ARISE-a prospective, non-interventional, single-arm study assessing clinical parameters associated with the use of insulin degludec/insulin aspart in patients with type 2 diabetes in real-world settings: rationale and design

Gregory R Fulcher, Henrik Jarlov, Johanne Spanggaard Piltoft, Kiran Pal Singh, Lei Liu, Mafauzy Mohamed, Nemencio Almare Nicodemus Jr, Saleh Jaser Al-Jaser, Adri Kok, Gregory R Fulcher, Henrik Jarlov, Johanne Spanggaard Piltoft, Kiran Pal Singh, Lei Liu, Mafauzy Mohamed, Nemencio Almare Nicodemus Jr, Saleh Jaser Al-Jaser, Adri Kok

Abstract

Purpose: IDegAsp, a co-formulation of long-acting basal (insulin degludec) and rapid-acting bolus (insulin aspart) insulin, provides separate prandial and basal glucose-lowering effects with relatively low risk of hypoglycaemia. Its efficacy and safety have been investigated in a large clinical trial programme (BOOST). We present the rationale and design of the ARISE study, which aims to assess glycaemic control and other clinical parameters associated with IDegAsp use in real world.

Methods: ARISE is a ~26-wk-long, prospective, non-interventional, single-arm study of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) initiating IDegAsp treatment. Approximately 1112 patients with T2D aged ≥18 years previously on anti-hyperglycaemic drugs except IDegAsp will be enroled across six countries from 15 Aug 2019 to 12 Nov 2020. IDegAsp treatment will be initiated at the physicians' discretion and as per the local label. Key exclusion criteria include previous participation, or previous IDegAsp treatment. The primary and secondary endpoints are change in HbA1c from baseline (wk 0) to study end (wk 26-36) and the proportion of patients achieving the target HbA1c level of <7% at the study end, respectively. A mixed model for repeated measurements will analyse the primary endpoint.

Conclusion: Between-country differences in the prescription patterns of glucose-lowering agents in people with T2D warrant examination of their clinical use in different geographical settings. The ARISE study is designed to assess the clinical use of IDegAsp from real world in six different countries. Findings from the ARISE study will supplement those of previous randomised controlled studies by establishing real-world evidence of IDegAsp use in the participating countries.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04042441. Registered 02 August 2014, https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT04042441.

Keywords: Co-formulation; Insulin aspart; Insulin degludec; Real world; Type 2 diabetes.

Conflict of interest statement

G.R.F. has received honoraria, teaching and research sponsorship/grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi-Aventis. H.J., J.S.P. and L.L. are employees of and hold shares at Novo Nordisk. K.P.S. has no conflicts of interests to disclose. M.M. received research contracts from Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly and is a member of the local advisory board for Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly and Sanofi. N.A.N. is a member of the local advisory board of Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, Merck and Torrent and received speaker honoraria from Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, Merck, Torrent, Eli Lilly, Sanofi, LRI-Therapharma and Servier. S.J.A.-J. has no conflicts of interests to disclose. A.K. has been involved in various advisory boards for Abbott, Adcock Ingram, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer and Sanofi and is a speaker panel member for Abbott, Aspen–GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pharmaplan, Pfizer and Sanofi and is involved in research with AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novo Nordisk and Pfizer. A.K. has received speaker or consulting honoraria from Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Sanofi, Amgen, Abbott, GlaxoSmithKline and Servier. A.K. served as a consultant and speaker panel member for Novo Nordisk.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design

References

    1. Fonseca VA. Defining and characterizing the progression of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:S151–S156. doi: 10.2337/dc09-S301.
    1. Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, Diamant M, Ferrannini E, Nauck M, Peters AL, Tsapas A, Wender R, Matthews DR. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centered approach: update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38:140–149. doi: 10.2337/dc14-2441.
    1. Khunti K, Millar-Jones D. Clinical inertia to insulin initiation and intensification in the UK: a focused literature review. Prim Care Diabetes. 2017;11:3–12. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2016.09.003.
    1. Holman RR, Farmer AJ, Davies MJ, Levy JC, Darbyshire JL, Keenan JF, Paul SK. Three-year efficacy of complex insulin regimens in type 2 diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;361:1736–1747. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0905479.
    1. Grunberger G, Sze D, Ermakova A, Sieradzan R, Oliveria T, Miller EM. Treatment intensification with insulin pumps and other technologies in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of a physician survey in the United States. Clin. Diabetes. 2020;38:47–55. doi: 10.2337/cd19-0008.
    1. Atkin S, Javed Z, Fulcher G. Insulin degludec and insulin aspart: novel insulins for the management of diabetes mellitus. Ther. Adv. Chronic Dis. 2015;6:375–388. doi: 10.1177/2040622315608646.
    1. Fulcher GR, Christiansen JS, Bantwal G, Polaszewska-Muszynska M, Mersebach H, Andersen TH, Niskanen LK. Comparison of insulin degludec/insulin aspart and biphasic insulin aspart 30 in uncontrolled, insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a phase 3a, randomized, treat-to-target trial. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:2084–2090. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2908.
    1. Kaneko S, Chow F, Choi DS, Taneda S, Hirao K, Park Y, Andersen TH, Gall MA, Christiansen JS. Insulin degludec/insulin aspart versus biphasic insulin aspart 30 in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal or pre-/self-mixed insulin: a 26-week, randomised, treat-to-target trial. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2015;107:139–147. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.09.026.
    1. Kumar S, Jang HC, Demirag NG, Skjøth TV, Endahl L, Bode B. Efficacy and safety of once-daily insulin degludec/insulin aspart compared with once-daily insulin glargine in participants with Type 2 diabetes: a randomized, treat-to-target study. Diabet. Med. 2017;34:180–188. doi: 10.1111/dme.13125.
    1. Onishi Y, Ono Y, Rabol R, Endahl L, Nakamura S. Superior glycaemic control with once-daily insulin degludec/insulin aspart versus insulin glargine in Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral drugs: a randomized, controlled phase 3 trial. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2013;15:826–832. doi: 10.1111/dom.12097.
    1. Yang W, Ma J, Hong T, Liu M, Miao H, Peng Y, Wang C, Xu X, Yang T, Nielsen AM, Pan L. Efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/insulin aspart versus biphasic insulin aspart 30 in Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes: A phase III, open-label, 2:1 randomized, treat-to-target trial. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2019;21:1652–1660. doi: 10.1111/dom.13703.
    1. Philis-Tsimikas A, Astamirova K, Gupta Y, Haggag A, Roula D, Bak BA, Fita EG, Nielsen AM, Demir T. Similar glycaemic control with less nocturnal hypoglycaemia in a 38-week trial comparing the IDegAsp co-formulation with insulin glargine U100 and insulin aspart in basal insulin-treated subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2019;147:157–165. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.10.024.
    1. Blonde L, Khunti K, Harris SB, Meizinger C, Skolnik NS. Interpretation and impact of real-world clinical data for the practicing clinician. Adv. Ther. 2018;35:1763–1774. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0805-y.
    1. Deed G, Kilov G, Dunning T, Cutfield R, Overland J, Wu T. Use of 50/50 premixed insulin analogs in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and clinical recommendations. Diabetes Ther. 2017;8:1265–96. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0328-6.
    1. Chaudhary A. Insulin prescribing practices in Saudi Arabia. World. World J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2015;4:29–40.
    1. Seaquist ER, Anderson J, Childs B, Cryer P, Dagogo-Jack S, Fish L, Heller SR, Rodriguez H, Rosenzweig J, Vigersky R. Hypoglycemia and diabetes: a report of a workgroup of the American Diabetes Association and the Endocrine Society. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013;98:1845–1859. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-4127.
    1. International Diabetes Federation, IDF Diabetes Atlas.: (2019). Accessed 17 Mar 2020
    1. Davis TM, Davis WA, Bruce DG. Glycaemic levels triggering intensification of therapy in type 2 diabetes in the community: the Fremantle Diabetes Study. Med. J. Aust. 2006;184:325–328. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00264.x.
    1. Jabbar A, Abdallah K, Hassoun A, Malek R, Senyucel C, Spaepen E, Treuer T, Bhattacharya I. Patterns and trends in insulin initiation and intensification among patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Middle East and North Africa region. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2019;149:18–26. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.01.017.
    1. Jabbar A, Mohamed W, Ozaki R, Mirasol R, Treuer T, Lew T, Qi R, Sheu WH, Deerochanawong C, Babineaux SM. Patterns and trends in insulin initiation and intensification among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Western Pacific region. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2018;34:1653–1662. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1484712.
    1. Mohan V, Shah S, Saboo B. Current glycemic status and diabetes related complications among type 2 diabetes patients in India: data from the A1chieve study. J. Assoc. Physicians India. 2013;61(Suppl:):12–5.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera