Drug-eluting stents vs. bare metal stents in saphenous vein graft disease. Insights from a meta-analysis of 7,090 patients

Abstract

Background: Evidence supporting the use of drug-eluting stents (DES) in saphenous vein graft (SVG) disease is uncertain. Previous studies have suggested that DES might reduce the re-intervention rate in SVG disease, with conflicting data on mortality. Thus, a meta-analysis was performed to compare outcomes of DES vs. bare metal stent (BMS) in SVG disease.

Methods and results: Medline and Web databases were searched for studies comparing DES and BMS for SVG disease, reporting rates of overall mortality, target vessel revascularization (TVR) and myocardial infarction (MI) with a follow-up of ≥6 months. The meta-analysis included 23 studies (7,090 patients). Compared with BMS, DES-treated patients had lower rates of TVR (odds ratio (OR), 0.53; confidence interval (CI), 0.39-0.72; P<0.0001) and overall mortality (OR, 0.63; CI, 0.40-0.99; P=0.05), but similar rates of MI (OR, 0.92; CI, 0.64-1.33; P=0.7). Subgroup analysis highlighted differences between non-randomized studies, in which DES improved mortality rates, and randomized trials, in which benefit from DES was not evident. Meta-regression analysis showed that DES were more effective in the presence of older grafts and type 2 diabetes.

Conclusions: The present meta-analysis showed that, in SVG disease, DES significantly reduced TVR, but did not provide clear benefits on mortality and MI, with an opposite direction of results in mortality observed from randomized and observational data.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01036048.