Associations of Cognitive Function Scores with Carbon Dioxide, Ventilation, and Volatile Organic Compound Exposures in Office Workers: A Controlled Exposure Study of Green and Conventional Office Environments

Joseph G Allen, Piers MacNaughton, Usha Satish, Suresh Santanam, Jose Vallarino, John D Spengler, Joseph G Allen, Piers MacNaughton, Usha Satish, Suresh Santanam, Jose Vallarino, John D Spengler

Abstract

Background: The indoor built environment plays a critical role in our overall well-being because of both the amount of time we spend indoors (~90%) and the ability of buildings to positively or negatively influence our health. The advent of sustainable design or green building strategies reinvigorated questions regarding the specific factors in buildings that lead to optimized conditions for health and productivity.

Objective: We simulated indoor environmental quality (IEQ) conditions in "Green" and "Conventional" buildings and evaluated the impacts on an objective measure of human performance: higher-order cognitive function.

Methods: Twenty-four participants spent 6 full work days (0900-1700 hours) in an environmentally controlled office space, blinded to test conditions. On different days, they were exposed to IEQ conditions representative of Conventional [high concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs)] and Green (low concentrations of VOCs) office buildings in the United States. Additional conditions simulated a Green building with a high outdoor air ventilation rate (labeled Green+) and artificially elevated carbon dioxide (CO2) levels independent of ventilation.

Results: On average, cognitive scores were 61% higher on the Green building day and 101% higher on the two Green+ building days than on the Conventional building day (p < 0.0001). VOCs and CO2 were independently associated with cognitive scores.

Conclusions: Cognitive function scores were significantly better under Green+ building conditions than in the Conventional building conditions for all nine functional domains. These findings have wide-ranging implications because this study was designed to reflect conditions that are commonly encountered every day in many indoor environments.

Citation: Allen JG, MacNaughton P, Satish U, Santanam S, Vallarino J, Spengler JD. 2016. Associations of cognitive function scores with carbon dioxide, ventilation, and volatile organic compound exposures in office workers: a controlled exposure study of green and conventional office environments. Environ Health Perspect 124:805-812; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1510037.

Conflict of interest statement

United Technologies was not involved in the data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, data presentation, or drafting of the manuscript.

The authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Average cognitive function scores and standard error bars by domain for the Conventional, Green, and two Green+ conditions, normalized to the Green condition by dividing all scores by the average score during the Green condition.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cognitive function scores by domain and participant and the corresponding carbon dioxide concentration in their cubicles. Each line represents the change in an individual’s CO2 exposure and cognitive scores from one condition to the next, normalized to the average CO2 exposure across all participants during the Green+ conditions.

References

    1. ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists) Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH; 2015. 2015 Guide to Occupational Exposure Values.
    1. Allen JG, MacIntosh DL, Saltzman LE, Baker BJ, Matheson JM, Recht JR, et al. Elevated corrosion rates and hydrogen sulfide in homes with ‘Chinese Drywall.’. Sci Total Environ. 2012;426:113–119.
    1. Allen JG, MacNaughton P, Laurent JG, Flanigan SS, Eitland ES, Spengler JD. Green buildings and health. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2015;2(3):250–258.
    1. ASHRAE (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers) Atlanta, GA: ASHRAE; 2013a. ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2013. Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality.
    1. ASHRAE. Atlanta, GA: ASHRAE; 2013b. 2013 ASHRAE Handbook—Fundamentals.
    1. Bornehag CG, Sundell J, Hägerhed-Engman L, Sigsgaard T. Association between ventilation rates in 390 Swedish homes and allergic symptoms in children. Indoor Air. 2005;15:275–280.
    1. Breuer K, Satish U. In: From Modeling to Managing Security: A Systems Dynamics Approach (Gonzalez JJ, ed) Kristiansand S., Norway: Høyskoleforlaget AS - Norwegian Academic Press; 2003. Emergency management simulations: an approach to the assessment of decision-making processes in complex dynamic crisis environments. pp. 145–156.
    1. Chan WR, Price PN, Sohn MD, Gadgil AJ. Analysis of U.S. residential air leakage database. Lawrence Berkeley National Labs Report Number 53367. 2003 Available: [accessed 15 March 2016]
    1. Colton M, MacNaughton P, Vallarino J, Kane J, Bennett-Fripp M, Spengler J, et al. Indoor air quality in green vs conventional multifamily low-income housing. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(14):7833–7841.
    1. Corsi RL, Torres VM, Sanders M, Kinney KA. In: Indoor Air 2002, 9th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Monterey, California (Levin H, ed) Monterey, CA: Indoor Air 2002 Inc.; 2002. Carbon dioxide levels and dynamics in elementary schools: results from the TESIAS study. pp. 74–79.
    1. Fisk WJ, Rosenfeld AH. 1997. Estimates of improved productivity and health from better indoor environments. Indoor Air 7 3 158 172, doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.1997.t01-1-00002.x
    1. Hedge A. Indoor environmental quality, health and productivity. Environ Res J 4 (1/2) 2009
    1. Hedge A, Gaygen DE. Indoor environment conditions and computer work in an office. HVAC&R Res. 2010;16(2):123–138.
    1. Hodgson AT, Rudd AF, Beal D, Chandra S. Volatile organic compound concentrations and emission rates in new manufactured and site-built houses. Indoor Air. 2000;10:178–192.
    1. Jacobs DE, Ahonen E, Dixon SL, Dorevitch S, Breysse J, Smith J, et al. 2015. Moving into green healthy housing. J Public Health Manag Pract 21 4 345 354, doi:10.1097/PHH.0000000000000047
    1. Maddalena R, Mendell MJ, Eliseeva K, Chan WR, Sullivan DP, Russell M, et al. 2015. Effects of ventilation rate per person and per floor area on perceived air quality, sick building syndrome symptoms, and decision-making. Indoor Air 25 4 362 370, doi:10.1111/ina.12149
    1. Mendell MJ. 1993. Non-specific symptoms in office workers: a review and summary of the epidemiologic literature. Indoor Air 3 4 227 236, doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.1993.00003.x
    1. Nishihara N, Wargocki P, Tanabe S. 2014. Cerebral blood flow, fatigue, mental effort, and task performance in offices with two different pollution loads. Build Environ 71 153 164, doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.09.018
    1. Noris F, Adamkiewicz G, Delp WW, Hotchi T, Russell M, Singer BC, et al. 2013. Indoor environmental quality benefits of apartment energy retrofits. Build Environ 68 170 178, doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.07.003
    1. NRC (National Research Council) Washington, DC: National Acadamies Press; 2007. Green Schools: Attributes for Health and Learning.
    1. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Nitrogen dioxide in workplace atmospheres (ion chromatography). 1991 Available: [accessed 5 April 2016]
    1. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Ozone in workplace atmospheres (impregnated glass fiber filter). 2008 Available: [accessed 5 April 2016]
    1. Persily A. Challenges in developing ventilation and indoor air quality standards: the story of ASHRAE Standard 62. Build Environ. 2015;91:61–69.
    1. Persily AK, Gorfain J. MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce; 2004. Analysis of Ventilation Data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Building Assessment Survey and Evaluation (BASE) Study, NISTIR 7145. Bethesda.
    1. R Core Team. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2015. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Available: [accessed 15 March 2015]
    1. Riesenberg DE, Arehart-Treichel J. 1986. “Sick building” syndrome plagues workers, dwellers. JAMA 255 3063, doi:10.1001/jama.1986.03370220021005
    1. Satish U, Cleckner L, Vasselli J. 2013. Impact of VOCs on decision making and productivity. Intell Build Int 5 4 213 220, doi:10.1080/17508975.2013.812956
    1. Satish U, Mendell MJ, Shekhar K, Hotchi T, Sullivan D, Streufert S, et al. 2012. Is CO2 an indoor pollutant? Direct effects of Low-to-moderate CO2 concentrations on human decision-making performance. Environ Health Perspect 120 1671 1677, doi:10.1289/ehp.1104789
    1. Satish U, Streufert S, Dewan M, Voort SV. Improvements in simulated real-world relevant performance for patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis: impact of desloratadine. Allergy. 2004;59(4):415–420.
    1. Shendell DG, Prill R, Fisk WJ, Apte MG, Blake D, Faulkner D. Associations between classroom CO2 concentrations and student attendance in Washington and Idaho. Indoor Air. 2004;14:333–341.
    1. Singh A, Syal M, Grady SC, Korkmaz S. 2010. Effects of green buildings on employee health and productivity. Am J Public Health 100 9 1665 1668, doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.180687
    1. Streufert S, Pogash R, Piasecki M. 1988. Simulation-based assessment of managerial competence: reliability and validity. Pers Psychol 41 3 537 557, doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00643.x
    1. Streufert S, Swezey RW. Orlando, FL: Academic Press; 1986. Complexity, Managers, and Organizations.
    1. Swezey RW, Streufert S, Satish U, Siem FM. Preliminary development of a computer-based team performance assessment simulation. Int J Cogn Ergonomics. 1998;2:163–179.
    1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Compendium method TO-11A: Determination of formaldehyde in ambient air using absorbent cartridge followed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [Active sampling methodology]. 1999 Available: [accessed 5 April 2016]
    1. U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) Compendium method TO-15: Determination of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in air collected in specially-prepared canisters and analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). 1999 Available: [accessed 5 April 2016]
    1. U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) Building Assessment Survey and Evaluation Study. 1998 Available: [accessed 22 January 2015]
    1. USGBC (U.S. Green Building Council) Washington DC: USGBC; 2014. LEED v4 User Guide. Available: [accessed 15 April 2015]
    1. Wargocki P, Wyon D, Sundell J, Clausen G, Fanger PO. 2000. The effects of outdoor air supply rate in an office on perceived air quality, sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms and productivity. Indoor Air 10 4), 222 236

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera