Prospective phase 2 trial of ixazomib after nonmyeloablative haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplant

Scott R Solomon, Melhem Solh, Xu Zhang, Stacey Brown, Katelin C Jackson, H Kent Holland, Lawrence E Morris, Asad Bashey, Scott R Solomon, Melhem Solh, Xu Zhang, Stacey Brown, Katelin C Jackson, H Kent Holland, Lawrence E Morris, Asad Bashey

Abstract

Proteasome inhibition results in extensive immunomodulatory effects that augment natural killer cell cytotoxicity and inhibit aspects of T-cell, B-cell, and dendritic cell function. We performed a phase 2 study that examined the effects of ixazomib for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis (up to 12 cycles) with posttransplant cyclophosphamide and tacrolimus after standard nonmyeloablative haploidentical donor transplantation (HIDT). Ixazomib was started on day +5 (4 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle), with dose reductions allowed in future cycles for toxicity. All patients received peripheral blood stem cells. Twenty-five patients were enrolled with a median age of 62 years (range, 35-77 years) who had acute leukemia (4), myelodysplastic syndrome (7), non-Hodgkin lymphoma/Hodgkin lymphoma/chronic lymphocytic leukemia (8), and myeloma (6). The hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index was ≥3 in 68% of the patients. After a median follow-up of 33.5 months, the cumulative incidence of relapse/progression at 1 year was 24% and 44% at 3 years, which failed to meet the statistically predefined goal of decreasing 1-year risk of relapse. Engraftment occurred in all patients with no secondary graft failure, and 3-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 12%. Cumulative incidence of grade 3 to 4 acute GVHD was 8%, whereas moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD occurred in 19%. Nineteen patients survive with an estimated 1-year overall survival (OS) of 84% and 3-year OS of 74%. Hematologic and cutaneous toxicities were common but manageable. The substitution of ixazomib for mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) post-HIDT results in reliable engraftment, comparable rates of clinically significant GVHD, relapse and NRM, and favorable OS. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as # NCT02169791.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Estimated cumulative incidence of GVHD. (A) Grade 2-4 and 3-4 aGVHD. (B) All-grade and moderate-severe cGVHD.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Survival estimates and estimated cumulative incidence of OS, PFS, relapse/progression, and NRM.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Effect of posttransplant lymphocyte recovery on PFS and relapse/progression. Estimates of probability of PFS according to day +30 ALC (A), CD3 T-cell count (C), and CD8+ cytotoxic T-cell count (E). Cumulative incidence of relapse/progression according to day +30 ALC (B), CD3 T-cell count (D), and CD8+ cytotoxic T-cell count (F).

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera