabaugh R, Beattie MC. Alcohol treatment research follow-up interviews and drinking behaviors. J Stud Alcohol. 2000;61(5):736–743.
    1. Epstein EE, Drapkin ML, Yusko DA, Cook SM, McCrady BS, Jensen NK. Is alcohol assessment therapeutic? Pretreatment change in drinking among alcohol-dependent women. J Stud Alcohol. 2005;66(3):369–378.
    1. Kaminer Y, Burleson JA, Burke R. Can assessment reactivity predict treatment outcome among adolescents with alcohol and other substance use disorders? Subst Abuse. 2008;29(2):63–69.
    1. Morton V, Torgerson DJ. Regression to the mean: treatment effect without the intervention. J Eval Clin Pract. 2005;11(1):59–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2004.00505.x.
    1. Moos RH. Context and mechanisms of reactivity to assessment and treatment. Addiction. 2008;103(2):249–250.
    1. Cherpitel CJ, Korcha RA, Moskalewicz J, Swiatkiewicz G, Ye Y, Bond J. Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT): 12-month outcomes of a randomized controlled clinical trial in a Polish emergency department. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010;34(11):1228–1922.
    1. Daeppen JB, Gaume J, Bady P, Yersin B, Calmes JM, Givel JC, Gmel G. Brief alcohol intervention and alcohol assessment do not influence alcohol use in injured patients treated in the emergency department: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Addiction. 2007;102(8):1224–1233. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01869.x.
    1. Bernstein E, Edwards E, Dorfman D, Heeren T, Bliss C, Bernstein J. Screening and brief intervention to reduce marijuana use among youth and young adults in a pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16(11):1174–1185. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00490.x.
    1. Bogenschutz MP, Donovan DM, Adinoff B, Crandall C, Forcehimes AA, Lindblad R, Mandler RN, Oden NL, Perl HI, Walker R. Design of NIDA CTN Protocol 0047: screening, motivational assessment, referral, and treatment in emergency departments (SMART-ED) Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2011;37(5):417–425. doi: 10.3109/00952990.2011.596971.
    1. Fals-Stewart W, O’Farrell TJ, Freitas TT, McFarlin SK, Rutigliano P. The timeline followback reports of psychoactive substance use by drug-abusing patients: Psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68(1):134–144.
    1. Sobell LC, Sobell MB. Timeline Followback User’s Guide: A Calendar Method for Assessing Alcohol and Drug Use. Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto; 1996.
    1. NIDA-Modified Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test: NM-ASSIST. .
    1. McLellan AT, Alterman AI, Cacciola J, Metzger D. et al.A new measure of substance abuse treatment: Initial studies of the Treatment Services Review. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1992;180(2):101–110. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199202000-00007.
    1. Diaz FJ, Jané M, Saltó E, Pardell H, Salleras L, Pinet C, de Leon J. A brief measure of high nicotine dependence for busy clinicians and large epidemiological surveys. Aust NZ J Psychiatry. 2005;39(3):161–168. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01538.x.
    1. Bush K, Kivlahan DR, McDonell MB, Fihn SD, Bradley KA. The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(16):1789–1795. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.16.1789.
    1. Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de-la-Fuente JR, Grant M. Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption: II. Addiction. 1993;88(6):791–804. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x.
    1. Skinner HA. The drug abuse screening test. Addict Behav. 1982;7(4):363–371. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(82)90005-3.
    1. Yudko E, Lozhkina O, Fouts A. A comprehensive review of the psychometric properties of the Drug Abuse Screening Test. J Substance Abuse Treat. 2007;32(2):189–198. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.08.002.
    1. Gavin D, Ross H, Skinner H. The diagnostic validity of the Drug Abuse Screening Test in the assessment of DSM-III drug disorders. Br J Addict. 1989;84:301–307. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1989.tb03463.x.
    1. Humeniuk R, Ali R, Babor TF, Farrell M, Formigoni ML, Jittiwutikarn J, de Lacerda RB, Ling W, Marsden J, Monteiro M. et al.Validation of the alcohol, smoking and substance involvement screening test (ASSIST) Addiction. 2008;103(6):1039–1047. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02114.x.
    1. Caplan YH, Goldberger BA. Alternative specimens for workplace drug testing. J Anal Toxicol. 2001;25:396–399.
    1. Gallardo E, Queiroz JA. The role of alternative specimens in toxicological analysis. Biomed Chromatogr. 2008;22:795–821. doi: 10.1002/bmc.1009.
    1. Kintz P, Villain M, Cirimele V. Hair analysis for drug detection. Ther Drug Monit. 2006;28:442–446. doi: 10.1097/01.ftd.0000211811.27558.b5.
    1. Dunn C, Ostafin B. Brief interventions for hospitalized trauma patients. J Trauma. 2005;59(3 Suppl):S88–S93.
    1. Dunn CW, Donovan DM, Gentilello LM. Practical guidelines for performing alcohol interventions in trauma centers. J Trauma. 1997;42:299–304. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199702000-00021.
    1. Gentilello LM, Donovan DM, Dunn CW, Rivara FP. Alcohol interventions in trauma centers: current practice and future directions. JAMA. 1995;274(13):1043–1048. doi: 10.1001/jama.1995.03530130049027.
    1. Gentilello LM, Rivara FP, Donovan DM, Jurkovich GJ, Daranciang E, Dunn CW, Villaveces A, Copass M, Ries R. Alcohol interventions in a trauma center as a means of reducing the risk of injury recurrence. Ann Surg. 1999;230(4):473–480. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199910000-00003.
    1. Dunn C, Deroo L, Rivara FP. The use of brief interventions adapted from motivational interviewing across behavioral domains: a systematic review. Addiction. 2001;96(12):1725–1742. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.961217253.x.
    1. Field C, Hungerford DW, Dunn C. Brief motivational interventions: an Introduction. J Trauma. 2005;59(3 Suppl):S21–S26.
    1. Krupski A, Sears JM, Joesch JM, Estee S, He L, Dunn C, Huber A, Roy-Byrne P, Ries R. Impact of brief interventions and brief treatment on admissions to chemical dependency treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;110(1–2):126–136.
    1. Estee S, Wickizer T, He L, Shah MF, Mancuso D. Evaluation of the Washington State screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment project: cost outcomes for Medicaid patients screened in hospital emergency departments. Medical Care. 2010;48(1):18–24. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181bd498f.
    1. Dunn CW, Estee S, Huber A, Ries R. Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, Olympia, WA; 2010. Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment for substance abuse: Bringing substance abuse counseling to acute medical care. A training manual for staff in acute medicine settings.
    1. Sise MJ, Sise CB, Kelley DM, Simmons CW, Kelso DJ. Implementing screening, brief intervention, and referral for alcohol and drug use: the trauma service perspective. J Trauma. 2005;59(3 Suppl):S112–S118.
    1. Mello MJ, Longabaugh R, Baird J, Nirenberg T, Woolard R. DIAL: a telephone brief intervention for high-risk alcohol use with injured emergency department patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;51(6):755–764. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.11.034.
    1. Miller WR, Zweben A, Diclemente CC, Rychtarik RG. Motivational enhancement therapy manual: A clinical research guide for therapists treating individuals with alcohol abuse and dependence. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Rockville, MD; 1992.
    1. Longabaugh R, Woolard RE, Nirenberg TD, Minugh AP, Becker B, Clifford PR, Carty K, Sparadeo F, Gogineni A. Evaluating the effects of a brief motivational intervention for injured drinkers in the emergency department. J Stud Alcohol. 2001;62(6):806–816.
    1. Bischof G, Grothues JM, Reinhardt S, Meyer C, John U, Rumpf H-J. Evaluation of a telephone-based stepped care intervention for alcohol-related disorders: A randomized controlled trial. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;93(3):244–251. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.10.003.
    1. Curry SJ, Ludman EJ, Grothaus LC, Donovan D, Kim E. A randomized trial of a brief primary-care-based intervention for reducing at-risk drinking practices. Health Psychol. 2003;22(2):156–165.
    1. Estee S, He L. Use of Alcohol and Other Drugs Declined among Emergency Department Patients Who Received Brief Interventions for Substance Use Disorders through WASBIRT. Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, Olympia, WA; 2007.
    1. Smith PC, Schmidt SM, Allensworth-Davies D, Saitz R. Primary care validation of a single-question alcohol screening test. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(7):783–788. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0928-6.
    1. Smith PC, Schmidt SM, Allensworth-Davies D, Saitz R. A single-question screening test for drug use in primary care. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(13):1155–1160. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.140.
    1. de Leon J, Diaz FJ, Becona E, Gurpegui M, Jurado D, Gonzalez-Pinto A. Exploring brief measures of nicotine dependence for epidemiological surveys. Addict Behav. 2003;28(8):1481–1486. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4603(02)00264-2.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera